Showing 1 - 19 results of 19 for search '"магнитно-резонансная холангиопанкреатография"', query time: 0.61s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    Authors: Pylypchuk, V. I.

    Source: Zaporožskij Medicinskij Žurnal, Iss 5, Pp 660-663 (2018)
    Zaporozhye Medical Journal; Vol. 20 No. 5 (2018)
    Запорожский медицинский журнал; Том 20 № 5 (2018)
    Запорізький медичний журнал; Том 20 № 5 (2018)

    File Description: application/pdf

  2. 2
  3. 3
    Academic Journal

    Source: Medical Visualization; № 4 (2015); 61-67 ; Медицинская визуализация; № 4 (2015); 61-67 ; 2408-9516 ; 1607-0763

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/216/217; Chen-Wang C., Shou-Chuan S., Shee-Chau L. et al. Gallstone ileus: a disease easily ignored in the elderly. Int. J. Gerontol. 2008; 2 (1): 18-21.; Савчук Б.Д., Тарасова А.С. Кишечная непроходимость, вызванная желчными камнями. Хирургия. 1970; 3: 85-91.; Добровольский С.Р., Иванов М.П., Нагай И.В. Желчнокаменная обтурационная кишечная непроходимость. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2004; 3: 51-55.; Кургузов О.П. Желчнокаменная тонкокишечная непроходимость. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2007; 6: 13-19.; Chatterjee S., Tamonas C., Goutan G. et al. Gallstone ileus an atypical presentation and unusual location. Int. J. Surgery. 2008; 6: e55-e56.; Deckoff S.L. Gallstone ileus: a report of 12 cases. Ann. Surg. 1955; 142 (1): 52-65.; Синельников Р.Д., Синельников Я.Р. Атлас анатомии человека. Учебник. 2-е изд. М.: Медицина, 1996; 2. 536 с.; Masannat Y., Shatnawei A. Gallstone ileus: a review. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 2006; 73(8): 1132-1134.; Дибиров М.Д., Федоров В.П., Мартиросян Н.К. и др. Особенности течения диагностики и лечения желчно-каменной кишечной непроходимости. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2007; 5: 17-21.; Шаповальянц С.Г., Линденберг А.А., Лубчева В.И. Особенности диагностики и хирургического лечения желчнокаменной тонкокишечной непроходимости. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2013; 8: 43-48.; Elabsi M., Amraoui M., Errougani A. et al. Diagnosis and treatment: gallstone ileus. Digestive and liver disease. 2007; 39: 180-181.; https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/216

  4. 4
    Academic Journal

    Source: Medical Visualization; № 6 (2015); 61-65 ; Медицинская визуализация; № 6 (2015); 61-65 ; 2408-9516 ; 1607-0763

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/164/165; Fulcher A., Turner M. Orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluation with MR cholangiography. Radiology. 1999; 211: 715-722.; Verdonk R., Buis C., Porte R. et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: a review. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; Suppl. 1: 89-101.; Fulcher A., Turner M., Capps G. MR cholangiography: technical advances and clinical applications. Radiographics.1999; 19: 25-41.; Gopal D.V., Pfau P.R., Lucey M.R. Endoscopic management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Curr. Treat. Options Gastroenterol. 2003; 6: 509-515.; Zhu Z., Rao W., Sun J. et al. Liver retransplantation for ischemic-type biliary lesions after orthotopic liver transplantation: a clinical report of 66 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2008; 7: 471-475.; Iwamoto H., Hama K., Nakamura Y. et al. Biliary complications after 52 adult living donor liver transplantations: a single-center experience. Transplant. Proc. 2008; 40: 2539-2541.; Imanieh M., Erjaee A., Dehghani S. et al. Early postoperative complications of pediatric liver transplantation. Indian Pediatr. 2009; 46: 1088-1090.; Wojcicki M., Milkiewicz P., Silva M. Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation: a review. Dig. Surg. 2008; 25: 245-257.; Pascher A., Neuhaus P. Bile duct complications after liver transplantation. Transplant. Int. 2005; 18: 627-642.; Kaltenthaler E., Walters S., Chilcott J. MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review. BMC Med. Imaging. 2006; 6: 9-24.; Lomas D., Bearcroft P., Gimson A. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breathhold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP. Eur. Radiol. 1999; 9: 1411-1417.; Moser M., Wall W. Management of biliary problems after liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2001; Suppl.1: 46-52.; Taylor A., Little A., Hennessy O. et al. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 55: 17-22.; Park D., Kim M., Lee S.S. et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance holangiopancreatography for locating hepatolithiasis and detecting accompanying biliary strictures. Endoscopy. 2004; 36: 987-992.; Franco J. Biliary complications in liver transplant recipients. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2005; 7: 160-164.; Kim J., Lee J., Han J. et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures: differentiation of malignant from benign bile duct strictures. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2007; 26: 304-312.; Nandalur K., Hussain H., Weadock W. et al. Possible biliary disease: diagnostic performance of high-spatialresolution isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP. Radiology. 2008; 249: 883-890.; Hekimoglu K., Ustundag Y., Dusak A. et al. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature. J. Dig. Dis. 2008; 9: 162-169.; McMahon C. The relative roles of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of common bile duct calculi: a critically appraised topic. Abdom. Imaging. 2008; 33: 6-9.; Gor N., Levy R., Ahn J. Biliary cast syndrome following liver transplantation: Predictive factors and clinical outcomes. Liver Transplant. 2008; 14: 1466-1472.; Kinner S., Dechêne A., Susanne C. et al. Comparison of different MRCP techniques for the depiction of biliary complications after liver transplantation. Eur. Radiol. 2010; 20: 1749-1756.; Irie H., Honda H., Kuroiwa T. et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics. 2001; 21: 23-37.; Jagannath S., Kalloo A. Biliary complications after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2002; 5: 101-102.; Kamel I., Erbay N., Warmbrand G. et al. Liver regeneration after living adult right lobe transplantation. Abdom. Imaging. 2003; 28: 53-57.; Federle M., Kapoor V. Complications of liver transplantation: imaging and intervention. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2003; 41: 1289-1305.; Giacomoni A., Lauterio A., Slim A. et al. Biliary complications after living donor adult liver transplantation. Transplant. Int. 2006; 19 (6): 466-73.; Yersiz H., Cameron A., Carmody I. et al. Split liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 2006; 38: 602-603.; Gemmete J., Mueller G., Carlos R. Liver transplantation in adults: postoperative imaging evaluation and interventional management of complications. Semin. Roentgenol. 2006; 41: 36-44.; Thuluvath P., Atassi T. Lee J. An endoscopic approach to biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Int. 2003; 23:156-162.; Uzochukwu L., Bluth E., Smetherman D. et al. Early postoperative hepatic sonography as a predictor of vascular and biliary complications in adult orthotopic liver transplant patients. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 1558-1570.; Kawachi S., Shimazu M., Wakabayashi G. et al. Biliary complications in adult living donor liver transplantation with ductto-duct hepaticocholedochostomy or Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy biliary reconstruction. Surgery. 2002; 132: 48-56.; Qian Y., Liu C., Lo C. et al. Risk factors for biliary complications after liver transplantation. Arch. Surg. 2004; 139:1101-1105.; Girometti R., Cereser L., Como G. et al. Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: MRCP findings. Abdom. Imaging. 2008; 33: 542-554.; Zamboni G., Pedrosa I., Kruskal J., Raptopoulos V. Multimodality postoperative imaging of liver transplantation. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18: 882-891.; Seehofer D., Eurich D., Veltzke-Schlieker W., Neuhaus P. Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation: Old Problems and New Challenges. Am. J. Transplant. 2013; 13: 253-265.; https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/164

  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19