Academic Journal
FINANCIAL STRATEGIES FOR POST-WAR RECOVERY IN UKRAINE AND EUROPE.
| Τίτλος: | FINANCIAL STRATEGIES FOR POST-WAR RECOVERY IN UKRAINE AND EUROPE. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | ФІНАНСОВІ СТРАТЕГІЇ ПОВОЄННОГО ВІДНОВЛЕННЯ УКРАЇНИ ТА ЄВРОПИ. |
| Συγγραφείς: | Hramotniev, Vitalii1 gramotnev.vitaliy@gmail.com, Tsygankova, Tetiana2, Buriachenko, Andrii3, Logvinov, Pavlo4, Mozgovyy, Oleg5 |
| Πηγή: | Financial & Credit Activity: Problems of Theory & Practice. 2026, Vol. 2 Issue 67, p402-415. 14p. |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | *Fiscal policy, *Economic equilibrium, *Economic stabilization, Postwar reconstruction, Russian invasion of Ukraine, 2022-, Institutional environment |
| Γεωγραφικοί όροι: | Ukraine, Europe |
| Περίληψη: | Post-conflict reconstruction is a fiscal and financial policy challenge: governments must mobilize large resources for recovery while preserving fiscal sustainability, external balance, and financial stability. This article investigates the determinants of reconstruction strategies and their outcomes, focusing on how actors’ strategic priorities align with the economic and financial instruments they deploy. The purpose is to specify the conditions under which reconstruction is effective and to identify the risks posed by ill-suited strategies. Building on comparative evidence from major post-war settlements, the study distinguishes two ideal-type configurations: (i) a control/extraction template that relies on reparations-style claims, compensation mechanisms, and restrictive trade and settlement arrangements, and (ii) an integration/investment template that relies on coordinated multi-year financing, trade normalization, risk-sharing instruments, and institution-building that supports credit intermediation and private capital formation. Principal results indicate that two drivers are pivotal in shaping strategy choice and performance: the magnitude of wartime damage and rivalry among principal actors. Outcomes, however, hinge on the depth of institutional design underpinning the financing architecture - credible economic rationale, enforceable commitments, and coordination capacity over a long horizon. A causal-dynamic framework is proposed to map shifts between templates under these drivers and to derive reconstruction scenarios for Europe and Ukraine following the Russian–Ukrainian war. The main conclusion is that a drift toward a weakly institutionalized, control-oriented configuration raises debt vulnerabilities and instability risks, whereas an institutionally robust, integration-oriented program with predictable funding and effective risk-sharing is more likely to sustain recovery, investment, and durable peace. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Financial & Credit Activity: Problems of Theory & Practice is the property of University of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | Business Source Index |
καταχωρήστε σχόλιο πρώτοι!