-
1Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Vladimir A. Vorobev, Artur R. Tukhiev, Kirill B. Lelyavin, Alexander E. Osadchinskiy, Semen O. Fokin, Konstantin R. Belykh, Kirill M. Su-Yanz
Πηγή: Байкальский медицинский журнал, Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp 74-83 (2025)
Θεματικοί όροι: доброкачественная гиперплазия простаты, rezum, водяной пар, минимально инвазивная хирургия, ipss, qmax, Medicine (General), R5-920
Περιγραφή αρχείου: electronic resource
Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://doaj.org/article/b56caf44d6f1429fa440420a8637358b
-
2Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Бахранович, Баратов Маннон
Πηγή: World of Medicine : Journal of Biomedical Sciences; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): World of Medicine : Journal of Biomedical Sciences; 90-94 ; 2960-9356
Θεματικοί όροι: Эндовидеохирургия, лапароскопическая фундопликация, грыжа пищеводного отверстия диафрагмы, минимально инвазивная хирургия, послеоперационные осложнения, рецидив грыжи, восстановление, качество жизни
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
-
3Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: A. U. Khamadyanova, T. T. Gaev, D. O. Gatsoev, V. V. Andreev, A. S. Pazhitnova, E. O. Tikhonova, V. G. Kim, D. A. Talalaeva, V. V. Agapova, R. S. Botina, A. K. Yakovleva, S. D. Vasilieva, D. Yu. Bakulin, А. У. Хамадьянова, Т. Т. Гаев, Д. О. Гацоев, В. В. Андреев, А. С. Пажитнова, Э. О. Тихонова, В. Г. Ким, Д. А. Талалаева, В. Е. Агапова, Р. С. Ботина, А. К. Яковлева, С. Д. Васильева, Д. Ю. Бакулин
Πηγή: Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction; Vol 19, No 4 (2025); 545-560 ; Акушерство, Гинекология и Репродукция; Vol 19, No 4 (2025); 545-560 ; 2500-3194 ; 2313-7347
Θεματικοί όροι: минимально инвазивная хирургия, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, fertility preservation, gynecologic oncology, minimally invasive surgery, uterine transplantation, рак шейки матки, рак эндометрия, рак яичников, фертильность, гинекологическая онкология
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.gynecology.su/jour/article/view/2421/1375; Гордиенко В.П., Леонтьева С.Н., Коробкова Т.Н. Рак репродуктивных органов у женщин Дальневосточного федерального округа. Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2020;19(3):23–37. https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2020-19-2-23-37.; Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2021 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. М., 2022. 252 с.; Кононова Г.А., Жуйкова Л.Д., Ананина О.А. и др. Рак репродуктивной системы у женщин Республики Тыва. Эпидемиологические особенности. Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2024;23(3):5–14. https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-3-5-14.; Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Wagle N.S., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763.; Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 2019. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/.; Архангельский В.Н., Калачикова О.Н. Возраст матери при рождении первого ребенка: динамика, региональные различия, детерминация. Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2020;13(5):200–17. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.12.; Diaz-Arrastia C., Jurnalov C., Gomez G., Townsend C. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(9):1271–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8523-5.; Бабаева Н.А., Антонова И.Б., Ивашина С.В. и др. Рак эндометрия у молодых: возможности органосохраняющего лечения при рецидивах. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020;(S1):130–6. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.1suppl.130-136.; Rodolakis A., Scambia G., Planchamp F. et al. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(1):hoac057. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac057.; Zhang Q., Qi G., Kanis M.J. et al. Comparison among fertility-sparing therapies for well differentiated early-stage endometrial carcinoma and complex atypical hyperplasia. Oncotarget. 2017;8(34):57642–53. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17588.; Mazzon I., Corrado G., Morricone D., Scambia G. Reproductive preservation for treatment of stage IA endometrial cancer in a young woman: hysteroscopic resection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(5):974–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00162.x.; Giampaolino P., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Mollo A. et al. Hysteroscopic endometrial focal resection followed by levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion as a fertility-sparing treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer: a retrospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(4):648-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.001.; Gu H., Li J., Gu Y. et al. Survival impact of ovarian preservation on women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000857.; Jones B.P., Kasaven L., Vali S. et al. Uterine transplantation: review of livebirths and reproductive implications. Transplantation. 2021;105(8):1695–707. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003578.; Cibula D., Raspollini M.R., Planchamp F. et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer – Update 2023. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33(5):649–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004429.; Wolswinkel J.T., Eikelder M.L.G.T., Verhoef C.G., Zusterzeel P.L.M. High- or intermediate-risk histologic features in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer planned for fertility-sparing surgery: a systematic review. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(15):3920. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153920.; Persson J., Kannisto P., Bossmar T. Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(3):564–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.034.; Ekdahl L., Crusensvärd M., Reynisson P. et al. Quality of life and long-term clinical outcome following robot-assisted radical trachelectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;267:234–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.018.; Api M., Boza A., Ceyhan M. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: case report and review of literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(5):677–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.009.; Ramirez P.T., Frumovitz M., Pareja R. et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806395.; Lewicki P.J., Basourakos S.P., Qiu Y. et al. Effect of a randomized, controlled trial on surgery for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(17):1669–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2035819.; Shekhar S., Jeyaseelan L. Laparoscopic or open radical hysterectomy for early stage cancer cervix: data inconsistency of LACC Trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(10):2881. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.10.2881.; Salvo G., Ramirez P.T., Leitao M.M. et al. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(1):97. e1–97.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.029.; Leitao M.M., Bixel K.L., Chase D.M. et al. ROCC/GOG-3043: a randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025 Feb 28:101760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101760.; Falconer H., Palsdottir K., Stalberg K. et al. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(6):1072–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000558.; Schmeler K.M., Pareja R., Blanco A.L. et al. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(10):1317–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-002921.; Carneiro V.C.G., Batista T.P., Andrade M.R. et al. Proof-of-concept randomized phase II non-inferiority trial of simple versus type B2 hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer ≤ 2 cm (LESSER). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33(4):498–503. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2022-004092.; Ekdahl L., Paraghamian S., Eoh K.J. et al. Long term oncologic and reproductive outcomes after robot-assisted radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. An international multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol. 2022;164(3):529–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.029.; Smith E.S., Moon A.S., O'Hanlon R. et al. Radical trachelectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(3):533–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003952.; Gubbala K., Laios A., Gallos I. et al. Outcomes of ovarian transposition in gynaecological cancers; a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-7-69.; Swift B.E., Leung E., Vicus D., Covens A. Laparoscopic ovarian transposition prior to pelvic radiation for gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018;24:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2018.04.005.; Iavazzo C., Darlas F.M., Gkegkes I.D. The role of robotics in ovarian transposition. Acta Inform Med. 2013;21(2):135–7. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2013.21.135-137.; Pavone M., Autorino R., Bizzarri N. et al. Uterine transposition versus uterine ventrofixation before radiotherapy as a fertility sparing option in young women with pelvic malignancies: Systematic review of the literature and dose simulation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024;50(1):107270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107270.; Ribeiro R., Baiocchi G., Moretti-Marques R. et al. Uterine transposition for fertility and ovarian function preservation after radiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33(12):1837–42. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004723.; Vitobello D., Siesto G., Bulletti C. et al. Gynecological fertility-sparing surgery. Placenta. 2011;32 Suppl 3:S224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2011.06.017.; Morice P., Denschlag D., Rodolakis A. et al. Fertility Task Force of the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Recommendations of the Fertility Task Force of the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology about the conservative management of ovarian malignant tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(5):951–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31821bec6b.; Zanetta G., Chiari S., Rota S. et al. Conservative surgery for stage I ovarian carcinoma in women of childbearing age. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(9):1030–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12062.x.; Schilder J.M., Thompson A.M., DePriest P.D. et al. Outcome of reproductive age women with stage IA or IC invasive epithelial ovarian cancer treated with fertility-sparing therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;87(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2002.6805.; Satoh T., Hatae M., Watanabe Y. et al. Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposal for patient selection. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1727–32. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8617.; Kajiyama H., Mizuno M., Shibata K. et al. Recurrence-predicting prognostic factors for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery: a multi-institutional study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;175:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.014.; Yoshihara M., Kajiyama H., Tamauchi S. et al. Prognostic factors and effects of fertility-sparing surgery in women of reproductive age with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(6):e102. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e102.; Kurnit K.C., Frumovitz M. Primary mucinous ovarian cancer: options for surgery and chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;32(11):1455–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2022-003806.; Yokoyama Y., Moriya T., Takano T. et al. Clinical outcome and risk factors for recurrence in borderline ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(11):1586–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603139.; Sonigo C., Sermondade N., Benard J. et al. Past, present and future of fertility preservation in cancer patients. Future Oncol. 2015;11(19):2667–80. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.15.152.; Zanetta G., Rota S., Chiari S. et al. Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(10):2658–64. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2658.; Marchette M.D., Ceppi L., Andreano A. et al. Oncologic and fertility impact of surgical approach for borderline ovarian tumours treated with fertility sparing surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2019;111:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.01.021.; Perrin L.C., Low J., Nicklin J.L. et al. Fertility and ovarian function after conservative surgery for germ cell tumours of the ovary. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;39(2):243–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03382.x.; Eskander R.N., Randall L.M., Berman M.L. et al. Fertility preserving options in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(2):103–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.025.; Nezhat F.R., DeNoble S.M., Liu C.S. et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging and debulking of apparent advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. JSLS. 2010;14(2):155–68. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12785289143990.; Pérez-Quintanilla M., Del Real-Ordoñez S., Gallardo-Alvarado L., Cantu-de L.D. Fertility-sparing treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer: a literature review. Chin Clin Oncol. 2020;9(4):48. https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-20-38.; Fagotti A., Perelli F., Pedone L., Scambia G. Current recommendations for minimally invasive surgical staging in ovarian cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016;17(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-015-0379-8.; Magrina J.F., Cetta R.L., Chang Y.H. et al. Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(2):336–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.01.015.; Brown J.V., Mendivil A.A., Abaid L.N. et al. The safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted lymph node staging in early-stage ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(8):1493–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000224.; Minig L., Padilla Iserte P., Zorrero C., Zanagnolo V. Robotic surgery in women with ovarian cancer: surgical technique and evidence of clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(3):309–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.10.014.; Schüring A.N., Fehm T., Behringer K. et al. Practical recommendations for fertility preservation in women by the FertiPROTEKT network. Part I: Indications for fertility preservation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(1):241–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4594-3.; Fageeh W., Raffa H., Jabbad H., Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76(3):245–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00597-5.; Ozkan O., Ozkan O., Dogan N.U. et al. Birth of a healthy baby 9 years after a surgically successful deceased donor uterus transplant. Ann Surg. 2022;275(5):825–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005346.; Brännström M., Johannesson L., Bokström H. et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):607–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61728-1.; Wei L., Xue T., Tao K.S. et al. Modified human uterus transplantation using ovarian veins for venous drainage: the first report of surgically successful robotic-assisted uterus procurement and follow-up for 12 months. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):346–356.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.039.; https://www.gynecology.su/jour/article/view/2421
-
4
-
5
-
6Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Жахонгирович, Мардонов Жамшид
Πηγή: SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF APPLIED AND MEDICAL SCIENCES; Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): AMALIY VA TIBBIYOT FANLARI ILMIY JURNALI; 333-336 ; НАУЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ ПРИКЛАДНЫХ И МЕДИЦИНСКИХ НАУК; Том 3 № 12 (2024): AMALIY VA TIBBIYOT FANLARI ILMIY JURNALI; 333-336 ; 2181-3469
Θεματικοί όροι: эндоскопическое удаление, грыжа межпозвоночного диска, минимально инвазивная хирургия, позвоночник, болевой синдром, восстановление, эффективность, безопасность, реабилитация
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
-
7Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: A. N. Kulikov, V. Yu. Skvortsov, D. V. Tulin, А. Н. Куликов, В. Ю. Скворцов, Д. В. Тулин
Πηγή: Ophthalmology in Russia; Том 21, № 3 (2024); 490-495 ; Офтальмология; Том 21, № 3 (2024); 490-495 ; 2500-0845 ; 1816-5095 ; 10.18008/1816-5095-2024-3
Θεματικοί όροι: катаракта, glaucoma surgery, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, inflammation, cataract, глаукома, минимально инвазивная хирургия глаукомы, воспаление
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2422/1242; Kapetanakis VV, Chan MP, Foster PJ, Cook DG, Owen CG, Rudnicka AR. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;100(1):86–93. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol‑2015‑307223. Ep; Алексеев БН, Ермолаев АП. Трабекулотомия ab interno в комбинации с одномоментной экстракцией катаракты. Вестник офтальмологии. 2003;119(4):7–10.; Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Kempen JH, Leasher J, Limburg H, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, Resnikoff S, Silvester A, Stevens GA, Tahhan N, Wong TY, Taylor HR; Vision Loss Expert Group. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Sep;5(9):e888–e897. doi:10.1016/S2214‑109X(17)30293‑0.; Zhang ML, Hirunyachote P, Jampel H. Combined surgery versus cataract surgery alone for eyes with cataract and glaucoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008671.pub3.; Guedes RAP, Guedes VMP, Gomes CEM, Chaoubah A. Maximizing cost‑effectiveness by adjusting treatment strategy according to glaucoma severity. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5745. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000005745.; Agrawal P, Bradshaw SE. Systematic Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Micro‑Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) in Primary Open‑Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmol Ther. 2018 Jun;7(1):49–73. doi:10.1007/s40123‑0180131‑0.; Francis BA, Berke SJ, Dustin L, Noecker R. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Aug;40(8):1313–1321. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.021.; Siegel MJ, Boling WS, Faridi OS, Gupta CK, Kim C, Boling RC, Citron ME, Siegel MJ, Siegel LI. Combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in the treatment of mild to moderate glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;43(6):531–539. doi:10.1111/ceo.12510.; Francis BA, Kwon J, Fellman R, Noecker R, Samuelson T, Uram M, Jampel H. Endoscopic ophthalmic surgery of the anterior segment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014 MarApr;59(2):217–231. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.03.010.; Walland MJ. Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation: longer term follow up of a standardized treatment protocol. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;28(4):263–267. doi:10.1046/j.1442‑9071.2000.00320.x.; Бойко ЭВ, Куликов АН, Скворцов ВЮ. Оценка эффективности и безопасности применения диод‑лазерной транссклеральной термотерапии цилиарного тела как способа лечения рефрактерной глаукомы. Вестник офтальмологии. 2014;130(5):64–66.; Francis BA, Kawji AS, Vo NT, Dustin L, Chopra V. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) in the management of uncontrolled glaucoma with prior aqueous tube shunt. J Glaucoma. 2011 Oct;20(8):523–527. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f46337.; Скворцов ВЮ, Тулин ДВ, Миргородская ОЕ. Особенности морфологических изменений и послеоперационного воспалительного ответа при выполнении эндоскопической лазерной циклодеструкции в различных режимах (экспериментальное исследование). Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2022;6(46):194–201. doi:10.25276/2312‑4911‑2022‑6‑194‑201.; Бойко ЭВ, Куликов АН, Скворцов ВЮ. Сравнительная оценка диод‑лазерной термотерапии и лазеркоагуляции как методов циклодеструкции (экспериментальное исследование). Практическая медицина. Офтальмология. Казань; 2012;4–1(59):175–179.; Pantcheva MB, Kahook MY, Schuman JS, Noecker RJ. Comparison of acute structural and histopathological changes in human autopsy eyes after endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and trans‑scleral cyclophotocoagulation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;91(2):248–252. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.103580. Epub 2006 Sep 20.; Uram M. Combined phacoemulsification, endoscopic ciliary process photocoagulation, and intraocular lens implantation in glaucoma management. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995 Jul‑Aug;26(4):346–352.; Roberts SJ, Mulvahill M, SooHoo JR, Pantcheva MB, Kahook MY, Seibold LK. Efficacy of combined cataract extraction and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for the reduction of intraocular pressure and medication burden. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(5):693–698. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.05.09.; Seibold LK, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan‑Mar;22(1):18–24. doi:10.4103/0974‑9233.148344.; Kaplowitz K, Kuei A, Klenofsky B, Abazari A, Honkanen R. The use of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for moderate to advanced glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;93(5):395–401. doi:10.1111/aos.12529. Epub 2014 Aug 13. PMID: 25123160.; Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL; Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow‑up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):789–803.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026.; Ishida K. Update on results and complications of cyclophotocoagulation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;24(2):102–110. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835d9335.; Clement CI, Kampougeris G, Ahmed F, Cordeiro MF, Bloom PA. Combining phacoemulsification with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation to manage cataract and glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;41(6):546–551. doi:10.1111/ceo.12051.; https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2422
-
8Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Oleinik A.V., Belenkiy I.G., Sergeev G.D., Kochish A.Y., Razumova K.V., Binazarov A.E., Maiorov B.A.
Πηγή: Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia; Vol 29, No 3 (2023); 65-72 ; Травматология и ортопедия России; Vol 29, No 3 (2023); 65-72 ; 2542-0933 ; 2311-2905 ; 10.17816/2311-2905-2023-30-3
Θεματικοί όροι: minimally invasive surgery, valgus deformity of the first toe, hallux valgus, correcting osteotomy, guide tool, минимально инвазивная хирургия, вальгусная деформация первого пальца стопы, корригирующая остеотомия, направляющее устройство
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/8427/pdf; https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/8427/pdf_1; https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/8427/142616; https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/8427/142617; https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/8427/142618; https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/8427/142619; https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/8427
-
9Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Р.Н. Комаров, О.О. Огнев, А.М. Исмаилбаев, С.В. Чернявский, А.Н. Дзюндзя, М.В. Ленковец
Πηγή: Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия, Vol 26, Iss 3 (2022)
Θεματικοί όροι: аортальный клапан, аутоперикардиальная неокуспидизация, минимально инвазивная хирургия, торакотомия, частичная стернотомия, Surgery, RD1-811
Περιγραφή αρχείου: electronic resource
Relation: https://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/1096; https://doaj.org/toc/1681-3472; https://doaj.org/toc/2500-3119
Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://doaj.org/article/06e93b5687124b2a99d6642635127f06
-
10Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: A. B. Movsisyan, A. E. Egorov, A. V. Kuroyedov, А. Б. Мовсисян, А. Е. Егоров, А. В. Куроедов
Πηγή: National Journal glaucoma; Том 21, № 4 (2022); 56-63 ; Национальный журнал Глаукома; Том 21, № 4 (2022); 56-63 ; 2311-6862 ; 2078-4104
Θεματικοί όροι: дренажные устройства, glaucoma surgery, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, drainage devices, хирургия глаукомы, минимально инвазивная хирургия глаукомы
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/417/395; Cai C.X., Wang J., Ahmad S., et al. National trends in surgical subspecialisation in ophthalmology in the USA. Br J Ophthalmol 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320295; Ong H.S., Ang M., Mehta J. Evolution of therapies for the corneal endothelium: past, present and future approaches. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105(4):454-467. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316149; Grajewski L., Grajewski O., Carstens J., Krause L. Incidence of Retinal Detachment after Macular Surgery. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2021; 238(5):580-583. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1353-5436; Marcos S., Martinez-Enriquez E., Vinas M. et al. Simulating Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Important Advances in Ophthalmology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2021; 23:277-306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082420-035827; Luebke J., Boehringer D., Anton A. et al. Trends in Surgical Glaucoma Treatment in Germany Between 2006 and 2018. Clin Epidemiol 2021; 13:581-592. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S310542; ICO Guidelines for Glaucoma Eye Care. International Council of Ophthalmology; 2016.; Диордийчук С.В., Куроедов А.В., Фомин Н.Е. и др. Своевременная диагностика и влияние приверженности лечению на прогноз и прогрессирование глаукомной оптической нейропатии. РМЖ Клиническая офтальмология 2021; 21(1):34-39. https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2021-21-1-34-39; Абышева Л.Д., Александров А.С., Арапиев М.У. и др. Оптимизация лечебно-диагностического процесса у пациентов с первичной открытоугольной глаукомой. Национальный журнал глаукома 2016; 15(2):19-35.; Петров С.Ю., Вострухин С.В., Асламазова А.Э., Шерстнева Л.В. Современная микроинвазивная хирургия глауком. Вестник офтальмологии 2016; 132(3):96-102. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2016132396-102; Мовсисян А.Б., Куроедов А.В., Архаров М.А. и др. Эпидемиологический анализ заболеваемости и распространенности первичной открытоугольной глаукомы в Российской Федерации. РМЖ Клиническая офтальмология 2022; 22(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2022-22-1-3-10; Петров С.Ю. Принципы современной хирургии глаукомы согласно IV изданию Европейского глаукомного руководства (аналитический комментарий). РМЖ Клиническая офтальмология 2017; 18(3):184-189.; Saheb H., Ahmed I.I. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23(2): 96-104.; Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery. Editors: Chelvin C. A. Sng., Keith Barton. Springer Nature, 2021: 204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5632-6.; Birnbaum F.A., Neeson C., Valle D.S. Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review. Semin Ophthalmol 2021; 36(8):772-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1903513.; Национальное руководство по глаукоме для практикующих врачей. Под ред. Е.А. Егорова, В.П. Еричева. М: ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2019; 384.; Старикова Д.И., Чурносов М.И. Современные представления о молекулярных основах этиопатогенеза первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. Офтальмохирургия 2017;(3):80-83. https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2017-3-80-83.; Andrew N.H., Akkach S., Casson R.J. A review of aqueous outflow resistance and its relevance to micro-invasive glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2020; 65:18-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.08.002; Ellingsen B.A., Grant W.M. Trabeculotomy and sinusotomy in enucleated human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol 1972; 11:21-28.; Hann C.R., Vercnocke A.J., Bentley M.D., Jorgensen S.M., Fautsch M.P. Anatomic changes in Schlemm's canal and collector channels in normal and primary open-angle glaucoma eyes using low and high perfusion pressures. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55:5834-5841. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14128; Gillmann K., Bravetti G.E., Mermoud A. et al. A prospective analy sis of iStent inject microstent positioning: Schlemm canal dilatation and intraocular pressure correlations. J Glaucoma 2019; 28:613-621. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001273; Глаукома: национальное руководство. Под ред. Егорова Е.А. М: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013; 824.; Vinod K., Gedde S.J. Safety profile of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2021; 32(2):160-168. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000731; Rosdahl J.A., Gupta D. Prospective Studies of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries: Systematic Review and Quality Assessment. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14:231-243. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S239772; Weinreb R.N. Uveoscleral outflow: the other outflow pathway. J Glaucoma 2000; 9:343-345. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200010000-00001; Toris C.B., Yablonski M.E., Wang Y.L. et al. Aqueous humor dynam ics in the aging human eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127:407-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00436-x; Figus M., Posarelli C., Passani A. et al. The supraciliary space as a suitable pathway for glaucoma surgery: ho-hum or home run? Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62:828-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.05.002.; Emi K., Pederson J.E., Toris C.B. Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space. Invest Ophthalmol. 1989; 30:233-238.; Kelly D.E., Hageman G.S., McGregor J.A. Uveal compartmentaliza tion in the hamster eye revealed by fine structural and tracer studies: implications for uveoscleral outflow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24:1288-1304.; Ring H.G., Fujino T. Observations on the anatomy and pathology of the choroidal vasculature. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967; 78:431-444. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1967.00980030433005.; Johnson M., McLaren J.W., Overby D.R. Unconventional aqueous humor outflow: a review. Exp Eye Res 2017; 158:94-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2016.01.017; Coban D.T., Erol M.K., Yucel O. Hemorrhagic choroidal detachment after use of anti-glaucomatous eye drops: case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2013; 76:309-310. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-27492013000500012; Gillmann К., Mansouri К. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Where Is the Evidence? Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2020; 9(3): 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000294.; Schlunck G., Meyer-ter-Vehn T., Klink T. et al. Conjunctival fibrosis following filtering glaucoma surgery. Exp Eye Res 2016; 142:76-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.03.021.; Tan S.Z., Walkden A., Au L. One-year result of XEN45 implant for glaucoma: efficacy, safety, and postoperative management. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32:324-332. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.162; Нестеров А.П., Егоров Е.А., Егоров А.Е., Кац Д.В. Влияние транссклеральной лазерной циклокоагуляции на внутриглазное давление и зрительную функцию у пациентов с далеко распространенной открытоугольной глаукомой. Вестник офтальмологии 2001; 117(1):3-4.; Ходжаев Н.С., Сидорова А.В., Старостина А.В., Елисеева М.А. Микроимпульсная транссклеральная циклофотокоагуляция в лечении глаукомы. Российский офтальмологический журнал 2020; 13(2):105-111. https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-2-105-111; Клинические рекомендации. Глаукома первичная открытоугольная (Н40.1). АВО, ООР, РГО; 2020; 84 (одобрено НПС Минздрава 10.12.2020, утверждены Минздравом РФ).; Ловпаче Д.Н., Завадский П.Ч., Зверева О.Г. и др. Комплаентность и персистентность у пациентов с первичной открытоугольной глаукомой с позиции офтальмолога. Национальный журнал глаукома 2020; 19(2):11-21. https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.02.02.; Pereira I.C.F., Wijdeven R., Wyss H.M. et al. Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions. Eye (Lond) 2021; 35(12):3202-3221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01595-x.; Lee R.M.H., Bouremel Y., Eames I. et al. Translating Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Devices. Clin Transl Sci 2020; 13(1):14-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12660.; https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/417
-
11Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Y. Y. Vecherskiy, D. V. Manvelyan, V. V. Zatolokin, V. M. Shipulin, Ю. Ю. Вечерский, Д. В. Манвелян, В. В. Затолокин, В. М. Шипулин
Πηγή: Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine; Том 34, № 1 (2019); 24-32 ; Сибирский журнал клинической и экспериментальной медицины; Том 34, № 1 (2019); 24-32 ; 2713-265X ; 2713-2927 ; 10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-1
Θεματικοί όροι: гидравлическая дилатация венозных шунтов, venous graft failure, minimally invasive surgery, endoscopy, bridge technique, no-touch, external stenting, pressure distension venous gr, недостаточность венозных шунтов, минимально инвазивная хирургия, эндоскопия, bridge-техника, наружное стентирование
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/674/422; Motwani J.G., Topol E.J. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention. Circulation. 1998 Mar. 10;97(9):916–931. Review.; Fitzgibbon G.M., Kafka H.P., Leach A.J., Keon W.J., Hooper G.D., Burton J.R. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1996 Sept.;28(3):616–626.; Cameron A.A., Davis K.B., Rogers W.J. Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1995;4:895–899.; Roubos N., Rosenfeldt F.L., Richards S.M., Conyers R.A., Davis B.B. Improved preservation of saphenous vein grafts by the use of glyceryl trinitrate — verapamil solution during harvesting. Circulation. 1995;92 (suppl. II):II-31-II-36.; Verrier E.D., Boyle E.M. Jr. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996;62:915–922.; Angelini G.D., Christie M.I., Bryan A.J., Lewis M.J. Surgical preparation impairs release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor from human saphenous vein. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1989;48:417–420.; Chesebro J.M., Fuster V. Platelet-inhibitor drugs before and after coronary artery bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty: the basis of their use, data from animal studies, clinical trial data, and current recommendations. Cardiology. 1986;73:292–305.; Dobrin P.B., Littoy F.N., Endean E.D. Mechanical factors predisposing to intimal hyperplasia and medial thickening in autogenous vein grafts. Surgery. 1989;105:393–400.; Walpola P.L., Gotlieb A.I., Cybulsky M.I., Langille B.L. Expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and monocyte adherence in arteries exposed to altered shear stress. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1995;15:2–10.; Stark V.K., Hoch J.R., Warner T.F. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 expression is associated with the development of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1997;17:1614–1621.; Shuhaiber J.H., Evans A.N., Masssad M.G., Geha A.S. Mechanisms and future directions for prevention of vein graft failure in coronary bypass surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2002;22:387–396.; Harskamp R.E., Lopes R.D., Baisden C.E., de Winter R.J., Alexander J.H. Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: pathophysiology, management, and future directions. Ann. Surg. 2013;257(5):824–833. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288c38d.; Jeremy J.Y., Birkett S., Bryan A.J., Angelini G.D. Cyclic nucleotide synthesis by freshly isolated and surgically prepared human saphenous vein before and after 14 days culture. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 1997;13:72–78.; Muzaffar S., Shukla N., Angelini G.D., Jeremy J.Y. Hypoxia and the expression of gp91phox and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the pulmonary artery. Thorax. 2005;60:305–313.; Jeremy J.Y., Shukla N., Muzaffar S., Handley A., Angelini G.D. Reactive oxygen species, vascular disease and cardiovascular surgery. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2004;2:229–236.; Lie J.T., Lawrie G.M., Morris G.C. Aortocoronary bypass saphenous vein graft atherosclerosis: anatomic study of 99 vein grafts from normal and hyperlipoproteinemic patients up to 75 months postoperatively. Am. J. Cardiol. 1977;40:906–914.; Вечерский Ю.Ю., Затолокин В.В., Петлин К.А., Шипулин В.М. Эндоскопическое выделение большой подкожной вены для коронарного шунтирования. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2016;5:86–90. DOI:10.17116/hirurgia2016586-90.; Raja S.G., Sarang Z. Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns & controversies. J. Thorac. Dis. 2013 Nov.;5 (Suppl. 6):S630. DOI:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.10.01. Review.; Cheng D., Allen K., Cohn W., Connolly M., Edgerton J., Falk V., et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and controlled trials. Innovations (Phila). 2005;1(2):61–74.; Arnaoutakis D.J., Scully R.E., Sharma G., Shah S.K., Ozaki C.K., Belkin M., et al. Impact of body mass index and gender on wound complications after lower extremity arterial surgery. J. Vasc. Surg. 2017 Jun.;65(6):1713–1718.e1. DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.116.; Athanasiou T., Aziz O., Skapinakis P., Perunovic B., Hart J., Crossman M.C., Casula R. Leg wound infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus conventional vein harvesting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003 Dec.;76(6):2141–2146.; Athanasiou T., Aziz O., Al-Ruzzeh S., Philippidis P., Jones C., Purkayastha S., et al. Are wound healing disturbances and length of hospital stay reduced with minimally invasive vein harvest? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004 Nov.;26(5):1015–1026. Review.; Parsonnet V., Lari A.A., Shah I.H. New stent for support of veins in arterial grafts. Arch. Surg. 1963;87(4):696–702.; Jeremy J.Y., Gadsdon P., Shukla N., Vijayan V., Wyatt M., Newby A.C., et al. On the biology of saphenous vein grafts fitted with external synthetic sheaths and stents. Biomaterials. 2007 Feb.;28(6):895–908. Review.; Lee S.S., Cheng C.L., Yu D.S., Chang S.Y., Ma C.P. Vicryl mesh for repair of severely injured kidneys: an experimental study. J. Trauma. 1993; 34: 406–410.; Jeremy J.Y., Bulbulia R., Johnson J.L., Gadsdon P., Vijayan V., Shukla N., et al. A bioabsorbable (polyglactin) external sheath inhibits porcine saphenous vein graft thickening. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004;127:1766–1772.; Murphy G.J., Newby A.C., Jeremy J.Y., Baumbach A., Angelini G.D. A randomized trial of an external Dacron sheath for the prevention of vein graft disease: the Extent study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007;134(2):504–505.; Schoettler J., Jussli-Melchers J., Grothusen C., Stracke L., Schoeneich F., Stohn S., et al. Highly flexible nitinol mesh to encase aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts: first clinical experiences and angiographic results nine months postoperatively. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2011;13:396–400.; Taggart D.P., Gal Y.B., Lees B., Patel N., Webb C., Rehman S.M., et al. A randomized trial of external stenting for saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015;99:2039–2045.; Souza D. A new no-touch preparation technique. Technical notes. Scand. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1996;30:41–44.; Souza D.S., Christofferson R.H., Bomfim V., Filbey D. No-touch technique using saphenous vein harvested with its surrounding tissue for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains an intact endothelium. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 1999;33:323–329.; Rueda F.D., Souza D., Lima R.D.C., Menezes A., Johansson B., Dashwood M., Vasconcelos F. Novel no-touch technique of harvesting the saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2008 Jun.;90(6):356–362. English, Portuguese.; Dashwood M.R., Dooley A., Shi-Wen X., Abraham D.J., Dreifaldt M., Souza D.S. Perivascular fat-derived leptin: a potential role in improved vein graft performance in coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2011;12:170–173.; Johansson B.L., Souza D.S., Bodin L., Filbey D., Loesch A., Geijer H., et al. Slower progression of atherosclerosis in vein grafts harvested with notouch technique compared with conventional harvesting technique in coronary artery bypass grafting: an angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2010 Oct.;38(4):414–419. DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.02.007.; Souza D.S., Dashwood M.R., Tsui J.C., Filbey D., Bodin L., Johansson B., et al. Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002;73:1189–1195.; Samano N., Geijer H., Liden M., Fremes S., Bodin L., Souza D. The notouch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: a randomized trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015;150:880–888.; Dreifaldt M., Mannion J.D., Bodin L., Olsson H., Zagozdzon L., Souza D. The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2013;96:105–111.; Galea J., Armstrong J., Francis S.E., Cooper G., Crossman D.C., Holt C.M. Alterations in c-fos expression, cell proliferation and apoptosis in pressure distended human saphenous vein. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999;44:436–448.; Gundry S.R., Jones M., Ishihara T., Ferrans V.J. Optimal preparation techniques for human saphenous vein grafts. Surgery. 1980 Dec.;88(6):785–794.; Chello M., Mastroroberto P., Frati G., Patt G., D’Ambrosio A., Di Sciascio G., et al. Pressure distension stimulates the expression of endothelial adhesion molecules in the human saphenous vein graft. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003 Aug.;76(2):453–458; discussion 458.; Okon E.B., Millar M.J., Crowley C.M., Bashir J.G., Cook R.C., Hsiang Y.N., et al. Effect of moderate pressure distention on the human saphenous vein vasomotor function. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004 Jan.;77(1):108–114; discussion 114-5.; Liu Z.G., Liu X.C., Yim A.P., He G.W. Direct measurement of nitric oxide release from saphenous vein: abolishment by surgical preparation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;71:133–137.; Angelini G.D., Bryan A.J., Williams H.M., Morgan R., Newby A.C. Distention promotes platelet and leukocyte adhesion and reduces short-term patency in pig arteriovenous bypass grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1990;99:433–439.; Holt C.M., Francis S.E., Newby A.C., Rogers S., Gadsdon P.A., Taylor T., et al. Comparison of response to injury in organ culture of human saphenous vein and internal mammary artery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1993;55:1522–1528.; Wilbring M., Ebner A., Schoenemann K., Knaut M., Tugtekin S.M., Zatschler B., et al. Heparinized blood better preserves cellular energy charge and vascular functions of intraoperatively stored saphenous vein grafts in comparison to isotonic sodium-chloride-solution. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2013 Jan. 1;55(4):445–455. DOI:10.3233/CH131781.; Woodward L.C., Antoniades C., Taggart D.P. Intraoperative Vein Graft Preservation: What Is the Solution? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016 Nov;102(5):1736–1746. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.097. Epub 2016 Sept. 10. Review.; Wise E.S., Hocking K.M., Eagle S., Absi T., Komalavilas P., CheungFlynn J., et al. Preservation solution impacts physiologic function and cellular viability of human saphenous vein graft. Surgery. 2015 Aug.;158(2):537–546. DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.036. Epub 2015 May 21.; Krishnamoorthy B., Critchley W.R., Glover A.T., Nair J., Jones M.T., Waterworth P.D., et al. A randomized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endoscopic harvest versus standard bridging and open techniques. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2012;15(2):224–228. DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivs164.; Jamison R.N., Ross M.J., Hoopman P., Griffin F., Levy J., Daly M., et al. Assessment of postoperative pain management: patient satisfaction and perceived helpfulness. Clin. J. Pain. 1997;13:229–236.; Cook R.C., Crowley C.M., Hayden R., Gao M., Fedoruk L., Lichtenstein S.V., et al. Traction injury during minimally invasive harvesting of the saphenous vein is associated with impaired endothelial function. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004 Jan.;127(1):65–71.; Elbassioni A.A.M., Amr M.A., Hassan H.S., Eldomiaty H.A. Bridging saphenous vein harvesting versus conventional techniques in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in Suez Canal university hospital. J. of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2017;25(3):210–216.; Lumsden A.B., Eaves F.F., Ofenloch J.C., Jordan W.D. Subcutaneous, video-assisted saphenous vein harvest: report of the first 30 cases. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1996;4(6):771–776.; Bitondo J.M., Daggett W.M., Torchiana D.F., Akins C.W., Hilgenberg A.D., Vlahakes G.J., et al. Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: a comparison of postoperative wound complications. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002 Feb.;73(2):523–528.; Allen K.B., Griffith G.L., Heimansohn D.A., Robison R.J., Matheny R.G., Schier J.J., et al. Endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998 Jul.;66(1):26–31; discussion 31–2.; Allen K., Cheng D., Cohn W., Connolly M., Edgerton J., Falk V., et al. Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations (Phila). 2005 Winter;1(2):51–60.; Lopes R.D., Hafley G.E., Allen K.B., Ferguson T.B., Peterson E.D., Harrington R.A., et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:235–244.; Zenati M.A., Shroyer A.L., Collins J.F., Hattler B., Ota T., Almassi G.H., et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011;141:338–344.; Sastry P., Rivinius R., Harvey R., Parker R.A., Rahm A.K., Thomas D., et al. The influence of endoscopic vein harvesting on outcomes after coronary bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 267,525 patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2013 Dec.;44(6):980–989. DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezt121.; Hess C.N., Lopes R.D., Gibson C.M., Hager R., Wojdyla D.M., EnglumB.R., et al. Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: insights from PREVENT IV. Circulation. 2014 Oct.;130(17):1445–1451. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008193.; Desai P., Kiani S., Thiruvanthan N., Henkin S., Kurian D., Ziu P., et al. Impact of the learning curve for endoscopic vein harvest on conduit quality and early graft patency. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011May;91(5):1385– 1391; discussion 1391–1392. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.079.; Lin T.Y., Chiu K.M., Wang M.J., Chu S.H. Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003;126:2011–2015.; Suarez‐Pierre A., Terasaki Y., Magruder J.T., Kapoor A., Grant M.C., Lawton J.S. Complications of CO2 insufflation during endoscopic vein harvesting. J. Card. Surg. 2017;32(12):783–789.; Rousou L.J., Taylor K.B., Lu X.G., Healey N., Crittenden M.D., Khuri S.F., et al. Saphenous Vein Conduits Harvested by Endoscopic Technique Exhibit Structural and Functional Damage. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;87:62–70.; Brown E.N., Kon Z.N., Tran R., Burris N.S., Gu J., Laird P., et al. Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007 Nov.;134(5):1259– 1265. Epub 2007 Sept. 29.; https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/674
-
12Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Yu. Yu. Vechersky, D. V. Manvelyan, N. V. Krakhmal, V. V. Zatolokin, S. V. Gusakova, A. N. Dzyuman, Ю. Ю. Вечерский, Д. В. Манвелян, Н. В. Крахмаль, В. В. Затолокин, С. В. Гусакова, А. Н. Дзюман
Πηγή: Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine; Том 34, № 2 (2019); 138-145 ; Сибирский журнал клинической и экспериментальной медицины; Том 34, № 2 (2019); 138-145 ; 2713-265X ; 2713-2927 ; 10.29001/2073-8552-2019-34-2
Θεματικοί όροι: иммуногистохимия, minimally invasive surgery, endoscopy, morphology, immunohistochemistry, минимально инвазивная хирургия, эндоскопия, морфология
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/772/459; Dashwood M.R., Loesch A. Surgical damage of the saphenous vein and graft patency. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007;133(1):274–275. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.029.; Rousou L.J., Taylor K.B., Lu X.G., Healey N., Crittenden M.D., Khuri S.F., et al. Saphenous vein conduits harvested by endoscopic technique exhibit structural and functional damage. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;87:62–70. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.049.; Souza D.S., Christofferson R.H., Bomfim V., Filbey D. “No-touch” technique using saphenous vein harvested with its surrounding tissue for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains an intact endothelium. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 1999;33(6):323–329.; Hussaini B.E., Lu X.G., Wolfe J.A., Thatte H.S. Evaluation of endoscopic vein extraction on structural and functional viability of saphenous vein endothelium. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2011;6(1):82. DOI:10.1186/1749-8090-6-82.; Bisleri G., Muneretto C. Endoscopic saphenous vein and radial harvest: state-of-the-art. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2015;30(6):624–628. DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000231.; Вечерский Ю.Ю., Затолокин В.В., Петлин К.А., Ахмедов Ш.Д., Шипулин В.М. Новый метод эндоскопического выделения большой подкожной вены в открытой системе. Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2017;23(2):131–136.; Nezafati M.H., Nezafati P., Amoueian S., Attaranzadeh A., Rahimi H.R. Immunohistochemistry comparing endoscopic vein harvesting vs. open vein harvesting on saphenous vein endothelium. J .Cardiothorac. Surg. 2014;9(1):101. DOI:10.1186/1749-8090-9-101.; Лавренюк О.В., Волков А.М., Чернявский А.М., Пустоветова М.Г. Морфологическая оценка венозного аутотрансплантата (большой подкожной вены) при операции аортокоронарного шунтирования. Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2012;6.; Hashmi S.F., Krishnamoorthy B., Critchley W.R., Walker P., Bishop P.W., Venkateswaran R.V., et al. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of human saphenous vein harvested by endoscopic and open conventional methods. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2014;20(2):178–185. DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivu359.; Kopjar T., Dashwood M.R. Endoscopic versus “no-touch” saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a trade-off between wound healing and graft patency. Angiology. 2016;67(2):121–132. DOI:10.1177/0003319715584126.; Vestweber D. VE-Cadherin: the major endothelial adhesion molecule controlling cellular junctions and blood vessel formation. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2008;28(2):223–232. DOI:10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.158014.; https://www.sibjcem.ru/jour/article/view/772
-
13Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Bobrov D.S., Shubkina A.A., Lychagin A.V., Slinyakov L.Y., Yakimov L.A.
Συνεισφορές: 1
Πηγή: Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences; Vol 74, No 4 (2019); 272-282 ; Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук; Vol 74, No 4 (2019); 272-282 ; 2414-3545 ; 0869-6047 ; 10.15690/vramn744
Θεματικοί όροι: hammer toe syndrome, minimally invasive surgical procedures, plantar plate, review literature, молоткообразная деформация, восстановление подошвенной связки, минимально инвазивная хирургия
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/1096/1140; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1096/770; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1096/771; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1096/772; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1096/773; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1096/774; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1096/775; https://vestnikramn.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/downloadSuppFile/1096/793
-
14Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Seregin, A. A., Pankratyev, Y. L., Simankov, I. V., Seregin, А. V., Серегин, А. А., Панкратьев, Ю. Л., Симанков, И. В., Серегин, А. В.
Θεματικοί όροι: HYDRONEPHROSIS, UPJO, PYELOPLASTY, MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, LAPAROSCOPY, MICROLAPAROSCOPY, MINILAPAROSCOPY, ГИДРОНЕФРОЗ, ПИЕЛОПЛАСТИКА, ЛАПАРОСКОПИЯ, МИКРОЛАПАРОСКОПИЯ, МИНИЛАПАРОСКОПИЯ, МИНИМАЛЬНО-ИНВАЗИВНАЯ ХИРУРГИЯ
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: Уральский медицинский журнал. 2018. Т. 164, № 9.; http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/12814
Διαθεσιμότητα: http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/12814
-
15Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Pavlov, V. N., Kabirov, I. R., Safiullin, R. I., Alekseyev, A. V., Kapora, Ye. S., Павлов, В. Н., Кабиров, И. Р., Сафиуллин, Р. И., Алексеев, А. В., Капора, Е. С.
Θεματικοί όροι: ROBOTIC SURGERY, PELVIC EVISCERATION, CERVICAL CANCER, MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, РОБОТИЧЕСКАЯ ХИРУРГИЯ, ЭВИСЦЕРАЦИЯ МАЛОГО ТАЗА, РАК ШЕЙКИ МАТКИ, МИНИМАЛЬНО-ИНВАЗИВНАЯ ХИРУРГИЯ
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: Уральский медицинский журнал. 2018. Т. 164, № 9.; http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/12793
Διαθεσιμότητα: http://elib.usma.ru/handle/usma/12793
-
16Academic Journal
-
17Academic Journal
Θεματικοί όροι: микролапароскопия, pyeloplasty, минимально-инвазивная хирургия, minilaparoscopy, laparoscopy, лапароскопия, пиелопластика, гидронефроз, 3. Good health, UPJO, microlaparoscopy, hydronephrosis, идронефроз, минилапароскопия, minimally invasive surgery
Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://umj.usma.ru/jour/article/download/287/287
https://urmj.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/287
https://umj.usma.ru/jour/article/view/287 -
18Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Цветанова, К., Цветкова, С., Ивова, Д., Петрова, Д.
Θεματικοί όροι: послеоперационная боль, минимально инвазивная хирургия, качество жизни, postoperative pain, minimally-invasive surgery, quality of life
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Διαθεσιμότητα: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12641/17530
-
19Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: БОКЕРИЯ ЛЕО АНТОНОВИЧ, КАКИАШВИЛИ РАМАЗ ЗУРАБОВИЧ
Θεματικοί όροι:
МИНИМАЛЬНО ИНВАЗИВНАЯ ХИРУРГИЯ,ОПЕРАЦИЯ "ЛАБИРИНТ",ФИБРИЛЛЯЦИЯ ПРЕДСЕРДИЙ,MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY,COX MAZE PROCEDURE,ATRIAL FIBRILLATION Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html
-
20Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Р.С. Джинджихадзе, О.Н. Древаль, В.А. Лазарев, Р.Л. Камбиев
Θεματικοί όροι: супраорбитальный доступ, keyhole, минимально инвазивная хирургия, церебральные аневризмы
Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html
