Comparison of the results of repeated reconstructive interventions on the breast using allo- and autologous materials. Experience of the P. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute ; Сравнение результатов повторных реконструктивных вмешательств на молочной железе с использованием алло- и аутоматериалов. Опыт МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена

Συγγραφείς: V. N. Sipki, M. Yu. Vlasova, M. V. Moshurova, E. A. Zanozina, A. D. Zikiryakhodzhaev, В. Н. Сипки, М. Ю. Власова, М. В. Мошурова, Е. А. Занозина, А. Д. Зикиряходжаев

Πηγή: Acta Biomedica Scientifica; Том 10, № 1 (2025); 169-178 ; 2587-9596 ; 2541-9420

Θεματικοί όροι: BREAST-Q, breast reconstruction, reconstructive-plastic surgery, repeated breast reconstruction, implant reconstruction, autografting, реконструкция молочной железы, реконструктивно-пластическая хирургия, повторная реконструкция молочной железы, реконструкция имплантатами, аутотрансплантация

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/5228/2973; Ostapenko E, Nixdorf L, Devyatko Y, Exner R, Wimmer K, Fitzal F. Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30(1): 126-136. doi:10.1245/s10434-022-12567-0; Hassan AM, Tran J, Asaad M, Slovacek C, Liu J, Butler CE. Outcomes of third-attempt breast reconstruction following infection-associated failure of secondary implant-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023; 151(3): 367e-375e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009903; von Glinski M, Holler N, Kümmel S, Reinisch M, Wallner C, Wagner JM, et al. Autologous reconstruction after failed implantbased breast reconstruction: A comparative multifactorial outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2023; 91(1): 42-47. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003599; Broyles JM, Balk EM, Adam GP, Cao W, Bhuma MR, Mehta S, et al. Implant-based versus autologous reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10(3): e4180. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000004180; Shauly O, Olson B, Marxen T, Menon A, Losken A, Patel KM, et al. Direct-to-implant versus autologous tissue transfer: A metaanalysis of patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023; 84: 93-106. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.029; Stefura T, Rusinek J, Wątor J, Zagórski A, Zając M, Libondi G, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies comparing surgical approaches in 55,455 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023; 77: 346-358. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.11.044; von Glinski M, Holler N, Kümmel S, Reinisch M, Wallner C, Wagner JM, et al. Autologous vs. implant-based breast reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy – A deeper insight considering surgical and patient-reported outcomes. Front Surg. 2022; 9: 903734. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.903734; de Kerckhove M, Matsunaga N, Tomita S, Fujii M, Terao Y. Tertiary autologous breast reconstruction after implant-based reconstruction: Safety and patient-related outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023; 79: 47-54. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.01.016; Persichetti P, Barone M, Salzillo R, Cogliandro A, Brunetti B, Ciarrocchi S, et al. Impact on patient’s appearance perception of autologous and implant based breast reconstruction following mastectomy using BREAST-Q. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022; 46(3): 1153-1163. doi:10.1007/s00266-022-02776-z; https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/5228

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/5228
https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2025-10.1.18