Evidence-based efficacy, safety and technical features of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (systematic review of meta-analyses) ; Эффективность, безопасность и технические особенности выполнения перкутанной нефролитотомии с точки зрения доказательной медицины (систематический обзор мета-анализов)

Authors: V. A. Malkhasyan, N. K. Gadzhiev, S. O. Sukhikh, D. Yu. Pushkar, В. А. Малхасян, Н. К. Гаджиев, С. О. Сухих, Д. Ю. Пушкарь

Source: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 2 (2024); 87-107 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 2 (2024); 87-107 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2

Subject Terms: обзор мета-анализов, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, postoperative complications, meta-analysis, перкутанная нефролитотомия, чрескожная нефролитотомия, нефролитолапаксия, нефролитотрипсия, послеоперационные осложнения

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/858/553; Chen Y, Feng J, Duan H, Yue Y, Zhang C, Deng T, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0206810. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0206810; Chung DY, Kang DH, Cho KS, Jeong WS, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Lee SH, Lee JY. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211316. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211316; Liu Y, Zhang H, Wen Z, Jiang Y, Huang J, Wang C, Chen C, Wang J, Bao E, Yang X. Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones (>1 cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):171. DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01341-3; De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, Torricelli FC, Di Palma C, Molina WR, Monga M, De Sio M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):125-137. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003; Jiang H, Yu Z, Chen L, Wang T, Liu Z, Liu J, Wang S, Ye Z. Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2035851. DOI:10.1155/2017/2035851; Davis NF, Quinlan MR, Poyet C, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM, Webb D, Jack GS. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile. World J Urol. 2018;36(7):1127-1138. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2230-x; Jiao B, Luo Z, Xu X, Zhang M, Zhang G. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019;71:1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.005; Chen Y, Wen Y, Yu Q, Duan X, Wu W, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):109. DOI:10.1186/s12894-020-00677-4; Dorantes-Carrillo LA, Basulto-Martínez M, Suárez-Ibarrola R, Heinze A, Proietti S, Flores-Tapia JP, Esqueda-Mendoza A, Giusti G. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(1):259-270. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.008; Gao XS, Liao BH, Chen YT, Feng SJ, Gao R, Luo DY, Liu JM, Wang KJ. Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1101-1110. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0547; Zheng C, Xiong B, Wang H, Luo J, Zhang C, Wei W, Wang Y. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2014;93(4):417-24. DOI:10.1159/000363509; Kang SK, Cho KS, Kang DH, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Lee JY. Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: An update. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(49):e9119. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000009119; Zewu Z, Cui Y, Feng Z, Yang L, Chen H. Comparison of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediate size renal stones (2-3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(1):10-22. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0510; Kim CH, Chung DY, Rha KH, Lee JY, Lee SH. Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 30;57(1):26. DOI:10.3390/medicina57010026; Barone B, Crocetto F, Vitale R, Di Domenico D, Caputo V, Romano F, De Luca L, Bada M, Imbimbo C, Prezioso D. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(4):441-450. DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03721-2; Awedew AF, Seman YS, Yalew DZ, Wondmeneh YC, Yigzaw WA. Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment for 1-2 cm sized lower pole of renal stone: network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Urolithiasis. 2023;51(1):82. DOI:10.1007/s00240-023-01454-2; Donaldson JF, Lardas M, Scrimgeour D, Stewart F, MacLennan S, Lam TB, McClinton S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol. 2015;67(4):612-6. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054; Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C, Chen Q, Song R, Sun Y. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):745-59. DOI:10.1089/end.2014.0799; Yuri P, Hariwibowo R, Soeroharjo I, Danarto R, Hendri AZ, Brodjonegoro SR, Rasyid N, Birowo P, Widyahening IS. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Acta Med Indones. 2018;50(1):18-25. PMID: 29686172; Junbo L, Yugen L, Guo J, Jing H, Ruichao Y, Tao W. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Urol J. 2019;16(2):97-106. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.4681; Cabrera JD, Manzo BO, Torres JE, Vicentini FC, Sánchez HM, Rojas EA, Lozada E. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2020;38(10):2621-2628. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-03043-8; Tsai SH, Chung HJ, Tseng PT, Wu YC, Tu YK, Hsu CW, Lei WT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(10):e19403. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000019403; Kallidonis P, Adamou C, Ntasiotis P, Pietropaolo A, Somani B, Özsoy M, Liourdi D, Sarica K, Liatsikos E, Tailly T. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of UroTechnology and Young Academic Urologists. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(6):711-723. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04388-3; Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Somani B, Adamou C, Emiliani E, Knoll T, Skolarikos A, Tailly T. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter. J Urol. 2020;204(3):427-433. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001013; Liu M, Hou J, Xu F, Du H, Liu J, Li N. Minimally invasive nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of Lower calyceal stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(5):1481-1488. DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000394; Hou J, Xu F, Du H, Liu J, Li N. Efficacy and safety of the surgical treatments for lower calyceal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(3):383-388. DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000062; Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2013;190(3):888-93. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092; Wang J, Yang Y, Chen M, Tao T, Liu C, Huang Y, Guan H, Han X, Xu B. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal pelvic calculi (diameter >2 cm): a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2016;116(6):346-356. DOI:10.1080/00015458.2016.1181312; Rui X, Hu H, Yu Y, Yu S, Zhang Z. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large renal pelvic stones: a meta-analysis. J Investig Med. 2016;64(6):1134-42. DOI:10.1136/jim-2015-000053; Zhao C, Yang H, Tang K, Xia D, Xu H, Chen Z, Ye Z. Comparison of laparoscopic stone surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large upper urinary stones: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(6):479-490. DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0862-0; Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L, Wang X, Yang Y, Wang J, Han P. Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):75. DOI:10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7; Mao T, Wei N, Yu J, Lu Y. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(1):300060520983136. DOI:10.1177/0300060520983136; Mantica G, Balzarini F, Chierigo F, Keller EX, Talso M, Emiliani E, Pietropaolo A, Papalia R, Scarpa RM, Terrone C, Esperto F; European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU) and Young Academic Urologists (YAU). The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(2):169-177. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04587-0; Wang Q, Guo J, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Wang S. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171478. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171478; Gao ZM, Gao S, Qu HC, Li K, Li N, Liu CL, Zhu XW, Liu YL, Wang P, Zheng XH. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy improves stone-free rates for impacted proximal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171230. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171230; Wu T, Duan X, Chen S, Yang X, Tang T, Cui S. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Per-cutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017;99(3):308-319. DOI:10.1159/000471773; Wang Y, Chang X, Li J, Han Z. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(6):902-926. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550; Lai S, Jiao B, Diao T, Seery S, Hu M, Wang M, Hou H, Wang J, Zhang G, Liu M. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2020;80:205-217. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025; Sharma G, Pareek T, Tyagi S, Kaundal P, Yadav AK, Thummala Y, Devana SK. Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11811. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-91364-3; Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP, Zeng G. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):563-70. DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y; Feng D, Hu X, Tang Y, Han P, Wei X. The efficacy and safety of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(2):115-126. DOI:10.4111/icu.2020.61.2.115; Deng J, Li J, Wang L, Hong Y, Zheng L, Hu J, Kuang R. Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis. Scand J Surg. 2021;110(3):301-311. DOI:10.1177/1457496920920474; Sharma G, Sharma A, Devana SK, Singh SK. Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1376-1385. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.014; Wan C, Wang D, Xiang J, Yang B, Xu J, Zhou G, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Zhong J, Liu J. Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):523-533. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01349-8; Mykoniatis I, Pietropaolo A, Pyrgidis N, Tishukov M, Anastasiadis A, Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Talso M, Tailly T, Kalidonis P; Young Academic Urologists of the European Association of Urology-Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Party. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stones over 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(4):409-417. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04678-X; Qin P, Zhang D, Huang T, Fang L, Cheng Y. Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(4):637-648. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347; Li H, Yin Y, Nie M. Efficacy and safety of super-mini per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):87. DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01256-z; Zeid M, Sayedin H, Sridharan N, Narayanaswamy A, Abul F, Jacob PT, Giri S, Sarica K, Almousawi S. Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Nephrolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32253. DOI:10.7759/cureus.32253; Li X, Li J, Zhu W, Duan X, Zhao Z, Deng T, Duan H, Zeng G. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206048. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0206048; Gu Z, Yang Y, Ding R, Wang M, Pu J, Chen J. Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):64-70. DOI:10.1159/000506716; Zhang B, Hu Y, Gao J, Zhuo D. Micropercutaneous versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Moderately Sized Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2020;104(1-2):94-105. DOI:10.1159/000503796; Chen D, Chen C, Xie Y, Luo Z, Liu G. Suctioning Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2021;19(1):1-8. DOI:10.22037/uj.v18i.6773; Zhu L, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Gou L, Huang Y, Zheng X. Comparison of vacuum-assisted sheaths and normal sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):158. DOI:10.1186/s12894-021-00925-1; Li P, Huang Z, Sun X, Yang T, Wang G, Jiang Y, Ke C, Li J. Comparison of Vacuum Suction Sheath and Non-Vacuum Suction Sheath in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(5):1145-1152. DOI:10.1080/08941939.2021.1995538; He Z, Tang F, Lu Z, He Y, Wei G, Zhong F, Zeng G, Wu W, Yan L, Li Z. Comparison of Supracostal and Infracostal Access For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2019;16(2):107-114. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.4727; Jiao B, Ding Z, Luo Z, Lai S, Xu X, Chen X, Zhang G. Single- versus Multiple-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Surgical Management of Staghorn Stones or Complex Caliceal Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8817070. DOI:10.1155/2020/8817070; Wang Z, Feng D, Cao D, Zhang Y, Wei W. Comparison of safety and efficacy between single-tract and multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment of complex renal calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(6):731-738. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04239-9; Song R, Ji C, Cong R, Luan J, Yao L, Song N, Meng X. Is It Safe to Increase the Number of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Channels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Esp Urol. 2022;75(10):819-830. DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227510.120; Widyokirono DR, Kloping YP, Hidayatullah F, Rahman ZA, Ng AC, Hakim L. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large and Complex Renal Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):865-876. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0761; Castellani D, Corrales M, Lim EJ, Cracco C, Scoffone CM, Teoh JY, Traxer O, Gauhar V. The Impact of Lasers in Per-cutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Comparative Trials. J Endourol. 2022;36(2):151-157. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0507; Lin L, Zhou L, Xiao K, Jin X, Jian Z, Liu Y, Li H, Wang K. Does combined lithotripter show superior stone-success rate than ultrasonic or pneumatic device alone during percutaneous nephrolithotrotomy? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2022;98:106223. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106223; Mykoniatis I, Pyrgidis N, Tzelves L, Pietropaolo A, Juliebø-Jones P, De Coninck V, Hameed BMZ, Chaloupka M, Schulz GB, Stief C, Kallidonis P, Somani BK, Skolarikos A. Assessment of single-probe dual-energy lithotripters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. World J Urol. 2023;41(2):551-565. DOI:10.1007/s00345-023-04278-2; Dehong C, Liangren L, Huawei L, Qiang W. A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(6):523-30. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0598-z; Li Y, Yang L, Xu P, Shen P, Qian S, Wei W, Wang J. One-shot versus gradual dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(5):443-8. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0583-6; Peng PX, Lai SC, Seery S, He YH, Zhao H, Wang XM, Zhang G. Balloon versus Amplatz for tract dilation in fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035943. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035943; Yuan H, Zheng S, Liu L, Han P, Wang J, Wei Q. The effi-cacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Res. 2011;39(5):401-10. DOI:10.1007/s00240-010-0355-5; Ni S, Qiyin C, Tao W, Liu L, Jiang H, Hu H, Han R, Wang C. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Urology. 2011;77(6):1293-8. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.023; Wang J, Zhao C, Zhang C, Fan X, Lin Y, Jiang Q. Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2012;109(6):918-24. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10463.x; Shen P, Liu Y, Wang J. Nephrostomy tube-free versus nephrostomy tube for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2012;88(3):298-306. DOI:10.1159/000332151; Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J, Piao Y, Zhou Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2013;27(4):420-6. DOI:10.1089/end.2012.0421; Xun Y, Wang Q, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Geng Y, Wang S. Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):102. DOI:10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2; Lee JY, Jeh SU, Kim MD, Kang DH, Kwon JK, Ham WS, Choi YD, Cho KS. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):48. DOI:10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x; Li Q, Gao L, Li J, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;29(2):61-69. DOI:10.1080/13645706.2019.1581224; Chen ZJ, Yan YJ, Zhou JJ. Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(1):60-68. DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.01.016; Gauhar V, Traxer O, García Rojo E, Scarcella S, Pavia MP, Chan VW, Pretore E, Wroclawski ML, Corrales M, Tiong HY, Lim EJ, Teoh JY, Heng CT, de la Rosette J, Somani BK, Castellani D. Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):511-522. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y; Wilhelm K, Hein S, Kunath F, Schoenthaler M, Schmidt S. Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7(7):CD012607. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2; Wang J, Zhang C, Tan G, Yang B, Chen W, Tan D. The use of adjunctive hemostatic agents in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(6):509-17. DOI:10.1007/s00240-014-0717-5; Yu C, Xu Z, Long W, Longfei L, Feng Z, Lin Q, Xiongbing Z, Hequn C. Hemostatic agents used for nephrostomy tract closure after tubeless PCNL: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(5):445-53. DOI:10.1007/s00240-014-0687-7; Chen Y, Feng J, Yue Y, Zhao Z, Deng T, Wu W, Zeng G. Externalized Ureteral Catheter Versus Double-J Stent in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2018;32(7):581-588. DOI:10.1089/end.2018.0066; Pu C, Wang J, Tang Y, Yuan H, Li J, Bai Y, Wang X, Wei Q, Han P. The efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(5):455-66. DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0776-2; Hu H, Qin B, He D, Lu Y, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang S. Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126587. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126587; Liu X, Huang G, Zhong R, Hu S, Deng R. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Regional versus General Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):132-142. DOI:10.1159/000491021; Liu L, Zheng S, Xu Y, Wei Q. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position. J Endourol. 2010;24(12):1941-6. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0292; Wu P, Wang L, Wang K. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(1):67-77. DOI:10.1007/s11255-010-9801-0; Zhang X, Xia L, Xu T, Wang X, Zhong S, Shen Z. Is the supine position superior to the prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)? Urolithiasis. 2014;42(1):87-93. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0614-3; Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, Cheng T, Sun Z, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen W, Zhong W, Zhu J. Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2016;30(7):754-63. DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0402; Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019;66:62-71. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.016; Birowo P, Tendi W, Widyahening IS, Rasyid N, Atmoko W. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res. 2020;9:231. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.22940.3; Keller EX, DE Coninck V, Proietti S, Talso M, Emiliani E, Ploumidis A, Mantica G, Somani B, Traxer O, Scarpa RM, Esperto F; European Association of Urology - European Society of Residents in Urology (EAU-ESRU). Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(1):50-58. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03960-0; Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M. An Update on Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2016;13(5):2814-2822.; Wang K, Zhang P, Xu X, Fan M. Ultrasonographic versus Fluoroscopic Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2015;95(1):15-25. DOI:10.1159/000369216; Liu Q, Zhou L, Cai X, Jin T, Wang K. Fluoroscopy versus ultrasound for image guidance during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(5):481-487. DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0934-1; Yang YH, Wen YC, Chen KC, Chen C. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019;37(5):777-788. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2443-z; Arabzadeh Bahri R, Maleki S, Shafiee A, Shobeiri P. Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0276708. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276708; Wang L, Li KP, Yin S, Yang L, Zhu PY. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with a non-dilated collecting system: results of a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):93. DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01269-8; Ma Y, Li P, Xiang L, Wen J, Jin X. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound vs Conventional Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Nondilated Collecting System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 2023;37(3):264-272. DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0360; Hu H, Lu Y, Cui L, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Qin B, Wang Y, Wang Q, Wang S. Impact of previous open renal surgery on the outcomes of subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010627. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010627; Pan Y, Xu M, Kang J, Wang S, Liu X. The Safety of Continuing Low-dose Aspirin Therapy Perioperatively in the Patients had Undergone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2022;19(4):253-261. DOI:10.22037/uj.v19i.7170; Wang Z, He X, Bai Y, Wang J. Can tranexamic acid reduce the blood transfusion rate in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(4):300060520917563. DOI:10.1177/0300060520917563; Feng D, Zhang F, Liu S, Han P, Wei W. Efficacy and safety of the tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(5):579-585. DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03826-6; Lee MJ, Kim JK, Tang J, Ming JM, Chua ME. The Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Perioperative Bleeding After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. J Endourol. 2022;36(3):303-312. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0498; Kallidonis P, Vagionis A, Pagonis K, Peteinaris A, Pietropaolo A, Adamou C, Liatsikos E, Tailly T. Is There Any Clinical Benefit for Peri-operative Administration of Tranexamic Acid for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(12):65. DOI:10.1007/s11934-021-01079-1; MacDonald M, Ilie G, Power L, Whalen S, Parker R, Skinner TA, Powers AGL. Effect of Tranexamic Acid on Bleeding Outcomes After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 2022;36(5):589-597. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0762; Baccaglini W, Rodrigues AF, Glina FPA, DallAqua V, Glina S, Neto ACL. Tranexamic Acid Use for Hemorrhagic Events Prevention in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):906-915. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0792; Prasad S, Sharma G, Devana SK, Kumar S, Sharma S. Is tranexamic acid associated with decreased need for blood transfusion in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023;105(2):99-106. DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2021.0259; Bapir R, Bhatti KH, Eliwa A, García-Perdomo HA, Gherabi N, Hennessey D, Mourmouris P, Ouattara A, Perletti G, Philipraj J, Trinchieri A, Buchholz N. Infectious complications of endourological treatment of kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022;94(1):97-106. DOI:10.4081/aiua.2022.1.97; Zhou G, Zhou Y, Chen R, Wang D, Zhou S, Zhong J, Zhao Y, Wan C, Yang B, Xu J, Geng E, Li G, Huang Y, Liu H, Liu J. The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):17. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01376-5; Liu M, Chen J, Gao M, Zeng H, Cui Y, Zhu Z, Chen H. Preoperative Midstream Urine Cultures vs Renal Pelvic Urine Culture or Stone Culture in Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Urosepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(10):1467-1478. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.1140; Castellani D, Teoh JY, Pavia MP, Pretore E, Dell'Atti L, Galosi AB, Gauhar V. Assessing the Optimal Urine Culture for Predicting Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(2):158-168. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0386; Yu J, Guo B, Yu J, Chen T, Han X, Niu Q, Xu S, Guo Z, Shi Q, Peng X, Deng Z, Yang P. Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol. 2020;38(7):1685-1700. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02967-5; Jung HD, Cho KS, Moon YJ, Chung DY, Kang DH, Lee JY. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267233. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267233; Danilovic A, Talizin TB, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS, Batagello C, Vicentini FC, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. One week pre-operative oral antibiotics for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduce risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2023;49(2):184-193. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0544; Jones P, Bennett G, Dosis A, Pietropaolo A, Geraghty R, Aboumarzouk O, Skolarikos A, Somani BK. Safety and Efficacy of Day-case Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from European Society of Uro-technology. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(6):1127-1134. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.002; Gao M, Zeng F, Zhu Z, Zeng H, Chen Z, Li Y, Yang Z, Cui Y, He C, Chen J, Chen H. Day care surgery versus inpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;81:132-139. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.056; Peng L, Meng C, Xia Z, Liang R, Gan L, Li K, Cao D, Li Y. Determining the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treating nephrolithiasis in patients with solitary kidneys. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):2. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01386-3; Jiang K, Zhang P, Xu B, Luo G, Hu J, Zhu J, Sun F. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger than 2cm in Patients with a Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2020;17(5):442-448. DOI:10.22037/uj.v16i7.5609; Zhou X, Sun X, Chen X, Gong X, Yang Y, Chen C, Yao Q. Effect of Obesity on Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017;98(4):382-390. DOI:10.1159/000455162; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/858

Availability: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/858
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2-87-107

Мультиперкутанный доступ в лечении коралловидного нефролитиаза ; Multi-percutaneous access in the treatment of coral nephrolithiasis

Authors: Rapoport, L. M., Gazimiyev, M. A., Akopyan, G. N., Рапопорт, Л. М., Газимиев, М. А., Акопян, Г. Н.

Subject Terms: CORAL NEPHROLITHIASIS, PERCUTANEOUS (PERCUTANEOUS) NEPHROLITHOTOMY, MULTIPERCUTANEOUS ACCESS, MINEROPERUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY, COMBINED TREATMENT OF CORAL NEPHROLITHIASIS, КОРАЛЛОВИДНЫЙ НЕФРОЛИТИАЗ, ПЕРКУТАННАЯ (ЧРЕСКОЖНАЯ) НЕФРОЛИТОТОМИЯ, МУЛЬТИПЕРКУТАННЫЙ ДОСТУП, МИНИПЕРКУТАННАЯ НЕФРОЛИТОТОМИЯ, КОМБИНИРОВАННОЕ ЛЕЧЕНИЕ КОРАЛЛОВИДНОГО НЕФРОЛИТИАЗА

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: Уральский медицинский журнал. 2018. Т. 164, № 9.; http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/12811

Availability: http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/12811

Мультиперкутанный доступ в лечении коралловидного нефролитиаза

Subject Terms: миниперкутанная нефролитотомия, multipercutaneous access, coral nephrolithiasis, коралловидный нефролитиаз, мультиперкутанный доступ, mineroperutaneous nephrolithotomy, percutaneous (percutaneous) nephrolithotomy, combined treatment of coral nephrolithiasis, комбинированное лечение коралловидного нефролитиаза, 3. Good health, перкутанная (чрескожная) нефролитотомия

Access URL: https://umj.usma.ru/jour/article/view/284