МАТЕМАТИЧЕСКАЯ МОДЕЛЬ ДЛЯ ОПИСАНИЯ ФОРМ КАМНЕЙ В ПОЧКАХ НА ОСНОВЕ ИХ ГЕОМЕТРИЧЕСКИХ ОСОБЕННОСТЕЙ

Συγγραφείς: Beknazarova S.S.

Θεματικοί όροι: kidney stones, mathematical modeling, geometric characteristics, image segmentation, threshold method, diagnostics, lithotripsy, volume, shape, medical images, computed tomography, ultrasound, shape analysis, individualized treatment, мочекаменная болезнь, камни в почках, математическое моделирование, геометрические характеристики, сегментация изображений, пороговый метод, диагностика, литотрипсия, объем, форма, медицинские изображения, компьютерная томография, ультразвуковое исследование, анализ формы, индивидуализированное лечение, buyrak toshlari, matematik modellashtirish, geometrik xususiyatlar, tasvir segmentatsiyasi, chegara usuli, diagnostika, litotripsiya, hajm, shakl, tibbiy tasvirlar, kompyuter tomografiyasi, ultratovush, shakl tahlili, individual davolash

АНАЛИЗ ЧАСТОТЫ ЗАБОЛЕВАЕМОСТИ МОЧЕКАМЕННОЙ БОЛЕЗНЬЮ В ИВАНОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ ЗА ПЕРИОД 2018-2019 ГГ

Πηγή: Высшая школа: научные исследования.

Θεματικοί όροι: муж- чины, пик заболеваемости, преобладающие ионы, мочекаменная болезнь, частота встречаемости, женщины

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guidelines on the management of pediatric urolithiasis ; Клинические рекомендации по лечению детей c мочекаменной болезнью, разработанные Международным альянсом мочекаменной болезни

Συγγραφείς: Guohua Zeng, Wei Zhu, B. Somani, S. Choong, M. Straub, M. V. Maroccolo, W. Kamal, Tarek Ahmed Amin Ibrahim, A. Cho, G. Mazzon, Chu Ann Chai, S. Ferretti, Wen Zhong, B. Onal, O. Mohamed, Sh. Saulat, B. Jurkiewicz, Ali Sezer, Yang Liu, Tao Zeng, Wei Wang, V. Gauhar, Ahmad Abdelaziz Elderwy, Z. Zaidi, M. Duvdevani, Saeed Bin Hamri, N. Kumar, L. Kartalas-Goumas, N. K. Gadzhiev, K. A. Shiranov, K. Kraft, F. Sepulveda, A. Halinski, S. Marietti, Naser Al Soudan Al-Anazi, L. S. Santos, Ch. M. Vaddi, Jianye Jia, Jun Li, Xiaogen Kuang, Zhangqun Ye, K. Sarica, Гуохуа Цзен, Вэй Чжу, Б. Сомани, Саймон Чунг, М. Штрауб, М. В. Марокколо, В. Камаль, Тарек Ахмед Амин Ибрагим, А. Чо, Дж. Маццон, Чу Энн Чай, С. Ферретти, Вень Чжун, Б. Онал, О. Мохамед, Ш. Саулат, Б. Юркевич, Али Сезер, Ян Лю, Тао Цзэн, Вэй Ван, В. Гаухар, Ахмад Абдельазиз Элдерви, З. Заиди, М. Дувдевани, Саид Бин Хамри, Н. Кумар, Л. Карталас-Гумас, Н. К. Гаджиев, К. А. Ширанов, К. Крафт, Ф. Сепульведа, А. Халински, С. Мариетти, Насер Аль Судан Аль-Анази, Л. С. Сантос, Ч. М. Вадди, Цзянье Цзя, Цзюнь Ли, Сяоген Куанг, Чжанцюнь Йе, К. Сарика

Συνεισφορές: This work was financed by grants from «Plan on Enhancing Scientific Research» in Guangzhou Medical University Grant № GMUCR2024-01006 . The authors express their sincere gratitude to Prof. G. Zeng for kindly granting permission to translate the clinical guidelines of the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) on paediatric urolithiasis into Russian. The authors also extend they’re thanks to Nariman K. Gadzhiev and Kirill A. Shiranov for their assistance in adapting the Russian version of the guidelines., Работа финансировалась грантами «Plan on Enhancing Scientific Research» Медицинского университета Гуанчжоу № GMUCR2024-01006 . Спонсоры не принимали непосредственного участия в проведении исследования. Благодарности. Авторы выражают искреннюю признательность профессору Цзену Г. (Prof. G. Zeng) за предоставленное разрешение на перевод (русский язык) клинических рекомендаций Международного альянса мочекаменной болезни (International Alliance of Urolithiasis, IAU) по лечению детей с мочекаменной болезнью. Авторы также выражают благодарность Гаджиеву Н.К. и Ширанову К.А. за помощь с адаптацией русскоязычной версии рекомендаций.

Πηγή: Urology Herald; Том 13, № 4 (2025); 107-124 ; Вестник урологии; Том 13, № 4 (2025); 107-124 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2017-72-6

Θεματικοί όροι: наблюдении, urolithiasis, pediatrics, prevention, follow-up, мочекаменная болезнь, дети, профилактика

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1104/661; Issler N., Dufek S., Kleta R., Bockenhauer D., Smeulders N., Van't Hoff W. Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease: a 22-year single centre experience in the UK. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):136. DOI:10.1186/s12882-017-0505-x; Ward J.B., Feinstein L., Pierce C., Lim J., Abbott K.C., Bavendam T., Kirkali Z., Matlaga B.R.; NIDDK Urologic Diseases in America Project. Pediatric Urinary Stone Disease in the United States: The Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urology. 2019;129:180-187. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.012; Routh J.C., Graham D.A., Nelson C.P. Epidemiological trends in pediatric urolithiasis at United States freestanding pediatric hospitals. J Urol. 2010;184(3):1100-1104. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.018; Yang H., Wang Q., Luo J., Li Q., Wang L., Li C.C., Zhang G., Xu Z., Tao H., Fan Z. Ultrasound of urinary system and urinary screening in 14 256 asymptomatic children in China. Nephrology (Carlton). 2010;15(3):362-367. DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1797.2009.01262.x; Rizvi S.A., Sultan S., Zafar M.N., Ahmed B., Aba Umer S., Naqvi S.A. Paediatric urolithiasis in emerging economies. Int J Surg. 2016;36(Pt D):705-712. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.085; Gonzalez-Padilla D.A., Dahm P. Evidence-based urology: understanding GRADE methodology. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(6):1230-1233. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.014; Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Vist G.E., Kunz R., Falck-Ytter Y., Alonso-Coello P., Schünemann H.J.; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926. DOI:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD; Rodriguez Cuellar C.I., Wang P.Z.T., Freundlich M., Filler G. Educational review: role of the pediatric nephrologists in the work-up and management of kidney stones. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020;35(3):383-397. DOI:10.1007/s00467-018-4179-9; Önal B., Kırlı E.A. Pediatric stone disease: Current management and future concepts. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021;56(2):99-107. DOI:10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.20273; Mai Z., Liu Y., Wu W., Aierken A., Jiang C., Batur J., Wusiman S., Ma J., Li Y., Xu H., Ainiwa A., Saimaiti S., Tuerxun A., Zeng G. Prevalence of urolithiasis among the Uyghur children of China: a population-based cross-sectional study. BJU Int. 2019;124(3):395-400. DOI:10.1111/bju.14776; Baştuğ F., Düşünsel R. Pediatric urolithiasis: causative factors, diagnosisand medical management. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9(3):138-146. DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2012.4; Schott C., Pourtousi A., Connaughton D.M. Monogenic causation of pediatric nephrolithiasis. Front Urol. 2022;2:1075711. DOI:10.3389/fruro.2022.1075711; Edvardsson V.O., Goldfarb D.S., Lieske J.C., Beara-Lasic L., Anglani F., Milliner D.S., Palsson R. Hereditary causes of kidney stones and chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28(10):1923-1942. DOI:10.1007/s00467-012-2329-z; Howles S.A., Thakker R.V. Genetics of kidney stone disease. Nat Rev Urol. 2020;17(7):407-421. DOI:10.1038/s41585-020-0332-x; Singh P., Harris P.C., Sas D.J., Lieske J.C. The genetics of kidney stone disease and nephrocalcinosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(4):224-240. DOI:10.1038/s41581-021-00513-4; Stechman M.J., Loh N.Y., Thakker R.V. Genetic causes of hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(12):2321-2332. DOI:10.1007/s00467-008-0807-0; Demirtas F., Çakar N., Özçakar Z.B., Akıncı A., Burgu B., Yalçınkaya F. Risk factors for recurrence in pediatric urinary stone disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2024;39(7):2105-2113. DOI:10.1007/s00467-024-06300-0; Perez-Brayfield M.R., Caplan D., Gatti J.M., Smith E.A., Kirsch A.J. Metabolic risk factors for stone formation in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Urol. 2002;167(2 Pt 1):480-484. DOI:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)69068-2; Al-Beltagi M., Saeed N.K., Bediwy A.S., Elbeltagi R., Hasan S., Hamza M.B. Renal calcification in children with renal tubular acidosis: What a paediatrician ‎should ‎know‎. World J Clin Pediatr. 2023;12(5):295-309. DOI:10.5409/wjcp.v12.i5.295; Bianchi L., Gaiani F., Bizzarri B., Minelli R., Cortegoso Valdivia P., Leandro G., Di Mario F., De' Angelis G.L., Ruberto C. Renal lithiasis and inflammatory bowel diseases, an update on pediatric population. Acta Biomed. 2018;89(9-S):76-80. DOI:10.23750/abm.v89i9-S.7908; Baştuğ F., Gündüz Z., Tülpar S., Poyrazoğlu H., Düşünsel R. Urolithiasis in infants: evaluation of risk factors. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1117-1122. DOI:10.1007/s00345-012-0828-y; López M., Hoppe B. History, epidemiology and regional diversities of urolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(1):49-59. DOI:10.1007/s00467-008-0960-5; Halinski A., Halinski A., Zaniew M., Kudliński B., Soltysiak J., Sobolewski B., Steyaert H. Interest of URS-L in the Treatment of Ureterolithiasis in Preschool Children. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:324. DOI:10.3389/fped.2019.00324; Hoppe B., Kemper M.J. Diagnostic examination of the child with urolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(3):403-413. DOI:10.1007/s00467-008-1073-x; Hernandez J.D., Ellison J.S., Lendvay T.S. Current Trends, Evaluation, and Management of Pediatric Nephrolithiasis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(10):964-970. DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1419; Penido M.G., Tavares Mde S. Pediatric primary urolithiasis: Symptoms, medical management and prevention strategies. World J Nephrol. 2015;4(4):444-454. DOI:10.5527/wjn.v4.i4.444; Barreto L., Jung J.H., Abdelrahim A., Ahmed M., Dawkins G.P.C., Kazmierski M. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6(6):CD010784. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD010784.pub2; Tekgül S., Stein R., Bogaert G., Nijman R.J.M., Quaedackers J., 't Hoen L., Silay M.S., Radmayr C., Doğan H.S. European Association of Urology and European Society for Paediatric Urology Guidelines on Paediatric Urinary Stone Disease. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(3):833-839. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.006; Porowski T., Kirejczyk J.K., Zoch-Zwierz W., Konstantynowicz J., Korzeniecka-Kozerska A., Motkowski R., Laube N. Assessment of lithogenic risk in children based on a morning spot urine sample. J Urol. 2010;184(5):2103-2108. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.134; Passerotti C., Chow J.S., Silva A., Schoettler C.L., Rosoklija I., Perez-Rossello J., Cendron M., Cilento B.G., Lee R.S., Nelson C.P., Estrada C.R., Bauer S.B., Borer J.G., Diamond D.A., Retik A.B., Nguyen H.T. Ultrasound versus computerized tomography for evaluating urolithiasis. J Urol. 2009;182(4 Suppl):1829-1834. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.072; Fulgham P.F., Assimos D.G., Pearle M.S., Preminger G.M. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1203-1213. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031; Palmer J.S., Donaher E.R., O'Riordan M.A., Dell K.M. Diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis: role of ultrasound and computerized tomography. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1413-1416. DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000173133.79174.c8; Grivas N., Thomas K., Drake T., Donaldson J., Neisius A., Petřík A., Ruhayel Y., Seitz C., Türk C., Skolarikos A. Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: A systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(5):612-624. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.003; Donnelly L.F., Emery K.H., Brody A.S., Laor T., Gylys-Morin V.M., Anton C.G., Thomas S.R., Frush D.P. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):303-306. DOI:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760303; National Cancer Institute. Radiation Risks and Pediatric Computed Tomography. 2002. Accessed on January 14, 2024 URL: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/pediatric-ct-scans; Leppert A., Nadalin S., Schirg E., Petersen C., Kardorff R., Galanski M., Fuchs J. Impact of magnetic resonance urography on preoperative diagnostic workup in children affected by hydronephrosis: should IVU be replaced? J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(10):1441-1445. DOI:10.1053/jpsu.2002.35408; Dos Santos J., Lopes R.I., Veloso A.O., Harvey E., Farhat W.A., Papanikolaou F. Outcome Analysis of Asymptomatic Lower Pole Stones in Children. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 2):1289-1293. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.038; Telli O., Hamidi N., Bagci U., Demirbas A., Hascicek A.M., Soygur T., Burgu B. What happens to asymptomatic lower pole kidney stones smaller than 10 mm in children during watchful waiting? Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32(5):853-857. DOI:10.1007/s00467-016-3570-7; Robinson C., Shenoy M., Hennayake S. No stone unturned: The epidemiology and outcomes of paediatric urolithiasis in Manchester, United Kingdom. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(3):372.e1-372.e7. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.03.009; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Renal and ureteric stones: assessment and management. 2019. Accessed on October 22, 2023. URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng118; Soliman M.G., El-Gamal O., El-Gamal S., Abdel Raheem A., Abou-Ramadan A., El-Abd A. Silodosin versus Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Children with Lower-Third Ureteric Stones: Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):568-573. DOI:10.1159/000513074; Ziaeefar P., Basiri A., Zangiabadian M., de la Rosette J., Zargar H.,Taheri M., Kashi A.H. Medical expulsive therapy for pediatric ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Med. 2023;12(4):1410. DOI:10.3390/jcm12041410; Tasian G.E., Cost N.G., Granberg C.F., Pulido J.E., Rivera M., Schwen Z., Schulte M., Fox J.A. Tamsulosin and spontaneous passage of ureteral stones in children: a multi-institutional cohort study. J Urol. 2014;192(2):506-511. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.091; Ugur G., Erhan E., Kocabas S., Ozyar B. Anaesthetic/analgesic management of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13(1):85-87. DOI:10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.09672.x; Aldridge R.D., Aldridge R.C., Aldridge L.M. Anesthesia for pediatric lithotripsy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(3):236-241. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01839.x; Chang T.H., Lin W.R., Tsai W.K., Chiang P.K., Chen M., Tseng J.S., Chiu A.W. Comparison of ultrasound-assisted and pure fluoroscopyguided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):183. DOI:10.1186/s12894-020-00756-6; Lee C., Best S.L., Ugarte R., Monga M. Impact of learning curve on efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy. Radiol Technol. 2008;80(1):20-24. PMID: 18796563.; Semins M.J., Matlaga B.R. Strategies to optimize shock wave lithotripsy outcome: Patient selection and treatment parameters. World J Nephrol. 2015;4(2):230-234. DOI:10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.230; Rassweiler J.J., Knoll T., Köhrmann K.U., McAteer J.A., Lingeman J.E., Cleveland R.O., Bailey M.R., Chaussy C. Shock wave technology and application: an update. Eur Urol. 2011;59(5):784-796. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.033; Bohris C., Roosen A., Dickmann M., Hocaoglu Y., Sandner S., Bader M., Stief C.G., Walther S. Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera. J Urol. 2012;187(1):157-163. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.039; Onal B., Demirkesen O., Tansu N., Kalkan M., Altintaş R., Yalçin V. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones. J Urol. 2004;172(3):1082-1086. DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c; Hochreiter W.W., Danuser H., Perrig M., Studer U.E. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi: what a powerful machine can achieve. J Urol. 2003;169(3):878-880. DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000051896.15091.0c; Tan A.H., Al-Omar M., Watterson J.D., Nott L., Denstedt J.D., Razvi H. Results of shockwave lithotripsy for pediatric urolithiasis. J Endourol. 2004;18(6):527-530. DOI:10.1089/end.2004.18.527; Vlajković M., Slavković A., Radovanović M., Sirić Z., Stefanović V., Perović S. Long-term functional outcome of kidneys in children with urolithiasis after ESWL treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2002;12(2):118-123. DOI:10.1055/s-2002-30167; Traxer O., Lottmann H., Archambaud F., Helal B., Mercier-Pageyral B. La lithotritie extracorporelle chez l'enfant. Etude de son efficacité et évaluation de ses conséquences parenchymateuses par la scintigraphie au DMSA-Tc 99m: une série de 39 enfants [Extracorporeal lithotripsy in children. Study of its efficacy and evaluation of renal parenchymal damage by DMSA-Tc 99m scintigraphy: a series of 39 children]. Arch Pediatr. 1999;6(3):251-258. (In French). DOI:10.1016/s0929-693x(99)80260-7; Ather M.H., Noor M.A. Does size and site matter for renal stones up to 30-mm in size in children treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy? Urology. 2003;61(1):212-215; discussion 215. DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02128-3; al Busaidy S.S., Prem A.R., Medhat M. Paediatric ureteroscopy for ureteric calculi: a 4-year experience. Br J Urol. 1997;80(5):797-801. DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00440.x; Dogan H.S., Tekgul S., Akdogan B., Keskin M.S., Sahin A. Use of the holmium:YAG laser for ureterolithotripsy in children. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):131-133. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-4096.2004.04873.x; Abu Ghazaleh L.A., Shunaigat A.N., Budair Z. Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy for small renal stones in prepubertal children. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011;22(3):492-496. PMID: 21566306.; Zhu W., Liu S., Cao J., Wang H., Liang H., Jiang K., Cui Y., Chai C.A., Sahinler E.B., Aquino A., Mazzon G., Zhong W., Zhao Z., Zhang L., Ding J., Wang Q., Wang Y., Chen K.W., Liu Y., Choong S., Sarica K., Zeng G. Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicen- tre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;74:102724. DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102724; Ripa F., Tokas T., Griffin S., Ferretti S., Bujons Tur A., Somani B.K. Role of Pediatric Ureteral Access Sheath and Outcomes Related to Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation: A Systematic Review of Literature. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;45:90-98. DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.012; Bortnick E., Kurtz M.P., Cilento B.G. Jr, Nelson C.P. Is cerebral palsy associated with successful ureteral access during the initial attempt at ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in children and young adults? J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(4):369.e1-369.e6. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.04.014; Campbell P., Mudd B., Craig K., Daugherty M., Vanderbrink B., DeFoor W., Minevich E., Reddy P., Strine A. One and done: Feasibility and Safety of Primary Ureteroscopy in a Pediatric Population. J Pediatr Urol. 2024;20(2):224.e1-224.e7. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.031; McGee L.M., Sack B.S., Wan J., Kraft K.H. The effect of preoperative tamsulosin on ureteroscopic access in schoolaged children. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(6):795.e1-795.e6. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.08.021; Chandramohan V., Siddalingaswamy P.M., Ramakrishna P., Soundarya G., Manas B., Hemnath A. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones in children; Castellani D., Somani B.K., Ferretti S., Gatti C., Sekerci C.A., Madarriaga Y.Q., Fong K.Y., Campobasso D., Ragoori D., Shrestha A., Vaddi C.M., Bhatia T.P., Sinha M.M., Lim E.J., Teoh J.Y., Griffin S., Tur A.B., Tanidir Y., Traxer O., Gauhar V. Role of Preoperative Ureteral Stent on Outcomes of Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery (RIRS) in Children. Results From a Comparative, Large, Multicenter Series. Urology. 2023;173:153-158. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.019; Gokce M.I., Telli O., Akinci A., Esen B., Suer E., Ozkidik M., Hajiyev P., Soygur T., Burgu B. Effect of Prestenting on Success and Complication Rates of Ureterorenoscopy in Pediatric Population. J Endourol. 2016;30(8):850-855. DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0201; Patil N., Javali T., Hamsa V., Nagaraj H.K. A single centre experience of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and its long-term outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(5):650.e1-650.e9. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.07.026; Cicekbilek I., Resorlu B., Oguz U., Kara C., Unsal A. Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal functions in children: assessment byquantitative SPECT of (99m)Tc-DMSA uptake by the kidneys. Ren Fail. 2015;37(7):1118-1121. DOI:10.3109/0886022X.2015.1056063; Desai M.R., Kukreja R.A., Patel S.H., Bapat S.D. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric renal calculus disease. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):23-27. DOI:10.1089/089277904322836613; Fan B.Y., Gu L., Chand H., Liu W.J., Yuan J.B. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric complex renal calculus disease: one-stage or two-stage? Int Urol Nephrol. 2019;51(2):201-206. DOI:10.1007/s11255-018-2054-z; Gamal W., Moursy E., Hussein M., Mmdouh A., Hammady A., Aldahshoury M. Supine pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(2):78.e1-5. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.012; Mahmood S.N., Aziz B.O., Tawfeeq H.M., Fakhralddin S.S. Miniversus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough? J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(6):664.e1-664. e6. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009; Jones P., Bennett G., Aboumarzouk O.M., Griffin S., Somani B.K. Role of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Techniques-Micro and Ultra-Mini PCNL (; Nerli R.B., Ghagane S.C., Mungarwadi A., Patil S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021;37(8):1109-1115. DOI:10.1007/s00383-021-04901-6; Long C.J., Srinivasan A.K. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy in children: evolutions. Urol Clin North Am. 2015;42(1):1-17. DOI:10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.002; Nouralizadeh A., Simforoosh N., Shemshaki H., Soltani M.H., Sotoudeh M., Ramezani M.H., Nikravesh M., Golshan A., Ansari A. Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urologia. 2018;85(1):3-9. DOI:10.5301/uj.5000270; Veser J., Fajkovic H., Seitz C. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of minimal invasive exit strategies after percutaneous stone treatment. Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(5):679-683. DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000802; Scoffone C.M., Cracco C.M., Cossu M., Grande S., Poggio M., Scarpa R.M. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1393-1403. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.073; Cracco C.M., Scoffone C.M. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - Tips and tricks to improve outcomes: A systematic review. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(Supp. 1):S46-S57. DOI:10.5152/tud.2020.20282; Abdullatif V.A., Sur R.L., Abdullatif Z.A., Szabo S.R., Abbott J.E. The Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Urol. 2022;2022:1716554. DOI:10.1155/2022/1716554; Quiroz Y., Somani B.K., Tanidir Y., Tekgul S., Silay S., Castellani D., Lim E.J., Fong K.Y., Garcia Rojo E., Corrales M., Hameed B.M.Z., Llorens E., Teoh J.Y., Dogan H.S., Traxer O., Bujons Tur A., Gauhar V. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Children: Evolution, Current Status, and Future Trends. J Endourol. 2022;36(12):1511-1521. Erratum in: J Endourol. 2023;37(2):241. DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0160; Onal B., Citgez S., Tansu N., Emin G., Demirkesen O., Talat Z., Yalcin V., Erozenci A. What changed in the management of pediatric stones after the introduction of minimally invasive procedures? A single-center experience over 24 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(6 Pt A):910-914. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.12.015; Rizvi S.A., Sultan S., Ijaz H., Mirza Z.N., Ahmed B., Saulat S., Umar S.A., Naqvi S.A. Open surgical management of pediatric urolithiasis: A developing country perspective. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(4):573-576. DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.74464; Güzel R., Yildirim Ü., Sarica K. Contemporary minimal invasive surgical management of stones in children. Asian J Urol. 2023;10(3):239-245. DOI:10.1016/j.ajur.2023.02.001; Honeck P., Wendt-Nordahl G., Krombach P., Bach T., Häcker A., Alken P., Michel M.S. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J Endourol. 2009;23(7):1209-1212. DOI:10.1089/end.2009.0027; Soltani M.H., Simforoosh N., Nouralizadeh A., Sotoudeh M., Mollakoochakian M.J., Shemshaki H.R. Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy in Children Less Than Two Years Old with Large Renal Stones: Initial Series. Urol J. 2016;13(5):2837-2840. PMID: 27734425; Erçil H., Karkin K., Vuruşkan E. Is laparoscopic pyelolithotomy an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones larger than 2.5 cm in pediatric patients? Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39(1):78. DOI:10.1007/s00383-023-05367-4; Esposito C., Masieri L., Blanc T., Lendvay T., Escolino M. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for treatment of urinary tract stones in children: report of a multicenter international experience. Urolithiasis. 2021;49(6):575-583. DOI:10.1007/s00240-021-01271-5; Lee R.S., Passerotti C.C., Cendron M., Estrada C.R., Borer J.G., Peters C.A. Early results of robot assisted laparoscopic lithotomy in adolescents. J Urol. 2007;177(6):2306-2309; discussion 2309-2310. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.178; Donaldson J.F., Ruhayel Y., Skolarikos A., MacLennan S., Yuan Y., Shepherd R., Thomas K., Seitz C., Petrik A., Türk C., Neisius A. Treatment of Bladder Stones in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Behalf of the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guideline Panel. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):352-367. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.018; Al-Marhoon M.S., Sarhan O.M., Awad B.A., Helmy T., Ghali A., Dawaba M.S. Comparison of endourological and open cystolithotomy in the management of bladder stones in children. J Urol. 2009;181(6):2684-2687; discussion 2687-2688. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.040; Yadav P., Madhavan K., Syal S., Farooq A., Srivastava A., Ansari M.S. Technique, complications, and outcomes of pediatric urolithiasis management at a tertiary care hospital: evolving paradigms over the last 15 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(6):665.e1-665.e7. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.011; Esposito C., Autorino G., Masieri L., Castagnetti M., Del Conte F., Coppola V., Cerulo M., Crocetto F., Escolino M. Minimally Invasive Manage- ment of Bladder Stones in Children. Front Pediatr. 2021;8:618756. DOI:10.3389/fped.2020.618756 05.; Torricelli F.C., Mazzucchi E., Danilovic A., Coelho R.F., Srougi M. Surgical management of bladder stones: literature review. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013;40(3):227-233. (In English, Portuguese). DOI:10.1590/s0100-69912013000300011; Tiselius H.G. Metabolic risk-evaluation and prevention of recurrence in stone disease: does it make sense? Urolithiasis. 2016;44(1):91-100. DOI:10.1007/s00240-015-0840-y; Maalouf N.M., Moe O.W., Adams-Huet B., Sakhaee K. Hypercalciuria associated with high dietary protein intake is not due to acid load. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):3733-3740. DOI:10.1210/jc.2011-1531; Huynh L.M., Dianatnejad S., Tofani S., Carrillo Ceja R., Liang K., Tapiero S., Jiang P., Youssef R.F. Metabolic diagnoses of recurrent stone formers: temporal, geographic and gender differences. Scand J Urol. 2020;54(6):456-462. DOI:10.1080/21681805.2020.1840430; Zeng G., Zhu W., Robertson W.G., Penniston K.L., Smith D., Pozdzik A., Tefik T., Prezioso D., Pearle M.S., Chew B.H., Veser J., Fiori C., Deng Y., Straub M., Türk C., Semins M.J., Wang K., Marangella M., Jia Z, Zhang L., Ye Z., Tiselius H.G., Sarica K. International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guidelines on the metabolic evaluation and medical management of urolithiasis. Urolithiasis. 2022;51(1):4. DOI:10.1007/s00240-022-01387-2; Resorlu B., Kara C., Resorlu E.B., Unsal A. Effectiveness of ultrasonography in the postoperative follow-up of pediatric patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(12):1337-1341. DOI:10.1007/s00383-011-2979-0; Jayman J., Gibbs H., Mathias R., Epelman M., Ellsworth P. Progression of asymptomatic nephrolithiasis in children: How often should patients receive follow-up ultrasound imaging? J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(1):25. e1-25.e8. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.010; Lao M., Kogan B.A., White M.D., Feustel PJ. High recurrence rate at 5-year followup in children after upper urinary tract stone surgery. J Urol. 2014;191(2):440-444. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.021; Öner N., Baştuğ F., Özkan B., Özçatal M., Karakükçü C. Urolithiasis in children; The importance of stone localization in treatment and follow-up. Urolithiasis. 2024;52:17. DOI:10.1007/s00240-023-01518-3; Tasian G.E., Kabarriti A.E., Kalmus A., Furth S.L. Kidney Stone Recurrence among Children and Adolescents. J Urol. 2017;197(1):246-252. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.090; Spivacow F.R., Del Valle E.E., Boailchuk J.A., Sandoval Díaz G., Rodríguez Ugarte V., Arreaga Álvarez Z. Metabolic risk factors in children with kidney stone disease: an update. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020;35(11):2107-2112. DOI:10.1007/s00467-020-04660-x; Üntan İ., Üntan S., Tosun H., Demirci D. Metabolic risk factors and the role of prophylaxis in pediatric urolithiasis. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(2):215.e1-215.e6. DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.003; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1104

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/1104
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-4-107-124

Retrograde intrarenal surgery using a flexible ureterorenoscope in children with urolithiasis ; Ретроградная интраренальная хирургия с использованием гибкого уретерореноскопа у детей с мочекаменной болезнью ; 儿童尿路结石病的柔性输尿管肾镜逆行肾内手术

Συγγραφείς: Surov R.V., Shmyrov O.S., Lazishvili M.N., Kulaev A.V., Sharkov S.M., Morozov K.D., Kovachich A.S., Lobach A.Y., Margieva D.A.

Συνεισφορές: 1

Πηγή: Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care; Vol 15, No 3 (2025); 307-316 ; Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии; Vol 15, No 3 (2025); 307-316 ; 2587-6554 ; 2219-4061 ; 10.17816/psaic.20253

Θεματικοί όροι: retrograde intrarenal surgery, urolithiasis, laser lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy, children, ретроградная интраренальная хирургия, мочекаменная болезнь, контактная лазерная литотрипсия, гибкий уретерореноскоп, дети, 逆行肾内手术；尿路结石病；接触性激光碎石术；柔性输尿管肾镜；儿童

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/view/1926/pdf; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2264; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2265; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2266; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2267; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2269; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2565; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2566; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2567; https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1926/2568; KFWFWU

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://rps-journal.ru/jour/article/view/1926
https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic1926

Urolithiasis in early childhood: treatment approach illustrated by a case report ; Мочекаменная болезнь у детей раннего возраста: тактика лечения на примере клинического наблюдения

Συγγραφείς: N. F. Shchapov, E. S. Keshishian, N. A. Telyatnikov, P. V. Bullikh, V. A. Epishov, A. S. Degtyarev, D. V. Kulikov, Н. Ф. Щапов, Е. С. Кешишян, Н. А. Телятников, П. В. Буллих, В. А. Епишов, А. С. Дегтярев, Д. В. Куликов

Πηγή: Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics); Том 69, № 6 (2024); 107-111 ; Российский вестник перинатологии и педиатрии; Том 69, № 6 (2024); 107-111 ; 2500-2228 ; 1027-4065

Θεματικοί όροι: профилактика уролитиаза у детей, pediatric urolithiasis, ureteral obstruction, lithoextraction, children’s urolithiasis prevention, мочекаменная болезнь у детей, урообструкция, литоэкстракция

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.ped-perinatology.ru/jour/article/view/2098/1558; Винниченко Л.В., Исмаилова И.А., Делягин В.М. Педиатрические аспекты мочекаменной болезни. Практическая медицина 2018; 16(8): 27–33.; Barreto L., Jung J.H., Abdelrahim A., Ahmed M., Dawkins G.P.C., Kazmierski M. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10(10): CD010784. Published 2019 Oct 9 DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD010784.pub3; Bertrand Y., Mechinaud F., Brethon B., Mialou V., Auvrignon A., Nelken B. et al; SFCE. SFCE (Société Française de Lutte contre les Cancers et Leucémies de l’Enfant et de l’Adolescent) recommendations for the management of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) with rasburicase: an observational survey. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2008; 30(4): 267–271. DOI:10.1097/MPH.0b013e318162bd41; Pui C.H., Mahmoud H.H., Wiley J.M., Woods G.M., Leverger G., Camitta B. et al. Recombinant urate oxidase for the prophylaxis or treatment of hyperuricemia in patients With leukemia or lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(3): 697–704. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.697; Coiffier B., Altman A., Pui C.H., Younes A., Cairo M.S. Guidelines for the management of pediatric and adult tumor lysis syndrome: an evidence-based review [published correction appears in J Clin Oncol 2010;28(4):708]. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(16): 2767–2778. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0177; Böhles H., Gebhardt B., Beeg T., Sewell A.C., Solem E., Posselt G. Antibiotic treatment-induced tubular dysfunction as a risk factor for renal stone formation in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr 2002; 140(1): 103–109. DOI:10.1067/mpd.2002.120694; Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Просянников М.Ю., Голованов С.А., Войтко Д.А., Анохин Н.В. и др. Кристаллообразующая активность мочи и методы ее измерения. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология 2023; 16(3): 146–153.; Goldman S.C., Holcenberg J.S., Finklestein J.Z., Hutchinson R., Kreissman S., Johnson F.L. et al. A randomized comparison between rasburicase and allopurinol in children with lymphoma or leukemia at high risk for tumor lysis. Blood 2001; 97(10): 2998–3003. DOI:10.1182/blood.v97.10.2998; Coiffier B., Mounier N., Bologna S., Fermé C., Tilly H., Sonet A. et al; Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte Trial on Rasburicase Activity in Adult Lymphoma. Efficacy and safety of rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase) for the prevention and treatment of hyperuricemia during induction chemotherapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of the GRAAL1 (Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adulte Trial on Rasburicase Activity in Adult Lymphoma) study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(23): 4402–4406. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2003.04.115; Jeha S., Kantarjian H., Irwin D., Shen V., Shenoy S., Blaney S. et al. Efficacy and safety of rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase (Elitek), in the management of malignancy-associated hyperuricemia in pediatric and adult patients: final results of a multicenter compassionate use trial. Leukemia 2005; 19(1): 34–38. DOI:10.1038/sj.leu.2403566; Bosly A., Sonet A., Pinkerton C.R., McCowage G., Bron D., Sanz M.A., Van den Berg H. Rasburicase (recombinant urate oxidase) for the management of hyperuricemia in patients with cancer: report of an international compassionate use study. Cancer 2003; 98(5): 1048–1054. DOI:10.1002/cncr.11612

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://www.ped-perinatology.ru/jour/article/view/2098
https://doi.org/10.21508/1027-4065-2024-69-6-107-112

РЕАЛИЗАЦИЯ ПРОФИЛАКТИКИ МОЧЕКАМЕННОЙ БОЛЕЗНИ В РАМКАХ ПЕРВИЧНОЙ МЕДИКО-САНИТАРНОЙ ПОМОЩИ

Πηγή: Медицина и организация здравоохранения, Vol 9, Iss 3 (2024)

Θεματικοί όροι: Medicine (General), R5-920, диспансеризация взрослого населения, мочекаменная болезнь, активное выявление хронических заболеваний, диспансерное наблюдение

Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://doaj.org/article/6a23409248e94e298b385f7486885fdf

МИНИ И СТАНДАРТНАЯ ПЕРКУТАННАЯ НЕФРОЛИТОТОМИЯ СРАВНЕНИЕ

Θεματικοί όροι: Мини-ПНЛ, Стандартная ПНЛ, Мочекаменная болезнь

МИНИ И СТАНДАРТНАЯ ПЕРКУТАННАЯ НЕФРОЛИТОТОМИЯ СРАВНЕНИЕ

Θεματικοί όροι: Мини-ПНЛ, Стандартная ПНЛ, Мочекаменная болезнь

СОСТОЯНИЕ СИСТЕМЫ ГЕМОСТАЗА У МУЖЧИН, БОЛЬНЫХ УРОЛИТИАЗОМ, ПРОХОДИВШИХ ЛЕЧЕНИЕ В УСЛОВИЯХ ПАНДЕМИИ COVID-19

Πηγή: Российские биомедицинские исследования, Vol 9, Iss 3 (2024)

Θεματικοί όροι: гемостаз, Medicine (General), R5-920, мочекаменная болезнь, COVID-19, андрогенная терапия

Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://doaj.org/article/7cdda849c7ef4f35979f17c82c1cbb2b

Заболевания кишечника и почки

Συγγραφείς: Dorofeiev, A.E., Rudenko, N.N., Derkach, I.A., Chechula, Yu.V.

Πηγή: Gastroenterologìa, Vol 49, Iss 3.57, Pp 101-105 (2015)
GASTROENTEROLOGY; № 3.57 (2015); 101-105
Гастроэнтерология-Gastroenterologìa; № 3.57 (2015); 101-105
Гастроентерологія-Gastroenterologìa; № 3.57 (2015); 101-105

Θεματικοί όροι: kidneys, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 13. Climate action, intestine, diseases, urolithiasis, кишечник, нирки, захворювання, сечо­кам'я­на хвороба, RC799-869, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, почки, заболевания, мочекаменная болезнь, 3. Good health

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://doaj.org/article/01c482289d844b1098ccc6582e401612
http://gastro.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/81532
http://gastro.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/download/81532/123038
http://gastro.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/81532

СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ПРЕДСТАВЛЕНИЯ О ФАКТОРАХ РИСКА РАЗВИТИЯ МОЧЕКАМЕННОЙ БОЛЕЗНИ У БОЛЬНЫХ МЕТАБОЛИЧЕСКИМ СИНДРОМОМ

Συγγραφείς: Абдикарим кизи, Юсупова Шахнозахон

Πηγή: SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF APPLIED AND MEDICAL SCIENCES; Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): AMALIY VA TIBBIYOT FANLARI ILMIY JURNALI; 594-600 ; НАУЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ПРИКЛАДНЫХ И МЕДИЦИНСКИХ НАУК; Том 3 № 6 (2024): AMALIY VA TIBBIYOT FANLARI ILMIY JURNALI; 594-600 ; 2181-3469

Θεματικοί όροι: мочекаменная болезнь, метаболический синдром, почки

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://sciencebox.uz/index.php/amaltibbiyot/article/view/11193/10215; https://sciencebox.uz/index.php/amaltibbiyot/article/view/11193

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://sciencebox.uz/index.php/amaltibbiyot/article/view/11193

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery (Russian adaptation) ; Клинические рекомендации Международного альянса мочекаменной болезни по ретроградной интраренальной хирургии (Российская адаптация)

Συγγραφείς: Guohua Zeng, Olivier Traxer, Wen Zhong, Palle Osther, Margaret Pearle, Glenn M. Preminger, Giorgio Mazzon, Christian Seitz, Petrisor Geavlete, Christian Fiori, Khurshid R. Ghani, Ben H. Chew, Kah Ann Git, Fabio Carvalho Vicentini, Athanasios Papatsoris, Marianne Brehmer, Juan López Martínez, Jiwen Cheng, Fan Cheng, Xiaofeng Gao, Nariman K. Gadzhiev, Dmitri S. Gorelov, Amelia Pietropaolo, Silvia Proietti, Zhangqun Ye, Kemal Sarika, Гохуа Цзэн, Оливье Траксер, Вэнь Чжун, Палле Остер, Маргарет Пирл, Гленн М. Премингер, Джорджио Маццон, Кристиан Зейтц, Петрисор Геавлете, Кристиан Фиори, Хуршид Р. Гани, Бен Х. Чу, Ках Анн Гит, Фабио Карвальо Висентини, Афанасиос Папацорис, Марианна Бремер, Хуан Лопес Мартинес, Цзивэнь Чэн, Фань Чэн, Сяофэн Гао, Нариман К. Гаджиев, Дмитрий С. Горелов, Амелия Пьетропаоло, Сильвия Пройетти, Чжанцюнь Йе, Кемаль Сарика

Συνεισφορές: The authors are grateful to Ibrahim Ye. Malikiev for his help in adapting the Russian version of the guideline., Авторы выражают признательность Ибрагиму Ермаковичу Маликиеву за помощь с адаптацией русской версии руководства.

Πηγή: Urology Herald; Том 12, № 2 (2024); 125-144 ; Вестник урологии; Том 12, № 2 (2024); 125-144 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2

Θεματικοί όροι: гибкая уретероскопия, urolithiasis, treatment, endourology, retrograde intrarenal surgery, RIRS, flexible ureteroscopy, мочекаменная болезнь, лечение, эндоурология, ретроградная интраренальная хирургия, РИРХ

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/849/544; Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1153-1160. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090; EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam, 2022. (Accessed on 10.06.2022) https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis; Zeng G, Zhao Z, Mazzon G, Pearle M, Choong S, Skolarikos A, Denstedt J, Seitz C, Olvera Pasada D, Fiori C, Bosio A, Papatsoris A, Méndez Probst CE, Perez Fentes D, Ann Git K, Wu Q, Wiseman O, Emiliani E, Farahat Y, Ilker Gökce M, Giannakopoulos S, Goumas Kartalas I, Somani B, Knoll T, de la Rosette J, Zhong J, Vinicius Maroccolo M, Saltirov L, Chew B, Wang K, Lahme S, Giusti G, Ferretti S, Yong Cho S, Geavlete P, Cansino R, Kamphuis GM, Smith D, Matlaga BR, Ghani KD, Bernardo N, Silva AD, Ng ACF, Yang S, Gao X, Traxer O, Miernik A, Liatsikos E, Priyakant Parikh K, Duvdevani M, Celia A, Yasui T, Aquino A, Alomar M, Choonhaklai V, Erkurt B, Glass J, Sriprasad S, Osther PJ, Keeley FX Jr, Preminger GM, Cepeda Delgado M, Beltran Suarez E, Ye Z, Sarica K. European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis and International Alliance of Urolithiasis Joint Consensus on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Renal Stones. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1461-1468. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.011; Цзэн Г., Чжун В., Маццон Д., Чун С., Пирл М., Агравал М., Скоффоне Ч.М., Фиори К., Гекче М.И., Лам У., Петкова К., Сабунку К., Гаджиев Н.К., Пьетропаоло A., Эмилиани Э., Сарика К. Клинические рекомендации международного альянса мочекаменной болезни по чрескожной нефролитотомии. Вестник урологии. 2022;10(4):179-200. DOI:10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-4-179-200; Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926. DOI:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD; OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group*. “The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (Accessed on 10.06.2022) https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence; Hyams ES, Monga M, Pearle MS, Antonelli JA, Semins MJ, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Pais VM Jr, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME, Eisner BH, Shah O, Sur RL, Mufarrij PW, Matlaga BR. A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm. J Urol. 2015;193(1):165-169. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002; Sener NC, Imamoglu MA, Bas O, Ozturk U, Goktug HN, Tuygun C, Bakirtas H. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm. Urolithiasis. 2014;42(2):127-131. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0618-z; El-Nahas AR, Ibrahim HM, Youssef RF, Sheir KZ. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm. BJU Int. 2012;110(6):898-902. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x; Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y, Can CE, Unsal A. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm. J Endourol. 2011;25(7):1131-1135. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0737; Zhang W, Zhou T, Wu T, Gao X, Peng Y, Xu C, Chen Q, Song R, Sun Y. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):745-759. DOI:10.1089/end.2014.0799; Hamamoto S, Yasui T, Okada A, Taguchi K, Kawai N, Ando R, Mizuno K, Kubota Y, Kamiya H, Tozawa K, Kohri K. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol. 2014;28(1):28-33. DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0361; Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008;179(3):981-984. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.083; Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. 2013;111(3 Pt B):E127-31. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11352.x; Geraghty R, Abourmarzouk O, Rai B, Biyani CS, Rukin NJ, Somani BK. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for Large Renal Stones in the Modern Era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(8):54. DOI:10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3; Zeng G, Zhu W, Li J, Zhao Z, Zeng T, Liu C, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wan SP. The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis. World J Urol. 2015;33(8):1159-1164. DOI:10.1007/s00345-014-1420-4; Zhong W, Leto G, Wang L, Zeng G. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a study of risk factors. J Endourol. 2015;29(1):25-28. DOI:10.1089/end.2014.0409; Baboudjian M, Gondran-Tellier B, Abdallah R, Sichez PC, Akiki A, Gaillet S, Delaporte V, Karsenty G, Lechevallier E, Boissier R. Predictive risk factors of urinary tract infection following flexible ureteroscopy despite preoperative precautions to avoid infectious complications. World J Urol. 2020;38(5):1253-1259. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02891-8; Martov A, Gravas S, Etemadian M, Unsal A, Barusso G, D'Addessi A, Krambeck A, de la Rosette J; Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Study Group. Postoperative infection rates in patients with a negative baseline urine culture undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal: a matched case-control analysis on antibiotic prophylaxis from the CROES URS global study. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):171-180. DOI:10.1089/end.2014.0470; Zeng G, Zhao Z, Yang F, Zhong W, Wu W, Chen W. Retrograde intrarenal surgery with combined spinal-epidural vs general anesthesia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Endourol. 2015;29(4):401-405. DOI:10.1089/end.2014.0249; Guzel O, Tuncel A, Balci M, Karakoyunlu N, Aslan Y, Erkan A, Senel C. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery is equally efficient and safe in patients with different American Society of Anesthesia physical status. Ren Fail. 2016;38(4):503-507. DOI:10.3109/0886022X.2016.1144248; Hoare DT, Wollin TA, De S, Hobart MG. Success rate of repeat flexible ureteroscopy following previous failed access: An analysis of stent duration. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15(8):255-258. DOI:10.5489/cuaj.7064; Bai PD, Wang T, Huang HC, Wu Z, Wang XG, Qin JX, Wang HQ, Chen B, Hu MB, Xing JC. Effect of Preoperative Double-J Ureteral Stenting before Flexible Ureterorenoscopy on Stone-free Rates and Complications. Curr Med Sci. 2021;41(1):140-144. DOI:10.1007/s11596-021-2328-z; Dessyn JF, Balssa L, Chabannes E, Jacquemet B, Bernardini S, Bittard H, Guichard G, Kleinclauss F. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Renal and Proximal Ureteral Stone in Patients with Previous Ureteral Stenting: Impact on Stone-Free Rate and Morbidity. J Endourol. 2016;30(10):1084-1088. DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0045; Fahmy O, Shsm H, Lee C, Khairul-Asri MG. Impact of Preoperative Stenting on the Outcome of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Upper Urinary Tract Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int. 2022;106(7):679-687. DOI:10.1159/000518160; Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ. Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology. 2012;80(6):1214-1219. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.064; Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A, Plothe KD, Thelen P, Ringert RH, Loertzer H. Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol. 2013;31(4):855-859. DOI:10.1007/s00345-011-0789-6; L'esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr, Marguet CG, Springhart WP, Maloney ME, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology. 2005;66(2):252-255. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.019; Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Ishigaki H, Ogawa T, Uemura H, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J. Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol. 2012;19(9):881-885. DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03046.x; Yuk HD, Park J, Cho SY, Sung LH, Jeong CW. The effect of preoperative ureteral stenting in retrograde Intrarenal surgery: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):147. DOI:10.1186/s12894-020-00715-1; Lee MH, Lee IJ, Kim TJ, Lee SC, Jeong CW, Hong SK, Byun SS, Oh JJ. The effect of short-term preoperative ureteral stenting on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. World J Urol. 2019;37(7):1435-1440. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2519-9; Falagario UG, Calò B, Auciello M, Carrieri G, Cormio L. Advanced ureteroscopic techniques for the management of kidney stones. Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31(1):58-65. DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000835; Xie Y, Tao J, Liu H, Zang X, Zhang Z, Guo G, Liu B. The use of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for the diagnosis of urinary calculi. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020;190(2):200-207. DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncaa094; Joyce S, O'Connor OJ, Maher MM, McEntee MF. Strategies for dose reduction with specific clinical indications during computed tomography. Radiography (Lond). 2020;26 Suppl 2:S62-S68. DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.012; Roberts MJ, Williams J, Khadra S, Nalavenkata S, Kam J, McCombie SP, Arianayagam M, Canagasingham B, Ferguson R, Khadra M, Varol C, Winter M, Sanaei F, Loh H, Thakkar Y, Dugdale P, Ko R. A prospective, matched comparison of ultra-low and standard-dose computed tomography for assessment of renal colic. BJU Int. 2020;126 Suppl 1:27-32. DOI:10.1111/bju.15116; Karsiyakali N, Karabay E, Erkan E, Kadihasanoglu M. Evaluation of Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Urol J. 2020;17(4):352-357. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.5256; Danilovic A, Rocha BA, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS, Batagello C, Vicentini FC, Traxer O, Viana PCC, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. Size is Not Everything That Matters: Preoperative CT Predictors of Stone Free After RIRS. Urology. 2019;132:63-68. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.006; Koc E, Kamaci D, Gok B, Bedir F, Metin BC, Atmaca AF. Does the renal parenchymal thickness affect the efficacy of the retrograde intrarenal surgery? A prospective cohort study. Urolithiasis. 2021;49(1):57-64. DOI:10.1007/s00240-020-01185-8; Kim DS, Moon SK, Lee SH. Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery. World J Urol. 2021;39(9):3563-3569. DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03659-9; Tastemur S, Senel S, Kizilkan Y, Ozden C. Evaluation of the anatomical factors affecting the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery for isolated lower pole kidney stones. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(1):65-70. DOI:10.1007/s00240-021-01279-x; Hu H, Hu XY, Fang XM, Chen HW, Yao XJ. Unenhanced helical CT following excretory urography in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract disease: a little more cost, a lot more value. Urol Res. 2010;38(2):127-133. DOI:10.1007/s00240-009-0237-x; Xu Y, Lyu JL. The value of three-dimensional helical computed tomography for the retrograde flexible ureteronephroscopy in the treatment of lower pole calyx stones. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2016;2(1):42-47. DOI:10.1016/j.cdtm.2016.02.001; Kaler KS, Safiullah S, Lama DJ, Parkhomenko E, Okhunov Z, Ko YH, Huynh L, Patel RM, Landman J, Clayman RV. Medical impulsive therapy (MIT): the impact of 1 week of preoperative tamsulosin on deployment of 16-French ureteral access sheaths without preoperative ureteral stent placement. World J Urol. 2018;36(12):2065-2071. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2336-1; Kim JK, Choi CI, Lee SH, Han JH, Shim YS, Choo MS; Young Endourological Study group. Silodosin for Prevention of Ureteral Injuries Resulting from Insertion of a Ureteral Access Sheath: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(2):572-579. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.009; Tapiero S, Kaler KS, Jiang P, Lu S, Cottone C, Patel RM, Okhunov Z, Klopfer MJ, Landman J, Clayman RV. Determining the Safety Threshold for the Passage of a Ureteral Access Sheath in Clinical Practice Using a Purpose-Built Force Sensor. J Urol. 2021;206(2):364-372. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001719; Koo KC, Yoon JH, Park NC, Lee HS, Ahn HK, Lee KS, Kim DK, Cho KS, Chung BH, Hong CH. The Impact of Preoperative α-Adrenergic Antagonists on Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion Force and the Upper Limit of Force Required to Avoid Ureteral Mucosal Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Urol. 2018;199(6):1622-1630. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.173; Zhao Z, Fan J, Sun H, Zhong W, Zhu W, Liu Y, Wu W, de la Rosette J, Del Pilar Laguna Pes M, Zeng G. Recommended antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in retrograde intrarenal surgery: evidence from a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2019;124(3):496-503. DOI:10.1111/bju.14832; Deng T, Liu B, Duan X, Cai C, Zhao Z, Zhu W, Fan J, Wu W, Zeng G. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. BJU Int. 2018;122(1):29-39. DOI:10.1111/bju.14101; Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ; Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practice Policy Panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1379-1390. Erratum in: J Urol. 2008;180(5):2262-2263. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068; Jian ZY, Ma YC, Liu R, Li H, Wang K. Preoperative positive urine nitrite and albumin-globulin ratio are independent risk factors for predicting postoperative fever after retrograde Intrarenal surgery based on a retrospective cohort. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):50. DOI:10.1186/s12894-020-00620-7; Culkin DJ, Exaire EJ, Green D, Soloway MS, Gross AJ, Desai MR, White JR, Lightner DJ. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in urological practice: ICUD/AUA review paper. J Urol. 2014;192(4):1026-1034. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.103; Sharaf A, Amer T, Somani BK, Aboumarzouk OM. Ureteroscopy in Patients with Bleeding Diatheses, Anticoagulated, and on Anti-Platelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1217-1225. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0253; Westerman ME, Scales JA, Sharma V, Gearman DJ, Ingimarsson JP, Krambeck AE. The Effect of Anticoagulation on Bleeding-related Complications Following Ureteroscopy. Urology. 2017;100:45-52. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2016.09.034; Westerman ME, Sharma V, Scales J, Gearman DJ, Ingimarsson JP, Krambeck AE. The Effect of Antiplatelet Agents on Bleeding-Related Complications After Ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2016;30(10):1073-1078. DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0447; Luo Z, Jiao B, Zhao H, Huang T, Zhang G. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery under regional versus general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;82:36-42. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.012; Çakici MÇ, Özok HU, Erol D, Çatalca S, Sari S, Özdemir H, Selmi V, Kartal İG, Karakoyunlu N. Comparison of general anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for retrograde intrarenal surgery. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019;71(6):636-643. DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03481-7; Olivero A, Ball L, Fontaneto C, Mantica G, Bottino P, Pelosi P, Terrone C. Spinal versus general anesthesia during retrograde intra-renal surgery: A propensity score matching analysis. Curr Urol. 2021;15(2):106-110. DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000014; Moawad ESH, Hefnawy EAS. Spinal vs. general anesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomized trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2015;31(1): 71–75. DOI:10.1016/j.egja.2014.08.004; Liaw CW, Khusid JA, Gallante B, Bamberger JN, Atallah WM, Gupta M. The T-Tilt Position: A Novel Modified Patient Position to Improve Stone-Free Rates in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Urol. 2021;206(5):1232-1239. DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001948; Cracco CM, Scoffone CM. ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new life for percutaneous surgery? World J Urol. 2011;29(6):821-827. DOI:10.1007/s00345-011-0790-0; Scoffone CM, Cracco CM. Invited review: the tale of ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):115-123. DOI:10.1007/s00240-017-1015-9; Hamamoto S, Okada S, Inoue T, Taguchi K, Kawase K, Okada T, Chaya R, Hattori T, Okada A, Matsuda T, Yasui T; SMART Study Group. Comparison of the safety and efficacy between the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: A multi-institutional analysis. Int J Urol. 2021;28(11):1129-1135. DOI:10.1111/iju.14655; Eandi JA, Hu B, Low RK. Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2008;22(8):1653-1658. DOI:10.1089/end.2008.0071; Dickstein RJ, Kreshover JE, Babayan RK, Wang DS. Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? J Endourol. 2010;24(10):1589-1592. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0145; Ulvik Ø, Rennesund K, Gjengstø P, Wentzel-Larsen T, Ulvik NM. Ureteroscopy with and without safety guide wire: should the safety wire still be mandatory? J Endourol. 2013;27(10):1197-1202. DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0248; Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol. 2007;21(2):119-123. DOI:10.1089/end.2007.9997; Özkaya F, Sertkaya Z, Karabulut İ, Aksoy Y. The effect of using ureteral access sheath for treatment of impacted ureteral stones at mid-upper part with flexible ureterorenoscopy: a randomized prospective study. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019;71(4):413-420. DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03356-3; Yitgin Y, Yitgin E, Verep S, Gasimov K, Tefik T, Karakose A. Is Access Sheath Essential for Safety and Effective Retrograde Intrarenal Stone Surgery? J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31(10):1202-1206. DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2021.10.1202; Huang J, Zhao Z, AlSmadi JK, Liang X, Zhong F, Zeng T, Wu W, Deng T, Lai Y, Liu L, Zeng G, Wu W. Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193600. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0193600; Damar E, Senocak C, Ozbek R, Haberal HB, Sadioglu FE, Yordam M, Bozkurt OF. Does ureteral access sheath affect the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(5):777-781. DOI:10.1080/13645706.2021.1941117; Meier K, Hiller S, Dauw C, Hollingsworth J, Kim T, Qi J, Telang J, Ghani KR, Jafri SMA. Understanding Ureteral Access Sheath Use Within a Statewide Collaborative and Its Effect on Surgical and Clinical Outcomes. J Endourol. 2021;35(9):1340-1347. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.1077; Aykac A, Baran O, Sari S. Ureteral Access Sheath Applicatıon Without Fluoroscopy in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020;30(5):503-507. DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2020.05.503; Kaler KS, Lama DJ, Safiullah S, Cooper V, Valley ZA, O'Leary ML, Patel RM, Klopfer MJ, Li GP, Landman J, Clayman RV. Ureteral Access Sheath Deployment: How Much Force Is Too Much? Initial Studies with a Novel Ureteral Access Sheath Force Sensor in the Porcine Ureter. J Endourol. 2019;33(9):712-718. DOI:10.1089/end.2019.0211; Kuntz NJ, Neisius A, Tsivian M, Ghaffar M, Patel N, Ferrandino MN, Sur RL, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. Balloon Dilation of the Ureter: A Contemporary Review of Outcomes and Complications. J Urol. 2015;194(2):413-417. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2917; Aghamir SM, Alizadeh F, Meysamie A, Assefi Rad S, Edrisi L. Sterile water versus isotonic saline solution as irrigation fluid in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J. 2009;6(4):249-253. PMID: 20027552; Hosseini MM, Hassanpour A, Manaheji F, Yousefi A, Damshenas MH, Haghpanah S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is distilled water as safe as saline for irrigation? Urol J. 2014;11(3):1551-1556. PMID: 25015597; Pirani F, Makhani SS, Kim FY, Lay AH, Cimmino CB, Hartsell L, Spence A, Master VA, Ogan K. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Safety and Clarity of Water Versus Saline Irrigant in Ureteroscopy. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(4):850-856. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2020.02.009; Chen SS, Lin AT, Chen KK, Chang LS. Hemolysis in trans-urethral resection of the prostate using distilled water as the irrigant. J Chin Med Assoc. 2006;69(6):270-275. DOI:10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70255-2; Guzelburc V, Balasar M, Colakogullari M, Guven S, Kandemir A, Ozturk A, Karaaslan P, Erkurt B, Albayrak S. Comparison of absorbed irrigation fluid volumes during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cm. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1707. DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-3383-y; Lama DJ, Owyong M, Parkhomenko E, Patel RM, Landman J, Clayman RV. Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Hand-Pump Infuser and UROMAT Endoscopic Automatic System for Irrigation Through a Flexible Ureteroscope. J Endourol. 2018;32(5):431-436. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0811; Doersch KM, Hart KD, Elmekresh A, Milburn PA, Machen GL, El Tayeb MM. Comparison of utilization of pressurized automated versus manual hand irrigation during ureteroscopy in the absence of ureteral access sheath. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018;31(4):432-435. DOI:10.1080/08998280.2018.1482518; Jefferson FA, Sung JM, Limfueco L, Lu S, Cottone CM, Tapiero S, Patel RM, Clayman RV, Landman J. Prospective Randomized Comparison of Standard Hand Pump Infuser Irrigation vs an Automated Irrigation Pump During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Ureteroscopy: Assessment of Operating Room Efficiency and Surgeon Satisfaction. J Endourol. 2020;34(2):156-162. DOI:10.1089/end.2019.0419; Meng C, Peng L, Li J, Li Y, Li J, Wu J. Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg. 2021;8:691170. DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.691170; Li Y, Chen J, Zhu Z, Zeng H, Zeng F, Chen Z, Yang Z, Cui Y, Chen H, Li Y. Comparison of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscope for renal stone management: a pooled analysis of 772 patients. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(1):483-493. DOI:10.21037/tau-20-1009; Ma YC, Jian ZY, Jin X, Li H, Wang KJ. Stone removing efficiency and safety comparison between single use ureteroscope and reusable ureteroscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(4):1627-1636. DOI:10.21037/tau-20-1399; Mager R, Kurosch M, Höfner T, Frees S, Haferkamp A, Neisius A. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(6):587-593. DOI:10.1007/s00240-018-1042-1; Ventimiglia E, Somani BK, Traxer O. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction? Curr Opin Urol. 2020;30(2):113-119. DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000700; Talso M, Goumas IK, Kamphuis GM, Dragos L, Tefik T, Traxer O, Somani BK. Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S418-S425. DOI:10.21037/tau.2019.06.13; Ozimek T, Schneider MH, Hupe MC, Wiessmeyer JR, Cordes J, Chlosta PL, Merseburger AS, Kramer MW. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative. J Endourol. 2017;31(12):1226-1230. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0427; Somani BK, Talso M, Bres-Niewada E. Current role of single-use flexible ureteroscopes in the management of upper tract stone disease. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):183-184. DOI:10.5173/ceju.2019.1937; Davis NF, McGrath S, Quinlan M, Jack G, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton DM. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. J Endourol. 2018;32(3):214-217. DOI:10.1089/end.2018.0001; Bahaee J, Plott J, Ghani KR. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: how to choose and what is around the corner? Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31(2):87-94. DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000852; Temiz MZ, Colakerol A, Ertas K, Tuken M, Yuruk E. Fiberoptic versus Digital: A Comparison of Durability and Cost Effectiveness of the Two Flexible Ureteroscopes. Urol Int. 2019;102(2):181-186. DOI:10.1159/000494385; Dragos LB, Somani BK, Sener ET, Buttice S, Proietti S, Ploumidis A, Iacoboaie CT, Doizi S, Traxer O. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation. J Endourol. 2017;31(7):630-637. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0109; Proietti S, Dragos L, Molina W, Doizi S, Giusti G, Traxer O. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model. J Endourol. 2016;30(6):655-659. DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0051; Multescu R, Geavlete B, Georgescu D, Geavlete P. Conventional fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope versus fourth generation digital flexible ureteroscope: a critical comparison. J Endourol. 2010;24(1):17-21. DOI:10.1089/end.2009.0390; Lusch A, Okhunov Z, del Junco M, Yoon R, Khanipour R, Menhadji A, Landman J. Comparison of optics and performance of single channel and a novel dual-channel fiberoptic ureteroscope. Urology. 2015;85(1):268-272. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.032; Haberman K, Ortiz-Alvarado O, Chotikawanich E, Monga M. A dual-channel flexible ureteroscope: evaluation of deflection, flow, illumination, and optics. J Endourol. 2011;25(9):1411-1414. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0642; Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A, Kata SG, Nabi G, Brown S. Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol. 2010;24(12):1915-1920. DOI:10.1089/end.2010.0188; Zelenko N, Coll D, Rosenfeld AT, Smith RC. Normal ureter size on unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(4):1039-1041. DOI:10.2214/ajr.182.4.1821039; Tokas T, Herrmann TRW, Skolarikos A, Nagele U; Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group. Pressure matters: intrarenal pressures during normal and pathological conditions, and impact of increased values to renal physiology. World J Urol. 2019;37(1):125-131. DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2378-4; Sener TE, Cloutier J, Villa L, Marson F, Butticè S, Doizi S, Traxer O. Can We Provide Low Intrarenal Pressures with Good Irrigation Flow by Decreasing the Size of Ureteral Access Sheaths? J Endourol. 2016;30(1):49-55. Erratum in: J Endourol. 2017;31(1):110. DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0387; Saglam R, Muslumanoglu AY, Tokatlı Z, Caşkurlu T, Sarica K, Taşçi Aİ, Erkurt B, Süer E, Kabakci AS, Preminger G, Traxer O, Rassweiler JJ. A new robot for flexible ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2b). Eur Urol. 2014;66(6):1092-1100. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.047; Geavlete P, Saglam R, Georgescu D, Mulţescu R, Iordache V, Kabakci AS, Ene C, Geavlete B; -. Robotic Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Classic Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Stones: the Initial Romanian Experience. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2016;111(4):326-329. PMID: 27604670; Suntharasivam T, Mukherjee A, Luk A, Aboumarzouk O, Somani B, Rai BP. The role of robotic surgery in the management of renal tract calculi. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S457-S460. DOI:10.21037/tau.2019.04.06; Rassweiler J, Fiedler M, Charalampogiannis N, Kabakci AS, Saglam R, Klein JT. Robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopy: an update. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):69-77. DOI:10.1007/s00240-017-1024-8; Sari S, Çakici MÇ, Kartal IG, Selmï V, Özdemïr H, Ozok HU, Karakoyunlu AN, Yildiz S, Hepsen E, Ozbal S, Ersoy H. Comparison of the efficiency, safety and pain scores of holmium laser devices working with 20 watt and 30 watt using in retrograde intrarenal surgery: One center prospective study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2020;92(2). DOI:10.4081/aiua.2020.2.149; Karakoyunlu N, Çakıcı MÇ, Sarı S, Hepşen E, Bikirov M, Kısa E, Özbal S, Özok HU, Ersoy H. Efficacy of various laser devices on lithotripsy in retrograde intrarenal surgery used to treat 1-2 cm kidney stones: A prospective randomized study. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(8):e14216. DOI:10.1111/ijcp.14216; Pietropaolo A, Hughes T, Mani M, Somani B. Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation (URSL) for Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): Comparative Cohort Study Using MOSES Technology 60 W Laser System versus Regular Holmium 20 W Laser. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2742. DOI:10.3390/jcm10132742; Mekayten M, Lorber A, Katafigiotis I, Sfoungaristos S, Leotsakos I, Heifetz EM, Yutkin V, Gofrit ON, Duvdevani M. Will Stone Density Stop Being a Key Factor in Endourology? The Impact of Stone Density on Laser Time Using Lumenis Laser p120w and Standard 20 W Laser: A Comparative Study. J Endourol. 2019;33(7):585-589. DOI:10.1089/end.2019.0181; Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL, Ghani KR. Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the New Stone Age: Dust or Bust? Front Surg. 2017;4:57. DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2017.00057; Chen S, Fu N, Cui W, Zhao Z, Luo X. Comparison of stone dusting efficiency when using different energy settings of Holmium: YAG laser for flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi. Urol J. 2019;17(3):224-227. DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.4955; Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020;38(8):1883-1894. DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5; Traxer O, Corrales M. Managing Urolithiasis with Thulium Fiber Laser: Updated Real-Life Results-A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3390. DOI:10.3390/jcm10153390; Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Guseynov M, Andronov AS, Plekhanova OA. Clinical Comparison of Super Pulse Thulium Fiber Laser and High-Power Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Management. J Endourol. 2021;35(6):795-800. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0581; Jones P, Beisland C, Ulvik Ø. Current status of thulium fibre laser lithotripsy: an up-to-date review. BJU Int. 2021;128(5):531-538. DOI:10.1111/bju.15551; Enikeev D, Taratkin M, Klimov R, Inoyatov J, Azilgareeva C, Ali S, Korolev D, Corrales M, Traxer O, Glybochko P. Super-pulsed Thulium Fiber Laser for Stone Dusting: In Search of a Perfect Ablation Regimen-A Prospective Single-Center Study. J Endourol. 2020;34(11):1175-1179. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0519; Matlaga BR, Chew B, Eisner B, Humphreys M, Knudsen B, Krambeck A, Lange D, Lipkin M, Miller NL, Monga M, Pais V, Sur RL, Shah O. Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Review of Dusting vs Fragmentation with Extraction. J Endourol. 2018;32(1):1-6. DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0641; Weiss B, Shah O. Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates? Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(12):726-733. DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2016.172; Wenzel M, Bultitude M, Salem J. Dusting, fragmenting, pop-corning or dustmenting? Curr Opin Urol. 2019;29(2):108-112. DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000580; Huang J, Xie D, Xiong R, Deng X, Huang C, Fan D, Peng Z, Qin W, Zeng M, Song L. The Application of Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Pressure Control in Treating Upper Urinary Tract Calculi on Patients With a Solitary Kidney. Urology. 2018;111:44-47. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.042; Deng X, Song L, Xie D, Fan D, Zhu L, Yao L, Wang X, Liu S, Zhang Y, Liao X, Liu S, Peng Z, Hu M, Zhu X, Huang J, Liu T, Du C, Guo S, Yang Z, Peng G, Ye Z. A Novel Flexible Ureteroscopy with Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure: An Initial Experience of 93 Cases. J Endourol. 2016;30(10):1067-1072. DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0770; Zeng G, Wang D, Zhang T, Wan SP. Modified Access Sheath for Continuous Flow Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Preliminary Report of a Novel Concept and Technique. J Endourol. 2016;30(9):992-996. DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0411; Tepeler A, Resorlu B, Sahin T, Sarikaya S, Bayindir M, Oguz U, Armagan A, Unsal A. Categorization of intraoperative ureteroscopy complications using modified Satava classification system. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):131-136. DOI:10.1007/s00345-013-1054-y; Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580-584. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197; Shigemura K, Yasufuku T, Yamanaka K, Yamahsita M, Arakawa S, Fujisawa M. How long should double J stent be kept in after ureteroscopic lithotripsy? Urol Res. 2012;40(4):373-376. DOI:10.1007/s00240-011-0426-2; Ozyuvali E, Resorlu B, Oguz U, Yildiz Y, Sahin T, Senocak C, Bozkurt OF, Damar E, Yildirim M, Unsal A. Is routine ureteral stenting really necessary after retrograde intrarenal surgery? Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015;87(1):72-75. DOI:10.4081/aiua.2015.1.72; Fischer KM, Louie M, Mucksavage P. Ureteral Stent Discomfort and Its Management. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(8):64. DOI:10.1007/s11934-018-0818-8; Dellis A, Joshi HB, Timoney AG, Keeley FX Jr. Relief of stent related symptoms: review of engineering and pharmacological solutions. J Urol. 2010;184(4):1267-1272. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.043; Oh JJ, Lee S, Cho SY, Lee SW, Cho MC, Na W, Park JH, Lee SB, Ahh S, Jeong CW. Effects of naftopidil on double-J stentrelated discomfort: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4154. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04505-y; Lamb AD, Vowler SL, Johnston R, Dunn N, Wiseman OJ. Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of α-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1894-1902. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10170.x; Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1203-1213. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031; Ulvik Ø, Harneshaug JR, Gjengstø P. What Do We Mean by "Stone Free," and How Accurate Are Urologists in Predicting Stone-Free Status Following Ureteroscopy? J Endourol. 2021;35(7):961-966. DOI:10.1089/end.2020.0933; Omar M, Chaparala H, Monga M, Sivalingam S. Contemporary Imaging Practice Patterns Following Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease. J Endourol. 2015;29(10):1122-1125. DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0088; Ito K, Takahashi T, Somiya S, Kanno T, Higashi Y, Yamada H. Predictors of Repeat Surgery and Stone-related Events After Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones. Urology. 2021;154:96-102. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.025; Grosso AA, Sessa F, Campi R, Viola L, Polverino P, Crisci A, Salvi M, Liatsikos E, Feu OA, DI Maida F, Tellini R, Traxer O, Cocci A, Mari A, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Carini M, Tuccio A, Minervini A. Intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications after ureteroscopy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73(3):309-332. DOI:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04294-4; Ozden C, Oztekin CV, Pasali S, Senel S, Demirel D, Bulut S, Kizilkan Y. Analysis of clinical factors associated with intraoperative and postoperative complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(6):1666-1670. DOI:10.47391/JPMA.449; Akilov FA, Giyasov SI, Mukhtarov ST, Nasirov FR, Alidjanov JF. Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo grading system for assessing the postoperative complications of endoscopic surgery for nephrolithiasis: a critical review. Turk J Urol. 2013;39(3):153-160. DOI:10.5152/tud.2013.032; Xu Y, Min Z, Wan SP, Nie H, Duan G. Complications of retrograde intrarenal surgery classified by the modified Clavien grading system. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(2):197-202. DOI:10.1007/s00240-017-0961-6; Ibrahim AK. Reporting ureteroscopy complications using the modified clavien classification system. Urol Ann. 2015;7(1):53-57. DOI:10.4103/0974-7796.148611; Kramolowsky EV. Ureteral perforation during ureterorenoscopy: treatment and management. J Urol. 1987;138(1):36-38. DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42979-x; Silva Simões Estrela JR, Azevedo Ziomkowski A, Dauster B, Costa Matos A. Arteriocaliceal Fistula: A Life-Threatening Condition After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. J Endourol Case Rep. 2020;6(3):241-243. DOI:10.1089/cren.2020.0004; Choi T, Choi J, Min GE, Lee DG. Massive retroperitoneal hematoma as an acute complication of retrograde intrarenal surgery: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(16):3914-3918. DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3914; Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Celia A, Paccaduscio A, Schips L, Proietti S, Breda A, Giusti G. Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol. 2016;34(3):305-310. DOI:10.1007/s00345-015-1642-0; Xu L, Li G. Life-threatening subcapsular renal hematoma after flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: treatment with superselective renal arterial embolization. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(5):449-451. DOI:10.1007/s00240-013-0585-4; Peng L, Xu Z, Wen J, Zhong W, Zeng G. A quick stone component analysis matters in postoperative fever: a propensity score matching study of 1493 retrograde intrarenal surgery. World J Urol. 2021;39(4):1277-1285. DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03268-y; Pietropaolo A, Geraghty RM, Veeratterapillay R, Rogers A, Kallidonis P, Villa L, Boeri L, Montanari E, Atis G, Emiliani E, Sener TE, Al Jaafari F, Fitzpatrick J, Shaw M, Harding C, Somani BK. A Machine Learning Predictive Model for Post-Ureteroscopy Urosepsis Needing Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Case-Control YAU Endourology Study from Nine European Centres. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17):3888. DOI:10.3390/jcm10173888; Chugh S, Pietropaolo A, Montanari E, Sarica K, Somani BK. Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS). Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21(4):16. DOI:10.1007/s11934-020-0969-2; Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K, Li X, Chen W, Yang H. Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol. 2008;22(9):2147-2151. DOI:10.1089/end.2008.0001; Li T, Sun XZ, Lai DH, Li X, He YZ. Fever and systemic inflammatory response syndrome after retrograde intrarenal surgery: Risk factors and predictive model. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(7):400-408. DOI:10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.002; Fan J, Wan S, Liu L, Zhao Z, Mai Z, Chen D, Zhu W, Yang Z, Ou L, Wu W. Predictors for uroseptic shock in patients who undergo minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(6):573-578. DOI:10.1007/s00240-017-0963-4; Wu H, Wang Z, Zhu S, Rao D, Hu L, Qiao L, Chen Y, Yan J, Chen X, Wan SP, Schulsinger DA, Li G. Uroseptic Shock Can Be Reversed by Early Intervention Based on Leukocyte Count 2 h Post-operation: Animal Model and Multicenter Clinical Cohort Study. Inflammation. 2018;41(5):1835-1841. DOI:10.1007/s10753-018-0826-3; Bonkat G, Cai T, Veeratterapillay R, Bruyère F, Bartoletti R, Pilatz A, Köves B, Geerlings SE, Pradere B, Pickard R, Wagenlehner FME. Management of Urosepsis in 2018. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(1):5-9. DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2018.11.003; Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.0287; Somani BK, Giusti G, Sun Y, Osther PJ, Frank M, De Sio M, Turna B, de la Rosette J. Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy (URS) related to treatment of urolithiasis: the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global study. World J Urol. 2017;35(4):675-681. DOI:10.1007/s00345-016-1909-0; Schoenthaler M, Buchholz N, Farin E, Ather H, Bach C, Bach T, Denstedt JD, Fritsche HM, Grasso M, Hakenberg OW, Herwig R, Knoll T, Kuehhas FE, Liatsikos E, Liske P, Marberger M, Osther PJ, Santos JM, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, Traxer O, Trinchieri A, Turney B, Miernik A. The Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS): a multicenter video-based evaluation of inter-rater reliability. World J Urol. 2014;32(4):1033-1040. DOI:10.1007/s00345-013-1185-1; Xiong S, Zhu W, Li X, Zhang P, Wang H, Li X. Intestinal interposition for complex ureteral reconstruction: A comprehensive review. Int J Urol. 2020;27(5):377-386. DOI:10.1111/iju.14222; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/849

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/849
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-2-125-144

Radiomics in Urolithiasis: a Systematic Review of Current Applications, Limitations and Future Directions ; Радиомика при мочекаменной болезни: систематический обзор текущих применений, ограничений и будущих направлений

Συγγραφείς: Pranovich A.A., Karmazanovsky G.G., Sirota E.S., Firsov M.A., Simonov P.A., Junker A.I., Dzhatdoeva M.K., Khubiev D.A.

Συνεισφορές: 1

Πηγή: Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences; Vol 79, No 5 (2024); 393-405 ; Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук; Vol 79, No 5 (2024); 393-405 ; 2414-3545 ; 0869-6047 ; 10.15690/vramn.795

Θεματικοί όροι: urolithiasis, radiomics, texture analysis, machine learning, artificial intelligence, мочекаменная болезнь, радиомика, текстурный анализ, машинное обучение, искусственный интеллект

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/17953/2018; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/17953/2049; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/17953/2062; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/17953/2095; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/17953/145551; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/17953/145844

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/17953
https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn17953

Влияние фитотерапии на метаболический статус и микробиоту мочи у пациентов с мочекаменной болезнью — оксалатно-кальциевым нефролитиазом после проведения ударно-волновой литотрипсии

Συγγραφείς: Shevchuk, O.O., Kushnirenko, S.V., Vozianov, O.S., Kushnirenko, O.V.

Πηγή: KIDNEYS; Том 8, № 3 (2019); 146-151
Почки-Počki; Том 8, № 3 (2019); 146-151
Нирки-Počki; Том 8, № 3 (2019); 146-151

Θεματικοί όροι: мочекаменная болезнь, ударно-волновая литотрипсия, Уролесан®, 6. Clean water, urolithiasis, shock wave lithotripsy, Urolesan®, 3. Good health, сечокам'яна хвороба, ударно-хвильова літотрипсія

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: http://kidneys.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/download/176452/177628
http://kidneys.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/176452
http://kidneys.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/176452

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF UROLITHIASIS IN THE TURKESTAN REGION: ЭПИДЕМИОЛОГИЯ МОЧЕКАМЕННОЙ БОЛЕЗНИ В ТУРКЕСТАНСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ

Συγγραφείς: Fatkhi, R.A., Seidinov, Sh.M.

Πηγή: Наука и здравоохранение. :139-145

Θεματικοί όροι: urolithiasis, эпидемиология, Туркестанская область, мочекаменная болезнь, epidemiology, Turkestan region, 3. Good health

Metabolic Passport of Patient with the Risk of Stone Formation in the Urinary System: Principles of Formation, Structural Elements

Πηγή: Лабораторная диагностика. Восточная Европа. :197-213

Θεματικοί όροι: oxalate, оксалаты, Ca, уролиты, сыворотка крови, Mg, urolithiasis, hair, Cl ions, мочевая кислота, lithogenic substances, urine, 3. Good health, волосы, литогенные субстанции, blood serum, uric acid, Cl, uroliths, мочекаменная болезнь, ионы Ca, Na, моча

SPECIES COMPOSITION AND RESISTANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS OF MICRO-ORGANISMS IDENTIFIED DURING THE URINARY SYSTEM PATHOLOGY IN CARNIVORES

Πηγή: Вестник Бурятской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии имени В. Р. Филиппова. :66-72

Θεματικοί όροι: антибиотикорезистентность, antibiotic resistance, микроорганизмы, urolithiasis, мочекаменная болезнь, цистит, microorganisms, cystitis, 3. Good health

АКТУАЛЬНОСТЬ РАННЕЙ ПРОФИЛАКТИКИ СЕРЬЕЗНЫХ СЕРДЕЧНО-СОСУДИСТЫХ СОБЫТИЙ У БОЛЬНЫХ НЕФРОЛИТИАЗОМ

Θεματικοί όροι: заболевания сердечно-сосудистой системы, атеросклероз, urolithiasis, нефролитиаз, мочекаменная болезнь, metabolic disorders, atherosclerosis, метаболические нарушения, cardiovascular diseases, nephrolithiasis

УРОВЕНЬ ИНФОРМИРОВАННОСТИ БОЛЬНЫХ О ФАКТОРАХ РИСКА РАЗВИТИЯ РЕЦИДИВОВ МОЧЕКАМЕННОЙ БОЛЕЗНИ КАК КРИТЕРИЙ ДОСТУПНОСТИ МЕДИЦИНСКОЙ ПОМОЩИ

Θεματικοί όροι: доступность медицинской помощи, patient awareness, accessibility of medical care, информирование пациентов, urolithiasis, мочекаменная болезнь

ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ ПОКАЗАТЕЛЕЙ ОБЩЕГО АНАЛИЗА КРОВИ У КОТОВ С МОЧЕКАМЕННОЙ БОЛЕЗНЬЮ

Συγγραφείς: А. М, Болатов, К. А, Орынханов, Баймирзаев, Б. К., Хасанова, Г. А., Абдулла , А. А.

Πηγή: AGROBIOTEXNOLOGIYA VA VETERINARIYA TIBBIYOTI ILMIY JURNALI; 2023: "PROBLEMS, SOLUTIONS AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF VETERINARY SURGERY AND OBSTETRICS" DEDICATED TO THE 95TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BIRTHDAY OF THE DOCTOR OF VETERINARY SCIENCES, PROFESSOR H.Q. RUSTAMOV; 60-64

Θεματικοί όροι: коты, мочекаменная болезнь, острая задержка мочи, гематоурия, странгурия

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://sciencebox.uz/index.php/tibbiyot/article/view/8217/7528; https://sciencebox.uz/index.php/tibbiyot/article/view/8217

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://sciencebox.uz/index.php/tibbiyot/article/view/8217