Academic Journal
Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling.
| Τίτλος: | Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling. |
|---|---|
| Συγγραφείς: | Weinstein, Hannah N. W.1, Tucker, Lauren H.1, Fernandez, Karla Y.1, Galatioto, Jessica A.1, Golub, Justin S.1 justin.golub@columbia.edu |
| Πηγή: | American Journal of Audiology. Dec2025, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p1013-1018. 6p. |
| Θεματικοί όροι: | *Auditory perception testing, *Professional practice, *Academic medical centers, *Research funding, *Hearing aids, *Retrospective studies, *Medical appointments, *Medical records, *Acquisition of data, *Hearing disorders, *Audiologists, *Data analysis software, *Psychosocial factors, *Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics) |
| Εταιρία/Οντότητα: | United States. Food & Drug Administration |
| Περίληψη: | Purpose: In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permitted the sale of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids nationwide. The impact on audiology practice has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study is to determine if there was a change in the volume of hearing aid evaluations (HAEs) and comprehensive audiologic exams (CAEs) at an academic tertiary care audiology practice following the ruling. Method: Data were collected from the billing records of patients ≥ 18 years old. HAE and CAE visits, defined by Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, were included. The number of visits was totaled for equal time periods (534 days) before and after October 17, 2022, when OTC hearing aid sales began. Sensitivity analysis (365 days before and after the ruling) accounted for seasonality. Change in visits per day over the entire period was calculated from the slope of the line of best fit. Results: The mean (SD) age was 60.5 (18.3) years. There were 20,300 combined HAE and CAE visits. Compared to before the ruling, over the entire study period (534 days), HAE visits increased by 12.0% (n = 57), CAE visits increased by 7.3% (n = 685), and combined visits (HAE and CAE) increased by 7.6% (n = 744) after the ruling. Over the entire study period (534 days), HAE had an increase of 0.084 visits/day, CAE had an increase of 4.56 visits/day, and combined visits (HAE and CAE) had an increase of 4.95 visits/day. Conclusions: The FDA OTC hearing aid ruling did not have a meaningful impact on the volume of HAEs and CAEs at an academic audiology practice. We found a small trend toward increased volume. Future studies should investigate visit patterns in other practice models to understand the full impact of the ruling on clinical audiology practice volumes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Βάση Δεδομένων: | Academic Search Index |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: asx DbLabel: Academic Search Index An: 190286342 RelevancyScore: 1473 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 1473.09606933594 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Weinstein%2C+Hannah+N%2E+W%2E%22">Weinstein, Hannah N. W.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tucker%2C+Lauren+H%2E%22">Tucker, Lauren H.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fernandez%2C+Karla+Y%2E%22">Fernandez, Karla Y.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Galatioto%2C+Jessica+A%2E%22">Galatioto, Jessica A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Golub%2C+Justin+S%2E%22">Golub, Justin S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> justin.golub@columbia.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Audiology%22">American Journal of Audiology</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p1013-1018. 6p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Auditory+perception+testing%22">Auditory perception testing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+practice%22">Professional practice</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+medical+centers%22">Academic medical centers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+aids%22">Hearing aids</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retrospective+studies%22">Retrospective studies</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+appointments%22">Medical appointments</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+records%22">Medical records</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Acquisition+of+data%22">Acquisition of data</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hearing+disorders%22">Hearing disorders</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Audiologists%22">Audiologists</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis+software%22">Data analysis software</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychosocial+factors%22">Psychosocial factors</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensitivity+%26+specificity+%28Statistics%29%22">Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics)</searchLink> – Name: SubjectCompany Label: Company/Entity Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%2E+Food+%26+Drug+Administration%22">United States. Food & Drug Administration</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: In 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permitted the sale of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids nationwide. The impact on audiology practice has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study is to determine if there was a change in the volume of hearing aid evaluations (HAEs) and comprehensive audiologic exams (CAEs) at an academic tertiary care audiology practice following the ruling. Method: Data were collected from the billing records of patients ≥ 18 years old. HAE and CAE visits, defined by Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes, were included. The number of visits was totaled for equal time periods (534 days) before and after October 17, 2022, when OTC hearing aid sales began. Sensitivity analysis (365 days before and after the ruling) accounted for seasonality. Change in visits per day over the entire period was calculated from the slope of the line of best fit. Results: The mean (SD) age was 60.5 (18.3) years. There were 20,300 combined HAE and CAE visits. Compared to before the ruling, over the entire study period (534 days), HAE visits increased by 12.0% (n = 57), CAE visits increased by 7.3% (n = 685), and combined visits (HAE and CAE) increased by 7.6% (n = 744) after the ruling. Over the entire study period (534 days), HAE had an increase of 0.084 visits/day, CAE had an increase of 4.56 visits/day, and combined visits (HAE and CAE) had an increase of 4.95 visits/day. Conclusions: The FDA OTC hearing aid ruling did not have a meaningful impact on the volume of HAEs and CAEs at an academic audiology practice. We found a small trend toward increased volume. Future studies should investigate visit patterns in other practice models to understand the full impact of the ruling on clinical audiology practice volumes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=asx&AN=190286342 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00069 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 6 StartPage: 1013 Subjects: – SubjectFull: United States. Food & Drug Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Auditory perception testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic medical centers Type: general – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Hearing aids Type: general – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical appointments Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical records Type: general – SubjectFull: Acquisition of data Type: general – SubjectFull: Hearing disorders Type: general – SubjectFull: Audiologists Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis software Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychosocial factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Changes in Audiology Visits at an Academic Audiology Practice Following the Food and Drug Administration Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Ruling. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Weinstein, Hannah N. W. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tucker, Lauren H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fernandez, Karla Y. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Galatioto, Jessica A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Golub, Justin S. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10590889 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 34 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: American Journal of Audiology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |