Εμφανίζονται 1 - 20 Αποτελέσματα από 30 για την αναζήτηση '"ретроперитонеоскопия"', χρόνος αναζήτησης: 0,90δλ Περιορισμός αποτελεσμάτων
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    Πηγή: Andrology and Genital Surgery; Том 25, № 1 (2024); 123-132 ; Андрология и генитальная хирургия; Том 25, № 1 (2024); 123-132 ; 2412-8902 ; 2070-9781

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/743/574; Кадыров З.А. Лапароскопические и ретроперитонеоскопические операции в урологии. M.: ГЕОТАР-Медиа, 2017. 488 с.; Angus Chin On Luk, Pandian Rajadoss Muthu, Heer Rakesh. Laparoscopic renal surgery is here to stay. Arab Journal of Urology 2018;16(3):314–320.; El-tohamy S.A., Shello H.M. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopy for simple nephrectomy. Egypt J Anaesth 2013;29:109–116.; Pierorazio P.M., Hyams E.S., Lin B.M. et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal masses: critical assessment of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of stage T2a and T2b tumors. Urology 2012;79(3):570–575. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.065. PMID: 22386399.; Selçuk E., Öner Ş ., Tzevat T., Tayfun O. et al. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy has better perioperative outcomes than transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in obese patients. Turkish J Urol 2012;38(2):80–87. DOI:10.5152/tud.2012.019.; De Cassai A., Boscolo A., Tonetti T. et al. Assignment of ASA-physical status relates to anesthesiologists’ experience: a survey-based national-study Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2019;72(1):53–59. DOI:10.4097/kja.d.18.00224.; Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213.; Mitropoulos D., Artibani W., Biyani C.S. et al. Validation of the Clavien-Dindo grading system in urology by the European Association of urology guidelines ad hoc panel. European Urology Focus 2018;4(4):608–613. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2017.02.014.; Ritchey M.L., Kelalis P.P., Breslow N. et al. Surgical complications after nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;175(6):507–514.; Fahlenkamp D., Rassweiler J., Fornara P. et al. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers. Journal of Urology 1999;162(3 Pt 1):765–771. DOI:10.1097/00005392-199909010-00038.; Ölçücüoğlu E. Comparing the complications of laparoscopically performed simple, radical and donor nephrectomy. Turk J Med Sci 2020;50:922–929. DOI:10.3906/sag-1910-120.; Widmer J.D., Schlegel A., Kron P. et al. Hand-assisted livingdonor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of two techniques. BMC Urol 2018;18(1):39. DOI:10.1186/s12894-018-0355-2.; Кадыров З.А., Одилов А.Ю. Осложнения традиционной, лапароскопической и ретроперитонеоскопической нефрэктомии при различных заболеваниях почек. Урология 2020;4:151–156. DOI:10.18565/urology.2020.4.151–156.; Кадыров З.А., Одилов А.Ю., Ягудаев Д.М. Сравнительный анализ интра- и послеоперационных осложнений ретроперитонеоскопической и лапароскопической нефрэктомии при опухолях больших размеров. Онкоурология 2018;14(4):22–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-4-22-28.; Pareek G., Hedican S.P., Gee J.R. et al. Meta-analysis of the Complications of Laparoscopic Renal Surgery: Comparison of Procedures and Techniques. J Urol 2006;175(4):1208–1213. DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00639-7. PMID: 16515961.; Elsamra S., Pareek G. Complications of Laparoscopic Renal Surgery. Int J Urol 2010;17(3):206–214. DOI:10.1111/j.1442- 2042.2010.02446.x. PMID: 20409216 Review.; Klap J., Butow Z., Champy C.M. et al. 1,000 Retroperitoneoscopic Procedures of the Upper Urinary Tract: Analysis of Complication. Urol Int 2019;102(4):406–412. DOI:10.1159/000497038. Epub 2019 Mar 6 PMID: 30840956.; Люлько А.В., Мягкий В.М. Ошибки и осложнений нефрэктомии. Клиническая хирургия 1979;12:36–37.; Ritchey M.L., Shamberger R.C., Haase G. et al. Surgical complications after primary nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor: report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192(1):63–68. DOI:10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00749-3.; Simon S.D., Castle E.P., Ferrigni R.G. et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience. J Urol 2004;171:1447–1450. DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000117942.61971.41.; Lombardo R., Martos R., Ribal M.J. et al. Retroperitoneoscopy in urology: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2019;71(1):9–16.; Montes S.F.-P., Rodríguez I.G., Ugarteburu R.G. et al. Intraoperative laparoscopic complications for urological cancer procedures. World J Clin Cases 2015;3(5):450–456.; Creta M., Calogero A., Sagnelli C. et al. Donor and Recipient Outcomes following Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:1729138. DOI:10.1155/2019/1729138.; Khan A., Palit V., Myatt A. et al. Assessment of Clavien-Dindo classification in patients > 75 years undergoing nephrectomy/ nephroureterectomy. Urol Ann 2013;5(1):18–22.; Xu H., Ding Q., Jiang H.W. Fewer complications after laparoscopic nephrectomy as compared to the open procedure with the modified Clavien classification system-a retrospective analysis from southern China. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:242. DOI:10.1186/1477-7819-12-242.; Srivastava A., Bansal A., Sureka S.K. et al. A retrospective analysis of complications of laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy using the Kocak’s modification of Clavien-Dindo system. Indian Journal of Urology 2018;34(2):133–139.; Permpongkosol S., Link R.E., Su L.M. et al. Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. Journal of Urology 2007;177(2):580–585. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.031.; Kim B.S., Yoo E.S., Kwon T.G. Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: a single-center experience. Urology 2009;73(6):1283–1287. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.017.; Hsiao W., Pattaras J.G. Not so «simple» laparoscopic nephrectomy: outcomes and complications of a 7-year experience. Journal of Endourology 2008;22(10):2285–2290. DOI:10.1089/end.2008.9718.; Garg M., Singh V., Sinha R.J., Sharma P. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. Urology 2014;84(2):335–339. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.038.; Parsons J.K., Varkarakis I., Rha K.H. et al. Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five-year analysis. Urology 2004;63:27–32. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.003.; Campos-Sañudo J.A., Ballestero-Diego R., Zubillaga-Guerrero S. et al. Complications and mortality after radical nephrectomy in a low-volume hospital. Arch Esp Urol 2019;72(7):653–661; Arfi N., Baldini A., Decaussin-Petrucci M. et al. Impact of obesity on complications of laparoscopic simple or radical nephrectomy. Current Urology 2015;8(3):149–155. DOI:10.1159/000365707.; Birkmeyer J.D., Finks J.F., O’Reilly A. et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. New England Journal of Medicine 2013;369(15):1434–1442. DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa1300625.; Hsu R.C.J., Salika T., Maw J. et al. Influence of hospital volume on nephrectomy mortality and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis stratified by surgical type. BMJ Open 2017;7(9):e016833. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016833.; Pieper D., Mathes T., Neugebauer E., Eikermann M. State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2013;216(5):1015– 1025. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.049.; Xu B., Hu J., Chen A. et al. Risk Factors Related with Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Converted to Open Nephrectomy for Nonfunctioning Renal Tuberculosis. J Endourol 2017;31(6):588–592.; Shah P., Ganpule A., Mishra S. et al. Prospective study of preoperative factors predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic transperitoneal simple nephrectomy. Urol Ann 2015;7(4):448–453.; Gahlawat S., Sood R., Sharma U. et al. Can preoperative clinicоradiological parameters predict the difficulty during laparoscopic retroperitoneal simple nephrectomy? A prospective study. Urol Ann 2018;10(2):191–197.; https://agx.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/743

  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20