-
1Academic Journal
Πηγή: Onkourologiâ, Vol 11, Iss 3 (2015)
Θεματικοί όροι: рак, простата, радикальная простатэктомия, робот-ассистированная хирургия, предстательная железа, рпж, онкология, методы оперативного лечения, сравнение результатов, интраоперационные результаты, функциональные результаты, Medicine
Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/441; https://doaj.org/toc/1726-9776; https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1812; https://doaj.org/article/6eff8334fc8f48ca83de6b3fa026253a
Διαθεσιμότητα: https://doaj.org/article/6eff8334fc8f48ca83de6b3fa026253a
-
2Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Е. А. Прилепская
Πηγή: Cancer Urology; Том 11, № 3 (2015) ; Онкоурология; Том 11, № 3 (2015) ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776 ; 10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3
Θεματικοί όροι: функциональные результаты, простата, радикальная простатэктомия, робот-ассистированная хирургия, предстательная железа, РПЖ, онкология, методы оперативного лечения, сравнение результатов, интраоперационные результаты
Relation: Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid H, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F: EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localized disease. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 61–71.; Schuessler W, Sculam P, Clayman R, Kavoussi L: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854–857.; Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000; 163: 1643–1649.; Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM: Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy – critical analysis of the results. EurUrol 2006; 49: 612–624.; Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody J, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002; 168: 945–949.; Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W: Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 45–56.; Artibani W, Cavalleri S, Iafrate M, et al: Learning curve of an experienced open surgeon with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Int 2008; 80: 237–244.; Bolenz C, Freedland S, Hollenbeck B, Lotan Y, Lowrance W, Nelson J, Hu JC: Costs of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 316–324.; Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A, et al: Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 104–111.; Fracalanza S, Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, et al: Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101: 1145–1149.; Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al: A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385–2389.; Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, et al: A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 170: 1798–1803.; Prasad SM, Keating NL, Wang Q, et al: Variations in surgeon volume and use of pelvic lymph node dissection with open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 647–652.; Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, et al: Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 83–89.; Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, Hamza A, Fornara P: Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response; after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007; 99: 1461–1466.; Touijer K, Eastham JA, Secin FP, et al: Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005. J Urol 2008; 179: 1811–1817.; Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, Shirley M, Vale L, Ramsay C, Pickard R: Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 361–369.; Anastasiadis AG, Salomon L, Katz R, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC: Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 2003; 62: 292–297.; Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS, Sullivan W, Su LM: Prospective comparison of shortterm convalescence: laparoscopic radical versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2003; 61: 612–616.; Roumeguere T, Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, et al: Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches. World J Urol 2003; 20: 360–366.; Artibani W, Grosso G, Novara G, et al: Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of perioperative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 401–406.; Egawa S, Kuruma H, Suyama K, Iwamura M, Baba S: Delayed recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2003; 10: 207–212.; Atallah F, Khedis M, Seguin P, Fourcade O, Samii K: Postoperative analgesia and recovery after open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1878–1879.; Brown JA, Garlitz C, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Diamond SM, Strup SE: Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2004; 22: 102–106.; Poulakis V, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Dillenburg W, Becht E: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men older than 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer: comparison of morbidity, reconvalescence, and short-term clinical outcomes between younger and older men. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 1341–1349.; Silva E, Ferreira U, Silva GD, et al: Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery. Int Urol Nephrol 2007; 39: 865–869.; Terakawa T, Miyake H, Tanaka K, Takenaka A, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M: Surgical margin status of open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy specimens. Int J Urol 2008; 15: 704–707.; Fromont G, Guillonneau B, Validire P, Vallancien G: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary pathologic evaluation. Urology; 60: 661–665.; Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.; Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T: Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169: 1689–1693.; Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Levrel O, et al: Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology 2003; 61: 386–390.; Martorana G, Manferrari F, Bertaccini A, et al: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation in the early phase of the learning curve comparing to retropubic approach. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2004; 76: 1–5.; Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G: Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 864–868.; Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M: A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205– 210.; Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 360–363.; Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, et al: Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 177: 929–931; Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Naspro R, et al: Intra and perioperative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 98–104.; Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, et al: Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 606–614.; Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, et al: Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103: 448–453.; Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW: Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 819–822.; Novara G., Ficarra V., D’Elia C. et al. Preoperative criteria to select patients for bilateral nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy // J. Sex Med. – 2012. – Vol.7. – P.839-845; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/441
Διαθεσιμότητα: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/441