-
1Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: P. N. Shebalin, П. Н. Шебалин
Συνεισφορές: Российский научный фонд, грант (проект 16-17-00093)
Πηγή: Chebyshevskii Sbornik; Том 19, № 4 (2018); 227-242 ; Чебышевский сборник; Том 19, № 4 (2018); 227-242 ; 2226-8383 ; 10.22405/2226-8383-2018-19-4
Θεματικοί όροι: нечеткие сравнения, Omori law, Gutenberg-Richter law, law of repeatability of the number of aftershocks, cluster, Discrete Mathematical Analysis, fuzzy sets, fuzzy comparisons, закон Омори, закон Гутенберга-Рихтера, закон повторяемости числа афтершоков, кластер, дискретный математический анализ, нечеткие множества
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.chebsbornik.ru/jour/article/view/452/389; Baiesi M., Paczuski M. Scale–free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks // Phys. Rev. E. 2004. Vol. 69.; Baranov S., Pavlenko V., Shebalin P. Forecasting aftershock activity: 4. Estimating maximum magnitude of subsequent aftershocks // Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. 2019. Vol. 55, no. 1.; Baranov S., Shebalin P. Forecasting aftershock activity: 3. B˚ath dynamic law // Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. 2018. Vol. 54, no. 6. P. 926–932.; Baranov S., Shebalin P. Global statistics of aftershocks of large earthquakes: independence of times and magnitudes // Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2018. Vol. 12, no. 6.; Bath M. Lateral inhomogeneities in the upper mantle // Tectonophysics. 1965. Vol. 2. P. 483– 514.; Fuzzy logic algorithms in the analysis of electrotelluric data with reference to monitoring of volcanic activity / Sh.R. Bogoutdinov, S.M. Agayan, A.D. Gvishiani et al. // Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth. 2007. Vol. 43, no. 7. P. 597–609.; Davis S., Frohlich C. Single-link cluster analysis of earthquakes aftershocks: decay laws and regional variations // J. Geophys. Res. 1991. Vol. 96. P. 6335–1350.; Gardner J., Knopoff L. Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California with aftershocks removed Poissonian? // Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1974. Vol. 5. P. 1363–1367.; Gordeev E., Fedotov S., Chebrov V. Detailed Seismological Investigations in Kamchatka during the 1961–2011 period: main results // Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2013. Vol. 7, no. 1. P. 1–15.; Gutenberg B., Richter C. Seismicity of the Earth. Princeton Univ. Press, 1954.; Algorithm barrier with single learning class for strong earthquake–prone areas recognition / A.D. Gvishiani, S. Agayan, B. Dzeboev, I. Belov // Geoinformatics Research Papers: Proceedings of Geophysical Center RAS. 2017. Vol. 5, no. 1. P. 95.; Gvishiani A., Agayan S., Bogoutdinov S. Fuzzy recognition of anomalies in time series // Doklady Earth Sciences. 2008. Vol. 421, no. 1. P. 838–842.; Mathematical methods of geoinformatics. III. Fuzzy comparisons and recognition of anomalies in time series / A.D. Gvishiani, S.M. Agayan, Sh.R. Bogoutdinov et al. // Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2008. Vol. 44, no. 3. P. 309–323.; Recognition of strong earthquake–prone areas with a single learning class / A.D. Gvishiani, S.M. Agayan, B.A. Dzeboev, I.O. Belov // Doklady Earth Sciences. 2017. Vol. 474, no. 1. P. 546–551.; Fuzzy–based clustering of epicenters and strong earthquake–prone areas / A.D. Gvishiani, M.N. Dobrovolsky, S. Agayan, B. Dzeboev // Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2013. Vol. 12, no. 1. P. 1–10.; Gvishiani A., Dzeboev B., Agayan S. A new approach to recognition of the strong earthquake– prone areas in the Caucasus // Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth. 2013. Vol. 49, no. 6. P. 747–766.; Gvishiani A., Dzeboev B., Agayan S. Fcazm intelligent recognition system for locating areas prone to strong earthquakes in the Andean and Caucasian mountain belts // Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth. 2016. Vol. 52, no. 4. P. 461–491.; Significant earthquake–prone areas in the Altai–Sayan region / A.D. Gvishiani, B.A. Dzeboev, N.A. Sergeeva et al. // Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. 2018. Vol. 54, no. 3. P. 406–414.; Formalized clustering and significant earthquake-prone areas in the Crimean peninsula and Northwest Caucasus / A.D. Gvishiani, B.A. Dzeboev, N.A. Sergeeva, A.I. Rybkina // Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth. 2017. Vol. 53, no. 3. P. 353–365.; Kagan Y., Jackson D. Long–term earthquake clustering // Geophys. J. Intern. 1991. Vol. 104. P. 117–133.; Fuzzy logic methods for geomagnetic events detections and analysis / R.G. Kulchinsky, E.P. Kharin, I.P. Shestopalov et al. // Russian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2010. Vol. 11, no. 4. P. 1–6.; Marsan D., Lengline O. A new estimation of the decay of aftershock density with distance to the mainshock // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2010. Vol. 115, no. B9.; Molchan G., Dmitrieva O. Aftershock identification: methods and new approaches // Geophys. J. Int. 1992. Vol. 109. P. 501–516.; Ogata Y. Statistical models for standard seismicity and detection of anomalies by residual analysis // Tectonophysics. 1989. Vol. 169. P. 159–174.; Ogata Y. Seismicity analysis through point-process modeling; a review // PAGEOPH. 1999. Vol. 155. P. 471–508.; Omori F. On the aftershocks of earthquake // J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo. 1894. Vol. 7. P. 111–200.; Reasenberg P. Second-order moment of Central California seismicity, 1969-1982 // J. Geophys. Res. 1985. Vol. 90. P. 5479–5495.; Reasenberg P., Jones L. Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California // Science. 1989. Vol. 242. P. 1173–1176.; Savage W. Microearthquake clustering near Fairview Peak, Nevada, and in the Nevada Seismic Zone // J. Geophys. Res. 1972. Vol. 77, no. 35. P. 7049–7056.; Shebalin P., Baranov S., Dzeboev B. The law of the repeatability of the number of aftershocks // Doklady Earth Sciences. 2018. Vol. 481, no. 1. P. 963–966.; Smirnov V. Prognostic anomalies of seismic regime: methodical basis of data preprocessing // Geofisicheskiye Issledovaniya. 2009. Vol. 10, no. 2. P. 7–22.; Utsu T. A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks // Geophys. Mag. 1961. Vol. 30. P. 521–605.; Clustering analysis of seismicity and aftershock identification / I. Zaliapin, A. Gabrielov, V. Keilis-Borok, H. Wong // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008. Vol. 101, no. 1. P. 1–4.; Zaliapin I., Ben-Zion Y. Earthquake clusters in Southern California I: Identification and stability // Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2013. Vol. 118, no. 6. P. 2847–2864.; Zaliapin I., Ben-Zion Y. A global classification and characterization of earthquake clusters // Geophysical Journal International. 2016. Vol. 207, no. 1. P. 608–634.; Zhuang J. Y., Ogata K., Vere-Jones D. Stochastic declustering of space–time earthquake occurrences // J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2002. Vol. 97. P. 369–380.; Automatic fuzzy–logic recognition of anomalous activity on long geophysical records: application to electric signals associated with the volcanic activity of La Fournaise volcano (R´eunion island) / J. Zlotnicki, J.L. LeMouel, A. Gvishiani et al. // Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2005. Vol. 234, no. 1–2. P. 261–278.; https://www.chebsbornik.ru/jour/article/view/452