Academic Journal

Hearing Loss Perceptions in Patients With Subjective Asymmetry: Analysis and Implications.

Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Τίτλος: Hearing Loss Perceptions in Patients With Subjective Asymmetry: Analysis and Implications.
Συγγραφείς: Tucker, Aaron1, Belilos, Andrew1, Krishnan, Pavan S.1, Saeedi, Arman1, Bentan, Mihai A.1, Gills, Sarah1, Coelho, Daniel H.1 dcoelho@vcu.edu
Πηγή: American Journal of Audiology. Sep2026, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p1078-1087. 10p.
Θεματικοί όροι: *Hearing disorder diagnosis, *Auditory perception testing, *Self-evaluation, *Cross-sectional method, *T-test (Statistics), *Fisher exact test, *Severity of illness index, *Audiometry, *Tertiary care, *Chi-squared test, *Odds ratio, *Data analysis software, *Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
Περίληψη: Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported hearing asymmetry in predicting objectively defined asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and identify patient factors associated with over- or underestimation of individual ear hearing loss severity. Method: A cross-sectional survey analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing audiometric evaluation was conducted at the audiology and otology/ neurotology clinics of a single tertiary referral center from 2020 to 2025. Fifty patients reporting hearing asymmetry who had not undergone prior audiometric testing within 5 years were included. A survey was administered to quantify subjective individual ear hearing loss severity before audiometric evaluation to determine the accuracy of self-reported AHL (≥ 15 dB interaural difference) and subjective severity estimation for each ear. Results: Seventy percent of patients incorrectly identified AHL based on audiometric testing. Misclassification did not differ significantly according to age, sex, or race. Patients with lower (< 25 dB) or moderate (25-50 dB) binaural pure-tone averages were more likely to misclassify AHL than those with higher thresholds (> 50 dB). Sixty-two percent of patients misclassified the worse hearing ear, with a strong bias toward overestimation (94%). In contrast, 48% misclassified the better hearing ear, with a modest skew toward underestimation (58%). Across subgroups, worse hearing ears were significantly overestimated compared with better hearing ears. Patients with better binaural hearing and narrower interaural differences were more prone to worse hearing ear overestimation. Conclusions: It is likely that patients do not reliably estimate AHL corresponding to a 15-dB interaural difference. Better binaural hearing and lower interaural asymmetry were associated with poorer estimation of the worse hearing ear, underscoring the importance of audiometric confirmation in patients with preserved hearing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Βάση Δεδομένων: Academic Search Index
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: asx
DbLabel: Academic Search Index
An: 196833542
RelevancyScore: 1532
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 1532.42749023438
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Hearing Loss Perceptions in Patients With Subjective Asymmetry: Analysis and Implications.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Tucker%2C+Aaron%22&quot;&gt;Tucker, Aaron&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Belilos%2C+Andrew%22&quot;&gt;Belilos, Andrew&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Krishnan%2C+Pavan+S%2E%22&quot;&gt;Krishnan, Pavan S.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Saeedi%2C+Arman%22&quot;&gt;Saeedi, Arman&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Bentan%2C+Mihai+A%2E%22&quot;&gt;Bentan, Mihai A.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Gills%2C+Sarah%22&quot;&gt;Gills, Sarah&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Coelho%2C+Daniel+H%2E%22&quot;&gt;Coelho, Daniel H.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;i&gt; dcoelho@vcu.edu&lt;/i&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22American+Journal+of+Audiology%22&quot;&gt;American Journal of Audiology&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Sep2026, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p1078-1087. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Hearing+disorder+diagnosis%22&quot;&gt;Hearing disorder diagnosis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Auditory+perception+testing%22&quot;&gt;Auditory perception testing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Self-evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Self-evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cross-sectional+method%22&quot;&gt;Cross-sectional method&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22T-test+%28Statistics%29%22&quot;&gt;T-test (Statistics)&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Fisher+exact+test%22&quot;&gt;Fisher exact test&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Severity+of+illness+index%22&quot;&gt;Severity of illness index&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Audiometry%22&quot;&gt;Audiometry&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Tertiary+care%22&quot;&gt;Tertiary care&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Chi-squared+test%22&quot;&gt;Chi-squared test&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Odds+ratio%22&quot;&gt;Odds ratio&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Data+analysis+software%22&quot;&gt;Data analysis software&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Sensitivity+%26+specificity+%28Statistics%29%22&quot;&gt;Sensitivity &amp; specificity (Statistics)&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported hearing asymmetry in predicting objectively defined asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and identify patient factors associated with over- or underestimation of individual ear hearing loss severity. Method: A cross-sectional survey analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing audiometric evaluation was conducted at the audiology and otology/ neurotology clinics of a single tertiary referral center from 2020 to 2025. Fifty patients reporting hearing asymmetry who had not undergone prior audiometric testing within 5 years were included. A survey was administered to quantify subjective individual ear hearing loss severity before audiometric evaluation to determine the accuracy of self-reported AHL (≥ 15 dB interaural difference) and subjective severity estimation for each ear. Results: Seventy percent of patients incorrectly identified AHL based on audiometric testing. Misclassification did not differ significantly according to age, sex, or race. Patients with lower (&lt; 25 dB) or moderate (25-50 dB) binaural pure-tone averages were more likely to misclassify AHL than those with higher thresholds (&gt; 50 dB). Sixty-two percent of patients misclassified the worse hearing ear, with a strong bias toward overestimation (94%). In contrast, 48% misclassified the better hearing ear, with a modest skew toward underestimation (58%). Across subgroups, worse hearing ears were significantly overestimated compared with better hearing ears. Patients with better binaural hearing and narrower interaural differences were more prone to worse hearing ear overestimation. Conclusions: It is likely that patients do not reliably estimate AHL corresponding to a 15-dB interaural difference. Better binaural hearing and lower interaural asymmetry were associated with poorer estimation of the worse hearing ear, underscoring the importance of audiometric confirmation in patients with preserved hearing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asx&AN=196833542
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00291
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1078
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Hearing disorder diagnosis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Auditory perception testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cross-sectional method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: T-test (Statistics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Fisher exact test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Severity of illness index
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Audiometry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tertiary care
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chi-squared test
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Odds ratio
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data analysis software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Hearing Loss Perceptions in Patients With Subjective Asymmetry: Analysis and Implications.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tucker, Aaron
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Belilos, Andrew
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Krishnan, Pavan S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Saeedi, Arman
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bentan, Mihai A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gills, Sarah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Coelho, Daniel H.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10590889
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: American Journal of Audiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1