Showing 1 - 2 results of 2 for search '"структурные компоненты производственной инфраструктуры"', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    Contributors: The article was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation as part of the Priority 2030 program № 075-15-2021-1323, Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке Министерства науки и высшего образования Российской Федерации, программа «Приоритет-2030» № 075-15-2021-1323

    Source: MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research); Том 13, № 4 (2022); 720-736 ; МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие); Том 13, № 4 (2022); 720-736 ; 2411-796X ; 2079-4665 ; 10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.4

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/1377/972; Stewart J. The UK National Infrastructure Plan 2010 // European Investment Bank. Luxembourg: EIB Papers, 2010. Vol. 15. Iss. 2. P. 28–32. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/45372 (дата обращения: 05.09.2022); Aschauer D.A. Is public expenditure productive? // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1989. Vol. 23. Iss. 2. P. 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0; Javid M. Public and private infrastructure investment and economic growth in Pakistan: an aggregate and disaggregate analysis // Sustainability. 2019. Vol. 11. Iss. 12. 3359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123359; Nijkamp P. Infrastructure and regional development: a multidimensional policy analysis // Empirical Economics. 1986. Vol. 11. P. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01978142; Meng J., Zhu Y., Han Y. Can ‘new’ infrastructure become an engine of growth for the Chinese economy? // Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies. 2022. Vol. 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2022.2036571; Khanna R., Sharma Ch. Does infrastructure stimulate total factor productivity? A dynamic heterogeneous panel analysis for Indian manufacturing industries // The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. 2021. Vol. 79. P. 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.08.003; Hoeft M., Pieper M., Eriksson K., Bargstädt H.-J. Toward life cycle sustainability in infrastructure: The role of automation and robotics in PPP projects // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 13. Iss. 7. 3779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073779; Aboelmaged M. The drivers of sustainable manufacturing practices in Egyptian SMEs and their impact on competitive capabilities: A PLS-SEM model // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 175. P. 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.053; Depietro R., Wiarda E., Fleischer M. The context for change: Organization, technology and environment // The Processes of Technological Innovation. 1990. Vol. 199. P. 151–175.; Munyasya B.M., Chileshe N. Towards sustainable infrastructure development: Drivers, barriers, strategies, and coping mechanisms // Sustainability. 2018. Vol. 10. Iss. 12. 4341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124341; Amović G., Maksimović R., Bunčić S. Critical success factors for sustainable public-private partnership (PPP) in transition conditions: An empirical study in Bosnia and Herzegovina // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. Iss. 17. 7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177121; Babatunde S.O., Ekundayo D., Udeaja C., Abubakar U.O. Stakeholder perceptions of drivers for, and barriers to, the incorporation of sustainability in PPP infrastructure projects in Nigeria // Open House International. 2020. Vol. 45. Iss. 4. P. 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-05-2020-0037; Делмон Дж. Государственно-частное партнерство в инфраструктуре: практическое руководство для органов государственной власти. Красноармейск: 2010. 154 с. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01009393101 (дата обращения 05.06.2022).; Lucas R.E. On the mechanics of economic development // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988. Vol. 22. Iss. 1. P. 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7; Romer P.M. Increasing returns and long-run growth // Journal of Political Economy. 1986. Vol. 94. Iss. 5. P. 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420; Bloom N., Jones C.I., Van Reenen J., Webb M. Are ideas getting harder to find? // American Economic Review. 2020. Vol. 110. Iss. 4. P. 1104–1144. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180338; Jones C.I. R&D-based models of economic growth // Journal of Political Economy. 1995. Vol. 103. Iss 4. P. 759–784. https://doi.org/10.1086/262002; Romer P.M. Endogenous technological change // Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98. Iss. 5.2. P. 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725; Аванесова Р.Р., Баснукаев И.Ш. Особенности создания и развития производственной инфраструктуры регионального промышленного комплекса // Естественно-гуманитарные исследования. 2020. № 29(3). С. 20–23. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/jrgdwi. https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-4788-2020-10222; Кириенко О.Э. Особенности формирования и развития инфраструктуры региона // Сборник научных работ серии «Государственное управление». 2021. № 21. С. 40–46. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/koholy. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5026055; Мусаева З.С., Ялмаев Р.А. Промышленная инфраструктура как необходимое условие роста российской экономики // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2021. № 4(129). С. 243–246. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/ywzxna. https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2021.129.4.045; Трофимов Е.А., Трофимова Т.И. Экономико-теоретические аспекты структуры современной экономики // Baikal Research Journal. 2021. Т. 12. № 2. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/isoxzs. https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(2).2; Михайлов Ю.И., Семенов В.П., Михайлова Н.В. Оценка эффективности функционирования производственной инфраструктуры предприятий горнодобывающей промышленности // Экономический вектор. 2021. № 2(25). С. 39–50. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/hlactj. https://doi.org/10.36807/2411-7269-2021-2-25-39-50; Аламшоев А.К. Роль производственной инфраструктуры в развитии регионов // Актуальные вопросы современной экономики. 2020. № 6. С. 557–560. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dksvhx. https://doi.org/10.34755/IROK.2020.53.75.104; Wu J., Zhuo S.H., Wu Z.F. National innovation system, social entrepreneurship, and rural economic growth in China // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. Vol. 121. P. 238–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.014; Suciu M.C., Năsulea D.F. Intellectual capital and creative economy as key drivers for competitiveness towards a smart and sustainable development: challenges and opportunities for cultural and creative communities // In: F. Matos, V. Vairinhos, P.M. Selig, et al. (Eds.). Intellectual Capital Management as a Driver of Sustainability. Cham: Springer, 2019. Р. 67–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79051-0_5; Nitkiewicz T., Pachura P., Reid N. An appraisal of regional intellectual capital performance using data envelopment analysis // Applied Geography. 2014. Vol. 53. P. 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.011; Drucker P.F. Post-capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993. 198 p. URL: http://pinguet.free.fr/drucker93.pdf (дата обращения 05.06.2022).; Анализ тенденций социально-экономического развития Республики Крым: монография / под ред. д.э.н., доцента Ю.П. Майданевич; ФГАОУ ВО КФУ им. В.И. Вернадского. Симферополь: ПОЛИПРИНТ, 2019. 362 с. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vwknoe; Liu Y., Li L., Zheng F.T. Regional synergy and economic growth: evidence from total effect and regional effect in China // International Regional Science Review. 2019. Vol. 42. Iss. 5-6. P. 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017619838317

  2. 2