Academic Journal
Current Status of Enhanced Publication Practices of Academic Database Platforms Comparing China to Other Countries.
| Τίτλος: | Current Status of Enhanced Publication Practices of Academic Database Platforms Comparing China to Other Countries. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Zhan, Lijuan1 (AUTHOR) zljwhu@qq.com, Sun, Xuhao1 (AUTHOR) sunxuhao@whut.edu.cn, Xia, Ziyan1 (AUTHOR) 1067170514@qq.com, Wan, Kezhuo1 (AUTHOR) 1023497174@qq.com |
| Πηγή: | Journal of Scholarly Publishing. Jul2026, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p573-591. 19p. |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | *Scholarly publishing, *Digital platforms, *Scholarly communication, *Reference sources, *Information display systems, *Scholarly periodicals |
| Περίληψη: | Enhanced publication expands the content of papers by the comprehensive use of entity linking, visualization, scripting languages, and other technologies, presenting them in a more intuitive, vivid, and richer way. This effectively enhances researchers' ability to understand academic papers and improves efficiency in acquiring knowledge. Based on a survey of the enhanced publication practices on CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and four other international academic database platforms that allow readers to access scholarly publication sources (Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, Taylor & Francis Online, and SpringerLink), the paper proposes four perspectives: Reading Accessibility, Resource Linking, Metrics Showcasing, and Access to Supplementary Materials to analyse the state of enhanced publication. The study found there were significant differences in the number and types of enhanced publication features across various platforms. Among them, Taylor & Francis Online and CNKI have the most abundant enhanced publication features, followed by Elsevier ScienceDirect and SpringerLink, while Wiley Online Library offers the fewest enhanced publication features. Specifically, from the perspective of Resource Linking, CNKI has poor support for external platform literature links; from the perspective of Metrics Showcasing, Elsevier ScienceDirect does not support the display of any literature evaluation metrics; from the perspective of Access to Supplementary Materials, Wiley Online Library does not support viewing or downloading any supplementary materials. Based on the findings, the paper points out directions for the future development of enhanced publication for these academic database platforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | Academic Search Index |
καταχωρήστε σχόλιο πρώτοι!