-
1Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: K. S. Skrupskiy, K. B. Kolontarev, A. V. Govorov, V. V. Dyakov, A. M. Lukin, B. I. Dzhumabaev, D. Yu. Pushkar, К. С. Скрупский, К. Б. Колонтарев, А. В. Говоров, В. В. Дьяков, А. М. Лукин, Б. И. Джумабаев, Д. Ю. Пушкарь
Πηγή: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 4 (2024); 82-90 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 4 (2024); 82-90 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-4
Θεματικοί όροι: Лимфоблок, robot-assisted prostatectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, Lymphoblock, робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия, тазовая лимфаденэктомия
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/923/591; Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. DOI:10.3322/caac.21660; Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243-262. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042; Рамазанов К.К., Колонтарев К.Б., Генс Г.П., Говоров А.В., Васильев А.О., Садченко А.В., Алавердян А.И., Строганов Р.В., Скрупский К.С., Ким Ю.А., Ширяев А.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Долгосрочные онкологические и функциональные результаты робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Онкоурология. 2021;17(3):121-128. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-3-121-128; Fujimoto N, Shiota M, Tomisaki I, Minato A, Yahara K. Reconsideration on Clinical Benefit of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Urol Int. 2019;103(2):125-136. DOI:10.1159/000497280; Колонтарев К. Б., Пушкарь Д. Ю., Ахвледиани Н.Д., Велиев Е.И., Говоров А.В., Дружинина Н.К., Дьяков, В.В., Зингеренко М.Б., Зырянов А.В., Ковылина М.В., Медведев В.Л., Мосоян М.С., Павлов В.Н., Серёгин А.А., Шептунов С.А. Робот-ассистированная урология: национальное руководство. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2023. DOI:10.33029/9704-7511-9-ROB-2023-1-464; Abdollah F, Cozzarini C, Suardi N, Gallina A, Capitanio U, Bianchi M, Tutolo M, Salonia A, La Macchia M, Di Muzio N, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Indications for pelvic nodal treatment in prostate cancer should change. Validation of the Roach formula in a large extended nodal dissection series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(2):624-629. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.2014; Dell’Oglio P, Abdollah F, Suardi N, Gallina A, Cucchiara V, Vizziello D, Zaffuto E, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Shariat S, Montorsi F, Briganti A. External validation of the European association of urology recommendations for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014;28(4):416-423. DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0571; Hinev AI, Anakievski D, Kolev NH, Hadjiev VI. Validation of nomograms predicting lymph node involvement in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Urol Int. 2014;92(3):300-305. DOI:10.1159/000354323; Gandaglia G, Martini A, Ploussard G, Fossati N, Stabile A, De Visschere P, Borgmann H, Heidegger I, Steinkohl F, Kretschmer A, Marra G, Mathieu R, Surcel C, Tilki D, Tsaur I, Valerio M, Van den Bergh R, Ost P, Gontero P, Montorsi F, Briganti A; EAU-YAU Prostate Cancer Working Group. External Validation of the 2019 Briganti Nomogram for the Identification of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Should Be Considered for an Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. Eur Urol. 2020;78(2):138-142. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.023; Cacciamani GE, Maas M, Nassiri N, Ortega D, Gill K, Dell’Oglio P, Thalmann GN, Heidenreich A, Eastham JA, Evans CP, Karnes RJ, De Castro Abreu AL, Briganti A, Artibani W, Gill I, Montorsi F. Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(2):134-149. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001; Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Da Pozzo LF, Roscigno M, Zanni G, Valiquette L, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):1006-1013. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.015; Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Vickers AJ, Parwani AV, Reuter VE, Fine SW, Eastham JA, Wiklund P, Han M, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, Nyberg T, Klein EA. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):428-435. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046; Mottrie A, Van Migem P, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Fonteyne E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):746-750. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.029; Stolzenburg JU, Wasserscheid J, Rabenalt R, Do M, Schwalenberg T, McNeill A, Constantinides C, Kallidonis P, Ganzer R, Liatsikos E. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol. 2008;26(6):581-586. DOI:10.1007/s00345-008-0327-3; Lebeis C, Canes D, Sorcini A, Moinzadeh A. Novel Technique Prevents Lymphoceles After Transperitoneal Robotic-assisted Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Peritoneal Flap Interposition. Urology. 2015;85(6):1505-1509. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.034; Lee M, Lee Z, Eun DD. Utilization of a Peritoneal Interposition Flap to Prevent Symptomatic Lymphoceles After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Endourol. 2020;34(8):821-827. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0073; Stolzenburg JU, Arthanareeswaran VKA, Dietel A, Franz T, Liatsikos E, Kyriazis I, Ganzer R, Yaney K, Do HM. Four-point Peritoneal Flap Fixation in Preventing Lymphocele Formation Following Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(5):443-448. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.004; Dal Moro F, Zattoni F. P.L.E.A.T.-Preventing Lymphocele Ensuring Absorption Transperitoneally: A Robotic Technique. Urology. 2017;110:244-247. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.031; Bründl J, Lenart S, Stojanoski G, Gilfrich C, Rosenhammer B, Stolzlechner M, Ponholzer A, Dreissig C, Weikert S, Burger M, May M. Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(14):243-250. DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0243; Student V Jr, Tudos Z, Studentova Z, Cesak O, Studentova H, Repa V, Purova D, Student V. Effect of Peritoneal Fixation (PerFix) on Lymphocele Formation in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Prospective Trial. Eur Urol. 2023;83(2):154-162. Erratum in: Eur Urol. 2024;85(3):e95. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.027; Gloger S, Ubrig B, Boy A, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Siemer S, Arndt M, Stolzenburg JU, Franz T, Oelke M, Witt JH. Bilateral Peritoneal Flaps Reduce Incidence and Complications of Lymphoceles after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection-Results of the Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial ProLy. J Urol. 2022;208(2):333-340. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000002693; Котов С.В., Простомолотов А.О., Неменов А.А. Факторы риска развития лимфогенных осложнений после радикальной простатэктомии с тазовой лимфаденэктомией. Урология. 2021;(3):114-121. DOI:10.18565/urology.2021.3.114-121.; Grande P, Di Pierro GB, Mordasini L, Ferrari M, Würnschimmel C, Danuser H, Mattei A. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Titanium Clips to Bipolar Coagulation in Sealing Lymphatic Vessels During Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017;71(2):155-158. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.006; Abaza R, Henderson SJ, Martinez O. Robotic Vessel Sealer Device for Lymphocele Prevention After Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial. J Laparoendosc ADV Surg Tech A. 2022;32(7):721-726. DOI:10.1089/lap.2021.0531; Basourakos SP, Zhu A, Lewicki PJ, Ramaswamy A, Cheng E, Dudley V, Yu M, Karir B, Hung AJ, Khani F, Hu JC. Clipless Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Impact on Outcomes. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1176-1185. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.010; Waldert M, Remzi M, Klatte T, Klingler HC. FloSeal reduces the incidence of lymphoceles after lymphadenectomies in laparoscopic and robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25(6):969-973. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0635; Simonato A, Varca V, Esposito M, Venzano F, Carmignani G. The use of a surgical patch in the prevention of lymphoceles after extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a randomized prospective pilot study. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2285-2290. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.033; Gilbert DR, Angell J, Abaza R. Evaluation of Absorbable Hemostatic Powder for Prevention of Lymphoceles Following Robotic Prostatectomy With Lymphadenectomy. Urology. 2016;98:75-80. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.071; Garayev A, Aytaç Ö, Tavukcu HH, Atug F. Effect of Autologous Fibrin Glue on Lymphatic Drainage and Lymphocele Formation in Extended Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2019;33(9):761-766. DOI:10.1089/end.2018.0853; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/923
-
2Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: K. S. Skrupskiy, K. B. Kolontarev, A. V. Govorov, V. V. Dyakov, A. L. Sarukhanian, I. O. Gritskov, D. Yu. Pushkar, К. С. Скрупский, К. Б. Колонтарев, А. В. Говоров, Д. В. Дьяков, А. Л. Саруханян, И. О. Грицков, Д. Ю. Пушкарь
Πηγή: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 3 (2024); 88-96 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 3 (2024); 88-96 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-3
Θεματικοί όροι: лимфоцеле, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, lymphocele, робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия, тазовая лимфаденэктомия
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/886/566; Рамазанов К.К., Колонтарев К.Б., Тер-Ованесов М.Д., Говоров А.В., Васильев А.О., Казаков А.С., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Сравнительный анализ 10-летних функциональных результатов робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии и радикальной позадилонной простатэктомии. Опыт клиники урологии Московского государственного медико-стоматологического университета им. А.И. Евдокимова. Онкоурология. 2023;19(2):56-65. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-2-56-65; Рамазанов К.К., Колонтарев К.Б., Генс Г.П., Говоров А.В., Васильев А.О., Садченко А.В., Алавердян А.И., Строганов Р.В., Скрупский К.С., Ким Ю.А., Ширяев А.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Долгосрочные онкологические и функциональные результаты робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Онкоурология. 2021;17(3):121-128. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-3-121-128; Рябов М.А., Котов С.В. Сравнительная оценка кривой обучения радикальной простатэктомии произведённой позадилонной, лапароскопической, промежностной и робот-ассистированной техниками. Вестник урологии. 2022;10(2):63-71. DOI:10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-2-63-71; Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243-262. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042; Cacciamani GE, Maas M, Nassiri N, Ortega D, Gill K, Dell'Oglio P, Thalmann GN, Heidenreich A, Eastham JA, Evans CP, Karnes RJ, De Castro Abreu AL, Briganti A, Artibani W, Gill I, Montorsi F. Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(2):134-149. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001; Fujimoto N, Shiota M, Tomisaki I, Minato A, Yahara K. Reconsideration on Clinical Benefit of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Urol Int. 2019;103(2):125-136. DOI:10.1159/000497280; Fossati N, Willemse PM, Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Yuan CY, Briers E, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Cornford P, De Santis M, MacPepple E, Henry AM, Mason MD, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Lam TB, Mottet N, Joniau S. The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2017;72(1):84-109. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003; Sarkar RR, Bryant AK, Parsons JK, Ryan ST, Karim Kader A, Kane CJ, McKay RR, Sandhu A, Murphy JD, Rose BS. Association between Radical Prostatectomy and Survival in Men with Clinically Node-positive Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(5):584-588. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2018.09.015; Ploussard G, Briganti A, de la Taille A, Haese A, Heidenreich A, Menon M, Sulser T, Tewari AK, Eastham JA. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2014;65(1):7-16. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057; Колонтарев К.Б., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Робот-ассистированная урология: национальное руководство. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2023. ISBN: 978-5-9704-7511-9; Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Da Pozzo LF, Roscigno M, Zanni G, Valiquette L, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):1006-1013. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.015; Grande P, Di Pierro GB, Mordasini L, Ferrari M, Würnschimmel C, Danuser H, Mattei A. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Titanium Clips to Bipolar Coagulation in Sealing Lymphatic Vessels During Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017;71(2):155-158. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.006; Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Vickers AJ, Parwani AV, Reuter VE, Fine SW, Eastham JA, Wiklund P, Han M, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, Nyberg T, Klein EA. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):428-435. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046; Mottrie A, Van Migem P, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Fonteyne E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol. 2007;52(3):746-750. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.029; Lestingi JFP, Guglielmetti GB, Trinh QD, Coelho RF, Pontes J Jr, Bastos DA, Cordeiro MD, Sarkis AS, Faraj SF, Mitre AI, Srougi M, Nahas WC. Extended Versus Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Early Oncological Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol. 2021;79(5):595-604. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.040; Touijer KA, Sjoberg DD, Benfante N, Laudone VP, Ehdaie B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Vickers A. Limited versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(4):532-539. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.006; Stolzenburg JU, Wasserscheid J, Rabenalt R, Do M, Schwalenberg T, McNeill A, Constantinides C, Kallidonis P, Ganzer R, Liatsikos E. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol. 2008;26(6):581-586. DOI:10.1007/s00345-008-0327-3; Lebeis C, Canes D, Sorcini A, Moinzadeh A. Novel Technique Prevents Lymphoceles After Transperitoneal Robotic-assisted Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Peritoneal Flap Interposition. Urology. 2015;85(6):1505-1509. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.034; Lee M, Lee Z, Eun DD. Utilization of a Peritoneal Interposition Flap to Prevent Symptomatic Lymphoceles After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Endourol. 2020;34(8):821-827. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0073; Bründl J, Lenart S, Stojanoski G, Gilfrich C, Rosenhammer B, Stolzlechner M, Ponholzer A, Dreissig C, Weikert S, Burger M, May M. Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(14):243-250. DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0243; Stolzenburg JU, Arthanareeswaran VKA, Dietel A, Franz T, Liatsikos E, Kyriazis I, Ganzer R, Yaney K, Do HM. Four-point Peritoneal Flap Fixation in Preventing Lymphocele Formation Following Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(5):443-448. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.004; Dal Moro F, Zattoni F. P.L.E.A.T.-Preventing Lymphocele Ensuring Absorption Transperitoneally: A Robotic Technique. Urology. 2017;110:244-247. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.031; Boğa MS, Sönmez MG, Karamık K, Yılmaz K, Savaş M, Ateş M. The effect of peritoneal re-approximation on lymphocele formation in transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(6):460-467. DOI:10.5152/tud.2020.20255; Student V Jr, Tudos Z, Studentova Z, Cesak O, Studentova H, Repa V, Purova D, Student V. Effect of Peritoneal Fixation (PerFix) on Lymphocele Formation in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Prospective Trial. Eur Urol. 2023;83(2):154-162. Erratum in: Eur Urol. 2024;85(3):e95. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.07.027; Gloger S, Ubrig B, Boy A, Leyh-Bannurah SR, Siemer S, Arndt M, Stolzenburg JU, Franz T, Oelke M, Witt JH. Bilateral Peritoneal Flaps Reduce Incidence and Complications of Lymphoceles after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection-Results of the Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial ProLy. J Urol. 2022;208(2):333-340. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000002693; Котов С.В., Простомолотов А.О., Неменов А.А. Факторы риска развития лимфогенных осложнений после радикальной простатэктомии с тазовой лимфаденэктомией. Урология. 2021;(3):114-121. DOI:10.18565/urology.2021.3.114-121; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/886
-
3Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: K. K. Ramazanov, K. B. Kolontarev, M. D. Ter-Ovanesov, A. V. Govorov, A. O. Vasilyev, A. S. Kazakov, D. Yu. Pushkar, К. К. Рамазанов, К. Б. Колонтарев, М. Д. Тер-Ованесов, А. В. Говоров, А. О. Васильев, А. С. Казаков, Д. Ю. Пушкарь
Πηγή: Cancer Urology; Том 19, № 2 (2023); 56-65 ; Онкоурология; Том 19, № 2 (2023); 56-65 ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776
Θεματικοί όροι: удержание мочи, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, radical retropubic prostatectomy, erectile function, urinary continence, робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия, радикальная позадилонная простатэктомия, эректильная функция
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1628/1458; Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(3):209–49. DOI:10.3322/caac.21660; Bhat K.R.S., Moschovas M.C., Sandri M. et al. Stratification of potency outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy based on age, preoperative potency, and nerve sparing. J Endourol 2021;35:1631–8. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0141; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Колонтарев К.Б. Робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия. Функциональный результат. Часть I. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова 2019;(3):111–20. DOI:10.17116/hirurgia2019031111; Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Garmo H. et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;370(10):932–42. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1311593.; Mottet N., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E. et al. EAU-EANMESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2021;79(2):243–62. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042; Abbou C.C., Hoznek A., Salomon L. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165(6 Pt 1): 1964–6. DOI:10.1097/00005392-200106000-00027; Мосоян М.С., Аль-Шукри С.Х., Ильин Д.М. Пятилетний опыт лечения рака предстательной железы на роботе “Da Vinci”. Нефрология 2016;20(4):103–6.; Рамазанов К.К., Колонтарев К.Б., Генс Г.П. и др. Долгосрочные онкологические и функциональные результаты робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Онкоурология 2021;17(3):121–8. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-3-121-128; Ramsay C., Pickard R., Robertson C. et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and costeffectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technol Assess 2012;16(41):1–313. DOI:10.3310/hta16410; Health Quality Ontario. Robotic surgical system for radical prostatectomy: a health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess.Ser 2017;17(11):1–172.; Ilic D., Evans S.M., Allan C.A. et al. Laparoscopic and robotassisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int 2018;121(6):845–53. DOI:10.1111/bju.14062; Nyberg M., Hugosson J., Wiklund P. et al. Functional and oncologic outcomes between open and robotic radical prostatectomy at 24-month follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2018;1(5): 353–60. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.012; Baunacke M., Schmidt M.L., Thomas C. et al. Long-term functional outcomes after robotic vs. retropubic radical prostatectomy in routine care: a 6-year follow-up of a large German health services research study. World J Urol 2020;38(7):1701–9. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02956-8; Herlemann A., Cowan J.E., Carroll P.R. et al. Community-based outcomes of open versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2018;73(2):215–23. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.027; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Говоров А.В., Колонтарев К.Б. Робот-ассистированная хирургия. Вестник Российской академии наук 2019;89(5):466–9. DOI:10.31857/S0869-5873895466-469; Отчет официального представителя компании Intuitive Surgical в России ООО «М.П.А. медицинские партнеры». Доступно по: https://robot-davinci.ru/materialy (дата обращения 30.09.2022).; Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment. NICE Guidelines (CG58). 2008. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg58.; D’Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B. et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998;280(11):969–74. DOI:10.1001/jama.280.11.969; Partin A.W., Yoo J., Carter H.B. et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol 1993;150(1):110–4. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35410-1; Partin A.W., Kattan M.W., Subong E.N. et al. Combination of prostatespecific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multiinstitutional update. JAMA 1997;277(18):1445–51.; Rosen M.A., Goldstone L., Lapin S. et al. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992;148(2 Pt 1):331–7. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36587-4; Herschorn S., Bruschini H., Comiter C. et al. Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in men. Materials of the 4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publications, 2009. Pp. 37–111.; Tholomier C., Couture F., Ajib K. et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of a large canadian robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy database with 10 years of surgical experience. Can J Urol 2019;26(4):9843–51.; Logigan H., Andras I., Pop C.D. et al. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy – the 5-year Romanian experience. J BUON 2015;20(4):1068–73.; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1628
-
4Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: I. I. Lutfarakhmanov, I. R. Galeev, A. D. Lifanova, Р. I. Mironov, И. И. Лутфарахманов, И. Р. Галеев, А. Д. Лифанова, П. И. Миронов
Πηγή: Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION; Том 18, № 1 (2021); 75-83 ; Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии; Том 18, № 1 (2021); 75-83 ; 2541-8653 ; 2078-5658
Θεματικοί όροι: общая анестезия, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Trendelenburg position, intraocular pressure, general anesthesia, робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия, положение Тренделенбурга, внутриглазное давление
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.vair-journal.com/jour/article/view/500/470; Лутфарахманов И. И., Лазарев С. Т., Здорик Н. А. Оценка частоты диспепсических расстройств при тотальной внутривенной анестезии прoпoфoлoм после рoбoт-aссистирoвaннoй радикальной простатэктомии // Креативная хирургия и онкология. – 2018. – Т. 8, № 2. – С. 130–135.; Awad H., Santilli S., Ohr M. et al. The effects of steep Trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy // Anesth. Analg. – 2009. – Vol. 109, № 2. – P. 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a9098f.; Blecha S., Harth M., Schlachetzki F. et al. Changes in intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep 45° Trendelenburg position // BMC Anesthesiol. – 2017. – Vol. 17, № 1. – Р. 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0333-3.; Chalmers D., Cusano A., Haddock P. et al. Are preexisting retinal and central nervous system-related comorbidities risk factors for complications following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? // Int. Braz. J. Urol. – 2015. – Vol. 41, № 4. – P. 661–668. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0464.; Danic M. J., Chow M., Alexander G. et al. Anesthesia considerations for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a review of 1,500 cases // J. Robot. Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 1, № 2. – P. 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0024-z.; Demasi C. L., Porpiglia F., Tempia A. et al. Ocular blood flow in steep Trendelenburg positioning during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy // Eur. J. Ophthal. – 2017. – Vol. – 28, № 3. – P. 333–338. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5001061.; Gainsburg D. M. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy // Minerva Anestesiol. – 2012. – Vol. 78, № 5. – P. 596–604.; Gkegkes I., Karydis A., Tyritzis S. et al. Ocular complications in robotic surgery // Int. J. Med. Robot. – 2014. – Vol. 11, № 3. – P. 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1632.; Goepfert C. E., Ifune C., Tempelhoff R. Ischemic optic neuropathy: Are we any further? // Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. – 2010. – Vol. 23, № 5. – P. 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833e15d0.; Hewer C. L. The physiology and complications of the Trendelenburg position // Can. Med. Assoc. J. – 1956. – Vol. 74, № 4. – P. 285–288. PMC1824068.; Hirooka K., Ukegawa K., Nitta E. et al. The effect of steep Trendelenburg positioning on retinal structure and function during robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures // J. Ophthalmol. – 2018. – Vol. 2018. – 1027397. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1027397.; Hoshikawa Y., Tsutsumi N., Ohkoshi K. et al. The effect of steep Trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure and visual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy // Br. J. Ophthalmol. – 2014. – Vol. 98, № 3. – P. 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303536.; Joo J., Koh H., Lee K. et al. Effects of systemic administration of dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure during laparoscopic surgery in a steep Trendelenburg position: prospective, randomized, double-blinded study // J. Korean. Med. Sci. – 2016. – Vol. 31, № 6. – P. 989–996. http://doi.org/10.3346/ jkms.2016.31.6.989.; Kim N. Y., Jang W. S., Choi Y. D. et al. Comparison of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with volatile and total intravenous anesthesia // Int. J. Med. Sci. – 2020. – Vol. 17, № 4. – P. 449–456. http://doi.org/ 10.7150/ijms.40958.; Kim N. Y., Yoo Y. C., Park H. J. et al. The effect of dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure increase in patients during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the steep Trendelenburg position // J. Endourol. – 2015. – Vol. 29, № 3. – P. 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0381.; Kitamura S., Takechi K., Nishihara T. et al. Effect of dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy under total intravenous anesthesia: A randomized, double blinded placebo controlled clinical trial // J. Clin. Anesth. – 2018. – Vol. 49. – P. 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.006.; Kitamura S., Takechi K., Yasuhira A. et al. Changes in intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy // J. Japan Soc. Clin. Anesth. – 2017. – Vol. 37, № 7. – P. 743–747. https://doi.org/10.2199/jjsca.37.743.; Lee L. A., Roth S., Posner K. L. et al. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Postoperative Visual Loss Registry: analysis of 93 spine cases with postoperative visual loss // Anesthesiology. – 2006. – Vol. 105, № 4. – P. 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200610000-00007.; Lee L. A., Stoelting R. K. APSF-sponsored conference on perioperative visual loss develops consensus conclusions // APSF Newsl. – 2013. – № 27. – P. 52–53.; Lee L. A. Visual loss, venous congestion and robotic prostatectomies // ASA Newsl. – 2011. – № 75. – P. 26–27.; Mathew D. J., Greene R. A., Mahsood Y. J. et al. Preoperative brimonidine tartrate 0.2% does not prevent an intraocular pressure rise during prostatectomy in steep Trendelenburg position // J. Glaucoma. – 2018. – Vol. 27, № 11. – P. 965–970. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001047.; Mizrahi H., Hugkulstone C. E., Vyakarnam P. et al. Bilateral ischaemic optic neuropathy following laparoscopic proctocolectomy: a case report // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. – 2011. – Vol. 93, № 5. – Р. e53–e54. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870811X582828.; Mizumoto K., Gosho M., Iwaki M. et al. Ocular parameters before and after steep Trendelenburg positioning for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy // Clin. Ophthalmol. – 2017. – Vol. 11. – P. 1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S139874.; Molloy B., Cong X. Perioperative dorzolamide-timolol intervention for rising intraocular pressure during steep Trendelenburg positioned surgery // AANA J. – 2014. – Vol. 82, № 3. – P. 203–211. PMID: 25109158.; Molloy B. L. Implications for postoperative visual loss: steep Trendelenburg position and effects on intraocular pressure // AANA J. – 2011. – Vol. 79, № 2. – P. 115–121. PMID: 21560974.; Mondzelewski T. J., Schmitz J. W., Christman M. S. et al. Intraocular pressure during robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures utilizing steep trendelenburg positioning // J. Glaucoma. – 2015. – Vol. 24, № 6. – P. 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000302.; Nishikawa M., Watanabe H., Kurahashi T. Effects of 25- and 30-degree Trendelenburg positions on intraocular pressure changes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy // Prostate Int. – 2017. – Vol. 5, № 4. – P. 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2017.03.008.; Ozcan A. A., Ulas B. Ischemic optic neuropathy in robotic‐assisted gynaecologic surgery: A case report // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. – 2019. – Vol. 45, № 3. – P. 748–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13877.; Ozcan M. F., Akbulut Z., Gurdal C. et al. Does steep Trendelenburg positioning effect the ocular hemodynamics and intraocular pressure in patients undergoing robotic cystectomy and robotic prostatectomy? // Int. Urol. Nephrol. – 2017. – Vol. 49, № 1. – P. 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1449-y.; Patel V. R., Palmer K. J., Coughlin G. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases // J. Endourol. – 2008. – Vol. 22, № 10. – P. 2299–2305. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.9711.; Pinkney T. D., King A. J., Walter C. et al. Raised intraocular pressure (IOP) and perioperative visual loss in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a catastrophe waiting to happen? A systematic review of evidence from other surgical specialities // Tech. Coloproctol. – 2012. – Vol. 16, № 5. – P. 331–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0879-5.; Raz O., Boesel T. W., Arianayagam M. et al. The effect of the modified Z Trendelenburg position on intraocular pressure during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized, controlled study // J. Urol. – 2015. – Vol. 193, № 4. – P. 1213–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.094.; Taketani Y., Mayama C., Suzuki N. et al. Transient but significant visual field defects after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in deep Trendelenburg position // PLoS One. – 2015. – Vol. 10, № 4. – e0123361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123361.e0123361.; The Postoperative Visual Loss Study Group. Risk factors associated with ischemic optic neuropathy and spinal fusion surgery // Anesthesiology. – 2012. – Vol. 116, № 1. – P. 15–24. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823d012a.; Tosh P., Krishnankutty S. V., Rajan S. et al. Does restrictive fluid strategy during robotic pelvic surgeries obtund intraoperative rise in intraocular pressure? // Anesth. Essays. Res. – 2018. – Vol. 12, № 1. – P. 155–158. https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_144_17.; Weber E., Colyer M., Lesser R., Subramanian P. Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy after minimally invasive prostatectomy // J. Neuroophthalmol. – 2007. – Vol. 27, № 4. – P. 285–287. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e31815b9f67.; Yonekura H., Hirate H., Sobue K. Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy // J. Clin. Anesth. – 2016. – Vol. 35. – P. 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.014.; Yoo Y. C., Bai S. J., Lee K. Y. et al. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial // Yonsei Med. J. – 2012. – Vol. 53, № 6. – P. 1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2012.53.6.1197.; Yoo Y. C., Kim N. Y., Shin S. et al. The intraocular pressure under deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade during low-pressure robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a randomized trial // PLoS One. – 2015. – Vol. 10, № 8. – e0135412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135412.; Yoo Y. C., Shin S., Choi E. K. et al. Increase in intraocular pressure is less with propofol than with sevoflurane during laparoscopic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position // Can. J. Anaesth. – 2014. – Vol. 61, № 4. – P. 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0112-2.; You A. H., Song Y., Kim D. H. et al. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomized, clinical trial // Medicine (Baltimore). – 2019. – Vol. 98, № 14. – e15051. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015051.
-
5Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: K. K. Ramazanov, K. B. Kolontarev, G. P. Gens, A. V. Govorov, A. O. Vasilyev, А. V. Sadcheko, A. I. Alaverdyan, R. V. Stroganov, K. S. Skrupskiy, Yu. A. Kim, A. А. Shiryaev, D. Yu. Pushkar, К. К. Рамазанов, К. Б. Колонтарев, Г. П. Генс, А. В. Говоров, А. О. Васильев, А. В. Садченко, А. И. Алавердян, Р. В. Строганов, К. С. Скрупский, Ю. А. Ким, А. А. Ширяев, Д. Ю. Пушкарь
Πηγή: Cancer Urology; Том 17, № 3 (2021); 121-128 ; Онкоурология; Том 17, № 3 (2021); 121-128 ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776
Θεματικοί όροι: радикальная простатэктомия, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1437/1313; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/downloadSuppFile/1437/980; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/downloadSuppFile/1437/981; Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Ervik M. et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013.; Алексеев Б.Я. Лечение локализованного и местно-распространенного рака предстательной железы. Дис. . д-ра мед. наук. М., 2006. 259 с.; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Бормотин А.В., Говоров А.В. Алгоритм ранней диагностики рака предстательной железы. РМЖ 2003; 11(8):483.; Li J., Djenaba J.A., Soman A. et al. Recent trends in prostate cancer incidence by age, cancer stage, and grade, the United States, 2001-2007. Prostate Cancer 2012;2012:691380. DOI:10.1155/2012/691380.; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Говоров А.В., Сидоренков А.В. и др. Ранняя диагностика рака предстательной железы. Методические рекомендации № 19. М., 2015. С. 20-37.; Говоров А.В., Васильев А.О., Ширяев А.А. и др. Актуальные методы ранней диагностики рака предстательной железы. Урология 2017;(6):101—6. DOI:10.18565/urology.2017.6.101-106.; Serrano N., Moghanaki D., Asher D. et al. Comparative study of late rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy: with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy 2016;15(4):435—41. DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.002.; Miller K.D., Siegel R.L., Lin C.C. et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66(4):271-89. DOI:10.3322/caac.21349.; Буевич Н.Н., Проценко С.А., Носов А.К. и др. Проблема выбора тактики ведения пациентов с высоким и очень высоким риском рака предстательной железы: обзор литературы. Онкоурология 2019;15(1):117-24. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-1-117-124.; Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy: a new extravesical technique report on 20 cases. Lancet1945;2(6380):693—6. DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(45)91030-0.; Walsh P.C. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998;160(6 Pt 2):2418-24. DOI:10.1097/00005392-199812020-00010.; Алексеев Б.Я. Новые малоинвазивные технологии лечения рака предстательной железы. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология 2011(2—3): 57—60.; Menon M., Tewari A., Peabody J.O. et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31(4):701—17. DOI:10.1016/j.ucl.2004.06.011.; Abbou C.C., Hoznek A., Salomon L. et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 2001;165(6 Pt 1):1964-6. DOI:10.1097/00005392-200106000-00027.; Колонтарев К.Б. Робот-ассистирован-ная радикальная простатэктомия. Дис. . д-ра мед. наук. М., 2015. 306 с.; Mottrie A., Ficarra V. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? Eur Urol 2010;58(4):525—7. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.033.; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Колонтарев К.Б. Робот-ассистированная радикальная простат-эктомия. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2014, С. 173.; Прилепская Е.А., Мальцев Е.Г., Колонтарев К.Б. и др. Сравнительный анализ функциональных и онкологических результатов радикальной простат-эктомии - позадилонной, лапароскопической и робот-ассистированной. Онкоурология 2015;11(4):54-8. DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-4-54-58.; Diaz M., Peabody J.O., Kapoor V. et al. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2014;67(6):1168-76. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025.; Menon M., Bhandari M., Gupta N. et al. Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2010;58:838-46. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.010.; Suardi N., Ficarra V., Willemsen P. et al. Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Urology 2012;79(1):133—8. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.045.; Rajan P., Hagman A., Sooriakumaran P. et al. Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a large European single-centre cohort with median 10-year follow-up. Eur Urol Focus 2018;4(3):351—9. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2016.10.007.; Abdollah F., Dalela D., Sood A. et al. Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis. World J Urol 2016;34(10):1357-66. DOI:10.1007/s00345-016-1781-y.; Lee D., Choi S.K., Park J. et al. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 2015;56(8):572-9. DOI:10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.572.; Bianchi L., Gandaglia G., Fossati N. et al. Oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series with more than 10 years follow up. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2019;71(1):38-46. DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03285-X.; Abdollah F., Sood A., Sammon J.D. et al. Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients. Eur Urol 2015;68(3):497-505. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.020.; Rizk J., Ouzzane A., Flamand V. et al. Long Term biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy for cancer: comparative analysis according to surgical approach and clinicopatholo-gical stage. Prog Urol 2015;25(3):157-68. DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2014.12.004.; Wang L., Wang B., Ai Q. et al. Long-term cancer control outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2017;49(6):995—1005. DOI:10.1007/s11255-017-1552-8.; Hung S.C., Yang C.K., Cheng C.L. et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon. Anticancer Res 2017;37(8):4157-64. DOI:10.21873/anticanres.11803.; Skarecky D., Gordon A., Babaian K.N. et al. Analysis of improved urinary peak flow rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2015;29(10):1152-8. DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0353.; Baunacke M., Schmidt M.L., Thomas C. et al. Long-term functional outcomes after robotic vs. retropubic radical prostatectomy in routine care: a 6-year follow-up of a large German health services research study. World J Urol 2020;38(7):1701-9. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02956-8.; Boeri L., Capogrosso P., Ventimiglia E. et al. Depressive symptoms and low sexual desire after radical prostatectomy: early and long-term outcomes in a real-life setting. J Urol 2018;199(2):474-80. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.08.104.; Alenizi A.M., Zorn K.C., Bienz M. et al. Erectile function recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): long term exhaustive analysis across all preoperative potency categories. Can J Urol 2016;23(5):8451-6.; Deffar N., Koutlidis N., Cormier L. Erectile function and sexuality of partners after radical prostatectomy with robotics versus manual laparoscopy: long-term assessment. Prog Urol 2013;23(1):42-9. DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2012.09.004.; Gordon A., Skarecky D., Babaian K.N. et al. Diminished long-term recovery of peak flow rate (PFR) after robotic prostatectomy in men with baseline PFR; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1437
-
6Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: V. N. Pavlov, M. V. Loginova, A. A. Izmailov, M. F. Urmantsev
Πηγή: Креативная хирургия и онкология, Vol 11, Iss 4, Pp 271-277 (2021)
Θεματικοί όροι: рак простаты, простатэктомия, робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия, роботизированные хирургические операции, факторы риска, биохимический рецидив, простаты специфический, Surgery, RD1-811, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Relation: https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/626; https://doaj.org/toc/2307-0501; https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3093; https://doaj.org/article/82bdb7b5ae3449deaff34bdf4d884685
-
7Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: I. A. Aboyan, D. I. Pakus, S. M. Pakus, S. V. Grachev, K. V. Berezin, И. А. Абоян, Д. И. Пакус, С. М. Пакус, С. В. Грачев, К. В. Березин
Πηγή: Cancer Urology; Том 14, № 3 (2018); 51-57 ; Онкоурология; Том 14, № 3 (2018); 51-57 ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776 ; 10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-3
Θεματικοί όροι: робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия, ICG testing, robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, ICG-диагностика, робот-ассистированная тазовая лимфаденэктомия
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/788/785; Wilt T.J., Brawer M.K., Jones K.M. et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;367(3):203–13. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1113162. PMID: 22808955.; Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Garmo H. et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;370(10):932–42. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1311593. PMID: 24597866.; Yaxley J.W., Coughlin G.D., Chambers S.K. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 2016;388(10049):1057–66. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. PMID: 27474375.; Allan C., Ilic D. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urol Int 2016;96(4):373–8. DOI:10.1159/000435861. PMID: 26201500.; Fossati N., Willemse P.M., Van den Broeck T. et al. The benefits and harms of different extents of lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2017;72(1):84–109. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003. PMID: 28126351.; Harisinghani M.G., Barentsz J., Hahn P.F. et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348(25):2491– 9. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa022749. PMID: 12815134.; Abdollah F., Gandaglia G., Suardi N. et al. More extensive pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with node-positive prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2015;67(2):212–9. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.011. PMID: 24882672.; Hövels A.M., Heesakkers R.A., Adang E.M. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a metaanalysis. Clin Radiol 2008;63(4):387–95. DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.022. PMID: 18325358.; Daneshmand S., Quek M.L., Stein J.P. et al. Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results. J Urol 2004;172(6 Pt 1):2252–5. PMID: 15538242.; Sanda G., Chen R., Crispino T. et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline, 2017.; Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Briers E. et al. EAU–ESTRO–SIOG Prostate Cancer Guidelines, 2017.; Tobis S., Knopf J.K., Silvers C. et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with near infrared fluorescence imaging. J Endourol 2012;26(7):797–802. DOI:10.1089/end.2011.0604. PMID: 22250958.; Manny T.B., Patel M., Hemal A.K. Fluorescence-enhanced robotic radical prostatectomy using real-time lymphangiography and tissue marking with percutaneous injection of unconjugated indocyanine green: the initial clinical experience in 50 patients. Eur Urol 2014;65(6):1162–8. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.017. PMID: 24289911.; Steineck G., Helgesen F., Adolfsson J. et al. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 2002;347(11):790–6. DOI:10.1056/NEJ-Moa021483. PMID: 12226149.; van As N.J., Norman A.R., Thomas K. et al. Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Eur Urol 2008;54(6):1297–305. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.039. PMID: 18342430.; Carter H.B., Kettermann A., Warlick C. et al. Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Urol 2007;178(6):2359–64. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.039. PMID: 17936806.; Seiler R., Studer U.E., Tschan K. et al. Removal of limited nodal disease in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: long-term results confirm a chance for cure. J Urol 2014;191(5):1280–5. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.029. PMID: 24262495.; Briganti A., Chun F.K., Salonia A. et al. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49(6):1019–26. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.043. PMID: 16530933.; Ramírez-Backhaus M., Mira Moreno A., Gómez Ferrer A. et al. Indocyanine green guided pelvic lymph node dissection: an efficient technique to classify the lymph node status of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2016;196(5):1429–35. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.087. PMID: 27235788.; Yee D.S., Katz D.J., Godoy G. et al. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical technique and initial experience. Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1199–204. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.103. PMID: 20163838.; Winter A., Vogt C., Weckermann D., Wawroschek F. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer: different techniques in comparison and dependency on the number of removed lymph nodes. Aktuelle Urol 2011;42(3):179–83. DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1271389.; van der Poel H.G., Grivas N. Towards an individualized approach for predicting postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: the role of nerve preservation and urethral stump length. BJU Int 2018;122(3):354–5. DOI:10.1111/bju.14205. PMID: 30187656.; van der Poel H.G., Buckle T., Brouwer O.R. et al. Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol 2011;60(4):826–33. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.024. PMID: 21458154.; Nguyen D.P., Huber P.M., Metzger T.A. et al. A specific mapping study using fluorescence sentinel lymph node detection in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Eur Urol 2016;70(5):734–7. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.034. PMID: 26856960.; Chennamsetty A., Zhumkhawala A., Tobis S.B. et al. Lymph node fluorescence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with indocyanine green: prospective dosing analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017;15(4):e529–34. DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2016.10.014. PMID: 27939590.; van den Berg N.S., Buckle T., KleinJan G.H. et al. Multispectral fluorescence imaging during robot-assisted laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy: a first step towards a fluorescence-based anatomic roadmap. Eur Urol 2017;72(1):110–7. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.012. PMID: 27345689.; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/788
-
8Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Aboyan, I. A., Pakus, S. M., Grachev, S. V., Berezin, K. V., Pakus, D. I., Chackin, S. V., Абоян, И. А., Грачев, C. B., Пакус, C. M., Березин, К. В., Пакус, Д. И., Шашкин, С. В.
Θεματικοί όροι: EARLY RECOVERY URINARY CONTINENCE, «6 STEPS METHOD», PELVIC FLOOR RECONSTRUCTION, ROBOTASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY, «6-ТИ ШАГОВАЯ» МЕТОДИКА, РАНЕЕ ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИЕ УДЕРЖАНИЯ МОЧИ, ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИЕ ТАЗОВЫХ СТРУКТУР, РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: Уральский медицинский журнал. 2017. Т. 146, № 2.; http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/13637
Διαθεσιμότητα: http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/13637
-
9Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Моисеенко, Т., Говоров, А., Прокопович, М., Пушкарь, Д.
Θεματικοί όροι: РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ, АНАТОМИЯ, РАК ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ, НЕЙРОАНАТОМИЯ ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ
Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html
-
10Academic Journal
Πηγή: Онкоурология.
Θεματικοί όροι: 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ, АНАТОМИЯ, РАК ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ, НЕЙРОАНАТОМИЯ ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ, 3. Good health
Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html
-
11
