-
1Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: I. V. Reshetov, A. S. Fatyanova, Yu. V. Babaeva, M. M. Gafarov, K. V. Ogdanskaya, T. E. Suhova, S. V. Korenev, M. V. Denisenko, Yu. S. Romanko, И. В. Решетов, А. С. Фатьянова, Ю. В. Бабаева, М. М. Гафаров, К. В. Огданская, Т. Е. Сухова, С. В. Коренев, М. В. Денисенко, Ю. С. Романко
Πηγή: Biomedical Photonics; Том 8, № 2 (2019); 25-30 ; 2413-9432 ; 10.24931/2413-9432-2019-8-2
Θεματικοί όροι: криохирургия, keratinocytic intraepidermal neoplasia, squamous cell carcinoma in situ, photodynamic therapy, fluorescence diagnostics, photosensitizer, natural light, fotoditazin, aminolevulinic acid, cryosurgery, интраэпидермальная неоплазия кератиноцитов, плоскоклеточный рак кожи in situ, фотодинамическая терапия, флуоресцентная диагностика, фотосенсибилизатор, естественный свет, фотодитазин, аминолевулиновая кислота
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.pdt-journal.com/jour/article/view/316/219; https://www.pdt-journal.com/jour/article/view/316/230; Memon A.A., Tomenson J.A., Bothwell J., Friedmann P.S. Prevalence of solar damage and actinic keratosis in a Merseyside population // British Journal of Dermatology. – 2000. – Vol. 142. – P. 1154–1159.; Schaefer I., Augustin M., Spehr C., et al. Prevalence and risk factors of actinic keratoses in Germany – analysis of multisource data // Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. – 2014. – Vol. 28. – P. 309–313.; Traianou A., Ulrich M., Apalla Z., et al. Risk factors for actinic keratosis in eight European centers: a case-control study // British Journal of Dermatology. – 2012. – Vol. 167. – P. 36–42.; Werner R.N., Stockfleth E., Connolly S.M., et al. Evidenceand consensus-based (S3) Guidelines for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis – International League of Dermatological Societies in cooperation with the European Dermatology Forum – Short version // European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. – 2015. – Vol. 29. – P. 2069–2079.; Conforti C., Beninanti E., Dianzani C. Are actinic keratoses really squamous cell cancer? How do we know if they would become malignant? // Clinics in Dermatology. – 2018. – Vol. 36. – P. 430–432.; De Berker D., McGregor J.M., Mohd Mustapa M.F., et al. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the care of patients with actinic keratosis 2017 // British Journal of Dermatology. – 2017. – Vol. 176. – P. 20–43.; Fargnoli M.C., Altomare G., Benati E., et al. Prevalence and risk factors of actinic keratoses in patients attending Italian dermatology clinics // European Journal of Dermatology. – 2017. – Vol. 27, Is. 6. – P. 599–608.; Schmitz L., Oster-Schmid C., Stockfleth E. Nonmelanoma skin cancer – from actinic keratosis to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma // Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen. – 2018. – P. 1002–1013.; Schmitz L., Gambichler T., Gupta G., et al. Actinic keratosis show variable histological basal growth patterns – a proposed classification adjustment // Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. – 2018. – Vol. 32, Is. 5. – P. 745–751.; Schmitz L., Gambichler T., Kost C., et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas are associated with basal proliferating actinic keratosis // Br J Dermatol. – 2018. doi:10.1111/bjd.16536.; Cappilli S., Perino F., Coco V., et al. Use of reflectance confocal microscopy to diagnose occult basal cell carcinoma: 2 case reports // JAAD Case Reports. – 2018. – P. 599–601.; Pellacani G., Longo C. Reflectance confocal microscopy: a crucial role for actinic keratosis treatment monitoring // Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. – 2018. – Vol. 32, Is. 7. – P. 1055.; Kohl E., Koller M., Zeman F., et al. Daylight photodynamic therapy versus cryosurgery for the treatment and prophylaxis of actinic keratoses of the face − protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, twoarmed study // BMC Dermatology. – 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895–017–0064–7; Osiecka B.J., Nockowski P., Szepietowski J.C. Treatment of Actinic Keratosis with Photodynamic Therapy Using Red or Green Light: A Comparative Study // Acta Dermato-Veneriologica. – 2018. – Vol. 98. – P. 689–693.; Gholam P., Bosselmann I., Enk A., Fink C. Impact of red versus blue light on tolerability and efficacy of PDT: A randomized controlled trial // JDDG – Journal of the German Society of Dermatology. – 2018. – Vol. 16, Is. 6. – P. 711–718.; Sotiriou E., Evangelou G., Papadavid E., et al. Conventional vs. daylight photodynamic therapy for patients with actinic keratosis on face and scalp: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized, intra-individual comparative analysis // Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. – 2018. – Vol. 32, Is. 4. – P. 595–600.; Levi A., Hodak E., Enk C.D., et al. Daylight photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic cheilitis // Photodermatology Photoimmunology and Photomedicine. – 2019. – Vol. 35, Is. 1. – P. 11–16.; Galimberti G.N. Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus 5-Fluorouracil for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Case Series // Dermatology and therapy. – 2018. – Vol. 8. – P. 137–141.; De Berker D., McGregor J.M., Hughes B.R. British Association of Dermatologists Therapy Guidelines and Audit Subcommittee. Guidelines for the management of actinic keratoses // Br J Dermatol. – 2007. – Vol. 2. – P. 222–230.