Showing 1 - 9 results of 9 for search '"камень мочеточника"', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    Source: Urology Herald; Том 11, № 4 (2023); 27-35 ; Вестник урологии; Том 11, № 4 (2023); 27-35 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-4

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/789/512; Каприн А.Д., Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Солнцева Т.В., Комарова В.А. Анализ уронефрологической заболеваемости и смертности в Российской Федерации за период 2002-2014 гг. по данным официальной статистики. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2016;(3):4-13. eLIBRARY ID: 28870098; EDN: YHTWLV; Kirkali Z, Rasooly R, Star RA, Rodgers GP. Urinary Stone Disease: Progress, Status, and Needs. Urology. 2015;86(4):651-3. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.006; Национальное руководство по урологии. Под ред. Н.А. Лопаткина. М., 2009.; Трусов П.В., Коган М.И., Хван В.К. Эффективность и безопасность мини-перкутанной нефролитотрипсии в лечении крупных и коралловидных камней почек. Вестник урологии. 2017;5(1):32-36. DOI:10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-1-32-36; Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Sarica K, Türk C, Wolf JS Jr; EAU/AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2418-34. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107; Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Prevalence of orthopedic complaints among endourologists and their compliance with radiation safety measures. J Endourol. 2011;25(10):1609-13. DOI:10.1089/end.2011.0109; Rassweiler J, Fiedler M, Charalampogiannis N, Kabakci AS, Saglam R, Klein JT. Robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopy: an update. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):69-77. DOI:10.1007/s00240-017-1024-8; Чернега В.С., Тлуховская-Степаненко Н.П., Еременко А.Н., Еременко С.Н. Оценка скорости фрагментации мочевых камней при контактной литотрипсии гольмиевым лазером. Урология. 2018;(5):69-73. DOI:10.18565/urology.2018.5.69-72; Gauhar V, Traxer O, Cho SY, Teoh JY, Sierra A, Gauhar V, Sarica K, Somani B, Castellani D. Robotic Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Journey from "Back to the Future". J Clin Med. 2022;11(18):5488. DOI:10.3390/jcm11185488; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/789

  2. 2
    Academic Journal

    Source: Urology Herald; Том 10, № 4 (2022); 171-178 ; Вестник урологии; Том 10, № 4 (2022); 171-178 ; 2308-6424 ; 10.21886/2308-6424-2022-10-4

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/618/427; Гудков Р.А., Слободянюк О. Мочекаменная болезнь у детей. Российский педиатрический журнал. 2021;24(4):253. EDN: NDPIDJ; Gadzhiev N, Prosyannikov M, Malkhasyan V, Akopyan G, Somani B, Sivkov A, Apolikhin O, Kaprin A. Urolithiasis prevalence in the Russian Federation: analysis of trends over a 15-year period. World J Urol. 2021;39(10):3939-3944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03729-y; Kim HW, Kim KD, Moon YT, Kim SC. A giant ureteral stone. J Korean Med Sci. 1995;10(1):48-50. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.1995.10.1.48; Resorlu B, Kara C, Resorlu EB, Unsal A. Effectiveness of ultrasonography in the postoperative follow-up of pediatric patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone manipulation. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(12):1337-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2979-0; Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, Somani B, Thomas K, Gambaro G. Urolithiasis. In: EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam, 2022. ISBN 978-94-92671-16-5. URL: https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/; Torricelli FC, Monga M, Marchini GS, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(4):645-54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0696; Lai S, Jiao B, Diao T, Seery S, Hu M, Wang M, Hou H, Wang J, Zhang G, Liu M. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2020;80:205-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025; Shao Y, Wang DW, Lu GL, Shen ZJ. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm. World J Urol. 2015;33(11):1841-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1545-0; Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, Wang G, Hou P, Meng J. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0236-0; Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Nanda B, Kumar N, Jha SK, Singh H. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1248-52. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0791; Jeong YB, Park JK, Kim HJ, Kim YG, Kim MK. Giant ureteral stone in a patient with a single functioning kidney: a case report. Clin Nephrol. 2011;75(6):547-9. https://doi.org/10.5414/cn106668; Wang Y, Chang X, Li J, Han Z. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(6):902-926. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0550; Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041; Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1161-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091; Gofrit ON, Pode D, Meretyk S, Katz G, Shapiro A, Golijanin D, Wiener DP, Shenfeld OZ, Landau EH. Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm.? J Urol. 2001;166(5):1862-4. PMID: 11586249; Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Atis G, Tokatli Z, Oztuna D, Armagan A, Gurbuz C, Caskurlu T, Saglam R. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with moderate-size kidney stones: results of multi-institutional analysis. Urology. 2012;80(3):519-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.018; Mugiya S, Ozono S, Nagata M, Takayama T, Nagae H. Retrograde endoscopic management of ureteral stones more than 2 cm in size. Urology. 2006;67(6):1164-8; discussion 1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.088; Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree GK, Bhaduria RP, Elhence A, Bhandari M. Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol. 1996;49(1):86-91. PMID: 8678608; Maheshwari PN, Oswal AT, Andankar M, Nanjappa KM, Bansal M. Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol. 1999;13(6):441-4. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1999.13.441; Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, Dogra PN, Hemal AK, Gupta NP. Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol. 2005;19(1):54-7. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.54; Mak D, Wragg R, Chandran H, McCarthy R, Parashar K. Silent But Giant: Giant ureteric calculus in a 7-year-old boy. J Surg Case Rep. 2010;2010(5):8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/2010.5.8; Dincel N, Resorlu B, Unsal A, Tepeler A, Silay MS, Armağan A, Diri A, Sancaktutar AA, Ziypak T, Mir S. Are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children? J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(4):840-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.07.061; El-Assmy A, El-Nahas AR, Harraz AM, El Demerdash Y, Elsaadany MM, El-Halwagy S, Sheir KZ. Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments: Is It an Appropriate Term in Children? Urology. 2015;86(3):593-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.017; https://www.urovest.ru/jour/article/view/618

  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9