-
1Academic Journal
Authors: A. M. Shvedov, K. B. Kolontarev, A. V. Bormotin, V. V. Dyakov, I. O. Gritskov, L. R. Abuladze, T. M. Kochoyan, D. Yu. Pushkar, А. М. Шведов, К. Б. Колонтарев, А. В. Бормотин, В. В. Дьяков, И. О. Грицков, Л. Р. Абуладзе, Т. М. Кочоян, Д. Ю. Пушкарь
Source: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 1 (2024); 98-107 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 1 (2024); 98-107 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-1
Subject Terms: недержание мочи, robot-assisted prostatectomy, incontinence, predictors, urinary incontinence, робот-ассистированная простатэктомия, инконтиненция, предикторы
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/834/538; Gandaglia G, Leni R, Bray F, Fleshner N, Freedland SJ, Kibel A, Stattin P, Van Poppel H, La Vecchia C. Epidemiology and Prevention of Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(6):877-892. DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2021.09.006; Seo HJ, Lee NR, Son SK, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(5):1165-1177. DOI:10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1165; Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415-1424. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1606220; Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;104(7):991-995. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x; Хирургия предстательной железы. Под ред. С.Б. Петрова. СПб., 2004.; Liatsikos EN, Assimakopoulos K, Stolzenburg JU. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2008;80(3):226-230. DOI:10.1159/000127331; Trost L, Elliott DS. Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:287489. DOI:10.1155/2012/287489; Tang K, Jiang K, Chen H, Chen Z, Xu H, Ye Z. Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32237-32257. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.13332; Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Björholt I, Carlsson S, Hugosson J, Marlow T, Stinesen-Kollberg K, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wiklund P, Wilderäng U, Haglind E. Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):816-824. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.038; Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405-417. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045; Шведов А.М., Колонтарев К.Б., Бормотин А.В., Дьяков В.В., Витославский А.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Факторы риска недержания мочи у пациентов, перенесших радикальную робот-ассистированную простатэктомию. Вестник урологии. 2023;11(1):150-158. DOI:10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5; Mungovan SF, Carlsson SV, Gass GC, Graham PL, Sandhu JS, Akin O, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Patel MI. Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18(5):259-281. DOI:10.1038/s41585-021-00445-5; Parry MG, Skolarus TA, Nossiter J, Sujenthiran A, Morris M, Cowling TE, Berry B, Aggarwal A, Payne H, Cathcart P, Clarke NW, van der Meulen J. Urinary incontinence and use of incontinence surgery after radical prostatectomy: a national study using patient-reported outcomes. BJU Int. 2022;130(1):84-91. DOI:10.1111/bju.15663; Novara G, Ficarra V, D'elia C, Secco S, Cioffi A, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028- 1033. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.069; Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, Katz MH, Thong AE, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316-322. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.493; Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1907-1911. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.036; Juszczak K, Ostrowski A, Adamowicz J, Maciukiewicz P, Drewa T. Urinary bladder hypertrophy and overactive bladder determine urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(10):1329-1337. DOI:10.17219/acem/104532; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/834
-
2Academic Journal
Authors: K. M. Nyushko, V. M. Perepukhov, B. Ya. Alekseev, O. I. Apolikhin, A. D. Kaprin, A. V. Sivkov, A. V. Koryakin, V. P. Aleshin, К. М. Нюшко, В. М. Перепухов, Б. Я. Алексеев, О. И. Аполихин, А. Д. Каприн, А. В. Сивков, А. В. Корякин, В. П. Алешин
Source: Cancer Urology; Том 20, № 3 (2024); 49-56 ; Онкоурология; Том 20, № 3 (2024); 49-56 ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776
Subject Terms: себестоимость, surgical treatment, radical prostatectomy, retropubic access, laparoscopic access, robot-assisted prostatectomy, oncologic outcome, erectile function, continence, minimally invasive access, quality of life, cost, хирургическое лечение, радикальная простатэктомия, позадилонный доступ, лапароскопический доступ, робот-ассистированная простатэктомия, онкологический результат, эректильная функция, удержание мочи, малоинвазивный доступ, качество жизни
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1814/1556; Шахзадова А.О., Старинский В.В., Лисичникова И.В. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2022 году. Сибирский онкологический журнал 2023;22(5):5–13. DOI:10.21294/1814-4861-2023-22-5-5-13; Carbonara U., Srinath M., Crocerossa F. et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes. World J Urol 2021;39(10):3721–32. DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03687-5; Hagman A., Lantz A., Carlsson S. et al. Urinary continence recovery and oncological outcomes after surgery for prostate cancer analysed by risk category: results from the LAParoscopic prostatectomy robot and open trial. World J Urol 2021;39(9): 3239–49. DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03662-0; Lantz A., Bock D., Akre O. et al. Functional and oncological outcomes after open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer: 8-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2021;80(5):650–60. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.025; Stolzenburg J.U., Holze S., Neuhaus P. et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from the first multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded controlled trial in radical prostatectomy (LAP-01). Eur Urol 2021;79(6):750–9. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.030; Stolzenburg J.U., Holze S., Arthanareeswaran V.K. et al. Roboticassisted versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 12-month outcomes of the multicentre randomised controlled LAP-01 trial. Eur Urol Focus 2022;8(6):1583–90. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2022.02.002; Moretti T.B.C., Magna L.A., Reis L.O. Open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy oncological results: a reverse systematic review. J Endourol 2023;37(5):521–30. DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0819; Wang J., Hu K., Wang Y. et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Robot Sur 2023;17(6):2617–31. DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01714-8; Ambrosini F., Knipper S., Tilki D. et al. Robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis based on 15 years and 18,805 patients. World J Urol 2024;42(1):131. DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-04824-6; Suh J., Jeong I.G., Jeon H.G. et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion: a multi-institutional study with a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023;149(5):1951–60. DOI:10.1007/s00432-022-04243-3; Rechtman M., Forbes A., Millar J.L. et al. Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria. BMC Urol 2022;22(1):18. DOI:10.1186/s12894-022-00966-0; Haney C.M., Kowalewski K.F., Westhoff N. et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur Urol Focus 2023;9(6):930–7. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.007; Wu S.Y., Chang C.L., Chen C.I. et al. Comparison of acute and chronic surgical complications following robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and traditional open radical prostatectomy among men in Taiwan. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4(8):e2120156. DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156; Labban M., Dasgupta P., Song C. et al. Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in the UK. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5(4):e225740. DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5740; Song C., Cheng L., Li Y. et al. Systematic literature review of costeffectiveness analyses of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. BMJ Open 2022;12(9):e058394. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058394; Wu S.Y., Chang S.C., Chen C.I. et al. Latest comprehensive medical resource consumption in robot-assisted versus laparoscopic and traditional open radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Cancers 2021;13(7):1564. DOI:10.3390/cancers13071564; Lindenberg M.A., Retèl V.P., van der Poel H.G. et al. Cost-utility analysis on robot-assisted and laparoscopic prostatectomy based on long-term functional outcomes. Sci Rep 2022;12(1):7658. DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-10746-3; Okhawere K.E., Shih I.F., Lee S.H. et al. Comparison of 1-year health care costs and use associated with open vs robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4(3):e212265. DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2265; Ploussard G., Grabia A., Barret E. et al. Annual nationwide analysis of costs and post-operative outcomes after radical prostatectomy according to the surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic). World J Urol 2022;40(2):419–25. DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03878-0; Рябов М.А., Котов С.В. Сравнительная оценка кривой обучения радикальной простатэктомии произведенной позадилонной, лапароскопической, промежностной и робот-ассистированной техниками. Вестник урологии 2022;10(2):63–71. DOI:10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-2-63-71; Grivas N., Zachos I., Georgiadis G. et al. Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review. World J Urol 2022; 40(4):929–49. DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03815-1; Chahal B., Aydin A., Amin M.S.A. et al. The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: a systematic review. Int J Surg 2023;109(7):2037–57. DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1814
-
3Academic Journal
Authors: A. M. Shvedov, K. B. Kolontarev, A. V. Bormotin, V. V. Dyakov, A. A. Vitoslavsky, D. Yu. Pushkar, А. М. Шведов, К. Б. Колонтарев, А. В. Бормотин, В. В. Дьяков, А. А. Витославский, Д. Ю. Пушкарь
Source: Urology Herald; Том 11, № 1 (2023); 150-158 ; Вестник урологии; Том 11, № 1 (2023); 150-158 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-1
Subject Terms: недержание мочи, radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted prostatectomy, urinary incontinence, predictors, радикальная простатэктомия, робот-ассистированная простатэктомия, инконтиненция, предикторы
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/680/456; Rider JR, Wilson KM, Sinnott JA, Kelly RS, Mucci LA, Giovannucci EL. Ejaculation Frequency and Risk of Prostate Cancer: Updated Results with an Additional Decade of Followup. Eur Urol. 2016;70(6):974-982. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.027; Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, Taari K, Busch C, Nordling S, Häggman M, Andersson SO, Andrén O, Steineck G, Adami HO, Johansson JE. Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer - 29-Year Follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2319-2329. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1807801; Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415-1424. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1606220; Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2009;104(7):991-5. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x; Tang K, Jiang K, Chen H, Chen Z, Xu H, Ye Z. Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32237-32257. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.13332; Shkolyar E, Shih IF, Li Y, Wong JA, Liao JC. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Associated with Decreased Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use. J Endourol. 2020;34(4):475- 481. DOI:10.1089/end.2019.0788; Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, Bjartell A, Björholt I, Carlsson S, Hugosson J, Marlow T, Stinesen-Kollberg K, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wiklund P, Wilderäng U, Haglind E. Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):816- 824. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.038; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Колонтарев К.Б. Робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2014.; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Колонтарев К.Б. Робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия. Функциональный результат. Часть I. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2019;(3):111 120. DOI:10.17116/hirurgia2019031111; Novara G, Ficarra V, D'elia C, Secco S, Cioffi A, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1028-33. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.069; Касян Г.Р., Газимиев М.А., Гаджиева З.К., Зайцев А.В., Ткачёва О.Н., Кривобородов Г.Г., Котовская Ю.В, Мильто А.С., Остапенко В.С., Рунихина Н.К., Фролова Е.В., Шарашкина Н.В. Недержание мочи: Клинические рекомендации. Москва: Российское общество урологов; 2020.; Liatsikos EN, Assimakopoulos K, Stolzenburg JU. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2008;80(3):226-30. DOI:10.1159/000127331; Trost L, Elliott DS. Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:287489. DOI:10.1155/2012/287489; Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405-17. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045; Lee DJ, Cheetham P, Badani KK. Predictors of early urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2010;17(3):5200-5. PMID: 20566014; Shikanov S, Desai V, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1803-7. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.016; Matsushita K, Kent MT, Vickers AJ, von Bodman C, Bernstein M, Touijer KA, Coleman JA, Laudone VT, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Akin O, Sandhu JS. Preoperative predictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2015;116(4):577-83. DOI:10.1111/bju.13087; Kadono Y, Ueno S, Kadomoto S, Iwamoto H, Takezawa Y, Nakashima K, Nohara T, Izumi K, Mizokami A, Gabata T, Namiki M. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(8):1034-1039. DOI:10.1002/nau.22877; Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, Katz MH, Thong AE, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology. 2009;73(2):316-22. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.493; Wolin KY, Luly J, Sutcliffe S, Andriole GL, Kibel AS. Risk of urinary incontinence following prostatectomy: the role of physical activity and obesity. J Urol. 2010;183(2):629-33. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.082; Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2003;61(3):601-6. DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02422-6; Nishikawa M, Watanabe H, Kurahashi T. Impact of metabolic syndrome on early recovery of continence after robotassisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2017;24(9):692- 697. DOI:10.1111/iju.13406; Yamada Y, Fujimura T, Fukuhara H, Sugihara T, Nakagawa T, Kume H, Igawa Y, Homma Y. Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018;10(3):287-291. DOI:10.1111/luts.12181; Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;180(3):928-32. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.029; Boczko J, Erturk E, Golijanin D, Madeb R, Patel H, Joseph JV. Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2007;21(2):184-8. DOI:10.1089/end.2006.0163; Konety BR, Sadetsky N, Carroll PR; CaPSURE Investigators. Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy: the impact of prostate volume--analysis of data from the CaPSURE Database. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1423-5; discussion 1425-6. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.089; Pettus JA, Masterson T, Sokol A, Cronin AM, Savage C, Sandhu JS, Mulhall JP, Scardino PT, Rabbani F. Prostate size is associated with surgical difficulty but not functional outcome at 1 year after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2009;182(3):949-55. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.029; Tienza A, Hevia M, Benito A, Pascual JI, Zudaire JJ, Robles JE. MRI factors to predict urinary incontinence after retropubic/laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(8):1343-9. DOI:10.1007/s11255-015-1019-8; Park JS, Lee D, Koo KC, Chung BH, Lee KS. The role of prostatic apex shape in voiding symptoms and urine flow: an exploratory and confirmatory study. World J Urol. 2020;38(5):1275-1282. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02925-1; Wenzel M, Preisser F, Mueller M, Theissen LH, Welte MN, Hoeh B, Humke C, Bernatz S, Bodelle B, Würnschimmel C, Tilki D, Huland H, Graefen M, Roos FC, Becker A, Karakiewicz PI, Chun FKH, Kluth LA, Mandel P. Effect of prostatic apex shape (Lee types) and urethral sphincter length in preoperative MRI on very early continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53(7):1297-1303. DOI:10.1007/s11255-021-02809-7; Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A. Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1907-11. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.036; Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, Otero JR, Serio AM, Scardino PT, Hricak H, Guillonneau B. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2009;55(3):629-37. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.057; Borin JF, Skarecky DW, Narula N, Ahlering TE. Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007;70(1):173-7. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.050; von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Savage C, Matikainen MP, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Rabbani F, Akin O, Sandhu JS. Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol. 2012;187(3):945-50. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.143; Jeong CW, Oh JJ, Jeong SJ, Hong SK, Byun SS, Hwang SI, Lee HJ, Lee SE. Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2013;31(2):383-8. DOI:10.1007/s00345-012-0857-6; Juszczak K, Ostrowski A, Adamowicz J, Maciukiewicz P, Drewa T. Urinary bladder hypertrophy and overactive bladder determine urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(10):1329-1337. DOI:10.17219/acem/104532; Song C, Lee J, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H. Urodynamic interpretation of changing bladder function and voiding pattern after radical prostatectomy: a long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2010;106(5):681-6. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09189.x; Lee H, Kim KB, Lee S, Lee SW, Kim M, Cho SY, Oh SJ, Jeong SJ. Urodynamic assessment of bladder and urethral function among men with lower urinary tract symptoms after radical prostatectomy: A comparison between men with and without urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(12):803-10. DOI:10.4111/kju.2015.56.12.803; Hoyland K, Vasdev N, Abrof A, Boustead G. Post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: etiology and prevention. Rev Urol. 2014;16(4):181-8. PMID: 25548545; PMCID: PMC4274175.; Elder JS, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ Jr, Brannen GE. Morbidity of radical perineal prostatectomy following transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 1984;132(1):55-7. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49462-6; Tienza A, Hevia M, Merino I, Diez-Caballero F, Rosell D, Pascual JI, Zudaire JJ, Robles JE. Can low urinary tract symptoms influence postprostatectomy urinary incontinence? Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016;68(4):324-9. PMID: 26222933.; Palisaar JR, Wenske S, Sommerer F, Hinkel A, Noldus J. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int. 2009;104(5):611-5. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08474.x; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/680
-
4Academic Journal
Authors: A. V. Zyryanov, A. S. Surikov, A. A. Keln, A. V. Ponomarev, V. G. Sobenin, А. В. Зырянов, А. С. Суриков, А. А. Кельн, А. В. Пономарев, В. Г. Собенин
Source: Siberian journal of oncology; Том 20, № 6 (2021); 32-40 ; Сибирский онкологический журнал; Том 20, № 6 (2021); 32-40 ; 2312-3168 ; 1814-4861 ; 10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-6
Subject Terms: открытая позадилонная простатэктомия, prostate volume, robot prostatectomy, open prostatectomy, объем предстательной железы, робот-ассистированная простатэктомия
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1982/929; Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2018 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М., 2019. 250 с.; Кельн А.А., Зырянов А.В., Измайлов А.А., Зотов П.Б., Знобищев В.Г., Пономарев А.В. Сравнительный анализ нежелательных явлений при использовании различных методик биопсии предстательной железы. Онкоурология. 2019; 1: 66–74.; European Association of Urology. Guidelines European Association of Urology. 2018; P. 233–234.; Dell’Oglio P., Mottrie A., Mazzone E. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Jan; 30(1): 73–78. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000688.; Skolarus T.A., Hedgepeth R.C., Zhang Y., Weizer A.Z., Montgomery J.S., Miller D.C., Wood D.P.Jr., Hollenbeck B.K. Does robotic technology mitigate the challenges of large prostate size? Urology. 2010 Nov; 76(5): 1117–21. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.060.; Dotzauer R., La Torre A., Thomas A., Brandt M.P., Böhm K., Mager R., Borgmann H., Jäger W., Kurosch M., Höfner T., Ruckes C., Haferkamp A., Tsaur I. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy: a single-center comparison. World J Urol. 2021 Jan; 39(1): 149–156. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03168-1.; Chang C.M., Moon D., Gianduzzo T.R., Eden C.G. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2005 Aug; 48(2): 285–90. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029.; Зырянов А.В., Пономарев А.В., Смирнов В.О., Суриков А.С. Технические особенности выполнения робот-ассистированной простатэктомии у пациентов с выраженным увеличением простаты в объеме. Креативная хирургия и онкология. 2018; 8(2): 117–124. doi:10.24060/2076-3093-2018-8-2-33-40.; D’Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B., Schultz D., Tomaszewski J.E., Wein A. A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 1998; 52: 631.; Zorn K.C., Orvieto M.A., Mikhail A.A., Gofrit O.N., Lin S., Schaeffer A.J., Shalhav A.L., Zagaja G.P. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007 Feb; 69(2): 300–5. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.021.; Sarle R., Tewari A., Hemal A.K., Menon M. Robotic-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy: technical difficulties due to a large median lobe. Urol Int. 2005; 74(1): 92–4. doi:10.1159/000082717.; Rehman J., Chughtai B., Guru K., Shabsigh R., Samadi D.B. Management of an enlarged median lobe with ureteral orifices at the margin of bladder neck during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2009; 16(1): 4490–4.; Meeks J.J., Zhao L., Greco K.A., Macejko A., Nadler R.B. Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009 Feb; 73(2): 323–7. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.484.; Alessandro S., Alessandro G., Susanna C., Michele I., Francesca D.Q., Andrea F., Von Heland M., Vincenzo G., Stefano S. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in high prostate volume cases: impact on oncological and functional results. Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Mar-Apr; 42(2): 223–33. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0385.; Cao L., Yang Z., Qi L., Chen M. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May; 98(22): e15770. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000015770.; Du Y., Long Q., Guan B., Mu L., Tian J., Jiang Y., Bai X., Wu D. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jan 14; 24: 272–287. doi:10.12659/msm.907092.; De Groote R., Nathan A., De Bleser E., Pavan N., Sridhar A., Kelly J., Sooriakumaran P., Briggs T., Nathan S. Techniques and Outcomes of Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP). Eur Urol. 2020 Dec; 78(6): 885–892. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.003.; Weaver P.E., Smith L.A., Sharma P., Keesari R., Al Mekdash H., de Riese W.T. Quantitative measurements of prostate capsule and gland density and their correlation to prostate size: possible clinical implications in prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020; 52(10): 1829–37. doi:10.1007/s11255-020-02527-6.; Coughlin G.D., Yaxley J.W., Chambers S.K., Occhipinti S., Samaratunga H., Zajdlewicz L., Teloken P., Dunglison N., Williams S., Lavin M.F., Gardiner R.A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug; 19(8): 1051–60. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7.; https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/1982
-
5Academic Journal
Source: Andrology and Genital Surgery; Том 23, № 3 (2022); 115-121 ; Андрология и генитальная хирургия; Том 23, № 3 (2022); 115-121 ; 2412-8902 ; 2070-9781
Subject Terms: реконструкция малого таза, robotic prostatectomy, pelvic reconstruction, робот-ассистированная простатэктомия
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/592/480; Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70(1):7–30. DOI:10.3322/caac.21590; Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2017 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петрова. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИРЦ» Минздрава России, 2018, 250 с.; Allan C., Ilic D. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urol Int 2016;96(4):373–8. DOI:10.1159/000435861; Pierorazio P.M., Spencer B.A., McCann T.R. et al. Preoperative risk stratification predicts likelihood of concurrent PSA-free survival, continence, and potency (the trifecta analysis) after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;70(4):717–22. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.639; Patel V.R., Sivaraman A., Coelho R.F. et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011;59(5):702–7. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032; Kang S.G., Shim J.S., Onol F. et al. Lessons learned from 12,000 robotic radical prostatectomies: is the journey as important as the outcome? Investig Clin Urol 2020;61(1):1–10. DOI:10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.1; Патент РФ 2732707С1/10.01.2020. Бюл. № 27. Мосоян М.С., Федоров Д.А., Васильев А.А. Способ проведения робот-ассистированной лапароскопической радикальной простатэктомии с латеральной фиксацией шейки мочевого пузыря при лечении рака предстательной железы.; Dell’Oglio P., Mottrie A., Mazzone E. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 2020;30(1):73–8. DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000688; Rocco B., Gregori A., Stener S. et al. Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51(4):996–1003. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.014; Patel V.R., Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., Rocco B. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 2009;56(3):472–8. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007; Hurtes X., Rouprêt M., Vaessen C. et al. Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. BJU Int 2012;110(6):875–83. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10849.x; Student V. Jr., Vidlar A., Grepl M. et al. Advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: one-year functional outcomes in a two-group randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2017;71(5):822–30. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032; Porpiglia F., Bertolo R., Manfredi M. et al. Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: implications on early recovery of urinary continence. Eur Urol 2016;69(3):485–95. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.005; Hamada A., Razdan, S., Etafy M.H. et al. Early return of continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using modified maximal urethral length preservation technique. J Endourol 2014;28(8):930–8. DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0794; Freire M.P., Weinberg A.C., Lei Y. et al. Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2009;56(6):972–80. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.017; Патент РФ на изобретение № 2725852C1 / 09.04.2019. Бюл. № 19. Мосоян М.С., Федоров Д.А. Способ проведения робот-ассистированной лапароскопической радикальной простатэктомии с задней реконструкцией малого таза при лечении рака предстательной железы.; https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/592
-
6Academic Journal
Authors: Ильдар Ильдусович Лутфарахманов, И. А. Мельникова, Е. Ю. Сырчин, В. Ф. Асадуллин, Ю. А. Корелов, П. И. Миронов
Source: Вестник интенсивной терапии, Iss 1 (2021)
Subject Terms: рак простаты, робот-ассистированная простатэктомия, механика дыхания, газообмен, Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid, RC86-88.9
File Description: electronic resource
-
7Academic Journal
Authors: I. A. Rezvikh, L. M. Rapoport, L. L. Chuvalov, E. S. Belisheva, A. A. Chibarov, N. B. Paramonova, E. E. Schelokova, Yu. S. Strakhov, M. A. Shariya, A. A. Vorobyev, I. V. Fokin, M. E. Enikeev, И. А. Резвых, Л. М. Рапопорт, Л. Л. Чувалов, Е. С. Белышева, А. А. Чибаров, Н. Б. Парамонова, Е. Е. Щелокова, Ю. С. Страхов, М. А. Шария, А. А. Воробьев, И. В. Фокин, М. Э. Еникеев
Source: Andrology and Genital Surgery; Том 22, № 2 (2021); 35-44 ; Андрология и генитальная хирургия; Том 22, № 2 (2021); 35-44 ; 2412-8902 ; 2070-9781
Subject Terms: анатомосберегающая простатэктомия, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, nerve-sparing prostatectomy, organ-sparing prostatectomy, мультипараметрическая магнитно-резонансная томография, робот-ассистированная простатэктомия, нервосберегающая простатэктомия
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/491/412; Sood A., Jeong W., Peabody J.O. et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: inching toward gold standard. Urol Clin North Am 2014;41(4):473-84. DOI:10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.002.; Davis M., Egan J., Marhamati S. et al. Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy: Past, Present, and Future. Urol Clin North Am 2021;48(1):11—23. DOI:10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.012.; Wang X., Wu Y., Guo J. et al. Oncological safety of intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy compared with conventional process: a pooled review and meta-regression analysis based on available studies. BMC Urol 2019;19(1):41. DOI:10.1186/s12894-019-0476-2.; De Rooij M., Hamoen E.H.J., Fhtterer J.J. et al. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: A meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(2):343—51. DOI:10.2214/AJR.13.11046.; Hoeks C.M.A., Barentsz J.O., Hambrock T. et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology 2011;261(1):46—66. DOI:10.1148/radiol.11091822.; Резвых И.А., Рапопорт Л.М., Белыше-ва Е.С. и др. МПМРТ в планировании нервосберегающей робот-ассистиро-ванной радикальной простатэктомии у больных с локализованным раком предстательной железы низкого и промежуточного рисков прогрессии. Пилотное исследование. Российский электронный журнал лучевой диагностики 2020;10(2):140—7. DOI:10.21569/2222-7415-2020-10-2-140-147.; Baco E., Ukimura O., Rud E. et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transectal Ultrasound Image-fusion Biopsies Accurately Characterize the Index Tumor: Correlation with Step-sectioned Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in 135 Patients. Eur Urol 2015:67(4):787—94. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.077.; Mohler J.L., Kantoff P.W., Armstrong A.J. et al. Prostate Cancer, version 2.2014. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2014;12(5):686—718. DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2014.0072; Loeb S., Smith N.D., Roehl K.A., Catalona WJ. Intermediate-Term Potency, Continence, and Survival Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically High-Risk or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer. Urology 2007;69(6):1170—5. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.054.; Gandaglia G., Abdollah F., Hu J. et al. Is Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Safe in Men with High-Risk Prostate Cancer? Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes, Positive Surgical Margins, and USe of Additional Cancer Treatments. J Endourol 2014;28(7):784—91. DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0774.; Park B.H., Jeon H.G., Jeong B.C. et al. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2014;192(1):82—8. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.005.; Somford D.M., Hamoen E.H., Ftttterer J.J. et al. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2013;190(5):1728-34. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.021.; Marcus D.M., Rossi P.J., Nour S.G., Jany A.B. The impact of multiparametric pelvic magnetic resonance imaging on risk stratification in patients with localized prostate cancer. Urology 2014;84(1):132—7. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.012.; Turkbey B., Pinto P.A., Mani H. et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection — histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2010;255(1):89—99. DOI:10.1148/radiol.09090475.; Rosenkrantz A.B., Deng F.M., Kim S. et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MRI for index lesion localization — a multiple-reader study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(4):830-7. DOI:10.2214/AJR.11.8446; Sooriakumaran P., Ploumidis A., Nyberg T. et al. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. BJU Int 2015;115(1):106—13. DOI:10.1111/bju.12483.; Yossepowitch O., Eggener S.E., Bianco FJ. Jr. et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods. J Urol 2007;178(2):493—99; discussion 499. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.105.; Makarov D.V., Trock B.J., Humphreys E.B. et al. Updated Nomogram to Predict Pathologic Stage of Prostate Cancer Given Prostate-Specific Antigen Level, Clinical Stage, and Biopsy Gleason Score (Partin Tables) Based on Cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology 2007;69(6):1095—1101. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.042.; Kozikowski M., Malewski W., Michalak W., Dobruch J. et al. Clinical utility of MRI in the decisionmaking process before radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and metaanalysis. PloS One 2019;14(1):e0210194. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0210194.; Boesen L., Chabanova E., Logager V. et al. Prostate cancer staging with extracapsular extension risk scoring using multipara-metric MRI: a correlation with histopatho-logy. Eur Radiol 2015;25(6):1776—85. DOI:10.1007/s00330-014-3543-9.; Ахвердиева Г.И., Санай Э.Б., Панов В.О. и др. Мультипараметрическая МРТ в диагностике рака предстательной железы. Российский электронный журнал лучевой диагностики 2013;3(4);109—20.; Hricak H., Wang L., Wei D.C. et al. The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 2004;100(12):2655-63. DOI:10.1002/cncr.20319.; Beyer B., Schlomm T., Tennstedt P. et al. A feasible and time-efficient adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2014;66(1):138—44. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.014.; Tatsugami K., Yoshioka K., Shiroki R. et al. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons’ early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan. Int J Urol 2017;24(3):191—6. DOI:10.1111/iju.13281; Servoll E., Vlatkovic L., Saeter T. et al. The length of a positive surgical margin is of prognostic significance in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 2014;93(3):289—95. DOI:10.1159/000362342.; Dev H.S., Wiklund P., Patel V. et al. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2015;33(3):109.e107—13. DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.005.; Evans A.J., Henry P.C., Van der Kwast T.H. et al. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32(10):1503—12. DOI:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31817fb3a0.; van der Kwast T.H., Collette L., Van Poppel H. et al. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911). Virchows Arch 2006;449(4):428-34. DOI:10.1007/s00428-006-0254-x.; Schlomm T., Tennstedt P., Huxhold C. et al. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2012;62(2):333—40. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.057.; https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/491
-
8Academic Journal
Authors: E. V. Shpot’, D. V. Chinenov, Ya. N. Chernov, A. Yu. Votyakov, E. N. Gasanov, L. M. Rapoport, Е. В. Шпоть, Д. В. Чиненов, Я. Н. Чернов, А. Ю. Вотяков, Э. Н. Гасанов, Л. М. Рапопорт
Source: Andrology and Genital Surgery; Том 22, № 3 (2021); 44-48 ; Андрология и генитальная хирургия; Том 22, № 3 (2021); 44-48 ; 2412-8902 ; 2070-9781
Subject Terms: робот-ассистированная простатэктомия, erectile dysfunction, nerve-saving, radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted prostatectomy, эректильная дисфункция, нервосбережение, радикальная простатэктомия
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/505/427; Hatzimouratidis K. et al. EAU Guidelines on Male Sexual Dysfunction. In: EAU Guidelines, edition presented at the annual EAU Congress Munich, 2016.; Thompson J.E., Egger S., Böhm M. et al. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective singlesurgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 2014;65(3):521–31. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.030.; Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2017;71(4):618–629. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003.; Казаков А.С., Колонтарев К.Б., Пушкарь Д.Ю., Пасечник И.Н. Анестезиологическое обеспечение робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова 2015;2:56–62. DOI:10.17116/hirurgia2015256-62.; Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Briers E. et al. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. European Association of Urology, 2015.; Ficarra V., Novara G., Ahlering T.E. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:418–30. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046.; Sankar A., Johnson S.R., Beattie W.S. et al. Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 2014;113(3):424–32. DOI:10.1093/bja/aeu100.; Bianchi L., Gandaglia G., Fossati N. et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: indications, extent and tailored approaches. Urologia 2017;84(1):9–19. DOI:10.5301/uro.5000139.; Briganti A., Larcher A., Abdollah F. et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 2012;61(3):480–7. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044.; Rees T., Raison N., Sheikh M.I. et al. Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the lite-rature. Turk J Urol 2016;42(4):240–6. DOI:10.5152/tud.2016.52893.; Heidenreich A., Bastian P.J., Bellmunt J. et al. EAU Guidelines on prostate, Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014;65(2):467–79. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.002.; Mandel P., Kretschmer A., Chandrasekar T. et al. The effect of BMI on clinicopathologic and functional outcomes after open radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2014;32(3):297–302. DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.09.005.; Michl U., Tennstedt P., Feldmeier L. et al. Nerve-sparing surgery technique, not the preservation of the neurovascular bundles, leads to improved long-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016;69(4):584–9. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.037.; F.C. Burkhard, Lucas M.G., Berghmans L.C. et al. EAU Guidelines on Urinary Incontinence in Adults. European Association of Urology, 2016.; Wei J.T., Dunn R.L., Litwin M.S. et al. Development and Validation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) for Comprehensive Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Men with Prostate Cancer. Urology 2000;56(6):899–905. DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00858-x.; Maratia S., Cedillo S., Rejas J. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments using the EMPRO tool. Qual Life Res 2016;25(10):2467–80. DOI:10.1007/s11136-016-1284-8.; Limoncin E., Gravina G. L., Corona G. et al. Erectile function recovery in men treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administration after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Andrology 2017;5(5):863–72. DOI:10.1111/andr.12403.; Глыбочко П.В., Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.М. и др. Хирургическая анатомия нервосберегающей робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана 2017;12(3(69)): 78–91.; Williams S.B., Morales B.E., Huynh L.M., et al. Analysis of Accessory Pudendal Artery Transection on Erections During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol 2017;31(11):1170–5. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0542.; https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/505
-
9Academic Journal
Authors: A. V. Zyryanov, A. S. Surikov, A. V. Ponomarev, A. A. Keln, V. G. Znobishchev, А. В. Зырянов, А. С. Суриков, А. В. Пономарев, А. А. Кельн, В. Г. Знобищев
Source: Cancer Urology; Том 15, № 4 (2019); 73-83 ; Онкоурология; Том 15, № 4 (2019); 73-83 ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776 ; 10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-4
Subject Terms: робот-ассистированная простатэктомия, prostate volume, robot-assisted prostatectomy, объем предстательной железы
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/985/897; Щепин О.П., Тишук Е.И. Проблемы демографического развития России. Экономика здравоохранения 2005;3: 5–8.; Kok E.T., Schouten B.W., Bohnen A.M. et al. Risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in a community based population of healthy aging men: the Krimpen Study. J Urol 2009;181(2): 710–6. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.025.; Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2017 году. Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2018. 236 с.; McNeal J.E. The zonal anatomy of the prostate. Prostate 1981;2:35–49. DOI:10.1002/pros.2990020105.; Pavelić J., Zeljko Z. Prostate glandtransition zone lesions. Etiology, growth regulation, growth factors, genetic changes. Lijec Vjesn 2002;124(6–7):211–9.; Tuppin P., Samson S., Fagot-Campagna A. et al. Dosage du PSA, biopsie, cancer et hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate en France. Prog Urol 2014;24(9). DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2014.03.004.; Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.М., Еникеев М.Э. и др. Радикальная простатэктомия у больных с инцидентальным раком предстательной железы. Урология 2016;2:63–6.; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Малхасян В.А., Ходырева Л.А. и др. Анализ и оптимизация медицинской помощи пациентам с острой задержкой мочеиспускания, поступающим в стационары г. Москвы. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология 2016;2:4–7.; Walsh P.C., Donker P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 2017;197(Suppl. 2):165–70. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.105.; Schuessler W.W., Schulam P.G., Clayman R.V., Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50(6):854–7. DOI:10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00543-8.; Pasticier G., Rietbergen J.B., Guillonneau B. et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 2001;40(1):70–4. DOI:10.1159/000049751.; Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M. et al. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92(3):205–10. DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04311.x.; Menon M., Shrivastava A., Kaul S. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51(3):648–58. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.055.; Coelho R.F., Rocco B., Patel M.B. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010;24(12):2003–15. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0295.; Ficarra V., Novara G., Rosen R.C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(3):405– 17. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045.; Novara G., Ficarra V., Rosen R.C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(3):431– 52. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044.; Novara G., Ficarra V., Mocellin S. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(3):382–404. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047.; Yaxley J.W., Coughlin G.D., Chambers S.K. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 2016;388(10049):1057–66. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X.; Allan C., Ilic D. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urol Int 2016;96(4):373–8. DOI:10.1159/000435861.; Tang K., Jiang K., Chen H. et al. Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an metaanalysis update. Oncotarget 2017;8(19):32237–57. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.13332.; Gandaglia G., Sammon J.D., Chang S.L. et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(14):1419–26. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5096.; D’Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B. et al. A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology 1998;52:631. DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00228-3.; Chang C.M., Moon D., Gianduzzo T.R. et al. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005;48(2):285–90. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029.; Zorn K.C., Orvieto M.A., Mikhail A.A. et al. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;69(2):300–5. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.021.; Skolarus T.A., Hedgepeth R.C., Zhang Y. et al. Does robotic technology mitigate the challenges of large prostate size? Urology 76(5):1117–21. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.060.; Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240: 205–13. DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.; Levinson A.W., Ward N.T., Sulman A. et al. The impact of prostate size on perioperative outcomes in a large laparoscopic radical prostatectomy series. J Endourol 2009;23(1):147–52. DOI:10.1089/end.2008.0366.; Foley C.L., Bott S.R., Thomas K. et al. A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates. BJU Int 2003;92(4):370–4. DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04361.x.; Kojima M., Troncoso P., Babaian R.J. Influence of noncancerous prostatic tissue volume on prostate-specific antigen. Urology 1998;51(2):293–9. DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00497-4.; De Gorski A., Rouprêt M., Peyronnet B. et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer in enlarged compared to smaller prostates. J Urol 2015;194(3):669–73. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.025.; Rehman J., Chughtai B., Guru K. et al. Management of an enlarged median lobe with ureteral orifices at the margin of bladder neck during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Can J Urol 2009;16(1):4490–4.; Meeks J.J., Zhao L., Greco K.A. et al. Impact of prostate median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2009;73(2):323– 7. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.484.; Huang A.C., Kowalczyk K.J., Hevelone N.D. et al .The impact of prostate size, median lobe, and prior benign prostatic hyperplasia intervention on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2011;59(4):595–603. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.033.; Зырянов А.В., Пономарев А.В., Смирнов В.О., Суриков А.С. Технические особенности выполнения робот-ассистированной простатэктомии у пациентов с выраженным увеличением простаты в объеме. Креативная хирургия и онкология 2018;8(2):117–24. DOI:10.24060/2076-3093-2018-8-2-33-40.; Boczko J., Erturk E., Golijanin D. et al. Impact of prostate size in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2007;21(2):184–8. DOI:10.1089/end.2006.0163.; Sutherland D.E., Perez D.S., Weeks D.C. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 2011;25(4):641–4. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0528.; Yasui T., Tozawa K., Kurokawa S. et al. Impact of prostate weight on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with a posterior approach to the seminal vesicle. BMC Urol 2014;14:6. DOI:10.1186/1471-2490-14-6.; Freedland S.J., Isaacs W.B., Platz E.A. et al. Prostate size and risk of highgrade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(30):7546–54. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.525.; Myers R.P. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28(3):473–90. DOI:10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70156-7.; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/985
-
10Academic Journal
Authors: Zyryanov, A. V., Ponomarev, А. V., Surikov, A. S., Kovalenko, R. Y., Popov, I. В., Зырянов, A. B., Пономарев, А. В., Суриков, А. С., Коваленко, Р. Ю., Попов, И. Б.
Subject Terms: PROSTATE CANCER, THE ROBOT-ASSISTED PROSTATECTOMY, INCREASED PROSTATE VOLUME, РАК ПРОСТАТЫ, РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ, УВЕЛИЧЕННЫЙ ОБЪЕМ ПРОСТАТЫ
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: Уральский медицинский журнал. 2017. Т. 146, № 2.; http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/13638
Availability: http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/13638