Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of manual anastomosis use of its own modernization in the rectum anterior resection ; Оценка эффективности и безопасности применения ручного анастомоза в собственной модернизации при передней резекции прямой кишки

Authors: S. G. Gaydarov, Z. Z. Mamedli, Z. A. Dudaev, D. M. Pugaev, Ch. M. Mongush, С. Г. Гайдаров, З. З. Мамедли, З. А. Дудаев, Д. М. Пугаев, Ч. М. Монгуш

Source: Surgery and Oncology; Том 14, № 2 (2024); 26-32 ; Хирургия и онкология; Том 14, № 2 (2024); 26-32 ; 2949-5857

Subject Terms: несостоятельность анастомоза, colorectal anastomosis, manual anastomosis, anastomotic failure, колоректальный анастомоз, ручной анастомоз

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/708/464; Sun Y., Li J., Shen L. et al. Predictive value of MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion in stage T3 rectal cancer patients before neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Diagn Interv Radiol 2018;24(3):128–34. DOI:10.5152/dir.2018.17286; Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2022 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2023.; Федянин М.Ю., Гладков О.А., Гордеев С.С. и др. Рак ободочной кишки, ректосигмоидного соединения и прямой кишки. Злокачественные опухоли 2023;13(3s2-1):425–82. DOI:10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-1-425-482; Golub R., Golub R.W., Cantu R. Jr, Stein H.D. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184(4):364–72.; Emile S.H., Khan S.M., Garoufalia Z. et al. When is a diverting stoma indicated after low anterior resection? A meta-analysis of randomized trials and meta-regression of the risk factors of leakage and complications in non-diverted patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2022;26(11):2368–79. DOI:10.1007/s11605-022-05427-5; Zhou L., Qin Z., Wang L. Risk factors and incidence of non-closure stoma in patients with anterior resection of rectal cancer with temporary stoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023;49(12):107120. DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107120; Балкаров А.А., Алексеев М.В., Рыбаков Е.Г., Шелыгин Ю.А. Влияние несостоятельности колоректального анастомоза на сроки закрытия превентивной стомы. Хирургия и онкология 2023;13(4):11–6. DOI:10.17650/2949-5857-2023-13-4-11-16; McKechnie T., Sharma S., Daniel R., Eskicioglu C. End-to-end versus end-to-side anastomosis for low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgery 2021;170(2):397–404. DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.030; Neutzling C.B., Lustosa S.A.S., Proenca I.M. et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(2):CD003144. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003144.pub2; Oliveira A., Faria S., Gonçalves N. et al. Surgical approaches to colonic and rectal anastomosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023;38(1):52. DOI:10.1007/s00384-023-04328-6; Qu H., Liu Y., Bi D.S. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2015;29(12):3608–17. DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4117-x; Лукмонов С.Н., Беленькая Я.В., Лебедько М.С. и др. Влияние предоперационного лечения на частоту послеоперационных осложнений при раке верхнеампулярного отдела прямой кишки. Тазовая хирургия и онкология 2023;13(2):46–53. DOI:10.17650/2686-9594-2023-13-2-46-53

Availability: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/708
https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-26-32

Influence of colorectal anastomotic leakage on time before the loop stoma closing ; Влияние несостоятельности колоректального анастомоза на сроки закрытия превентивной стомы

Authors: A. A. Balkarov, M. V. Alekseev, E. G. Rybakov, Yu. A. Shelygin, А. А. Балкаров, М. В. Алексеев, Е. Г. Рыбаков, Ю. А. Шелыгин

Source: Surgery and Oncology; Том 13, № 4 (2023); 11-16 ; Хирургия и онкология; Том 13, № 4 (2023); 11-16 ; 2949-5857

Subject Terms: закрытие отключающей илеостомы, anastomotic leakage, closure of loop ileostomy, несостоятельность анастомоза

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/653/442; Jutesten H., Draus J., Frey J. el al. High risk of permanent stoma after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2019;21(2):174–82. DOI:10.1111/codi.14469; Kitaguchi D., Nishizawa Y., Sasaki T. et al. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors. Colorectal Dis 2019;21(11):1304–11. DOI:10.1111/codi.14728; Rahbari N.N., Weitz J., Hohenberger W. et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010;147(3):339–51. DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012; Hain E., Maggiori L., Manceau G. et al. Persistent Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Can Diverting Stoma Be Reversed Safely at 6 Months? Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59(5):369–76. DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000568; Файзулин Р.И., Тарасов М.А., Пономаренко А.А. и др. Влияет ли высокая перевязка нижней брыжеечной артерии на результаты хирургического лечения больных раком прямой кишки? (метаанализ и системный обзор литературы). Колопроктология 2022;21(4):10–20. DOI:10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-4-10-20; Phan K., Oh L., Ctercteko G. et al. Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019;10(2):179–87. DOI:10.21037/jgo.2018.11.07; Tan W.S., Tang C.L., Shi L. Et al. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96(5):462–72. DOI:10.1002/bjs.6594; Keane C., Park J., Öberg S. et al. Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer. Br J Surg 2019;106(5):645–52. DOI:10.1002/bjs.11092; Artus A., Tabchouri N., Iskander O. et al. Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1):780. DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-07109-4; Gessler B., Eriksson O., Angenete E. Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32(4):549–56. DOI:10.1007/s00384-016-2744-x; Khomyakov E.A., Nafedzov I.O., Fomenko O.Yu. et al. Risk factors for major low anterior resection syndrome: meta-analysis and systematic literature review. Russian Open Medical Journal 2021;10(1):113. DOI:10.15275/rusomj.2021.0113; Hüser N., Michalski C.W., Erkan M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248(1):52–60. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65; Shellito P.C. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41(12):1562–72. DOI:10.1007/BF02237308; Anaraki F., Vafaie M., Behboo R. et al. Quality of life outcomes in patients living with stoma. Indian J Palliat Care 2012;18(3): 176–80. DOI:10.4103/0973-1075.105687; Krishnamurty D.M., Blatnik J., Mutch M. Stoma Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017;30(3):193–200. DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1598160; Серебрий А.Б., Хомяков Е.А., Нафедзов И.О. и др. Качество жизни больных после хирургического лечения рака прямой кишки (обзор литературы). Колопроктология 2021;20(1):59–67. DOI:10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-1-59-67; Den Dulk M., Smit M., Peeters K.C. et al. A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: aretrospective study. Lancet Oncol 2007;8(4):297–303. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70047-5; Nguyen T.H., Chokshi R.V. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020;22(10):48. DOI:10.1007/s11894-020-00785-z; Chow A., Tilney H.S., Paraskeva P. et al. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24(6):711–23. DOI:10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z

Availability: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/653
https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2023-13-4-11-16

ФАКТОРЫ РИСКА И ИНТРАОПЕРАЦИОННЫЕ ПОДХОДЫ К ПРОФИЛАКТИКЕ НЕСОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ КИШЕЧНЫХ АНАСТОМОЗОВ

Subject Terms: несостоятельность анастомоза, кишечный анастомоз, колоректальный анастомоз, intestinal anastomosis, профилактика несостоятельности, prevention of leakage, anastomotic leakage, colorectal anastomosis

Immediate and long-term results of the treatment of patients with rectal cancer ; Непосредственные и отдаленные результаты лечения рака прямой кишки

Authors: O. I. Kit, Yu. A. Gevorkyan, N. V. Soldatkina, V. E. Kolesnikov, O. K. Bondarenko, E. K. Khabzhokov, R. E. Tolmakh, A. V. Dashkov, D. S. Petrov, D. A. Savchenko, E. N. Kolesnikov, A. V. Snezhko, О. И. Кит, Ю. А. Геворкян, Н. В. Солдаткина, В. Е. Колесников, О. К. Бондаренко, Э. К. Хабжоков, Р. Е. Толмах, А. В. Дашков, Д. С. Петров, Д. А. Савченко, Е. Н. Колесников, А. В. Снежко

Source: Siberian journal of oncology; Том 22, № 1 (2023); 15-23 ; Сибирский онкологический журнал; Том 22, № 1 (2023); 15-23 ; 2312-3168 ; 1814-4861

Subject Terms: отдаленные метастазы, rectal cancer, anastomotic failure, distant metastases, рак прямой кишки, несостоятельность анастомоза

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/2423/1072; São Julião G.P., Habr-Gama A., Vailati B.B., Araujo S.E.A., Fernandez L.M., Perez R.O. New Strategies in Rectal Cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2017; 97(3): 587–604. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2017.01.008.; Turano M., Delrio P., Rega D., Cammarota F., Polverino A., Duraturo F., Izzo P., De Rosa M. Promising Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers for Precision Prevention and Therapy. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(12): 1932. doi:10.3390/cancers11121932.; Кит О.И., Геворкян Ю.А., Солдаткина Н.В., Тимошкина Н.Н., Харагезов Д.А., Каймакчи Д.О., Полуэктов С.И., Дашков А.В., Гудцкова Т.Н. Современные прогностические факторы при колоректальном раке. Колопроктология. 2021; 20(2): 42–9. doi:10.33878/20737556-2021-20-2-42-49.; Foppa C., Ng S.C., Montorsi M., Spinelli A. Anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer patients: New insights and perspectives. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 46(6): 943–54. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.027.; McDermott F.D., Heeney A., Kelly M.E., Steele R.J., Carlson G.L., Winter D.C. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(5): 462–79. doi:10.1002/bjs.9697.; Thomas M.S., Margolin D.A. Management of Colorectal Anastomotic Leak. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016; 29(2): 138–44. doi:10.1055/s0036-1580630.; Tao K, Gao J. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018; 21(4): 384–7.; Arron M.N.N., Greijdanus N.G., Ten Broek R.P.G., Dekker J.W.T., van Workum F., van Goor H., Tanis P.J., de Wilt J.H.W. Trends in risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery (2011-2019): A Dutch population-based study. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(12): 3251–61. doi:10.1111/codi.15911.; Frasson M., Flor-Lorente B., Rodríguez J.L., Granero-Castro P., Hervás D., Alvarez Rico M.A., Brao M.J., Sánchez González J.M., GarciaGranero E.; ANACO Study Group. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection for Cancer: Multivariate Analysis and Nomogram From a Multicentric, Prospective, National Study With 3193 Patients. Ann Surg. 2015; 262(2): 321–30. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000973.; Takahashi H., Haraguchi N., Nishimura J., Hata T., Yamamoto H., Matsuda C., Mizushima T., Doki Y., Mori M. The Severity of Anastomotic Leakage May Negatively Impact the Long-term Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018; 38(1): 533–9. doi:10.21873/anticanres.12255.; Holt J., Schwalb H., Elbourne H., Te Marvelde L., Reid C. Risk factors for recurrence in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis in a regional Australian hospital. ANZ J Surg. 2021; 91(11): 2482–6. doi:10.1111/ans.17209.; Inoue A., Kagawa Y., Nishizawa Y., Hirano M., Song X., Nakai K., Sumimoto S., Yokono Y., Komatsu H., Miyazaki Y., Tomokuni A., Motoori M., Iwase K., Goto M., Fujitani K. [Risk Factors for Recurrence in Patients with Pathological Stage Ⅱ Colorectal Cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2021; 48(13): 1938–40.; Кит О.И., Геворкян Ю.А., Солдаткина Н.В., Водолажский Д.И. Частота и спектр мутаций гена KRAS при распространенном колоректальном раке. Клинико-морфологические особенности. Молекулярная медицина. 2015; 5: 26–9.; Кит О.И., Геворкян Ю.А., Солдаткина Н.В., Новикова И.А., Водолажский Д.И., Шуликов П.Б., Харагезов Д.А., Ильченко С.А., Дашков А.В., Полуэктов С.И. Некоторые молекулярно-биологические особенности метастатического колоректального рака. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2017; (3): 3.; Wu M., Kim Y.S., Ryu H.S., Choi S.C., Kim K.Y., Park W.C., Kim M.S., Myung J.Y., Choi H.S., Kim E.J., Lee M.Y. MSI status is associated with distinct clinicopathological features in BRAF mutation colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathol Res Pract. 2020; 216(1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2019.152791.; Okita A., Takahashi S., Ouchi K., Inoue M., Watanabe M., Endo M., Honda H., Yamada Y., Ishioka C. Consensus molecular subtypes classification of colorectal cancer as a predictive factor for chemotherapeutic efficacy against metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018; 9(27): 18698–711. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24617.; Khalfallah M., Dougaz W., Jerraya H., Nouira R., Bouasker I., Dziri C. Prognostic factors in rectal cancer: where is the evidence? Tunis Med. 2017; 95(2): 79–86.; Колесников Е.Н., Снежко А.В., Трифанов В.С., Кожушко М.А., Фоменко Ю.А., Кациева Т.Б., Мягков Р.Е., Санамянц С.В., Аверкин М.А., Егоров Г.Ю. Результаты передней резекции прямой кишки с формированием аппаратного анастомоза у онкологических больных. Южно-Российский онкологический журнал 2021; (4): 6–12. doi:10.37748/2686-9039-2021-2-4-1.; https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/2423

Availability: https://www.siboncoj.ru/jour/article/view/2423
https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2023-22-1-15-23

Possible role of features of the intestinal microbiome in patients with colorectal cancer as a cause of anastomotic leak ; Возможная роль особенностей кишечного микробиома у пациентов с колоректальным раком как причина несостоятельности анастомоза

Authors: P. V. Kosareva, R. A. Konev, A. P. Godovalov, L. V. Sivakova, E. I. Samodelkin, П. В. Косарева, Р. А. Конев, А. П. Годовалов, Л. В. Сивакова, Е. И. Самоделкин

Source: Bulletin of Siberian Medicine; Том 22, № 3 (2023); 120-131 ; Бюллетень сибирской медицины; Том 22, № 3 (2023); 120-131 ; 1819-3684 ; 1682-0363 ; 10.20538/1682-0363-2023-22-3

Subject Terms: несостоятельность анастомоза, cancer, intestinal obstruction, anastomotic leak, рак, кишечная непроходимость

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/5318/3445; https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/5318/3464; Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2018 году (заболеваемость и смертность); под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2019:250.; Sawicki T., Ruszkowska M., Danielewicz A., Nied´zwiedzka E., Arłukowicz T., Przybyłowicz K.E. A Review of Colorectal Cancer in Terms of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Development, Symptoms and Diagnosis. Cancers. 2021;13(9):2025. DOI:10.3390/CANCERS13092025.; Hull R., Francies F.Z., Oyomno M., Dlamini Z. Colorectal cancer genetics, incidence and risk factors: in search for targeted therapies. Cancer Management and Research. 2020;12:9869– 9882. DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S251223.; Keum N.N., Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2019;16(12):713– 732. DOI:10.1038/S41575-019-0189-8.; Jahani-Sherafat S., Alebouyeh M., Moghim S., Ahmadi Amoli H., Ghasemian-Safaei H. Role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer; a review article. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed. Bench. 2018;11(2):101–109.; Hamoya T., Fujii G., Miyamoto S., Takahashi M., Totsuka Y., Wakabayashi K. et al.M. Effects of NSAIDs on the risk factors of colorectal cancer: a mini rewiew. Genes and Environ. 2016;38:6. DOI:10.1186/S41021-016-0033-0.; Macrae F.A., Goldberg R.M., Seres D., Savarese D.M.F. Colorectal cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, and protective factors. Literature review current through: Aug. 2021. This topic lastupdated: Aug.30,2021.; Yu K., Liu L., Zhang X., Zhang Z., Rao B., Chen Y. et al. Surgical and conservative management of malignant bowel obstruction: outcome and prognostic factors. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020;12:7797–7803. DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S256219.; Karakaş D.Ö., Yeşiltaş M., Gökçek B., Eğin S., Hot S. Etiology, management, and survival of acute mechanical bowel obstruction: Five-year results of a training and research hospital in Turkey. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019;25(3):268– 280. DOI:10.14744/TJTES.2019.44834.; Franke A.J., Iqbal A., Starr J.S., Nair R.M., George T.J. Jr. Management of malignant bowel obstruction associated with GI cancers. J. Oncol. Pract. 2017;13(7):426–434. DOI:10.1200/JOP.2017.022210.; Pisano M., Zorcolo L., Merli C. et al. 2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2018;3:36. DOI:10.1186/S13017-018-0192-3.; Munakata Sh., Murai Y., Koiuzumi A., Kato H., Yamamoto R., Ueda Sh. et al. Long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with and without malignant large-bowel obstruction. Colorect. Cancer. 2018;7(2). DOI:10.2217/CRC-2018-0001.; Ахметзянов Ф.Ш., Егоров В.И., Валеев А.И., Бухалова В.А. Лечение несостоятельности швов колоректального анастомоза: возможно ли сохранить анастомоз? Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2018;17(1):92–98. DOI:10.21294/1814-4861-2018-17-1-92-98.; Climent M., Martin S.T. Complications of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Mini-invasive Surg. 2018;2:45. DOI:10.20517/2574-1225.2018.62.; An V., Chandra R., Lawrence M. Anastomotic failure in colorectal surgery: where are we at? Indian J. Surg. 2018;80(2):163– 170. DOI:10.1007/S12262-018-1745-0.; Söderbäck H., Gunnarsson U., Martling A. Incidence of wound dehiscence after colorectal cancer surgery: results from a national population-based register for colorectal cancer. Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2019;34(10):1757–1762. DOI:10.1007/S00384-019-03390-3.; Weledji E.P. Is patient factor more important than surgeon-related factor in sepsis prevention in colorectal surgery? International Journal of Surgery Open. 2018;12:29–36. DOI:10.1016/J.IJSO.2018.07.001.; Wallace B., Schuepbach F., Gaukel S., Marwan A.I., Staerkle R.F., Vuille-dit-Bille R.N. Evidence according to Cochrane Systematic Reviews on Alterable Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. Hindawi. 2020.2020:9057963. DOI:10.1155/2020/9057963.; Zhang G., Lian R., Sun L., Liu H., Wang Y., Zhou L. Redefined hyponatremia as a marker to exclude the diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery. Journal of International Medical Research. 2020;48(8):1–10. DOI:10.1177/0300060520950565.; Broda M., Schlesinger N.H. Prevention of anastomotic leak following surgical treatment for rectal cancer. Dan. Med. J. 2020;67(10):A04200286.; Zhou C., Wu X.-R., Liu X.-H., Chen Y.-F., Ke J., He X.-W. et al. Male gender is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients after total mesorectal excision. Gastroenterology Report. 2018;6(2):137–143. DOI:10.1093/GASTRO/GOX039.; Lv X., Yu H., Gao P., Song Y., Sun J., Chen X. et al. A nomogram for predicting bowel obstruction in preoperative colorectal cancer patients with clinical characteristics. World J. Surg. Onc. 2019;17(1):21. DOI:10.1186/S12957-019-1562-3.; Gessler B., Eriksson O., Angenete E. Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2017;32(4):549–556. DOI:10.1007/S00384-016-2744-X.; Gray M., Marland J.R.K., Murray A.F., Argyle D.J., Potter M.A. Predictive and diagnostic biomarkers of anastomotic leakage: a precision medicine approach for colorectal cancer patients. J. Pers. Med. 2021;11(6):471. DOI:10.3390/JPM11060471.; Althumairi A.A., Canner J.K., Pawlik T.M., Schneider E., Nagarajan N., Safar B., Efron J.E. Benefits of Bowel Preparation Beyond Surgical Site Infection: A Retrospective Study. Ann Surg. 2016;264(6):1051–1057. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001576.; Cheng W.Y., Wu C.-Y., Yu J. The role of gut microbiota in cancer treatment: friend or foe? Gut. 2020;69(10):1867–1876. DOI:10.1136/GUTJNL-2020-321153.; Phillips B. Reducing gastrointestinal anastomotic leak rates: review of challenges and solutions. Open Access Surgery. 2016;9:5–14. DOI:10.2147/OAS.S54936.; Sánchez-Alcoholado L., Ramos-Molina B., Otero A., Laborda-Illanes A., Ordóñez R. et al. The role of the gut microbiome in colorectal cancer development and therapy response. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1406. DOI:10.3390/CANCERS12061406.; Ternes D., Karta J., Tsenkova M., Wilmes P., Haan S., Letellier E. Microbiome in colorectal cancer: how to get from meta-omics to mechanism? Trends in Microbiology. 2020;28(5):401–423. DOI:10.1016/J.TIM.2020.01.001.; Bartolini I., Risaliti M., Ringressi M.N., Melli F., Nannini G., Amedei A. et al. Role of gut microbiota-immunity axis in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: Focus on short and long-term outcomes. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020;26(20):2498–2513. DOI:10.3748/WJG.V26.I20.2498.; Agnes A., Puccioni C., D’Ugo D. The gut microbiota and colorectal surgery outcomes: facts or hype? A narrative review. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):83. DOI:10.1186/S12893-021-01087-5.; Hajjar R., Richard C.S., Santos M.M. The role of butyrate in surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. American Journal of Physiology. 2021Apr.1;320(4):G601–G608. DOI:10.1152/AJPGI.00316.2020.; Gershuni V.M., Friedman E.S. The microbiome-host interaction as a potential driver of anastomotic leak. Current Gastroenterology Reports. 2019;21(1):4. DOI:10.1007/S11894-019-0668-7.; Saus E., Iraola-Guzmán S., Willis J.R., Brunet-Vega A., Gabaldón T. Microbiome and colorectal cancer: Roles in carcinogenesis and clinical potential. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2019;69:93–106. DOI:10.1016/J.MAM.2019.05.001.; Si H., Yang Q., Hu H., Ding C., Wang H., Lin X. Colorectal cancer occurrence and treatment based on changes in intestinal flora. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2021;70:3–10. DOI:10.1016/J.SEMCANCER.2020.05.004.; Clos-Garcia M., Garcia K., Alonso C., Iruarrizaga-Lejarreta M., D’Amato M., Crespo A et al. Integrative analysis of fecal metagenomics and metabolomics in colorectal cancer. Cancers. 2020;12(5):1142. DOI:10.3390/cancers12051142.; Kasper S.H., Morell-Perez C., Wyche T.P. Colorectal cancer-associated anaerobic bacteria proliferate in tumor spheroids and alter the microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):5321. DOI:10.1038/S41598-020-62139-Z.; Morais de Sousa D.J., Cardoso de Sousa L.L., Fontenele L.C., Nogueira T.R. Betânia de Jesus e Silva de Almendra Freitas Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: Evidence from observational studies. Microbiota intestinal en el cáncer colorrectal: Evidencia de estudios observacionales. Rev. Chil. Nutr. 2020;47(6):1009–1017. DOI:10.4067/S0717-75182020000601009.; Long X., Wong C.C., Tong L., Chu E.S.H., Szeto C.H., Go M.Y.Y. et al. Peptostreptococcus anaerobius promotes colorectal carcinogenesis and modulates tumour immunity. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4(12):2319–2330. DOI:10.1038/S41564-019-0541-3.; Gaines S., Shao C., Hyman N., Alverdy J.C. Gut microbiome influences on anastomotic leak and recurrence rates following colorectal cancer surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2018;105(2):е131– е141. DOI:10.1002/BJS.10760.; Baker S.E., Monlezun D.J., Ambroze W.L., Margolin D.A. Anastomotic leak is increased with clostridium difficile infection after colectomy: machine learning-augmented propensity score modified analysis of 46735 patients. The American Surgeon. 2022;88(1):74–82. DOI:10.1177/0003134820973720.; Grewal S., Korthouwer R., Bögels M., Braster R., Heemskerk N., Budding A.E. et al. Spillage of bacterial products during colon surgery increases the risk of liver metastases development in a rat colon carcinoma model. Oncol. Immunology. 2018;7(9):e1461302. DOI:10.1080/2162402X.2018.1461302.; Koliarakis I., Athanasakis E., Sgantzos M., Mariolis-Sapsakos T., Xynos E., Chrysos E. et al. Intestinal microbiota in colorectal cancer surgery. Cancers. 2020;12(10):3011. DOI:10.3390/CANCERS12103011.; Kent I., Jahansouz C., Ghuman A., Shpitz B., Kidron D., Yaffe V. et al. Human oral mucosal stem cells reduce anastomotic leak in an animal model of colonic surgery. Eur. Surg. Res. 2021;62(1):32–39. DOI:10.1159/000514987.; Lohsiriwat V., Assawasirisin C. Anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer surgery: incidence, presentation, pathogens, treatment and outcome. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2020;103(5):6–11.; Van Praagh J.B., de Goffau M.C.P., Bakker I.S., van Goor H., Harmsen H.J.M., Olinga P. et al. Mucus microbiome of anastomotic tissue during surgery has predictive value for colorectal anastomotic leakage. Annals of Surgery. 2019;269(5):911– 916. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002651.; Lauka L., Reitano E., Carra M.C. Role of the intestinal microbiome in colorectal cancer surgery outcomes. World J. Surg. Onc. 2019;17(1):204. DOI:10.1186/S12957-019-1754-X.; Chaouch M.A., Kellil T., Jeddi C., Saidani A., Chebbi F., Zouari K. How to Prevent Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review. Annals of Coloproctology. 2020;36(4):213–222. DOI:10.3393/AC.2020.05.14.2.; Yang G., Woo Kim C., Lee S.-H. Patterns of antibiotics and pathogens for anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery. Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019;15(2): 79–85. DOI:10.14216/KJCO.19015.; Kayano H., Nomura E., Ueda Y., Kuramoto T., Machida T., Mukai M. et al. Short- and Long-term outcomes of 2-step stapled intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Anticancer Research. 2019;39(11):6393–6401. DOI:10.21873/ANTICANRES.13853.; Grewal S., Reuvers J.R.D., Abis G.S.A., Otten R.H.J., Kazemier G., Stockmann H.B.A.C. et al. Oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Biomedicines. 2021;9(9):1184. DOI:10.3390/BIOMEDICINES9091184.; Holubar S.D., Hedrick T., Gupta R. American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on prevention of postoperative infection within an enhanced recovery pathway for elective colorectal surgery. Perioper. Med. 2017;6:4. DOI:10.1186/s13741-017-0059-2.; Wirth U., Rogers S., Haubensak K., Schopf S. Local antibiotic decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage shortterm outcome in rectal cancer surgery. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2018;33(5):53–60. DOI:10.1007/S00384-017-2933-2.; Грошилин В.С., Мартынов Д.В., Набока Ю.Л., Бакуляров М.Ю., Мрыхин Г.А. Коррекция дисбиотических нарушений при диверсионном проктите: возможности внутрипросветной санации и профилактика осложнений после восстановительных операций. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2019;29(6):36–48. DOI:10.22416/1382-4376-2019-29-6-36-48.; https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/5318

Availability: https://bulletin.ssmu.ru/jour/article/view/5318
https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2023-3-120-131

Анализ результатов лечения пациентов с колоректальным раком в условиях пандемии COVID-19 ; Analysis of treatment outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer in the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors: Shishkina, G. A., Topuzov, E. G., Petryashev, A. V., Erokhina, E. A., Plotnikov, U. V., Serkova, O. P., Kravchenko, M. B., Isaev, S. V., Шишкина, Г. А., Топузов, Э. Г., Петряшев, А. В., Ерохина, Е. А., Плотников, Ю. В., Серкова, О. П., Кравченко, М. Б., Исаев, С. В.

Subject Terms: COLORECTAL CANCER, ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE, COVID-19, COLORECTAL RESECTIONS, КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНЫЙ РАК, НЕСОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ АНАСТОМОЗА, ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОЕ ЛЕЧЕНИЕ КОЛОРЕКТАЛЬНОГО РАКА

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: Уральский медицинский журнал. 2022. т. 21. №1; http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/6356

Availability: http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/6356

Elimination of factors contributing to the development of colo-esophageal anastomotic dehiscence following retrosternal colonic esophagoplasty performed for esophageal atresia correction ; Устранение факторов развития несостоятельности колоэзофагеального анастомоза при загрудинной кишечной эзофагопластике по поводу атрезии пищевода

Authors: A. N. Kivva, M. G. Chepurnoy, B. M. Belik, Yu. V. Tyshlek, M. Yu. Shtilman, A. A. Kivva, I. R. Chumburidze, А. Н. Кивва, М. Г. Чепурной, Б. М. Белик, Ю. В. Тышлек, М. Ю. Штильман, А. А. Кивва, И. П. Чумбуридзе

Source: Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation; Том 14, № 3 (2022); 322-330 ; Трансплантология; Том 14, № 3 (2022); 322-330 ; 2542-0909 ; 2074-0506 ; 10.23873/2074-0506-2022-14-3

Subject Terms: резекция рукоятки грудины, retrosternal colonic esophagoplasty, anastomotic dehiscence, sternal manubrium resection, загрудинная колоэзофагопластика, несостоятельность анастомоза

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.jtransplantologiya.ru/jour/article/view/688/710; https://www.jtransplantologiya.ru/jour/article/view/688/717; Zhang J, Wu Q, Chen L, Wang Y, Cui X, Huang W. Zhou С. Clinical analysis of surgery for type III esophageal atresia via thoracoscopy: a study of a Chinese single-center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15(1):55. PMID: 32228652 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01097-z; Kumari V, Joshi P, Dhua A, Sapra S, Srinivas M, Agarwala S, et al. Share developmental status of children operated for esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula along with maternal stress, their quality of life, and coping abilities at AIIMS, New Delhi. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2019;29(1):125–131. PMID:30597492 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676825; Разумовский А.Ю., Алхасов А.Б., Батаев С.М., Чумакова Г.Ю., Задвернюк А.С. Пластика пищевода желудком или колоэзофагопластика у детей? Сравнительный анализ результатов лечения. Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2018;8(4):22–32. Razumovsky AYu, Alkhasov AB, Bataev SM, Chumakova GYu, https://doi.org/10.30946/2219-4061-2018-8-4-22-32; Godoy J, Ferraris Т, Guelfand M. Early management of esophageal leak in esophageal atresia: changing paradigms. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(8):923-926. PMID: 32552247 https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0099; Moon S, Kim J, Cho D, Park J. Early detection of complications: anastomotic leakage. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(5):S805–S811. PMID: 31080662 https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.11.55; Mine S, Watanabe M, Okamura A, Imamura Y, Kajiyama Y, Sano T. Superior thoracic aperture size is significantly associated with cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2017;41(10):2598–2604. PMID: 28466364 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4047-y; Gust L, De Lesquen H, Bouabdallah I, Brioude G, Thomas P, D'journo X. Peculiarities of intra-thoracic colon interposition-eso-coloplasty: indications, surgical management and outcomes. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(3):41. PMID: 29610733 https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.06.10; Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Migita K, Nakade H, Kunishige T, Miyao S, et al. Anastomotic leakage following retrosternal pull-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019;404(3):335–341. PMID: 30830313 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01765-2; Sato S, Nakatani E, Higashizono K, Nagai E, Taki Y, Nishida M, et al. Size of the thoracic inlet predicts cervical anastomotic leak after retrosternal reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2020;168(3):558–566. PMID: 32611514 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.021; Hu H, Ye T, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Luketich J, Chen H. Modifications in retrosternal reconstruction after oesophagogastrectomy may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42(2):359–363. PMID: 22345283 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs015; Petrov R, Bakhos C, Abbas A. Robotic substernal esophageal bypass and reconstruction with gastric conduit-frequently overlooked minimally invasive option. J Vis Surg. 2019;5:47. PMID: 31157161 https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2019.04.02; Lock J, Reimer S, Pietryga S, Jakubietz R, Flemming S, Meining A, et al. Managing esophagocutaneous fistula after secondary gastric pull-up: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(16):1841–1846. PMID: 33967561 https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i16.1841; Чепурной Г.И., Кивва А.Н., Чепурной М.Г., Новиков К.А., Каймакчи М.Ю. Новая методика формирования загрудинного туннеля при эзофагопластике у детей. Медицинский вестник Северного Кавказа. 2019;14(1–1):26–29. https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2019.14041; https://www.jtransplantologiya.ru/jour/article/view/688

Availability: https://www.jtransplantologiya.ru/jour/article/view/688
https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2022-14-3-322-330

Immediate results of rectal resections for cancer in depending on the restoration of the integrity of the pelvic peritoneal floor: retrospective study ; Непосредственные результаты резекций прямой кишки по поводу рака в зависимости от восстановления целостности тазовой брюшины: ретроспективное исследование

Authors: M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, S. G. Gaydarov, Z. Z. Mamedli, V. Yu. Kosyrev, A. A. Aniskin, S. O. Kochkina, М. С. Лебедько, С. С. Гордеев, С. Г. Гайдаров, З. З. Мамедли, В. Ю. Косырев, А. А. Анискин, С. О. Кочкина

Source: Surgery and Oncology; Том 11, № 3-4 (2021); 23-28 ; Хирургия и онкология; Том 11, № 3-4 (2021); 23-28 ; 2949-5857

Subject Terms: восстановление тазовой брюшины, rectal resection, laparoscopic rectal resection, anastomotic leakage, pelvic peritoneal floor reconstruction, резекция прямой кишки, лапароскопическая резекция прямой кишки, несостоятельность анастомоза

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/520/373; Tsai Y.Y., Chen W.T.L. Management of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery: a review article. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019;10(6):1229.; Boni L., David G., Dionigi G. et al. Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 2016;30(7):2736–42. DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4540-z.; Blanco-Colino R., Espin-Basany E. Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2018;22(1):15–23. DOI:10.1007/s10151-017-1731-8.; Chaouch M.A., Kellil T., Jeddi C. et al. How to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery? A systematic review. Ann Coloproctol 2020;36(4):213–22. DOI:10.3393/ac.2020.05.14.2.; Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveiraet M. et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250(2): 187–96. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.; Chuan L., Linfeng G., Hongchang L. et al. Short-term outcomes of pelvic floor peritoneum closure in endoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021;123(1):271–7. DOI:10.1002/jso.26238.; Wang Z.K., Xu J., Shang C.-C. et al. Clinical significance of pelvic peritonization in laparoscopic dixon surgery. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018;131(3):289–94. DOI:10.4103/0366-6999.223852.

Availability: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/520
https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2021-11-3-4-23-28

Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage and preventive measures: a retrospective cohort study ; Факторы риска развития несостоятельности колоректального анастомоза и методы ее профилактики: ретроспективное когортное исследование

Authors: M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, E. V. Alieva, M. D. Sivolob, Z. Z. Mamedli, S. G. Gaydarov, V. Yu. Kosyrev, М. С. Лебедько, С. С. Гордеев, Э. В. Алиева, М. Д. Сиволоб, З. З. Мамедли, С. Г. Гайдаров, В. Ю. Косырев

Source: Surgery and Oncology; Том 12, № 2 (2022); 17-27 ; Хирургия и онкология; Том 12, № 2 (2022); 17-27 ; 2949-5857

Subject Terms: факторы риска, resection of the rectum, laparoscopic resection of the rectum, anastomotic leakage, pelvic peritoneum reconstruction, reinforcement of the anastomosis, risk factors, резекция прямой кишки, лапароскопическая резекция прямой кишки, несостоятельность анастомоза, восстановление тазовой брюшины, укрепление анастомоза

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/534/387; Bostrom P., Haapamaki M.M., Rutegard J. et al. Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2019;3:106–11. DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50106.; Arron M.N.N., Greijdanus N.G., Ten Broek R.P.G. et al. Trends in risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery (2011–2019): A Dutch population-based study. Colorectal Dis 20121;23:3251–61. DOI:10.1111/codi.15911.; Kverneng Hultberg D., Svensson J., Jutesten H. et al. The impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term function after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020;63:619–28. DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001613.; Rullier E., Laurent C., Garrelon J.L. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:355–8.; Van Rooijen S.J., Huisman D., Stuijvenberg M. et al. Intraoperative modifiable risk factors of colorectal anastomotic leakage: Why surgeons and anesthesiologists should act together. Int J Surg 2016;36:183–200.; Boni L., David G., Dionigi G. et al. Indocyanine green-enhanced fluorescence to assess bowel perfusion during laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2736–42. DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4540-z.; Blanco-Colino R., Espin-Basany E. Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2018;22:15–23.; Chaouch M.A., Kellil T., Jeddi C. et al. How to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery? A systematic review. Ann Coloproctol 2020;36:213–22. DOI:10.3393/ac.2020.05.14.2.; Sciuto A., Merola G., De Palma G.D. et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:2247–60.; Kockerling F., Rose J., Schneider C. et al. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis: risk of postoperative leakage. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surg Endosc 1999;13:639–44.; Boccola M.A., Buettner P.G., Rozen W.M. et al. Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg 2011;35:186–95.; Damen N., Spilsbury K., Levitt M. et al. Anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 2014;84:763–8. DOI:10.1111/ans.12494.; Moran B.J. Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1996;83:902–9.; Nisar P.J., Lavery I.C., Kiran R.P. Influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on anastomotic leak after restorative resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:1750–7. DOI:10.1007/s11605-012-1936-0.; Park J.S., Choi G.S., Kim S.H. et al. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 2013;257:665–71.; Hamabe A., Ito M., Nishigori H. et al. Preventive effect of diverting stoma on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique reconstruction applied based on risk stratification. Asian J Endosc Surg 2018;11:220–6. DOI:10.1111/ases.12439.; Kayano H., Okuda J., Tanaka K. et al. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2972–9. DOI:10.1007/s00464-011-1655-8.; Choi D.H., Hwang J.K., Ko Y.T. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2010;26:265–73.; Li J., An Y., Wu G. et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2018;21:413–8.; Deng K., Zhang J., Jiang X. et al. Factors associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection in rectal cancer. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2018;21:425–30.; Hu M.H., Huang R.K., Zhao R.S. et al. Does neoadjuvant therapy increase the incidence of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer? A systematic review and metaanalysis. Colorectal Dis 2017;19:16–26.; Wu Y., Zheng H., Guo T. et al. Temporary diverting stoma improves recovery of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Sci Rep 2017;7:1–7. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-16311-7.; Dekker J.W.T., Liefers G.J., van Otterloo J.C.M. et al. Predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage in leftsided colorectal surgery using a colon leakage score. J Surg Res 2011;166:e27–e34.; Yao H.H., Shao F., Huang Q. et al. Nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2014;1:1257–61.; Kim C.H., Lee S.Y., Kim H.R. et al. Nomogram prediction of anastomotic leakage and determination of an effective surgical strategy for reducing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017;2017:4510561. DOI:10.1155/2017/4510561.; Penna M., Hompes R., Arnold S. et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry. Ann Surg 2019;269:700–11.; Braunschmid T., Hartig N., Baumann L. et al. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate. Surg Endosc 2017;31:5318–26.; Sakamoto W., Ohki S., Kikuchi T. et al. Higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and multiple stapler firings for rectal transection are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection in rectal cancer. Fukushima J Med Sci 2020;66:10–6. DOI:10.5387/fms.2019-17.; Otsuka K., Kimura T., Matsuo T. et al. Laparoscopic low anterior resection with two planned stapler fires. JSLS 2019;23(1):e2018.00112.; Yamamoto S., Fujita S., Akasu T. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:239–43.; Senagore A.J., Delaney C.P., Madboulay K. et al. Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:558–61.; Biondo S., Parés D., Kreisler E. et al. Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2272–80. DOI:10.1007/s10350-005-0159-9.; Balkarov A.A., Ponomarenko A.A., Alekseev M.V. et al. Reinforcement of staple line of colorectal anastomosis for leakage prevention: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2019:53–8.; Balkarov A.A., Alekseev M.V., Rybakov E.G. et al. Prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage using its reinforcement (results of the randomized study). Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2021:18–23.; Baek S.-J., Kim J., Kwak J. et al. Can trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling in lower anterior resection reduce the need for a temporary diverting ostomy? World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:5309. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5309.; Altomare D.F., Delrio P., Shelgyn Y. et al. Transanal reinforcement of low rectal anastomosis versus protective ileostomy after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. Colorectal Dis 2021;23(7):1814–23. DOI:10.1111/codi.15685.; Heald R.J., Leicester R.J. The low stapled anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:437–44.; Wang Z.K., Xu J., Shang C.C. et al. Clinical significance of pelvic peritonization in laparoscopic dixon surgery. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018;131:289–94.; Fujii S., Ishibe A., Ota M. et al. Randomized clinical trial of high versus low inferior mesenteric artery ligation during anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2018;2:195–202. DOI:10.1002/bjs5.71.; Guo Y., Wang D., He L. et al. Marginal artery stump pressure in left colic arterypreserving rectal cancer surgery: a clinical trial. ANZ J Surg 2017;87:576–81. DOI:10.1111/ans.13032.; Zeng J., Su G. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2018;16:157. DOI:10.1186/s12957-018-1458-7.

Availability: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/534
https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-2-17-27

Experimental study of morphofunctional characteristics of the welding anastomosis of the small intestine

Authors: Lysenko, V. M., Glagolieva, A. Yu., Krestyanov, M. Yu., Zavertylenko, D. S., Rublenko, M. V., Rublenko, S. V., Radkevych, Ya. S., Dyadyk, O. O.

Source: Морфологія, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 55-63 (2018)
Morphologia; Том 12, № 4 (2018); 55-63

Subject Terms: биоэлектросвариание, сварочный межкишечный анастомоз, несостоятельность анастомоза, электрохирургия, QH301-705.5, неспроможність анастомозу, електрохірургія, біоелектрозварювання, зварювальний міжкишковий анастомоз, Biology (General), 3. Good health, bioelectrowelding, welded small bowel anastomosis, anastomotic leak, electrosurgery

File Description: application/pdf

Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/773281abbfa14b02be7db5072dab9192
http://morphology.dma.dp.ua/article/view/166769/166118
http://morphology.dma.dp.ua/article/view/166769/0
http://morphology.dma.dp.ua/article/view/166769

Bronchial complications after lung transplantation ; Бронхиальные осложнения после трансплантации легких

Authors: I. V. Pashkov, M. T. Bekov, S. V. Gautier, И. В. Пашков, М. Т. Беков, С. В. Готье

Contributors: Исследование проведено при частичной поддержке гранта Президента Российской Федерации НШ-2598.2020.7 для государственной поддержки ведущих научных школ РФ.

Source: Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs; Том 23, № 1 (2021); 140-149 ; Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов; Том 23, № 1 (2021); 140-149 ; 1995-1191

Subject Terms: интервенционная бронхология, bronchial arteries, anastomotic dehiscence, bronchial stenosis, bronchomalacia, bronchial stenting, interventional bronchology, бронхиальные артерии, несостоятельность анастомоза, бронхиальные стенозы, бронхомаляция, бронхиальное стентирование

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1325/1094; https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1325/1192; Hardy JD, Watts RW, Martin LD, George RW. Lung homotransplantation in man: report of the initial case. Jama. 1963; 186 (12): 1065-1074. doi:10.1001/jama.1963.63710120001010.; Reitz BA, Wallwork, JL, Hunt SA, Pennock JL, Billingham ME, Oyer PE et al. Heart-lung transplantation: successful therapy for patients with pulmonary vascular disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 1982; 306 (10): 557-564. doi:10.1056/NEJM198203113061001.; Nelems JM, Duffin J, Glynn MFX, Brebner J, Scott AA, Cooper JD. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support for human lung transplantation. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 1978; 76 (1): 28-32. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)40929-X.; Benfield JR, Wain JC. The history of lung transplantation. Chest surgery clinics of North America. 2000; 10 (1): 189. PMID: 10689537.; Lima O, Cooper JD, Peters WJ, Ayabe H, Townsend E, Luk SC et al. Effects of methylprednisolone and azathioprine on bronchial healing following lung autotransplantation. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1981; 82 (2): 211-215. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)39357-2.; Saunders NR, Egan TM, Chamberlain D, Cooper JD. Cyclosporine and bronchial healing in canine lung transplantation. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1984; 88 (6): 993-999. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)35415-7.; Dubois P, Choiniere L, Cooper JD. Bronchial omentopexy in canine lung allotransplantation. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1984; 38 (3): 211-214. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(10)62239-4.; Tong MZ, Johnston DR, Pettersson GB. The role of bronchial artery revascularization in lung transplantation. Thoracic surgery clinics. 2015; 25 (1): 77-85. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.09.004.; Cooper JD. Dominoes-pragmatism or piracy? Transplant International. 1991; 4 (1): 1-2. doi:10.1007/BF00335507.; Klepetko W, Wollenek G, Laczkovics A, Laufer G, Wolner E. Domino transplantation of heart-lung and heart: an approach to overcome the scarcity of donor organs. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation: the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 1991; 10 (1): 129-131. PMID: 2007165.; Vanderhoeft P, Dubois A, Lauvau N, de Francquen P, Carpentier Y, Rocmans P et al. Block allotransplantation of both lungs with pulmonary trunk and left atrium in dogs. Thorax. 1972; 27 (4): 415-419. doi:10.1136/thx.27.4.415.; Santacruz JF, Mehta AC. Airway complications and management after lung transplantation: ischemia, dehiscence, and stenosis. Proceedings of the American thoracic society. 2009; 6 (1): 79-93.; Van Berkel V, Guthrie TJ, Pur V, Krupnick AS, Kreisel D, Patterson GA et al. Impact of anastomotic techniques on airway complications after lung transplant. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2011; 92 (1): 316-321. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.031.; Weder W, Inci I, Korom S, Kestenholz PB, Hillinger S, Eich C et al. Airway complications after lung transplantation: risk factors, prevention and outcome. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2009; 35 (2): 293298. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.035.; Pettersson GB, Karam K, Thuita L, Johnston DR, McCurry KR, Kapadia SR et al. Comparative study of bronchial artery revascularization in lung transplantation. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2013; 146 (4): 894-900. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.04.030.; Garfein ES, McGregor CC, Galantowicz ME, Schulman LL. Deleterious effects of telescoped bronchial anastomosis in single and bilateral lung transplantation. Annals of transplantation. 2000; 5 (1): 5-11. PMID: 10850603.; Date H, Trulock EP, Arcidi JM, Sundaresan S, Cooper JD, Patterson GA. Improved airway healing after lung transplantation: an analysis of 348 bronchial anastomoses. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1995; 110 (5): 1424-1433. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70065-X.; Chen CZ, Gallagher RC, Ardery P, Dyckman W, Donabue S, Low HB. Retrograde flush and cold storage for twenty-two to twenty-five hours lung preservation with and without prostaglandin E1. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation: the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 1997; 16 (6): 658-666. PMID: 9229296.; Schmid RA, Boehler A, Speich R, Frey HR, Russi EW, Weder W. Bronchial anastomotic complications following lung transplantation: still a major cause of morbidity? European Respiratory Journal. 1997; 10 (12): 2872-2875.; Alvarez A, Algar J, Santos F, Lama R, Aranda JL, Baa-monde C. Airway complications after lung transplantation: a review of 151 anastomoses. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2001; 19 (4): 381-387. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)00619-4.; Crespo MM, McCarthy DP, Hopkins PM, Clark SC, Budev M, Bermudez CA et al. ISHLT Consensus Statement on adult and pediatric airway complications after lung transplantation: Definitions, grading system, and therapeutics. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2018; 37 (5): 548-563. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2018.01.1309.; Snell GI, Yusen RD, Weill D, Strueber M, Garrity E, Reed A et al. Report of the ISHLT Working Group on primary lung graft dysfunction, part I: definition and grading - a 2016 consensus group statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2017; 36 (10): 1097-1103. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.021.; Castleberry AW, Worni M, Kuchibhatla M, Lin SS, Snyder LD, Shofer SL et al. A comparative analysis of bronchial stricture after lung transplantation in recipients with and without early acute rejection. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2013; 96 (3): 1008-1018. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.104.; Schafers HJ, Wagner TOF, Demertzis S, Hamm M, Wahlers T, Cremer J et al. Preoperative corticosteroids: a contraindication to lung transplantation? Chest. 1992; 102 (5): 1522-1525. doi:10.1378/chest.102.5.1522.; McAnally KJ, Valentine VG, LaPlace SG, McFadden PM, Seoane L, Taylor DE. Effect of pre-transplantation prednisone on survival after lung transplantation. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation. 2006; 25 (1): 67-74. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2005.07.012.; De Pablo A, Santos F, Sole A, Borro JM, Cifrian JM, Laporta R et al. Recommendations on the use of everolimus in lung transplantation. Transplantation Reviews. 2013; 27 (1): 9-16. doi:10.1016/j.trre.2012.11.001.; Sole A, Salavert M. Fungal infections after lung transplantation. Transplantation reviews. 2008; 22 (2): 89104. doi:10.1016/j.trre.2007.12.007.; Felton TW, Roberts SA, Isalska B, Brennan S, Philips A, Whiteside S et al. Isolation of Aspergillus species from the airway of lung transplant recipients is associated with excess mortality. Journal of Infection. 2012; 65 (4): 350-356. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2012.07.008.; Choong CK, Sweet SC, Zoole JB, Guthrie TJ, Mendeloff EN, Haddad FJ et al. Bronchial airway anastomotic complications after pediatric lung transplantation: incidence, cause, management, and outcome. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2006; 131 (1): 198-203. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.053.; Kramer MR, Stoehr C, Lewiston NJ, Starnes VA, Theodore J. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii infections in heart-lung and lung transplantation - how effective and for how long? Transplantation. 1992; 53 (3): 586-589.; Varela A, Hoyos L, Romero A, Campo-Canaveral JL, Crowley S. Management of bronchial complications after lung transplantation and sequelae. Thoracic surgery clinics. 2018; 28 (3): 365-375. doi:10.1016/j.thor-surg.2018.04.006.; Chhajed PN, Tamm M. Uncovered metallic stents for anastomotic dehiscence after lung transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 2005; 24 (9): 1447-1448. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2004.08.004.; Mughal MM, Gildea TR, Murthy S, Pettersson G, DeCamp M, Mehta AC. Short-term deployment of self-expanding metallic stents facilitates healing of bronchial dehiscence. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2005; 172 (6): 768-771. doi:10.1164/rccm.200410-1388OC.; Maloney JD, Weigel TL, Love RB. Endoscopic repair of bronchial dehiscence after lung transplantation. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2001; 72 (6): 2109-2111. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02698-4.; Chang CC, Hsu HH, Kuo SW, Lee YC. Bronchoscopic gluing for post-lung-transplant bronchopleural fistula. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2007; 31 (2): 328-330. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.11.002.; Khan NU, Al-Aloul M, Khasati N, Machaal A, Leonard CT, Yonan N. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator as a bridge to successful surgical repair of bronchopleural fistula following bilateral sequential lung transplantation: a case report and review of literature. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2007; 2 (1): 1-6. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-2-28.; Machuzak M, Santacruz JF, Gildea T, Murthy SC. Airway complications after lung transplantation. Thoracic surgery clinics. 2015; 25 (1): 55-75. doi:10.1016/j.thor-surg.2014.09.008.; Knight J, Elwing JM, Milstone A. Bronchovascular fistula formation: a rare airway complication after lung transplantation. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation. 2008; 27 (10): 1179-1185. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2008.06.013.; Karmy-Jones R, Vallieres E, Culver B, Raghu G, Wood DE. Bronchial-atrial fistula after lung transplant resulting in fatal air embolism. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1999; 67 (2): 550-551. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(98)01242-9.; Rea F, Marulli G, Loy M, Bortolotti L, Giacometti C, Schiavon M et al. Salvage right pneumonectomy in a patient with bronchial-pulmonary artery fistula after bilateral sequential lung transplantation. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation. 2006; 25 (11): 1383-1386. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2006.09.013.; Thistlethwaite PA, Yung G, Kemp A, Osbourne S, Jamieson SW, Channick C et al. Airway stenoses after lung transplantation: incidence, management, and outcome. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2008; 136 (6): 1569-1575. doi:10.1016/j.jt-cvs.2008.08.021.; Souilamas R, Wermert D, Guillemain R, Reynaud P, Herniguou A, Hyune I et al. Uncommon combined treatment of nonanastomotic bronchial stenosis after lung transplantation. Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology. 2008; 15 (1): 54-55. doi:10.1097/LBR.0b013e318162c415.; De Gracia J, Culebras M, Alvarez A, Catalan E, De la Rosa D, Maestre J et al. Bronchoscopic balloon dilatation in the management of bronchial stenosis following lung transplantation. Respiratory medicine. 2007; 101 (1): 27-33. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.04.019.; Lischke R, Pozniak J, Vondrys D, Elliott MJ. Novel biodegradable stents in the treatment of bronchial stenosis after lung transplantation. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2011; 40 (3): 619-624. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.047.; Sundset A, Lund MB, Hansen G, Bjørtuft Q, Kongerud J, Geiran OR. Airway complications after lung transplantation: long-term outcome of silicone stenting. Respiration. 2012; 83 (3): 245-252. doi:10.1159/000334905.; Dumon JF, Cavaliere S, Diaz-Jimenez JP, Vergnon JM, Venuta F. Seven-year experience with the Dumon prosthesis. Journal of Bronchology. 1996; 3: 6-10.; Mahajan AK, Folch E, Khandhar SJ, Channick CL, Santacruz JF, Mehta AC et al. The diagnosis and management of airway complications following lung transplantation. Chest. 2017; 152 (3): 627-638. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.02.021.; Nathan SD, Shorr AF, Schmidt ME, Burton NA. Aspergillus and endobronchial abnormalities in lung transplant recipients. Chest. 2000; 118 (2): 403-407. doi:10.1378/chest.118.2.403.; Madu CN, Machuzak MS, Sterman DH, Musani A, Ahya V, McDonough J et al. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for the treatment of benign obstructive endobronchial granulation tissue. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2006; 66 (5): 1450-1456. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.011.; Sonett JR, Keenan RJ, Ferson, PF, Griffith BP, Landreneau RJ. Endobronchial management of benign, malignant, and lung transplantation airway stenoses. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1995; 59 (6): 1417-1422. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00216-8.; Veen EJ, Dikkers FG. Topical use of MMC in the upper aerodigestive tract: a review on the side effects. European archives of otorhinolaryngology. 2010; 267 (3): 327-334. PMCID: PMC2811249.; Nechaev N, Inozemtsev A, Golovinskiy S, Poptsov V, Gautier S. Bronchial stenosis treatment after lung transplantation. European Respiratory Journal. 2017; 50 (61): 2461. doi:10.1183/1393003.congress-2017.PA2461.; Marulli G, Loy M, Rizzardi G, Calabrese F, Feltracco P, Sartori F et al. Surgical treatment of posttransplant bronchial stenoses. Transplantation proceedings. 2007; 39 (6): 1973-1975. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.05.021.; Paulson EC, Singhal S, Kucharczuk JC, Sterman DH, Kaiser LR, Marshall MB. Bronchial sleeve resection for posttransplant stricture. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2003; 76 (6): 2075-2076. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00762-8.; https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1325

Availability: https://journal.transpl.ru/vtio/article/view/1325
https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2021-1-140-149

Colorectal anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery: methods of anastomotic leakage prevention ; Колоректальный анастомоз в хирургии рака прямой кишки: методы профилактики несостоятельности

Authors: S. G. Gaydarov, Z Z Mamedli, M. S. Lebedko, V. Yu. Selchuk, I. Sh. Tataev, С. Г. Гайдаров, З. З. Мамедли, М. С. Лебедько, В. Ю. Сельчук, И. Ш. Татаев

Source: Surgery and Oncology; Том 11, № 2 (2021); 36-43 ; Хирургия и онкология; Том 11, № 2 (2021); 36-43 ; 2949-5857

Subject Terms: номограмма, rectal resection, anastomotic leak, colorectal anastomosis, risk factors, prevention, prognosis, nomogram, резекция прямой кишки, несостоятельность анастомоза, колоректальный анастомоз, факторы риска, профилактика, прогноз

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/508/367; Черкасов М.Ф., Дмитриев А.В., Грошилин В.С. и др. Несостоятельность колоректального анастомоза: факторы риска, профилактика, диагностика, лечебная тактика. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии 2019;29(2):27–34.; Williams N.S., Nasmyth D.G., Jones D., Smith A.H. De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 1986;73:566–70. DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800730717.; Кит О.И. Аппаратный межкишечный анастомоз при колоректальном раке: непосредственные результаты. Колопроктология 2016;(1):48–53.; Петряшев А.В., Шишкина Г.А., Плотников Ю.В. Применение превентивных стом в хирургическом лечении колоректального рака. Онкологическая колопроктология 2016;6(3):29–33.; Половинкин В.В., Порханов В.А., Завражнов А.А. Факторы риска развития несостоятельности колоректального анастомоза после операций по поводу рака прямой кишки. Кубанский научный медицинский вестник 2013;7(142):106–12.; Рахматов К.К. Сфинктеросохраняющая хирургия при дистальном раке прямой кишки: интерсфинктеральная резекция с колоанальным анастомозом. Материалы X Юбилейной Международной научно-практической конференции молодых ученых-медиков, Курск, 26–27 февраля 2016 г. Под ред. В.А. Лазаренко, И.Э. Есауленко, Р.Ш. Хасанова. T. 2. Курск, 2016. С. 230–232.; Тулина И.И. Функциональные результаты интерсфинктерной резекции и экстирпации прямой кишки, выполненных по поводу рака нижнеампулярного отдела, и качество жизни таких больных. Врач 2017;(4):53–6.; Черданцев Д.В., Поздняков А.А., Шпак В.В. и др. Несостоятельность колоректального анастомоза. Современное состояние проблемы (обзор литературы). Колопроктология 2015;4(54):57–64.; Дарбишгаджиев Ш.О., Баулин А.А., Ивачева Н.А. и др. Роль уровня формирования колоректального анастомоза в развитии несостоятельности и пути улучшения результатов хирургического лечения рака прямой кишки. Вестник новых медицинских технологий 2020;27(1):21–5.; Дарбишгаджиев Ш.О., Баулин А.А., Зимин Ю.И. и др. Результаты хирургического лечения колоректального рака. Здоровье и образование в ХХI веке 2018;20(4):42–6.; Николаева А.О., Данилов М.А., Атрощенко А.О. Оценка факторов риска развития несостоятельности межкишечных анастомозов: обзор литературы. Наука молодых 2020;8(1):106–15.; Center M., Siegel R., Jemal A. Global Cancer Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society, 2011. 58 p.; Weaver M., Burdon D.V., Youngs D.J. Oral neomycin and erythromycin compared with single-dose systemic metronidazole and ceftriaxone prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 1986;151:437–42. DOI:10.1016/0002-9610(86)90097-8.; Caulfield H., Hyman N.H. Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection. A spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 2013;148(2):177–82.; Мельник В.Е., Пойда А.И. Диагностика, лечение и профилактика осложнений, связанных с формированием анастомозов на толстой кишке. Хирургия 2013;(8):69–74.; Алиев С.А. Тактика хирургического лечения послеоперационных осложнений у больных с обтурационной непроходимостью ободочной кишки опухолевой этиологии. Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова 1999;(3):66–70.; Beunis A., Pauli S., Van Cleemput M. Anastomotic leakage of a colorectal anastomosis treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Acta Chir Belg 2008;108(4):474–6.; Chopra S.S., Mrak K., Hunerbein M. The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surgery 2009;145:182–8.; Khan A.A., Wheeler J., Cunningham C. The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:587–92.; Ахметзянов Ф.Х. Ближайшие результаты внутрибрюшных резекций прямой кишки. Поволжский онкологический вестник 2016;5(27):25–30.; Янушкевич С.В., Янушкевич В.Ю. Протекция анастомозов в хирургии рака прямой кишки. Новости хирургии 2017;25(4):412–20.; Груба Л.Н. Взгляд хирурга на несостоятельность шва толстокишечного анастомоза. Факторы риска (обзор литературы). Московский хирургический журнал 2015;(6):11–21.; Каравай А.В., Беляев А.И., Гузаевский Ю.Н., Салмин Р.М. Брюшноанальная резекция прямой кишки при раке дистальной локализации. Журнал Гродненского государственного медицинского университета 2019;17(4):453–7.; Карачун А.М. Рак среднеампулярного отдела прямой кишки – какую операцию выбрать? Низкая передняя резекция прямой кишки. Злокачественные опухоли 2013;(2):23–32.; Ермаков Д.Ф. Факторы риска несостоятельности аппаратного анастомоза после передней резекции прямой кишки. Автореф. дис. . канд. мед. наук. М., 2012.; Котельникова Л.П., Шатрова Н.А., Белякова Я.В. Отдаленные результаты резекций левой половины ободочной и прямой кишок. Современные проблемы науки и образования 2012;(2):78.; Huser N., Michalski C.W., Erkan M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:52–60. DOI:10.1002/bjs.6594.; Алексеев М.В., Шелыгин Ю.А., Рыбаков Е.Г. Диагностическая ценность применения номограмм в прогнозировании возникновения несостоятельности колоректального анастомоза(обзор литературы). Тазовая хирургия и онкология 2019;9(3):27–33.; Komen N., Slieker J., Willemsen P. et al. Acute phase proteins in drain fluid: a new screening tool for colorectal anastomotic leakage? The APPEAL study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage. Am J Surgery 2014;208(3):317–23.; Sparreboom C.L., van Groningen J.T., Lingsma H.F. et al. Different risk factors for early and late colorectal anastomotic leakage in a nationwide audit. Dis Colon Rectum 2018;61(11):1258–66.; Pina D.E., Simo R.M., Machado R.A. et al. PROCOLE(Prognostic Colorectal Leakage): A new prognostic index to predict the risk of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery. Clin Gastroenterol J 2016;1(2):1000109.; Caziuc A., Mironiuc A. Anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgery: a prognostic score. acta marisiensis. Seria Medica 2014;60(1):3–6. DOI: 10. 2478/amma-2014-0001.; Gorissen K.J., Benning D., Berghmans T. et al. Risk of anastomotic leakage with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2012; 99(5):721–7. DOI:10.1002/bjs.8691.; Vasiliu E.C., Zarnescu N.O., Costea R. et al. Review of risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Chirurgia(Bucur) 2015;110(4):319–26.; Teoh C.M., Gunasegaram T., Chan K.Y. et al. Review of risk factors associated with the anastomosis leakage in anterior resection in Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 2005;60(3):275–80.; Park J.S., Huh J.W., Park Y.Ah. et al. Risk factors of anastomotic leakage and longterm survival after colorectal surgery. Medicine 2016;95(8):e2890. DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000002890.; Iancu C., Mocan L.C., Todea-Iancu D. et al. Hostrelated predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2008;17(3):299–303.; Golub R., Golub R.W., Cantu R.Jr. et al. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am College Surg 1997;184(4):364–72. DOI: 10. 1016/s1072-7515(98)00241-5.; Abd El Hameed El-Badawy H.A. Anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery: risk factors, presentation and outcome. Egyptian J Hospital Med 2014;57:494–512. DOI:10.12816/0008484.; Park J.S., Choi G.S., Kim S.H. et al. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg 2013;257:665–71. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b8ed9.; Kang C.Y., Halabi W.J., Chaudhry O.O. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 2013;148:65–71. DOI:10.1001/2013.jamasurg.2.; Den Dulk M., Marijnen C.A., Collette L. et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2009;96:1066–75.; Peeters K.C., Tollenaar R.A., Marijnen C.A. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:211–6.; Paun B.C., Cassie S., MacLean A.R. et al. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010;251:807–18.; Snijders H.S., Wouters M.W., van Leersum N.J. et al. Metaanalysis of the risk for anastomotic leakage, the postoperative mortality caused by leakage in relation to the overall postoperative mortality. Eur J Surg Oncol 2012;38:1013–9.; Ito M., Sugito M., Kobayashi A. et al. Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23(7):703–7. DOI:10.1007/s00384-008-0470-82008.; Hallböök O., Påhlman L., Krog M. et al. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 1996;224(1):58–65.; Zheng H., Wu Z., Wu Y. et al. Laparoscopic surgery may decrease the risk of clinical anastomotic leakage and a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019;34(2):319–28. DOI:10.1007/s00384-018-3199-z.; Wang S., Zhang Z., Liu M. et al. Efficacy of transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2016;14:92. DOI:10.1186/s12957-016-0854-0.; Yang C.S., Choi G.S., Park J.S. et al. Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 2016;18(12):O445–52. DOI:10.1111/codi.13506.; Adamova Z. Transanal tube as a means of prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Viszeral Medizin 2014;30(6):422–6. DOI:10.1159/000369569.; Yeh C.Y., Changchien C.R., Wang J.Y. et al. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 2005;241(1):9–13. DOI:10.1097/00000658200512000-00019.; Gingold B.S., Jagelman D.G. Value of pelvic suction-irrigation in reducing morbidity of low anterior resection of the rectum: a ten year experience. Surgery 1982;91(4):394–8.; Tsujinaka S., Kawamura Y., Konishi F. et al. Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks. ANZ J Surg 2008;78(6):461–5.; Chuan L., Linfeng G., Hongchang L. et al. Short-term outcomes of pelvic floor peritoneum closure in endoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021;123(1):271–7.; Wang Z.K., Xu J., Shang C.C. et al. Clinical significance of pelvic peritonizati on in laparoscopic dixon surgery. Chin Med J (Engl) 2018;131(3):289–94.; Kobayashi M., Okamoto K., Namikawa T. et al. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery for cancer in the lower sigmoid colon and rectum: is D3 lymph node dissection with preservation of the left colic artery feasible? Surg Endosc 2006;20:563–9.; Cirocchi R., Trastulli S., Farinella E. et al. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. Surg Oncol 2012;21(3):e111–23. DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2012.04.004.; Rouffet F., Hay J., Vacher B. et al. Curative resection for left colonic carcinoma: hemicolectomy vs. segmental colectomy. A prospective, controlled, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:651–9. DOI:10.1007/BF02054407.; Zheng B., Wang N., Wu T. et al. Preservation of left colic artery in laparoscopic radical operation for rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2016;19(8):886–91.; Fan Y.-Ch., Ning F.-L., Zhang Ch.-D., Dai D.-Q. Preservation versus non-preservation of left colic artery in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis. Int J Surgery 2018;52:269–77. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.054.; Chen Z.-F., Liu X., Jiang W., Guan G. Laparoscopic double-stapled colorectal anastomosis without “dog-ears”. Tech Coloproctol 2016;20(4):243–7. DOI:10.1007/s10151-016-1437-3.

Availability: https://www.onco-surgery.info/jour/article/view/508
https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2021-11-2-36-43

PERFORMANCE OF PRIMARY RADICAL SURGERIES IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER COMPLICATED BY LOCAL PERITONITIS AND ILEUS

Authors: Bedeniuk, A. D., Hrytsenko, Y. M., Hrytsenko, S. Y., Horman, M. V., Boiko, H. O.

Source: Клінічна анатомія та оперативна хірургія; Том 16, № 3 (2017); 10-15
Клиническая анатомия и оперативная хирургия; Том 16, № 3 (2017); 10-15
Clinical anatomy and operative surgery; Том 16, № 3 (2017); 10-15

Subject Terms: 2. Zero hunger, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, колоректальный рак, кишечная непроходимость, несостоятельность анастомоза, colorectal cancer, colon obstruction, anastomotic leakage, 10. No inequality, колоректальний рак, кишкова непрохідність, неспроможність анастомозу, 3. Good health

File Description: application/pdf

Access URL: http://kaos.bsmu.edu.ua/article/download/1727-0847.16.3.2017.67/133042
http://kaos.bsmu.edu.ua/article/download/1727-0847.16.3.2017.67/133042
http://kaos.bsmu.edu.ua/article/view/1727-0847.16.3.2017.67
http://kaos.bsmu.edu.ua/article/view/1727-0847.16.3.2017.67

Choosing a method to perform an esophageal-intestinal anastomosis after complete removal of the stomach ; Выбор способа формирования пищеводно-кишечного анастомоза после полного удаления желудка

Authors: Ivanov Y.V., Danilina E.S., Istomin N.P., Velichko E.A., Mamoshin A.V., Agibalov D.Y.

Source: Almanac of Clinical Medicine; Vol 48, No 6 (2020); 437-444 ; Альманах клинической медицины; Vol 48, No 6 (2020); 437-444 ; 2587-9294 ; 2072-0505

Subject Terms: gastrectomy, esophageal-intestinal anastomosis, manual and stapler suture, anastomosis failure, гастрэктомия, пищеводно-кишечный анастомоз, ручной и степлерный шов, несостоятельность анастомоза

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/1395/1277; https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/1395

Availability: https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/1395
https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2020-48-067

Структура осложнений при формировании и закрытии превентивных илео- и колостом ; Structure of complications after forming and closing preventive ileo-and colostomy

Authors: Darbishgadjiev, Sh. O., Baulin, A. A., Zimin, Yu. I., Baulina, O. A., Baulin, V. A., Дарбишгаджиев, Ш. О., Баулин, А. А., Зимин, Ю. И., Баулина, О. А., Баулин, В. А.

Subject Terms: PREVENTIVE STOMA, ILEOSTOMA, COLOSTOMA, ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE, COMPLICATIONS, TREATMENT, PREVENTION OF COMPLICATIONS, ПРЕВЕНТИВНАЯ СТОМА, ИЛЕОСТОМА, КОЛОСТОМА, НЕСОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ АНАСТОМОЗА, ОСЛОЖНЕНИЯ, ЛЕЧЕНИЕ, ПРОФИЛАКТИКА ОСЛОЖНЕНИЙ

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: Уральский медицинский журнал. 2020. № 5(188).; http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/19007

Availability: http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/19007

Структура осложнений при формировании и закрытии превентивных илео- и колостом

Subject Terms: ileostoma, complications, treatment, илеостома, colostoma, колостома, лечение, Preventive stoma, anastomotic leakage, prevention of complications, 3. Good health, несостоятельность анастомоза, Превентивная стома, осложнения, профилактика осложнений

НОВЫЙ ПОДХОД К ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИЮ КИШЕЧНОЙ ПРОХОДИМОСТИ ПОСЛЕ ВЫВЕДЕННОЙ ОДНОСТВОЛЬНОЙ ИЛЕОСТОМЫ

Subject Terms: anastomosis leak, elimination, несостоятельность анастомоза, илеостома, ликвидация, ileostomy, intussusceptional small-and-thick bowel anastomosis, инвагинационный тонко-толстокишечный анастомоз, 3. Good health

Prediction of postpancreatoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula with the use of computer tomography ; Прогнозирование панкреатической фистулы после панкреатодуоденальной резекции с помощью компьютерной томографии

Authors: I. E. Khatkov, S. A. Domrachev, V. V. Tsvirkun, R. E. Izrailov, O. S. Vasnev, Yu. V. Kulezneva, K. A. Les’ko, V. V. Schadrova, B. S. Nikitin, N. S. Starostina, P. S. Tyutyunnik, M. E. Baychorov, А. V. Andrianov, M. V. Mikhnevich, И. Е. Хатьков, С. А. Домрачев, В. В. Цвиркун, Р. Е. Израилов, О. С. Васнев, Ю. В. Кулезнева, К. А. Лесько, В. В. Щадрова, Б. С. Никитин, Н. С. Старостина, П. С. Тютюнник, М. Э. Байчоров, А. В. Андрианов, М. В. Михневич

Source: Medical Visualization; № 1 (2019); 19-27 ; Медицинская визуализация; № 1 (2019); 19-27 ; 2408-9516 ; 1607-0763

Subject Terms: факторы риска, computer tomography, pancreas, fistula, leakage, prediction, risk factors, компьютерная томография, поджелудочная железа, фистула, несостоятельность анастомоза, прогнозирование

File Description: application/pdf

Relation: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/721/529; Bassi C., Dervenis C., Butturini G., Fingerhut A., Yeo C., Izbicki J., Neoptolemos J., Sarr M., Traverso W., Buchler M., International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138 (1):8-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.; Cameron J.L., Riall T.S., Coleman J., Belcher K.A. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244 (1): 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea.; Winter J.M., Cameron J.L., Campbell K.A., Arnold M.A., Chang D.C., Coleman J., Hodgin M.B., Sauter P.K., Hruban R.H., Riall T.S., Schulick R.D., Choti M.A., Lillemoe K.D., Yeo C.J. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2006. 10 (9): 1199-1210; discussion 1210-1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur. 2006.08.018.; Daskalaki D., Butturini G., Molinari E., Crippa S., Pederzoli P., Bassi C. A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 755 consecutive patients. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2011; 396 (1): 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0719-x.; Niedergethmann M., Farag Soliman M., Post S. Postoperative complications of pancreatic cancer surgery. Minerva Chir. 2004; 59 (2): 175-183.; Tani M., Kawai M., Hirono S., Hatori T., Imaizumi T., Nakao A., Egawa S., Asano T., Nagakawa T, Yamaue H. Use of omentum or falciform ligament does not decrease complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery. 2012; 151 (2): 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.surg.2011.07.023.; Boggi U., Amorese G., Vistoli F., Caniglia F, De Lio N., Perrone V., Barbarello L., Belluomini M., Signori S., Mosca F. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg. Endosc. 2015: 29 (1):9-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3670-z.; Katayama H., Kurokawa Y., Nakamura K., Ito H., Kanemitsu Y., Masuda N., Tsubosa Y., Satoh T., Yoko-mizo A., Fukuda H., Sasako M. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg. Today. 2016; 46 (6): 668-685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x.; Riall T.S., Reddy D.M., Nealon W.H., Goodwin J.S. The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann. Surg. 2008: 248 (3): 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e1b3.; Callery M.P, Pratt W.B., Vollmer C.M. Jr. Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2009; 13 (1): 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0534-7.; Veillette G., Dominguez I., Ferrone C., Thayer S.P., McGrath D., Warshaw A.L., Fernandez-del Castillo C. Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Arch. Surg. 2008; 143 (5): 476-481. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.5.476.; House M.G., Fong Y., Arnaoutakis D.J., Sharma R., Winston C.B., Protic M., Gonen M., Olson S.H,. Kurtz R.C., Brennan M.F., Allen P.J. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008; 12 (2): 270-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0421-7.; Roberts K.J., Sutcliffe R.P., Marudanayagam R., Hodson J., Isaac J., Muiesan P., Navarro A., Patel K., Jah A., Napetti S., Adair A., Lazaridis S., Prachalias A., Shingler G., Al-Sarireh B., Storey R., Smith A.M., Shah N., Fusai G., Ahmed J., Abu Hilal M., Mirza D.F. Scoring system to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a UK multicenter study. Ann. Surg. 2015; 261 (6): 1191-1197. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000997.; DeOliveira M.L., Winter J.M., Schafer M., Cunningham S.C., Cameron J.L., Yeo C.J., Clavien P.A. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244 (6): 931-937; discussion 937-939. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a.; Lermite E., Pessaux P., Brehant O., Teyssedou C., Pelletier I., Etienne S., Arnaud J.P. Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2007; 204 (4): 588-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.018.; Tajima Y., Kuroki T., Tsutsumi R., Fukuda K., Kitasato A., Adachi T, Mishima T., Kanematsu T. Risk factors for pancreatic anastomotic leakage: the significance of preoperative dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas as a predictor of leakage. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006; 202 (5): 723-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.008.; Akamatsu N., Sugawara Y., Komagome M., Shin N., Cho N., Ishida T, Ozawa F, Hashimoto D. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2010; 17 (3): 322-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0248-6.; Mathur A., Pitt H.A., Marine M., Saxena R., Schmidt C.M., Howard T.J., Nakeeb A., Zyromski N.J., Lillemoe K.D. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann. Surg. 2007; 246 (6): 1058-1064. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31814a6906.; Gaujoux S., Cortes A., Couvelard A., Noullet S., Clavel L., Rebours V., Levy P., Sauvanet A., Ruszniewski P., Belghiti J. Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2010. 148 (1): 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.surg.2009.12.005.; Kanda M., Fujii T., Suenaga M., Takami H., Hattori M., Inokawa Y., Yamada S., Nakayama G., Sugimoto H., Koike M., Nomoto S., Kodera Y Estimated pancreatic parenchymal remnant volume accurately predicts clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2014; 156 (3): 601-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.04.011.; Cheng T.Y., Sheth K., White R.R., Ueno T., Hung C.F., Clary B.M., Pappas T.N., Tyler D.S. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on operative mortality and morbidity for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006; 13 (1): 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1245/AS0.2006.02.003.; Heinrich S., Schafer M., Weber A., Hany T.F., Bhure U., Pestalozzi B.C., Clavien P.A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generates a significant tumor response in resectable pancreatic cancer without increasing morbidity: results of a prospective phase II trial. Ann. Surg. 2008; 248 (6): 1014-1022. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318190a6da.; Tomihara H., Eguchi H., Yamada D., Gotoh K., Kawamoto K., Wada H., Asaoka T., Noda T, Takeda Y., Tanemura M., Mori M., Doki Y. Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy does not compromise the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surg. Today. 2017; 47 (2): 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1405-6.; Hashimoto Y, Traverso L.W. Pancreatic anastomotic failure rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases with microsurgery. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2010; 211 (4): 510-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.018.; Yamashita Y., Yoshida Y., Kurihara T., Tsujita E., Takeishi K., Ishida T, Ikeda T., Furukawa Y., Shirabe K., Maehara Y. Surgical loupes at 5.0x magnification and the VIO soft-coagulation system can prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula in duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. AnticancerRes. 2015; 35 (3): 1691-1696.; Ho V., Heslin M.J. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2003; 237 (4): 509-514. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000059981.13160.97.; Schmidt C.M., Turrini O., Parikh P., House M.G., Zyromski N.J., Nakeeb A., Howard T.J., Pitt H.A., Lillemoe K.D. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch. Surg. 2010; 145 (7): 634-640. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2010.118.; Laugier R., Camatte R., Sarles H. Chronic obstructive pancreatitis after healing of a necrotic pseudocyst. Am. J. Surg. 1983; 146 (5): 551-557.; Sarles H., Cambon P., Choux R., Payan M.J., Odaira S., Laugier R., Sahel J. Chronic obstructive pancreatitis due to tiny (0.6 to 8 mm) benign tumors obstructing pancreatic ducts: report of three cases. Pancreas. 1988; 3 (2): 232-237.; Hashimoto Y., Sclabas G.M., Takahashi N., Kirihara Y., Smyrk T.C., Huebner M., Farnell M.B. Dual-phase computed tomography for assessment of pancreatic fibrosis and anastomotic failure risk following pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2011; 15 (12): 2193-2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1687-3.; Kang J.H., Park J.S., Yu J.S., Chung J.J., Kim J.H., Cho E.S., Yoon D.S. Prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy by preoperative dynamic CT and fecal elastase-1 levels. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5): e0177052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177052.; Sugimoto M., Takahashi S., Kobayashi T., Kojima M., Gotohda N., Satake M., Ochiai A., Konishi M. Pancreatic perfusion data and post-pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes. J. Surg. Res. 2015; 194 (2): 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.046.; Rosso E., Casnedi S., Pessaux P., Oussoultzoglou E., Panaro F, Mahfud M., Jaeck D., Bachellier P. The role of “fatty pancreas” and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2009; 13 (10): 1845-1851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0974-8.; Tranchart H., Gaujoux S., Rebours V., Vullierme M.P., Dokmak S., Levy P., Couvelard A., Belghiti J., Sauvanet A. Preoperative CT scan helps to predict the occurrence of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2012; 256 (1): 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256c32c.; Kirihara Y., Takahashi N., Hashimoto Y., Sclabas G.M., Khan S., Moriya T., Sakagami J., Huebner M., Sarr M.G., Farnell M.B. Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition. Ann. Surg. 2013; 257 (3): 512-519. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827827d0.; Sugimoto M., Takahashi S., Kojima M., Gotohda N., Kato Y., Kawano S., Ochiai A., Konishi M. What is the nature of pancreatic consistency? Assessment of the elastic modulus of the pancreas and comparison with tactile sensation, histology, and occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2014; 156 (5): 1204-1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.05.015.; Belyaev O., Rosenkranz S., Munding J., Herzog T., Chromik A.M., Tannapfel A., Uhl W. Quantitative assessment and determinants of suture-holding capacity of human pancreas. J. Surg. Res. 2013; 184 (2): 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.017; Motoi F., Egawa S., Rikiyama T., Katayose Y., Unno M. Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy. Br. J. Surg. 2012; 99 (4): 524-531.; Xiong J.J., Altaf K., Mukherjee R., Huang W., Hu W.M., Li A., Ke N.W., Liu X.B. Systematic review and metaanalysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 2012; 99 (8): 1050-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8788.; Kawahara R., Akasu G., Ishikawa H., Yasunaga M., Kinoshita H. A questionnaire on the educational system for pancreatoduodenectomy performed in 1,134 patients in 71 institutions as members of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2013; 20 (2): 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0505-y.; Tajima Y., Kuroki T., Kitasato A., Adachi T., Isomoto I., Uetani M., Kanematsu T. Patient allocation based on preoperative assessment of pancreatic fibrosis to secure pancreatic anastomosis performed by trainee surgeons: a prospective study. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2010; 17 (6): 831-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0277-1.; Xiong J.J., Tan C.L., Szatmary P., Huang W., Ke N.W., Hu W.M., Nunes Q.M., Sutton R., Liu X.B. Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejuno-stomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 2014. 101 (10): 1196-1208. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9553.; Menahem B., Guittet L., Mulliri A., Alves A., Lubrano J. Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejuno-stomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Surg. 2015; 261 (5): 882-887. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000806.; He T., Zhao Y., Chen Q., Wang X., Lin H., Han W. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Surg. 2013; 30 (1): 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1159/000350901.; Keck T., Wellner U.F., Bahra M., et al. Pancreatogastrostomy Versus Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): Perioperative and Long-term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann. Surg. 2016; 263 (3): 440-449. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001240.; Zeng Q., Zhang Q., Han S., Yu Z., Zheng M., Zhou M., Bai J., Jin R. Efficacy of somatostatin and its analogues in prevention of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pancreas. 2008; 36 (1): 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0b013e3181343f5d.; Gurusamy K.S., Koti R., Fusai G., Davidson B.R. Somatostatin analogues for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013 (4): CD008370. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008370.pub3.; Allen P.J., Gonen M., Brennan M.F., Bucknor A.A., Robinson L.M., Pappas M.M., Carlucci K.E., D'Angelica M.I., DeMatteo R.P, Kingham T.P., Fong Y., Jarnagin W.R. Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 370 (21): 2014-2022. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1313688.; Jin K., Zhou H., Zhang J., Wang W., Sun Y., Ruan C., Hu Z., Wang Y. Systematic review and meta-analysis of somatostatin analogues in the prevention of postoperative complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig. Surg. 2015; 32 (3): 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381032.; https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/721

Availability: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/721
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2019-1-19-27

SSI Following Construction of Colorectal Anastomoses and C-Reactive Protein as Marker for Infectious Complications

Authors: E. A. Grushevzkaya, N. M. Mekhtiev, E. E. Grishina, M. V. Timerbulatov

Source: Креативная хирургия и онкология, Vol 9, Iss 3, Pp 171-176 (2019)

Subject Terms: инфекция области хирургического вмешательства, с-реактивный белок, колоректальная хирургия, анастомоз хирургический, послеоперационные осложнения, несостоятельность анастомоза, Surgery, RD1-811, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282

Relation: https://www.surgonco.ru/jour/article/view/411; https://doaj.org/toc/2307-0501; https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3093; https://doaj.org/article/13f57e844995436380e798809b2dd39c

Availability: https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2019-9-3-171-176
https://doaj.org/article/13f57e844995436380e798809b2dd39c

SPLENIC FLEXURE MOBILIZATION DURING ANTERIOR RESECTION OF THE RECTUM FOR CANCER: SAFETY AND CANCER VALIDITY

Authors: V. V. Polovinkin, P. S. Pryn, V. V. Sapsay

Source: Кубанский научный медицинский вестник, Iss 4, Pp 134-141 (2016)

Subject Terms: рак прямой кишки, мобилизация селезеночного изгиба, несостоятельность анастомоза, рецидив местный, рецидив системный, rectal cancer, splenic flexure mobilization, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, relapse system, Medicine

File Description: electronic resource

Relation: https://ksma.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/575; https://doaj.org/toc/1608-6228; https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9544

Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/090e6cbd41a5401d8577e2dfb9531d4d