Αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης - "Political dynamics of the EU series"

Relation: 西文\r\n（一）專書\r\n\r\nAmstrong, K. and S. Bulmer. The Governance of the Single European Market. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.\r\n\r\nAndersen, Svein S. and Kjell A. Fliassen. The European Union: How Democratic Is It? London: SAGE Publications, 1996.\r\n\r\nAndreas, Maurer. What Next For The European Parliament? London: Federal Trust for Education and Research Published, 1999.\r\n\r\nArcher, Clive. The European Union- Structure and Process. New York: Continuum, 2000.\r\n\r\nBanchoff, Thomas and Mitchell P. Smith. Legitimacy and the European Union -The\r\nContested Polity. New York: Routledge, 1999.\r\n\r\nBeetham, David. and Christopher Lord. Transnational Parties in the European Union. London: Ashgate, 1998.\r\n\r\nBeetham, David and Christopher Lord. Legitimacy and the EU. London: Political Dynamics of the EU Series, 1998.\r\n\r\nBlondel, Jean, Richard Sinnot and Palle Sevensson. People and Parliament in the Europe Union, Participation, Democracy and Legitimacy. New York.: Oxford University Press, 1998.\r\n\r\nBurgess , Michael. Federalism and European union：Political Ideas, Influences, and Strategies in the European Community, 1972-1987. London : Routledge, 1989.\r\n\r\nBurgess, Michael. Federalism and European Union- The Biilding of Europe, (London: Routledge, 2000.\r\n\r\nBurns, Charlotte.“Rules, the European Parliament”, Edited by, Alex Warleigh, Understanding European Union Institutions., London: Routledge, 2002.\r\n\r\nCowgill, Anthony and Andrew Coegill. The European Constitution in Perspective. Gloucestershire: British Management Data Foundation, 2004.\r\n\r\nCommbes, David. Seven Theorems in Search of the European Parliament. London: Federal Trust 1998.\r\n\r\nCorbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs and Michael Shackleton. The European Parliament (3rd Edition). London: Cartermill Publishing, 1995.\r\n\r\nCorbett, Richard. The European Parliament’s Role in closer EU Integration. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan Press; New York : St. Martin` s Press, 1998.\r\n\r\nDinan, Desmond. Ever Closer Union? An Introduction to the European Community. London: Lynne Rienner Publisher Press, 1994.\r\nDaltrop, Anne. Politics and the European Community. London: Longman, 1990.\r\n\r\nGriller, S., D. P. Droutsas, G. Falkner and M. Nentwich, The Treaty of Amsterdam- Facts, Analysis, Prospects. Springer:Wien,2000.\r\n\r\nGoodin, Robert E. The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.\r\n\r\nGeorge, Stephen and Ian Bache, Politics in the European Union, London: Oxford University Press, 2001.\r\n\r\nGrünhage, Jan. “The 1996/97 Intergovernmental Conference: A survey of the Process.”, Edited by, Jörg Monar and Wolfgang Wessels, The European Union after the Treaty of Amsterdam , London: Continuum, 2001.\r\n\r\nHass, Ernst. The Uniting of Europe：Political, Economical and Social Forces,1950-1957. California：Stanford University Press,1968.\r\n\r\nHass, Ernst. The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. California: Stanford University Press, 1963.\r\n\r\nHartley, T. C. The fundtleytions of Procedure of the Community Law. New York: Oxford Univ. Press Inc., 3rd Edition, 1994.\r\n\r\nHerman, Valentine and Mark Hagger, The Legislation of Direct Elections to the European Parliament, Hampshire: Gower Publishing Company, 1980.\r\nHolland, Martin, European Integration: From Community to Union. London: Pinter Publishers, 1993.\r\n\r\nJacobs, Francis, Richard Corbett and Michael Shackleton, The European Parliament. 3ed. London: Cartermill International Ltd, 1995.\r\n\r\nLindberg, L. N. Beyond the Nation-State：Functionalism and International Organization. California：Stanford University Press, 1964.\r\n\r\nLynch, Philip, Nanette Neuwahl and G. Wyn Rees. Reforming the European Union- from Maastricht to Amsterdam. Harlow：Pearson Education Limited, 2000.\r\n\r\nMcKay, David. Federalism and European Union：A Political Economy Perspective . Oxford：Oxford University Press, 1999.\r\n\r\nMoussis, Nicolas, Handbook of European Union : institutions and policies. Rixensart : European Study Service, 1998.\r\n\r\nRichardson, Jeremy. European Union: Power and Policy-making(2nd edition). London: Routledge, 2001.\r\n\r\nRaworth, Philip. The Legislative Process in the European Community. Diverter: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1993.\r\n\r\nWestlake, Martin, A Modern Guide to the European Parliament. London: Pinter Publishers,1994.\r\n（二）期刊論文\r\n\r\nAlesina, Alberto and Roberto Perotti, “The European Union: A Political Incorrect View,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives18:4( Fall 2004):27-49.\r\n\r\nArrett, Geoffrey and George Tsebelis “An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism.” International Organization 50：2 (1996): 269-299.\r\n\r\nBulmer, Simon J. “New Institutionalism and the Governance of the single European Market.” Journal of European Public Policy 5:3 (September 1998):365-386.\r\n\r\nCorbett, R. G. “The Intergovernment Conference on Political Union,” Journal of Common Market Studies (September 1992):55-89.\r\n\r\nDowding, Keith.” Institutionalist Research on the European Union: A Critical Review.” European Union Politics 1：1 (2000):125-144.\r\n\r\nHix, S. “The Study of the European Union: The New Governance Agenda and its Rival.” Journal of European Public Policy 5:1 (1994):38-65.\r\n\r\nHoworth, Jolyon. “ The European Draft Constitutional Treaty and the Future of the European Defense Initiative: A question of Flexibility.” European Foreign Affairs Review 9 (2004): 483-508.\r\n\r\nJones, Erik, Niels van der Bijl. “Public Opinion and Enlargement.” European Union Politics 5:3 (2004):331-351.\r\n\r\nKonig, Thomas and Thomas Brauninger. “Accession and Reform of the European Union: A Game-Theoretical Analysis of Eastern Enlargement and the Constitutional Reform.” European Union Politics 5:4 (2004):419-439.\r\n\r\nKreppel, Amie. “Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Past Present and Future.” European Union Politics1：3 (2000):340-362.\r\n\r\nKreppel, Amie. \"What Affects the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37:3 (1999): 521-538.\r\n\r\nKyam, Dietrich.” The EU after the Agreement on the Constitutional Treaty.” European Foreign Affairs Review 9 (2004): 455-458\r\n\r\nLaurent, Pierre-Henri.“European Election and the Making of the Europe.” World Affairs 140:4(Spring 1978): 273-284.\r\n\r\nLane, Jan-Erik. “Symposium on the Enlargement of the European Union,” International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Boca Baton 7:4( winter 2004):pp498-503.\r\n\r\nMarsh, Michael and Pippa Norris. “Political Representation in the European Parliament.” European Journal of political Research 32(1997): 153-164.\r\n\r\nMazey, Sonia. “European Integration: Unfinished Journey or Journey Without End?” Edited by Jeremy Richardson, European Union-Power and Policy-making , Oxford：Oxford University Press (2001): 27-50.\r\n\r\nMoravcsik, Andrew. “Negotiating the Single European Act：National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.” International Organization 45:1(1991): 19-56.\r\n\r\nObradovic, Danielp. “Policy Legitimacy and the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 34:2 (1996): 192-221.\r\n\r\nOsborn, Alan. “The European Parliament- Past, Present and Future.” Europe 386(May 1999):30-35.\r\n\r\nPierson, Paul. “The Path to European Integration：A Historical Institutionalist Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 29: 2 (1996): 123-163.\r\n\r\nPeter A. Hall and Rosemary C. R. Taylor.”Political Science and the Three New- Institutions,” Political Studies 11：4( 1996): 936-957.\r\n\r\nPollack, Mark A “International Relations Theory and European Integration.”Journal of Common Market Studies 39:2 ( 2001): 221-244.\r\n\r\nSchmitt, Hermann and Jacques J. A. Thomassen “Dynamic Represatation: The Case of European Integration.” European Union Politics 1:3 ( 2000): 318-339.\r\n\r\nScully, Roger M. “The European Parliament and the Co-Decision Procedure: A Reassessment.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 3:3 (1997): 58-73.\r\nSelck, Torsten J. and Bernard Steunenberg, “Between Power and Luck: The European Parliament in the EU Legislative Process”, European Union Politics 5:1 (2004) :25-46.\r\n\r\nSkach, Cindy. “We, the Peoples? Constitutionalizing the European Union”, JCMS 43:\r\n1 (2005):149-170.\r\n\r\nSmith, Michael E. “Rules, Transgovernmentalism, and the Expansion of European Political Cooperation.”, Edited by, Wayne Sandholtz and Alec Stone Sweet, European Integration and Supranational Governance , Oxford: Oxford University Press (1998):\r\n304-333.\r\n\r\nSoros, George.“Can Europe Work?” Foreign Affairs, 75 (Sep/Oct1996):pp8-14.\r\n\r\nTaylor, Paul. “Intergovernmentalism in the European Communities in the1970s: patterns and perspectives.” International Organization 36: 4( 1982): 741-766.\r\n\r\nTsebelis, George and Geoffrey Garrett . “The Institutionalsm Fundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union.” International Organization 55:2(2001): 357-390.\r\n\r\nTsebelis, George. “The Power of European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter.” American Political Science Review 88( 1994): 128-142.\r\n\r\nWessels, Wolfgang.” Nice Results: The Millennium IGC in the EU’s Evolution.” Journal of Common Market Studies 39:2( 2001): 197-219.\r\n\r\n（三）網際網路\r\n\r\n“A constitution for Europe”, http://europa.eu.int/constitution/download/brochure_160904_en.pdf.\r\n\r\nBBC, “Chirac appeals for French unity”, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4597549.stm EU Observer,\r\n\r\nBBC, “EU constitution: Where member states stand”, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3954327.stm#france\r\n\r\n“ Benelux Memorandum on the Future of Europe”, Press Release by the Belgian EU Presidency, 21 June 2001, http://www.eu2001.be.\r\n\r\n“Constitution debates underway”, http://euobserver.com/9/19024EU Observer,\r\nEU Observer, “EU at a crossroads, says Barroso”, http://www.euobserver.com/?sid=9&aid=19334\r\n\r\n“Giscard defends own EU Constitution”, http://euobserver.com/9/19150\r\n\r\n“How the European Union works/A citizen’s guide to the EU institutions,” Luxembourg: European union, 2003. http://europa.eu.int/comm/publications/booklets/eu_documentation/06/en.pdf\r\n\r\nFinancial Times, “Frenetic start to France`s EU treaty campaign”, http://news.ft.com/cms/s/1d936b3e-c672-11d9-b69b-00000e2511c8.html\r\n\r\nReuters, “New French PM vows to lead the fight for jobs”,\r\nhttp://today.reuters.co.uk/news/default.aspx\r\n\r\nSpecial Eurobarometer No. 214 (Jan. 2005) “The Future Constitutional Treaty: FirstResults,” http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs214_en_first.pdf\r\n\r\nhttp://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.chinabroadcast.cn/2201/2005/06/02/1405@568577_1.htm\r\n\r\nhttp://www.europarl.eu.int/presentation/powers\r\n\r\nhttp://www.europarl.eu.int/parliament/expert/staticDisplay.do?language=EN&id=52.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.europarl.eu.int/groups/default_en.htm\r\n\r\nhttp://www.europarl.eu.int/activities/expert/committees.do\r\n\r\nhttp://www.europarl.eu.int/activities/expert/delegations.do\r\n\r\nhttp://www.europarl.eu.int/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=46&pageRank=2&language=EN\r\nhttp://www.europarl.eu.int/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=46&pageRank=3&language=EN\r\nhttp://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=DOC/05/2&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en\r\nhttp://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/6/16/n99690.htm.\r\n\r\nhttp://economy.enorth.com.cn/system/2001/12/15/000218003.shtml\r\n\r\nhttp://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk\r\n\r\nNice Treaty- The reader friendly edition of the EC/EU treaties as amended by the Treaty of Nice., http://www.bonde.com\r\n\r\n巴黎條約〈http://www.europa.eu.int/abc/obj/treaties/en/entoc29.htm〉\r\n\r\n巴黎條約〈http://www.europa.eu.int/abc/obj/treaties/en/entr30b.htm#Article_23〉\r\n\r\n馬斯垂克條約：http://www.europa.eu.int/abc/obj/treaties/en/entoc01.htm\r\n\r\n歐洲議會網站：http://www.europarl.eu.int/presentation/1_1_en.htm\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n中文\r\n（一）專書\r\n\r\n王泰銓。《歐洲共同體法總論》。台北：三民圖書公司，民國86年。\r\n\r\n王皓昱。《歐洲合眾國－歐洲政治統合理想之實踐》。台北：揚智文化，民國86年。\r\n\r\n尼可勞斯摩蘇(Nicholas Moussis)著，王萬里譯。《前進歐洲—歐盟手冊。台北：中國生產力》，民國88年。\r\n\r\n吳弦。《歐洲經紀圈—形成、發展與前景》。北京：當代世界出版社，民國90年4月。\r\n\r\n張亞中。《歐洲統合：政府間主義與超國家主義的互動》。台北市：智楊文化，民87年。\r\n\r\n張維邦。《莫內與「歐洲煤鋼共同體」的建立》。台北：一橋，民國92年。\r\n\r\n張顯耀。《歐洲聯盟發展「共同外交暨安全政策」之研究》。台北：幼獅文化事業公司，民國94年。\r\n\r\n施正鋒編。《從歐洲反思台灣》。台北：前衛出版社，民國92年。\r\n\r\n施正鋒編。《歐洲統合與台灣》。台北：前衛出版社，民國92年。\r\n沈玄池、洪德欽主編。《歐洲聯盟：理論與政策》。台北：中研院歐美所，民國87年。\r\n\r\n曾令良。《歐洲聯盟與現代國際法》。台北：志一，民國83年。\r\n\r\n邱晃泉、張炳煌合著。《歐洲共同同體解讀：實用的制度與案例介紹》。台北：\r\n月旦出版社，民國82年。。\r\n\r\nPhilip Thody著；鄭綮元譯。《歐洲聯盟簡史》。台北：三民，民國90年。\r\n\r\nJean De Ruyt著；許連高譯。《透視單一歐洲法案：從歐市邁向聯盟之路》。台北：遠流出版社，民國80年。\r\n\r\n許仟。《歐洲各國政府》。台北：漢威出版社，民國86年。\r\n\r\n郭秋慶。《歐洲聯盟概論》。台北：五南圖書公司，民國88年。\r\n\r\n陳勁。《歐洲聯盟之整合與體制運作》。台北：五南圖書公司，民國88年。\r\n\r\n陳麗娟。《歐洲共同體法導論》。台北：五南圖書出版公司，民國85年。\r\n\r\n陳麗娟。《阿姆斯特丹條約解讀》。台北：五南圖書出版公司，民國87年。\r\n\r\n黃偉峰主編。《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作》。台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，民國92年。\r\n\r\n黃琛瑜。《歐洲聯盟-跨世紀政治工程》。台北：五南圖書出版公司，民國88年。\r\n\r\n閻小冰、鄺揚。《歐洲議會》。北京：世界知識出版社，民國85年。\r\n\r\n〈認識馬斯垂克條約（歐洲聯盟條約）〉。《國際經貿組織簡訊（二十五）》。台北：經濟部國際貿易局，民國82年2月。\r\n\r\n\r\n(二)期刊論文\r\n\r\n王皓昱。〈「歐洲合眾國」：聯邦主義的未來？〉。《東吳政治學報》，第3期，民國85年，頁125-149。\r\n\r\n王皓昱。〈從歷史發展看歐洲統合思想的緣起〉。《東吳政治學報》，第5騎，民國85年，頁1-26。\r\n\r\n王萬里。〈歐洲議會跨國政黨制度研析〉。《立法院院聞》，第29卷，第6期，民國90年，頁22-26。\r\n\r\n王泰銓。〈歐洲聯盟政治統合之發展〉。《問題與研究》，第33卷第8 期，民國83年，頁24-52。\r\n\r\n朱景鵬。〈歐洲議會主義之理論與實際〉。《美歐月刊》，第11卷第7 期，民國85年，頁4-27。\r\n\r\n李高英。〈單一貨幣與歐洲議會〉。《立法院院聞》，第316期，民國88年，頁 103-107。\r\n\r\n李貴英。〈阿姆斯特丹條約關於歐洲聯盟機構改革事宜之評估〉。《問題與研究》，第38卷，第1期，民國88年，頁49-62。\r\n\r\n沈玄池。〈歐洲聯盟共同外交暨安全政策體制與運作方式改革之研究〉。《美歐季刊》，第14卷第3期，民國89年，頁 263-304。\r\n\r\n吳東野。〈歐洲議會選舉之分析〉。《美歐月刊》，第9卷第9 期，民國83年，頁39-56。\r\n\r\n胡婉玲。〈歐洲議會職權形成與變遷〉。《新世紀智庫論壇》，第11期，民國89年，頁111-118。\r\n\r\n郭秋慶。〈歐洲統合過程中國家主權的弱化或強化－從歐盟的決策過程論起〉。《東海學報》，第39卷（5），民國87年，頁73-95。\r\n\r\n郭秋慶。〈歐洲議會在歐洲聯盟中的超國家發展〉。《美歐月刊》，第11卷，第7期，民國85年7月。\r\n\r\n翁瑞廷。〈歐洲議會改選及其前途〉。《問題與研究》，第24卷第1期，民國73年，頁64-78。\r\n\r\n陳勁。〈論整合理論的趨勢及主權問題的迷思：以歐盟為例〉。《成功大學學報》，第32卷，民國86年，頁215-238。\r\n\r\n陳麗娟。〈評析馬斯垂克條約關於歐洲共同體立法程序之新規定〉。《法學叢刊》，第154期，民國84年，頁96-108。\r\n\r\n黃偉峰。〈1999年歐洲議會選舉之經驗觀察與理論意涵〉。《臺灣政治學刊》，第4期，民國89年，頁149-208。\r\n\r\n黃偉峰。〈「次級選舉」理論與歐洲議會選舉：英國經驗資料的檢證〉。《歐美研究》，第27卷第4期，民國86年，頁200 -232。\r\n\r\n張台麟。〈歐洲共同體議會之功能與角色〉。《問題與研究》，第32卷，第3 期，民國82年，頁45-54。\r\n\r\n張台麟。〈歐洲共同體執行委員會之功能與角色〉。《問題與研究》，第31卷，第8期，民國81年，頁50-60。\r\n\r\n張亞中。〈歐洲統合過程中的國家主權問題〉。《美歐月刊》，第9卷，第11期，民國83年，頁98-114。\r\n\r\n張顯耀。〈歐洲聯盟共同外交與安全政策之趨向〉。《美歐月刊》，第9卷，第5 期，民國83年，頁72-90。\r\n\r\n湯紹成。〈歐洲共同體的決策程序〉。《東亞季刊》，第25卷，第4期，民國83年，頁71-80。\r\n\r\n劉文秀。〈歐洲議會的權力及其運行機制〉。《歐洲》，第18卷，第3期，民國89年，頁39-48。\r\n劉書彬。〈歐洲聯盟東擴的課題和影響〉《中山人文社會科學期刊》，台北：國立政治大學中山社會科學研究所第八卷第一期，民國89年，頁214-250。\r\n\r\n蔡昕翰。〈歐洲議會之民主正當性的研究〉。《認識歐洲》，第6期，民國89年，頁91-98。\r\n\r\n盧倩儀。〈區域整合理論的比較與評析〉。《美歐季刊》，第12卷，第1期，民國86年，頁27-44。\r\n\r\n蘇秀法。〈從歐洲議會改選看歐洲民意動向〉。《問題與研究》，第28卷，第11期，民國78年，頁17-35。\r\n\r\n蘇宏達。〈論歐盟東擴與憲法辯論間的關連性〉。《二００二歐盟發展之回顧與前瞻學術研討會論文集》，民國92年，頁1-14。\r\n\r\n藍玉春。〈有關歐洲統合的論戰及其實踐：聯邦派v.s.主權派〉。《政治科學論叢》，第11期，民國88年，頁181-228。\r\n\r\n藍玉春。〈阿姆斯特丹條約對歐盟決策程序之影響與意涵〉。《美歐季刊》，第13卷，第1期，民國88年，頁1-29。\r\n\r\n\r\n（三）學位論文\r\n\r\n余正國。〈論歐洲議會的「議會化」發展及其困境-兼論阿姆斯特丹條約的衝擊〉。台北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文，民國87年。\r\n\r\n沈志嚴。〈歐洲議會直接普選之研究〉。台北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文，民國70年。\r\n\r\n胡婉玲。〈從新制度主義論歐洲議會職權之變遷〉。台北：中國文化大學中山學術研究所博士論文，民國89年。\r\n\r\n耿敬時。〈歐洲聯盟民主赤字問題及其改革之研究—以歐盟立法程序為例〉。台北：南華大學歐洲研究所碩士論文，民國87年。\r\n\r\n張釗嘉。〈歐洲議會職權擴張之研究（1958-1988）〉。台北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文，民國83。\r\n\r\n蔡裕鎮。〈以尼斯條約探討歐洲聯盟執委會,理事會及歐洲議會改革研究〉。台北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文，民國92年。\r\n\r\n\r\n（四）報紙、網際網路\r\n羊城晚報，〈歐盟東擴三機構面臨癱瘓〉，http://www.ycwb.com/gb/content/2004-04/24/content_681329.htm\r\n\r\n大紀元，〈歐盟東擴仰賴翻譯溝通〉，http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/4/4/30/n525812.htm\r\n\r\n大紀元，〈歐盟領袖努力挽救\"瀕危\"歐洲憲法〉，http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/6/3/n942679.htm\r\n\r\n大紀元，〈荷蘭否決歐憲歐洲各國坦承出現問題〉，http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/6/2/n941444.htm\r\n\r\n大紀元，〈歐盟：儘管荷蘭說不歐憲批准程序必須繼續〉，http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/6/2/n941653.htm\r\n\r\n淡江大學歐盟文獻中心：http://www.lib.tku.edu.tw/eudoc/newsletter/issue02.pdf#search; G0902530253; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw//handle/140.119/94322; https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/94322/1/index.html