Εμφανίζονται 1 - 11 Αποτελέσματα από 11 για την αναζήτηση '"удовлетворенность лечением"', χρόνος αναζήτησης: 0,72δλ Περιορισμός αποτελεσμάτων
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    Πηγή: Ophthalmology in Russia; Том 18, № 4 (2021); 822-826 ; Офтальмология; Том 18, № 4 (2021); 822-826 ; 2500-0845 ; 1816-5095 ; 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/1685/904; Бойко Э.В., Винницкий Д.А. Сравнение зрительных функций у пациентов после имплантации бифокальных, трифокальных и монофокальных интраокулярных линз. Офтальмохирургия. 2019;1:11–19. DOI:10.25276/0235-4160-2019-1-11-19; Першин К.Б., Пашинова Н.Ф., Цыганков А.Ю. Хирургические методы коррекции пресбиопии. Катарактальная и рефракционная хирургия. 2016;16(2):4– 14.; Keates R.H., Pearce J.L., Schneider R.T. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987;13(5):557–560. DOI:10.1016/s0886-3350(87)80114-1; Темиров Н.Э., Темиров Н.Н. Субъективные ощущения пациентов после имплантации различных моделей мультифокальных интраокулярных линз. Катарактальная и рефракционная хирургия. 2015;15(1):43–48.; Marques E.F., Ferreira T.B. Comparison of visual outcomes of 2 diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):354–363. DOI:10.1016/j. jcrs.2014.05.048; Blaylock J.F., Si Z., Vickers C. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(9):1464–1473. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.04.011; Gierek-Ciaciura S., Cwalina L., Bednarski L., Mrukwa-Kominek E. A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(1):133–140. DOI:10.1007/s00417-009-1177-4; Tan N., Zheng D., Ye J. Comparison of visual performance after implantation of 3 types of intraocular lenses: accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(5):693–698. DOI:10.5301/ejo.5000425; Mencucci, R., Cennamo, M., Venturi, D., Vignapiano, R., Favuzza, E. Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2020;46(3):378–387. DOI:10.1097/j. jcrs.0000000000000061; Mendicute J., Kapp A., Lévy P., Krommes G., Arias-Puente A., Tomalla M., Barraquer E., Rozot P., Bouchut P. Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2016;42(2):203–210. DOI:10.1016/j. jcrs.2015.11.037; Liu Y., Gao Y., Liu R. Influence of angle kappa-customized implantation of rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens on visual quality and patient satisfaction [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 24]. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;10:1111/ aos.14356. DOI:10.1111/aos.14356; Nuzzi R., Tridico F. Comparison of visual outcomes, spectacles dependence and patient satisfaction of multifocal and accommodative intraocular lenses: innovative perspectives for maximal refractive-oriented cataract surgery. BMC ophthalmology. 2017;17(1):12. DOI:10.1186/s12886-017-0411-9; Hamdi I.M. Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1955–1961. DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S223062; Akman A., Asena L., Ozturk C., Gür Güngör S. Evaluation of quality of life after implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2019;45(2):130–134. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.003; McNeely R.N., Pazo E., Millar Z Threshold limit of postoperative astigmatism for patient satisfaction after refractive lens exchange and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(8):1126–1134. DOI:10.1016/j. jcrs.2016.05.007; Rosa A.M., Miranda Â.C., Patrício M.M., McAlinden C., Silva F.L., CasteloBranco M., Murta J. N. Functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neuroadaptation to multifocal intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2017;43(10):1287–1296. DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.031; https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/1685

  2. 2
    Academic Journal

    Πηγή: Modern Rheumatology Journal; Том 15, № 4 (2021); 43-49 ; Современная ревматология; Том 15, № 4 (2021); 43-49 ; 2310-158X ; 1996-7012

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: https://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/1169/1126; Лила АМ, Древаль РО, Инамова ОВ и др. Медико-экономический анализ влияния инвалидизации, ассоциированной с ревматическими заболеваниями, на экономику страны с учетом реализации пенсионной реформы. Современная ревматология. 2019;13(4):18-25. doi:10.14412/1996-7012-2019-4-18-25; Lwin MN, Serhal L, Holroyd C, Edwards CJ. Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Impact of Mental Health on Disease: A Narrative Review. Rheumatol Ther. 2020 Sep;7(3):457-71. doi:10.1007/s40744020-00217-4; Mpinga EK, Chastonay P. Satisfaction of patients: a right to health indicator? Health Policy. 2011 May;100(2-3):144-50. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 3.; Batbaatar E, Dorjdagva J, Luvsannyam A, Amenta P. Conceptualisation of patient satisfaction: a systematic narrative literature review. Perspect Public Health. 2015 Sep; 135(5):243-50. doi:10.1177/1757913915594196. Epub 2015 Jul 17.; Taylor PC, Ancuta C, Nagy O, et al. Treatment Satisfaction, Patient Preferences, and the Impact of Suboptimal Disease Control in a Large International Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort: SENSE Study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Feb 17;15:359-73. doi:10.2147/PPA.S289692. eCollection 2021.; Payne VL, Singh H, Meyer AN, et al. Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May;89(5):687-96. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.02.015.; Gore M, Sadosky A, Leslie D, et al. Therapy Switching, Augmentation, and Discontinuation in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Chronic Low Back Pain. Pain Pract. 2012 Jul;12(6):457-68. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00524.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.; Makris UE, Abrams RC, Gurland B, Reid MC. Management of persistent pain in the older patient: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014 Aug 27;312(8):825-36. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.9405.; Anghel LA, Farcas AM, Oprean RN. Medication adherence and persistence in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a narrative review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jul 3;12:1151-66. doi:10.2147/PPA.S165101.; Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Henningsen P, Brähler E. Chronic pain, pain disease, and satisfaction of patients with pain treatment in Germany. Results of a representative population survey. Schmerz. 2014 Oct;28(5):483-92. doi:10.1007/s00482-014-1438-y.; Todd K, Cowan P, Kelly N, Homel P. Chronic or recurrent pain in the emergency department: national telephone survey of patient experience. West J Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;11(5):408-15.; Kone V, Lecomte F, Randriamanana D, et al. Impact of a pilot team on patients' pain reduction and satisfaction in an emergency department: A before-and-after observational study. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2016 Apr;64(2):59-66. doi:10.1016/j.respe.2015.11.010.; Taylor S, Everett S, Taylor T, et al. A measure of treatment response: patient and physician satisfaction with traditional NSAIDs for osteoarthritis control. Open Access Rheumatol. 2013 Jul 29;5:69-76. doi:10.2147/OARRR.S41940.; Gossec L, Molto A, Romand X, et al. Recommendations for the assessment and optimization of adherence to disease-modifying drugs in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: A process based on literature reviews and expert consensus. Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Jan;86(1):13-19. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.08.006.; Margolis JM, Princic N, Smith DM, et al. Development of a novel algorithm to determine adherence to chronic pain treatment guidelines using administrative claims. J Pain Res. 2017 Feb 8;10:327-39. doi:10.2147/JPR.S118248.; Efthimiou P, Kukar M. Complementary and alternative medicine use in rheumatoid arthritis: proposed mechanism of action and efficacy of commonly used modalities. Rheumatol Int. 2010 Mar;30(5):571-86. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1206-y; Casale R, Atzeni F, Bazzichi L, et al. Pain in Women: A Perspective Review on a Relevant Clinical Issue that Deserves Prioritization. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1): 287-314. doi:10.1007/s40122-021-00244-1. Epub 2021 Mar 15.; Courties A, Gualillo O, Berenbaum F, Sellam J. Metabolic stress-induced joint inflammation and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Nov;23(11):1955-65. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.016.; Belluzzi E, El Hadi H, Granzotto M, et al. Systemic and Local Adipose Tissue in Knee Osteoarthritis. J Cell Physiol. 2017 Aug; 232(8):1971-8. doi:10.1002/jcp.25716.; Pincus T, Castrejon I, Yazici Y, et al. Osteoarthritis is as severe as rheumatoid arthritis: evidence over 40 years according to the same measure in each disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct;37 Suppl 120(5):7-17.; Яхно НН, Кукушкин МЛ, редакторы. Боль (практическое руководство для врачей). Москва: Издательство РАМН; 2012. 512 c.; Larsson C, Hansson EE, Sundquist K, Jakobsson U. Chronic pain in older adults: prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. Scand J Rheumatol. 2016 Nov 25:1-9. doi:10.1080/03009742.2016.1218543.; Felson DT. The sources of pain in knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005 Sep; 17(5):624-8. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000172800.49120.97.; Staud R. Evidence for shared pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis, low back pain, and fibromyalgia. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011 Dec;13(6):513-20. doi:10.1007/s11926-0110206-6.; Haviv B, Bronak S, Thein R. The complexity of pain around the knee in patients with osteoarthritis. Isr Med Assoc J. 2013 Apr;15(4):178-81.

  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
    Academic Journal

    Συνεισφορές: Т.А.Гаврилова, Е.Ю.Мартынова (клиника эндокринологии ФГБОУ ВО «Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России)

    Πηγή: Almanac of Clinical Medicine; Vol 44, No 4 (2016); 392-405 ; Альманах клинической медицины; Vol 44, No 4 (2016); 392-405 ; 2587-9294 ; 2072-0505 ; 10.18786/2072-0505-2016-44-4

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11