Search Results - "перкутанная нефролитотомия"

1

Academic Journal

Direct-guided punction percutaneous nephrolitothomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolitothomy ; Сравнение директивной пункции с традиционной методикой перкутанной нефролитотомии

Source: Urology Herald; Том 13, № 1 (2025); 5-12 ; Вестник урологии; Том 13, № 1 (2025); 5-12 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-1

Subject Terms: директивная пункция, percutaneous nephrolitothomy, surgery, direct-guided punction, перкутанная нефролитотомия, хирургия

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1004/617; Vicentini FC, Gomes CM, Danilovic A, Neto EA, Mazzucchi E, Srougi M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Current concepts. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(1):4-10. DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.44281; Малхасян В.А., Гаджиев Н.К., Сухих С.О., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Эффективность, безопасность и технические особенности выполнения перкутанной нефролитотомии с точки зрения доказательной медицины (систематический обзор мета-анализов). Вестник урологии. 2024;12(2):87-107. DOI:10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2-87-107; Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J, Piao Y, Zhou Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2013;27(4):420-426. DOI:10.1089/end.2012.0421; Patel SR, Nakada SY. The modern history and evolution of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):153-7. DOI:10.1089/end.2014.0287; Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Rouprêt M, Truss M; European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):341-349. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.033; Kim SC, Kuo RL, Lingeman JE. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13(3):235-241. DOI:10.1097/00042307-200305000-00012; Barcellos Sampaio FJ, Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA. 3-Dimensional and radiological pelviocaliceal anatomy for endourology. J Urol. 1988;140(6):1352-1355. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42042-8; Sampaio FJ, Aragão AH. Anatomical relationship between the renal venous arrangement and the kidney collecting system. J Urol. 1990;144(5):1089-1093. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39665-9; Irani D, Haghpanah A, Hosseini MM, Malekmakan L, Ashraf MA, Shahraki HR. Complications and surgical results of stone-directed antegrade pyelography compared to the retrograde pyelographic access method in percutaneous nephrolithotomy using ‘bull’s eye’ technique: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Urol. 2022;15:6–12. DOI:10.1177/2051415821993729; Kyriazis I, Panagopoulos V, Kallidonis P, Özsoy M, Vasilas M, Liatsikos E. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2015;33(8):1069-1077. DOI:10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8; Wollin DA, Preminger GM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: complications and how to deal with them. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):87-97. DOI:10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x; Sharma K, Sankhwar SN, Goel A, Singh V, Sharma P, Garg Y. Factors predicting infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann. 2016;8(4):434-438. DOI:10.4103/0974-7796.192105; Comfere TB, Sprung J, Case KA, Dye PT, Johnson JL, Hall BA, Schroeder DR, Hanson AC, Marienau ME, Warner DO. Predictors of mortality following symptomatic pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(8):634-641. DOI:10.1007/BF03022957; Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan Jr. ED, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA. Campbells Urology, 8th ed. Saunders publication, Philadelphia; 2002.; Varkarakis J, Su LM, Hsu TH. Air embolism from pneumopyelography. J Urol. 2003;169(1):267. DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64084-0; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1004

Availability: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1004
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-1-5-12

View record from BASE

2

Academic Journal

Endoscopic stone surgery in patients having asymptomatic bacteriuria ; Эндоскопическое удаление камней мочевых путей у пациентов с бессимптомной бактериурией

Authors: V. A. Malkhasyan, N. K. Gadzhiev, S. O. Sukhikh, E. G. Maltsev, I. Z. Kindarov, D. Yu. Pushkar, В. А. Малхасян, Н. К. Гаджиев, С. О. Сухих, Е. Г. Мальцев, И. З. Киндаров, Д. Ю. Пушкарь

Source: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 1 (2024); 69-79 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 1 (2024); 69-79 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-1

Subject Terms: контактная уретеролитотрипсия, ureteral stones, asymptomatic bacteriuria, infection, complications, bacteriology study, endoscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureterolithotripsy, посев мочи, бактериурия, гибкая уретерореноскопия, перкутанная нефролитотомия

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/831/535; Gadzhiev N, Prosyannikov M, Malkhasyan V, Akopyan G, Somani B, Sivkov A, Apolikhin O, Kaprin A. Urolithiasis prevalence in the Russian Federation: analysis of trends over a 15-year period. World J Urol. 2021;39(10):3939-3944. DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03729-y; Ghani KR, Roghmann F, Sammon JD, Trudeau V, Sukumar S, Rahbar H, Kumar R, Karakiewicz PI, Peabody JO, Menon M, Sun M, Trinh QD. Emergency department visits in the United States for upper urinary tract stones: trends in hospitalization and charges. J Urol. 2014;191(1):90-96. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.098; Bapir R, Bhatti KH, Eliwa A, García-Perdomo HA, Gherabi N, Hennessey D, Mourmouris P, Ouattara A, Perletti G, Philipraj J, Trinchieri A, Buchholz N. Infectious complications of endourological treatment of kidney stones: A metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022;94(1):97-106. DOI:10.4081/aiua.2022.1.97; Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, Hakenberg OW, Liatsikos E, Nagele U, Tolley D. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):146-158. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.016; Dybowski B, Bres-Niewada E, Rzeszutko M, Tkaczyk A, Woźniak B, Wójcik M, Znajdek Z. Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery - a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):437-445. DOI:10.5173/ceju.2021.250; Senocak C, Ozcan C, Sahin T, Yilmaz G, Ozyuvali E, Sarikaya S, Resorlu B, Oguz U, Bozkurt OF, Unsal A, Adsan O. Risk Factors of Infectious Complications after Flexible Ureterorenoscopy with Laser Lithotripsy. Urol J. 2018;15(4):158-163. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.3967; Kreydin EI, Eisner BH. Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(10):598-605. DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2013.183; Li T, Sun XZ, Lai DH, Li X, He YZ. Fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome after retrograde intrarenal surgery: Risk factors and predictive model. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(7):400-408. DOI:10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.002; Mi Q, Meng X, Meng L, Chen D, Fang S. Risk Factors for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Induced by Flexible Ureteroscope Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6842479. DOI:10.1155/2020/6842479; Chen Y, Wen Y, Yu Q, Duan X, Wu W, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a metaanalysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):109. DOI:10.1186/s12894-020-00677-4; Zhou G, Zhou Y, Chen R, Wang D, Zhou S, Zhong J, Zhao Y, Wan C, Yang B, Xu J, Geng E, Li G, Huang Y, Liu H, Liu J. The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):17. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01376-5; Российское общество урологов. Клинические рекомендации «Мочекаменная болезнь». 2020.; European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. 2023. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis; Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1153-1160. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090; Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ; Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practice Policy Panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1379-1390. Erratum in: J Urol. 2008;180(5):2262-2263. PMID: 18280509. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068; Yu J, Guo B, Yu J, Chen T, Han X, Niu Q, Xu S, Guo Z, Shi Q, Peng X, Deng Z, Yang P. Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol. 2020;38(7):1685-1700. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02967-5; Sur RL, Krambeck AE, Large T, Bechis SK, Friedlander DF, Monga M, Hsi RS, Miller NL, Chew BH, Lange D, Knudsen B, Sourial MW, Humphreys MR, Stern KL, Shah O, Abbott JE, Abedi G. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderate to High Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium. J Urol. 2021;205(5):1379-1386. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001582; Jung HD, Cho KS, Moon YJ, Chung DY, Kang DH, Lee JY. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267233. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267233; Xu P, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Zeng T, Chen D, Wu W, Tiselius HG, Li S, Huang J, Zeng G, Wu W. Preoperative antibiotic therapy exceeding 7 days can minimize infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with positive urine culture. World J Urol. 2022;40(1):193-199. DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03834-y; Gutierrez J, Smith A, Geavlete P, Shah H, Kural AR, de Sio M, Amón Sesmero JH, Hoznek A, de la Rosette J; CROES PCNL Study Group. Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1135-1140. DOI:10.1007/s00345-012-0836-y; Bhojani N, Miller LE, Bhattacharyya S, Cutone B, Chew BH. Risk Factors for Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(7):991-1000. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.1133; Wang F, Hong Y, Yang Z, Ye L. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of stones at ureteropelvic junction with high-grade hydronephrosis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14050. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-93551-8; Chew BH, Miller NL, Abbott JE, Lange D, Humphreys MR, Pais VM Jr, Monga M, Krambeck AE, Sur RL. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics Prior to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in a Low Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium. J Urol. 2018;200(4):801-808. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.062; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/831

Availability: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/831
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-1-69-79

View record from BASE

3

Academic Journal

Evidence-based efficacy, safety and technical features of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (systematic review of meta-analyses) ; Эффективность, безопасность и технические особенности выполнения перкутанной нефролитотомии с точки зрения доказательной медицины (систематический обзор мета-анализов)

Authors: V. A. Malkhasyan, N. K. Gadzhiev, S. O. Sukhikh, D. Yu. Pushkar, В. А. Малхасян, Н. К. Гаджиев, С. О. Сухих, Д. Ю. Пушкарь

Source: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 2 (2024); 87-107 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 2 (2024); 87-107 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2

Subject Terms: обзор мета-анализов, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, postoperative complications, meta-analysis, перкутанная нефролитотомия, чрескожная нефролитотомия, нефролитолапаксия, нефролитотрипсия, послеоперационные осложнения

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/858/553; Chen Y, Feng J, Duan H, Yue Y, Zhang C, Deng T, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for surgical treatment of patients with staghorn stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0206810. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0206810; Chung DY, Kang DH, Cho KS, Jeong WS, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Lee SH, Lee JY. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0211316. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0211316; Liu Y, Zhang H, Wen Z, Jiang Y, Huang J, Wang C, Chen C, Wang J, Bao E, Yang X. Eﬃcacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones (>1 cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):171. DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01341-3; De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, Torricelli FC, Di Palma C, Molina WR, Monga M, De Sio M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):125-137. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003; Jiang H, Yu Z, Chen L, Wang T, Liu Z, Liu J, Wang S, Ye Z. Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2035851. DOI:10.1155/2017/2035851; Davis NF, Quinlan MR, Poyet C, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM, Webb D, Jack GS. Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ﬂexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical eﬃcacy and safety proﬁle. World J Urol. 2018;36(7):1127-1138. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2230-x; Jiao B, Luo Z, Xu X, Zhang M, Zhang G. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019;71:1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.005; Chen Y, Wen Y, Yu Q, Duan X, Wu W, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus ﬂexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical eﬃcacy and safety. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):109. DOI:10.1186/s12894-020-00677-4; Dorantes-Carrillo LA, Basulto-Martínez M, Suárez-Ibarrola R, Heinze A, Proietti S, Flores-Tapia JP, Esqueda-Mendoza A, Giusti G. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones >1cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(1):259-270. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.02.008; Gao XS, Liao BH, Chen YT, Feng SJ, Gao R, Luo DY, Liu JM, Wang KJ. Diﬀerent Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1101-1110. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0547; Zheng C, Xiong B, Wang H, Luo J, Zhang C, Wei W, Wang Y. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2014;93(4):417-24. DOI:10.1159/000363509; Kang SK, Cho KS, Kang DH, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Lee JY. Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: An update. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(49):e9119. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000009119; Zewu Z, Cui Y, Feng Z, Yang L, Chen H. Comparison of retrograde ﬂexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediate size renal stones (2-3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(1):10-22. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0510; Kim CH, Chung DY, Rha KH, Lee JY, Lee SH. Eﬀectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 30;57(1):26. DOI:10.3390/medicina57010026; Barone B, Crocetto F, Vitale R, Di Domenico D, Caputo V, Romano F, De Luca L, Bada M, Imbimbo C, Prezioso D. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(4):441-450. DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03721-2; Awedew AF, Seman YS, Yalew DZ, Wondmeneh YC, Yigzaw WA. Eﬃcacy and safety of surgical treatment for 1-2 cm sized lower pole of renal stone: network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Urolithiasis. 2023;51(1):82. DOI:10.1007/s00240-023-01454-2; Donaldson JF, Lardas M, Scrimgeour D, Stewart F, MacLennan S, Lam TB, McClinton S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical eﬀectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol. 2015;67(4):612-6. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.054; Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C, Chen Q, Song R, Sun Y. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):745-59. DOI:10.1089/end.2014.0799; Yuri P, Hariwibowo R, Soeroharjo I, Danarto R, Hendri AZ, Brodjonegoro SR, Rasyid N, Birowo P, Widyahening IS. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Acta Med Indones. 2018;50(1):18-25. PMID: 29686172; Junbo L, Yugen L, Guo J, Jing H, Ruichao Y, Tao W. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Urol J. 2019;16(2):97-106. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.4681; Cabrera JD, Manzo BO, Torres JE, Vicentini FC, Sánchez HM, Rojas EA, Lozada E. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20 mm lower pole renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2020;38(10):2621-2628. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-03043-8; Tsai SH, Chung HJ, Tseng PT, Wu YC, Tu YK, Hsu CW, Lei WT. Comparison of the eﬃcacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(10):e19403. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000019403; Kallidonis P, Adamou C, Ntasiotis P, Pietropaolo A, Somani B, Özsoy M, Liourdi D, Sarica K, Liatsikos E, Tailly T. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of UroTechnology and Young Academic Urologists. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(6):711-723. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04388-3; Kallidonis P, Ntasiotis P, Somani B, Adamou C, Emiliani E, Knoll T, Skolarikos A, Tailly T. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones Less Than 2 cm in Maximum Diameter. J Urol. 2020;204(3):427-433. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001013; Liu M, Hou J, Xu F, Du H, Liu J, Li N. Minimally invasive nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of Lower calyceal stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(5):1481-1488. DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000394; Hou J, Xu F, Du H, Liu J, Li N. Eﬃcacy and safety of the surgical treatments for lower calyceal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(3):383-388. DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000062; Wang X, Li S, Liu T, Guo Y, Yang Z. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2013;190(3):888-93. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092; Wang J, Yang Y, Chen M, Tao T, Liu C, Huang Y, Guan H, Han X, Xu B. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal pelvic calculi (diameter >2 cm): a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2016;116(6):346-356. DOI:10.1080/00015458.2016.1181312; Rui X, Hu H, Yu Y, Yu S, Zhang Z. Comparison of safety and eﬃcacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large renal pelvic stones: a meta-analysis. J Investig Med. 2016;64(6):1134-42. DOI:10.1136/jim-2015-000053; Zhao C, Yang H, Tang K, Xia D, Xu H, Chen Z, Ye Z. Comparison of laparoscopic stone surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large upper urinary stones: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(6):479-490. DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0862-0; Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L, Wang X, Yang Y, Wang J, Han P. Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):75. DOI:10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7; Mao T, Wei N, Yu J, Lu Y. Eﬃcacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(1):300060520983136. DOI:10.1177/0300060520983136; Mantica G, Balzarini F, Chierigo F, Keller EX, Talso M, Emiliani E, Pietropaolo A, Papalia R, Scarpa RM, Terrone C, Esperto F; European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU) and Young Academic Urologists (YAU). The ﬁght between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(2):169-177. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04587-0; Wang Q, Guo J, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Wang S. Rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171478. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171478; Gao ZM, Gao S, Qu HC, Li K, Li N, Liu CL, Zhu XW, Liu YL, Wang P, Zheng XH. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy improves stone-free rates for impacted proximal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171230. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171230; Wu T, Duan X, Chen S, Yang X, Tang T, Cui S. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Per-cutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017;99(3):308-319. DOI:10.1159/000471773; Wang Y, Chang X, Li J, Han Z. Eﬃcacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(6):902-926. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550; Lai S, Jiao B, Diao T, Seery S, Hu M, Wang M, Hou H, Wang J, Zhang G, Liu M. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2020;80:205-217. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025; Sharma G, Pareek T, Tyagi S, Kaundal P, Yadav AK, Thummala Y, Devana SK. Comparison of eﬃcacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11811. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-91364-3; Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP, Zeng G. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):563-70. DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0808-y; Feng D, Hu X, Tang Y, Han P, Wei X. The eﬃcacy and safety of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(2):115-126. DOI:10.4111/icu.2020.61.2.115; Deng J, Li J, Wang L, Hong Y, Zheng L, Hu J, Kuang R. Standard versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a meta-analysis. Scand J Surg. 2021;110(3):301-311. DOI:10.1177/1457496920920474; Sharma G, Sharma A, Devana SK, Singh SK. Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of Renal Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1376-1385. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.07.014; Wan C, Wang D, Xiang J, Yang B, Xu J, Zhou G, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Zhong J, Liu J. Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):523-533. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01349-8; Mykoniatis I, Pietropaolo A, Pyrgidis N, Tishukov M, Anastasiadis A, Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Talso M, Tailly T, Kalidonis P; Young Academic Urologists of the European Association of Urology-Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Party. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of renal stones over 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(4):409-417. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04678-X; Qin P, Zhang D, Huang T, Fang L, Cheng Y. Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(4):637-648. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347; Li H, Yin Y, Nie M. Eﬃcacy and safety of super-mini per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):87. DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01256-z; Zeid M, Sayedin H, Sridharan N, Narayanaswamy A, Abul F, Jacob PT, Giri S, Sarica K, Almousawi S. Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Nephrolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e32253. DOI:10.7759/cureus.32253; Li X, Li J, Zhu W, Duan X, Zhao Z, Deng T, Duan H, Zeng G. Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206048. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0206048; Gu Z, Yang Y, Ding R, Wang M, Pu J, Chen J. Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2021;105(1-2):64-70. DOI:10.1159/000506716; Zhang B, Hu Y, Gao J, Zhuo D. Micropercutaneous versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Moderately Sized Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2020;104(1-2):94-105. DOI:10.1159/000503796; Chen D, Chen C, Xie Y, Luo Z, Liu G. Suctioning Versus Traditional Access Sheath in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2021;19(1):1-8. DOI:10.22037/uj.v18i.6773; Zhu L, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Gou L, Huang Y, Zheng X. Comparison of vacuum-assisted sheaths and normal sheaths in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2021;21(1):158. DOI:10.1186/s12894-021-00925-1; Li P, Huang Z, Sun X, Yang T, Wang G, Jiang Y, Ke C, Li J. Comparison of Vacuum Suction Sheath and Non-Vacuum Suction Sheath in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(5):1145-1152. DOI:10.1080/08941939.2021.1995538; He Z, Tang F, Lu Z, He Y, Wei G, Zhong F, Zeng G, Wu W, Yan L, Li Z. Comparison of Supracostal and Infracostal Access For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2019;16(2):107-114. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.4727; Jiao B, Ding Z, Luo Z, Lai S, Xu X, Chen X, Zhang G. Single- versus Multiple-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Surgical Management of Staghorn Stones or Complex Caliceal Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:8817070. DOI:10.1155/2020/8817070; Wang Z, Feng D, Cao D, Zhang Y, Wei W. Comparison of safety and eﬃcacy between single-tract and multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment of complex renal calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(6):731-738. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04239-9; Song R, Ji C, Cong R, Luan J, Yao L, Song N, Meng X. Is It Safe to Increase the Number of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Channels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Esp Urol. 2022;75(10):819-830. DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227510.120; Widyokirono DR, Kloping YP, Hidayatullah F, Rahman ZA, Ng AC, Hakim L. Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large and Complex Renal Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):865-876. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0761; Castellani D, Corrales M, Lim EJ, Cracco C, Scoﬀone CM, Teoh JY, Traxer O, Gauhar V. The Impact of Lasers in Per-cutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Comparative Trials. J Endourol. 2022;36(2):151-157. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0507; Lin L, Zhou L, Xiao K, Jin X, Jian Z, Liu Y, Li H, Wang K. Does combined lithotripter show superior stone-success rate than ultrasonic or pneumatic device alone during percutaneous nephrolithotrotomy? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2022;98:106223. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106223; Mykoniatis I, Pyrgidis N, Tzelves L, Pietropaolo A, Juliebø-Jones P, De Coninck V, Hameed BMZ, Chaloupka M, Schulz GB, Stief C, Kallidonis P, Somani BK, Skolarikos A. Assessment of single-probe dual-energy lithotripters in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies. World J Urol. 2023;41(2):551-565. DOI:10.1007/s00345-023-04278-2; Dehong C, Liangren L, Huawei L, Qiang W. A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(6):523-30. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0598-z; Li Y, Yang L, Xu P, Shen P, Qian S, Wei W, Wang J. One-shot versus gradual dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(5):443-8. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0583-6; Peng PX, Lai SC, Seery S, He YH, Zhao H, Wang XM, Zhang G. Balloon versus Amplatz for tract dilation in ﬂuoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035943. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035943; Yuan H, Zheng S, Liu L, Han P, Wang J, Wei Q. The eﬃ-cacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Res. 2011;39(5):401-10. DOI:10.1007/s00240-010-0355-5; Ni S, Qiyin C, Tao W, Liu L, Jiang H, Hu H, Han R, Wang C. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Urology. 2011;77(6):1293-8. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.023; Wang J, Zhao C, Zhang C, Fan X, Lin Y, Jiang Q. Tubeless vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2012;109(6):918-24. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10463.x; Shen P, Liu Y, Wang J. Nephrostomy tube-free versus nephrostomy tube for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2012;88(3):298-306. DOI:10.1159/000332151; Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J, Piao Y, Zhou Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2013;27(4):420-6. DOI:10.1089/end.2012.0421; Xun Y, Wang Q, Hu H, Lu Y, Zhang J, Qin B, Geng Y, Wang S. Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):102. DOI:10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2; Lee JY, Jeh SU, Kim MD, Kang DH, Kwon JK, Ham WS, Choi YD, Cho KS. Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):48. DOI:10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x; Li Q, Gao L, Li J, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;29(2):61-69. DOI:10.1080/13645706.2019.1581224; Chen ZJ, Yan YJ, Zhou JJ. Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(1):60-68. DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.01.016; Gauhar V, Traxer O, García Rojo E, Scarcella S, Pavia MP, Chan VW, Pretore E, Wroclawski ML, Corrales M, Tiong HY, Lim EJ, Teoh JY, Heng CT, de la Rosette J, Somani BK, Castellani D. Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(5):511-522. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y; Wilhelm K, Hein S, Kunath F, Schoenthaler M, Schmidt S. Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;7(7):CD012607. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2; Wang J, Zhang C, Tan G, Yang B, Chen W, Tan D. The use of adjunctive hemostatic agents in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(6):509-17. DOI:10.1007/s00240-014-0717-5; Yu C, Xu Z, Long W, Longfei L, Feng Z, Lin Q, Xiongbing Z, Hequn C. Hemostatic agents used for nephrostomy tract closure after tubeless PCNL: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(5):445-53. DOI:10.1007/s00240-014-0687-7; Chen Y, Feng J, Yue Y, Zhao Z, Deng T, Wu W, Zeng G. Externalized Ureteral Catheter Versus Double-J Stent in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2018;32(7):581-588. DOI:10.1089/end.2018.0066; Pu C, Wang J, Tang Y, Yuan H, Li J, Bai Y, Wang X, Wei Q, Han P. The eﬃcacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(5):455-66. DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0776-2; Hu H, Qin B, He D, Lu Y, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang S. Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126587. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126587; Liu X, Huang G, Zhong R, Hu S, Deng R. Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Regional versus General Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):132-142. DOI:10.1159/000491021; Liu L, Zheng S, Xu Y, Wei Q. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position. J Endourol. 2010;24(12):1941-6. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0292; Wu P, Wang L, Wang K. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(1):67-77. DOI:10.1007/s11255-010-9801-0; Zhang X, Xia L, Xu T, Wang X, Zhong S, Shen Z. Is the supine position superior to the prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)? Urolithiasis. 2014;42(1):87-93. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0614-3; Yuan D, Liu Y, Rao H, Cheng T, Sun Z, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen W, Zhong W, Zhu J. Supine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2016;30(7):754-63. DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0402; Li J, Gao L, Li Q, Zhang Y, Jiang Q. Supine versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019;66:62-71. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.016; Birowo P, Tendi W, Widyahening IS, Rasyid N, Atmoko W. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res. 2020;9:231. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.22940.3; Keller EX, DE Coninck V, Proietti S, Talso M, Emiliani E, Ploumidis A, Mantica G, Somani B, Traxer O, Scarpa RM, Esperto F; European Association of Urology - European Society of Residents in Urology (EAU-ESRU). Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(1):50-58. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03960-0; Falahatkar S, Mokhtari G, Teimoori M. An Update on Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2016;13(5):2814-2822.; Wang K, Zhang P, Xu X, Fan M. Ultrasonographic versus Fluoroscopic Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2015;95(1):15-25. DOI:10.1159/000369216; Liu Q, Zhou L, Cai X, Jin T, Wang K. Fluoroscopy versus ultrasound for image guidance during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(5):481-487. DOI:10.1007/s00240-016-0934-1; Yang YH, Wen YC, Chen KC, Chen C. Ultrasound-guided versus ﬂuoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019;37(5):777-788. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2443-z; Arabzadeh Bahri R, Maleki S, Shaﬁee A, Shobeiri P. Ultrasound versus ﬂuoroscopy as imaging guidance for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0276708. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276708; Wang L, Li KP, Yin S, Yang L, Zhu PY. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus conventional ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with a non-dilated collecting system: results of a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):93. DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01269-8; Ma Y, Li P, Xiang L, Wen J, Jin X. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound vs Conventional Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Nondilated Collecting System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 2023;37(3):264-272. DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0360; Hu H, Lu Y, Cui L, Zhang J, Zhao Z, Qin B, Wang Y, Wang Q, Wang S. Impact of previous open renal surgery on the outcomes of subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010627. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010627; Pan Y, Xu M, Kang J, Wang S, Liu X. The Safety of Continuing Low-dose Aspirin Therapy Perioperatively in the Patients had Undergone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urol J. 2022;19(4):253-261. DOI:10.22037/uj.v19i.7170; Wang Z, He X, Bai Y, Wang J. Can tranexamic acid reduce the blood transfusion rate in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(4):300060520917563. DOI:10.1177/0300060520917563; Feng D, Zhang F, Liu S, Han P, Wei W. Eﬃcacy and safety of the tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(5):579-585. DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03826-6; Lee MJ, Kim JK, Tang J, Ming JM, Chua ME. The Eﬃcacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in the Management of Perioperative Bleeding After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. J Endourol. 2022;36(3):303-312. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0498; Kallidonis P, Vagionis A, Pagonis K, Peteinaris A, Pietropaolo A, Adamou C, Liatsikos E, Tailly T. Is There Any Clinical Beneﬁt for Peri-operative Administration of Tranexamic Acid for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22(12):65. DOI:10.1007/s11934-021-01079-1; MacDonald M, Ilie G, Power L, Whalen S, Parker R, Skinner TA, Powers AGL. Eﬀect of Tranexamic Acid on Bleeding Outcomes After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endourol. 2022;36(5):589-597. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0762; Baccaglini W, Rodrigues AF, Glina FPA, DallAqua V, Glina S, Neto ACL. Tranexamic Acid Use for Hemorrhagic Events Prevention in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):906-915. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0792; Prasad S, Sharma G, Devana SK, Kumar S, Sharma S. Is tranexamic acid associated with decreased need for blood transfusion in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023;105(2):99-106. DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2021.0259; Bapir R, Bhatti KH, Eliwa A, García-Perdomo HA, Gherabi N, Hennessey D, Mourmouris P, Ouattara A, Perletti G, Philipraj J, Trinchieri A, Buchholz N. Infectious complications of endourological treatment of kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022;94(1):97-106. DOI:10.4081/aiua.2022.1.97; Zhou G, Zhou Y, Chen R, Wang D, Zhou S, Zhong J, Zhao Y, Wan C, Yang B, Xu J, Geng E, Li G, Huang Y, Liu H, Liu J. The inﬂuencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):17. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01376-5; Liu M, Chen J, Gao M, Zeng H, Cui Y, Zhu Z, Chen H. Preoperative Midstream Urine Cultures vs Renal Pelvic Urine Culture or Stone Culture in Predicting Systemic Inﬂammatory Response Syndrome and Urosepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(10):1467-1478. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.1140; Castellani D, Teoh JY, Pavia MP, Pretore E, Dell'Atti L, Galosi AB, Gauhar V. Assessing the Optimal Urine Culture for Predicting Systemic Inﬂammatory Response Syndrome After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(2):158-168. DOI:10.1089/end.2021.0386; Yu J, Guo B, Yu J, Chen T, Han X, Niu Q, Xu S, Guo Z, Shi Q, Peng X, Deng Z, Yang P. Antibiotic prophylaxis in perioperative period of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol. 2020;38(7):1685-1700. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02967-5; Jung HD, Cho KS, Moon YJ, Chung DY, Kang DH, Lee JY. Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267233. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267233; Danilovic A, Talizin TB, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS, Batagello C, Vicentini FC, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. One week pre-operative oral antibiotics for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduce risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2023;49(2):184-193. DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0544; Jones P, Bennett G, Dosis A, Pietropaolo A, Geraghty R, Aboumarzouk O, Skolarikos A, Somani BK. Safety and Efﬁcacy of Day-case Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from European Society of Uro-technology. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(6):1127-1134. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.002; Gao M, Zeng F, Zhu Z, Zeng H, Chen Z, Li Y, Yang Z, Cui Y, He C, Chen J, Chen H. Day care surgery versus inpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;81:132-139. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.056; Peng L, Meng C, Xia Z, Liang R, Gan L, Li K, Cao D, Li Y. Determining the safety and eﬀectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treating nephrolithiasis in patients with solitary kidneys. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):2. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01386-3; Jiang K, Zhang P, Xu B, Luo G, Hu J, Zhu J, Sun F. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger than 2cm in Patients with a Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2020;17(5):442-448. DOI:10.22037/uj.v16i7.5609; Zhou X, Sun X, Chen X, Gong X, Yang Y, Chen C, Yao Q. Eﬀect of Obesity on Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2017;98(4):382-390. DOI:10.1159/000455162; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/858

Availability: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/858
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2-87-107

View record from BASE

4

Academic Journal

Dynamics of inflammatory reaction markers in patients under endourological interventions ; Динамика маркеров воспалительной реакции у пациентов, подвергающихся эндоурологическому удалению камней

Authors: V. A. Malkhasyan, Yu. A. Kim, I. O. Grickov, D. Yu. Pushkar, В. А. Малхасян, Ю. А. Ким, И. О. Грицков, Д. Ю. Пушкарь

Contributors: The study did not have sponsorship, Исследование не имело спонсорской поддержки

Source: Urology Herald; Том 11, № 2 (2023); 74-82 ; Вестник урологии; Том 11, № 2 (2023); 74-82 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-2

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/722/468; Ghani KR, Roghmann F, Sammon JD, Trudeau V, Sukumar S, Rahbar H, Kumar R, Karakiewicz PI, Peabody JO, Menon M, Sun M, Trinh QD. Emergency department visits in the United States for upper urinary tract stones: trends in hospitalization and charges. J Urol. 2014;191(1):90-6. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.098; Лопаткин Н.А. Урология. Национальное руководство. М: Гэотар-Медиа. 2013.; Комяков Б.К. Урология. 2-е изд, Москва: Гэотар-Медиа. 2018. Komyakov BK. Urology. 2nd edn, Moscow: Geotar-Media. 2018. (In Russian); Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):468-74. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.040; Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Celia A, Paccaduscio A, Schips L, Proietti S, Breda A, Giusti G. Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):305-10. DOI:10.1007/s00345-015-1642-0; Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165-228. DOI:10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8; Kreydin EI, Eisner BH. Risk factors for sepsis after percutaneous renal stone surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(10):598-605. DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2013.183; O'Keeffe NK, Mortimer AJ, Sambrook PA, Rao PN. Severe sepsis following percutaneous or endoscopic procedures for urinary tract stones. Br J Urol. 1993;72(3):277-83. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb00717.x; Armitage JN, Withington J, Fowler S, Finch WJG, Burgess NA, Irving SO, Glass J, Wiseman OJ; BAUS section of Endourology. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy access by urologist or interventional radiologist: practice and outcomes in the UK. BJU Int. 2017;119(6):913-918. DOI:10.1111/bju.13817; Demir DO, Doluoglu OG, Yildiz Y, Bozkurt S, Ayyildiz A, Demirbas A. Risk Factors for Infectious Complications in Patients Undergoing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(6):558-562. DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.558; Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M, Cera N, Proietti S, Hennessey D, Dalpiaz O, Cracco C, Scoffone C, Schips L, Giusti G, Cindolo L. Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(11):1757-1762. DOI:10.1007/s11255-016-1373-1; Fan S, Gong B, Hao Z, Zhang L, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Liang C. Risk factors of infectious complications following flexible ureteroscope with a holmium laser: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11252-9. PMID: 26379932; PMCID: PMC4565315.; Ganesan V, Brown RD, Jiménez JA, De S, Monga M. C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Predict Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2017;31(7):638-644. DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0884; Bozkurt IH, Aydogdu O, Yonguc T, Koras O, Sen V, Yarimoglu S, Degirmenci T. Predictive Value of Leukocytosis for Infectious Complications After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2015;86(1):25-9. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.026; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/722

Availability: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/722
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-2-74-82

View record from BASE

5

Academic Journal