Εμφανίζονται 1 - 11 Αποτελέσματα από 11 για την αναζήτηση '"трансграничное углеродное регулирование"', χρόνος αναζήτησης: 0,64δλ Περιορισμός αποτελεσμάτων
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Academic Journal

    Πηγή: Law Enforcement Review; Том 7, № 4 (2023); 55-65 ; Правоприменение; Том 7, № 4 (2023); 55-65 ; 2658-4050 ; 2542-1514

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/850/935; https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/850/936; Harris P., de Cogan D. (eds.). Studies in the History of Tax Law. Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2019. 528 p. DOI:10.5040/9781509924967.; Richardson B.J., Chanwai K.L. The UK's Climate Change Levy: Is it working?. Journal of Environmental Law, 2003, vol. 15, iss. 1, pp. 39–58. DOI:10.1093/jel/15.1.39.; Pearce D. The political economy of an energy tax: The United Kingdom's Climate Change Levy. Energy Economics, 2006, vol. 28, iss. 2, pp. 149–158. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2005.10.001.; Agnolucci P., Barker T., Ekins P. Hysteresis and Energy Demand: the Announcement Effects and the effects of the UK Climate Change Levy, Tyndall Centre Working Paper 51. June 2004. 16 p.; McEldowney J., Salter D. Environmental taxation in the UK: the climate change levy and policy making. Denning Law Journal, 2015, vol. 28, spec. iss., pp. 37–65.; Ekins P., Etheridge B. The environmental and economic impacts of the UK climate change agreements. Energy Policy, 2006, vol. 34, iss. 15, pp. 2071–2086. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.01.008.; Barker T., Ekins P., Foxon T. Macroeconomic effects of efficiency policies for energy-intensive industries: The case of the UK Climate Change Agreements, 2000-2010. Energy Economics, 2007, vol. 29, pp. 760–778.; Martin R., De Preux L.B., Wagner U.J. The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing: Evidence from microdata. Journal of Public Economics, 2014, vol. 117, pp. 1–14. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.016.; Martin R., Muûls M., De Preux L.B., Wagner U.J. Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU emissions trading scheme. American Economic Review, 2014, vol. 104, iss. 8, pp. 2482–2508.; Adetutu M.O., Stathopoulou E. Information asymmetry in voluntary environmental agreements: theory and evidence from UK climate change agreements. Oxford Economic Papers, 2020, vol. 73, iss. 2, pp. 644–670. DOI:10.1093/oep/gpaa018.; Koelemeijer R., Van Hout M., Daniëls B. Analyse tarief CO2-heffing industrie [Analysis of the CO2 tax rate of the industry]. The Hague, Planning Office for the Living Environment Publ., June 2022. 42 p. (In Dutch).; Sleven K. What can we learn from the Dutch national carbon tax?. Carbon Market Watch, December 21, 2020, available at: https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2020/12/21/what-can-we-learn-from-the-dutch-national-carbon-tax/.; Anker P. A pioneer country? A history of Norwegian climate politics. Climatic Change, 2018, vol. 151, pp. 29–41. DOI:10.1007/s10584-016-1653-x.; Banet C. Effectiveness in Climate Regulation: Simultaneous Application of a Carbon Tax and an Emissions Trading Scheme to the Offshore Petroleum Sector in Norway. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 2017, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25–38.; Zahar A. The Polluter Pays Principle and its Ascendancy in Climate Change Law. National Taipei University Law Review, 2020, vol. 114, pp. 129–180.; Bureau D., Henriet F., Schubert K. A proposal for the climate: Taxing carbon not people. Notes du conseil d’analyse économique, 2019, vol. 50, iss. 2, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.3917/ncae.050.0001.; Guillou A., Perrier Q. Climat et fiscalité: trois scénarios pour sortir de l’impasse [Climate and taxation: three scenarios to break the deadlock]. Paris, I4CE - Institute for Climate Economics Publ., February 2019. 17 p. (In France).; Rogissart L., Postic S., Grimault J. La composante carbone en France: fonctionnement, revenus et exonera-tions [The carbon component in France: functioning, income and exemptions], Point climat No. 56. Paris, I4CE - Institute for Climate Economics Publ., October 2018. 7 p. (In France).; Anne-Braun J., Guesdon T. Le consentement à la fiscalité environnementale [The consent to environmental taxation], Special report No. 1. Council for Compulsory Levies Publ., February 2022. 107 p. (In France).; Sterner T. The carbon tax in Sweden, in: Henry C., Rockström J., Stern N. (eds.). Standing up for a Sustain-able World, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020, pp. 59–67. DOI:10.4337/9781800371781.; Scharin H., Wallström J. The Swedish CO2 tax – an overview, Rapport 2018:3. Anthesis Enveco AB Publ., 2018. 34 p.; OECD. Taxing Energy Use 2019: Using Taxes for Climate Action. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2019. 105 p. DOI:10.1787/058ca239-en.; Anderson K., Broderick J.F., Stoddard I. A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways. Climate Policy, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 10, pp. 1290–1304. DOI:10.1080/14693062.2020.1728209.; Shmelev S.E., Speck S.U. Green fiscal reform in Sweden: econometric assessment of the carbon and ener-gy taxation scheme. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, vol. 90, pp. 969–981. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.032.; Andersson J.J. Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–30. DOI:10.1257/pol.20170144.; Eskander S.M.S.U., Fankhauser S. Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation. Nature Climate Change, 2020, vol. 10, pp. 750–756. DOI:10.1038/s41558-020-0831-z.; Mildenberger M., Lachapelle E., Harrison K., Stadelmann-Steffen I. Limited impacts of carbon tax rebate programmes on public support for carbon pricing. Nature Climate Change, 2022, vol. 12, pp. 141–147. DOI:10.1038/s41558-021-01268-3.; Hintermann B., Zarkovic M. Carbon Pricing in Switzerland: A Fusion of Taxes, Command-and-Control, and Permit Markets. ifo DICE Report, 2020, vol. 18, iss. 1, pp. 35–41.; Fiedler A., Rihs T. Carbon taxation: Comparing France and Switzerland. Der öffentliche Sektor, 2020, vol. 46, iss. 2, pp. 59–65.; https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/850

  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11