Academic Journal

Do t -Statistic Hurdles Need to Be Raised?

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Do t -Statistic Hurdles Need to Be Raised?
Συγγραφείς: Chen, Andrew Y.1 (AUTHOR) andrew.y.chen@frb.gov
Πηγή: Management Science (INFORMS). Jul2025, Vol. 71 Issue 7, p5830-5848. 19p.
Θεματικοί όροι: *Empirical research, *Data analysis, False positive error, Scholarly publishing, Empirical Bayes methods, T-test (Statistics)
Περίληψη: Many scholars have called for raising statistical hurdles to guard against false discoveries in academic publications. I show these calls may be difficult to justify empirically. Published data exhibit bias: Results that fail to meet existing hurdles are often unobserved. These unobserved results must be extrapolated, which can lead to weak identification of revised hurdles. In contrast, statistics that can target only published findings (e.g. empirical Bayes shrinkage and the false discovery rate) can be strongly identified, as data on published findings are plentiful. I demonstrate these results theoretically and in an empirical analysis of the cross-sectional return predictability literature. This paper was accepted by Kay Giesecke, finance. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03083. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Management Science (INFORMS) is the property of INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research & the Management Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Βάση Δεδομένων: Business Source Index
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: http://www.jstor.org/openurl?issn=00251909&date=2025&volume=71&issue=7&spage=5830
    Name: JSTOR (all content) (s7799221)
    Category: fullText
    Text:
    Icon: https://imageserver.ebscohost.com/branding/jstor/iconJSTOR.gif
    MouseOverText: Full Text from JSTOR
Header DbId: bsx
DbLabel: Business Source Index
An: 187524677
RelevancyScore: 1419
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 1419.33068847656
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Do t -Statistic Hurdles Need to Be Raised?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Andrew+Y%2E%22">Chen, Andrew Y.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> andrew.y.chen@frb.gov</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Management+Science+%28INFORMS%29%22">Management Science (INFORMS)</searchLink>. Jul2025, Vol. 71 Issue 7, p5830-5848. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Empirical+research%22">Empirical research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22False+positive+error%22">False positive error</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+publishing%22">Scholarly publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Empirical+Bayes+methods%22">Empirical Bayes methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22">T-test (Statistics)</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Many scholars have called for raising statistical hurdles to guard against false discoveries in academic publications. I show these calls may be difficult to justify empirically. Published data exhibit bias: Results that fail to meet existing hurdles are often unobserved. These unobserved results must be extrapolated, which can lead to weak identification of revised hurdles. In contrast, statistics that can target only published findings (e.g. empirical Bayes shrinkage and the false discovery rate) can be strongly identified, as data on published findings are plentiful. I demonstrate these results theoretically and in an empirical analysis of the cross-sectional return predictability literature. This paper was accepted by Kay Giesecke, finance. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03083. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Management Science (INFORMS) is the property of INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research & the Management Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=bsx&AN=187524677
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.03083
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 5830
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Empirical research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: False positive error
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scholarly publishing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Empirical Bayes methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Do t -Statistic Hurdles Need to Be Raised?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chen, Andrew Y.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00251909
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 71
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Management Science (INFORMS)
              Type: main
ResultId 1