The model of the mechanism of public administration of the processes of providing such services to entrepreneurs as an element of a digital state platform

Πηγή: Экономика и предпринимательство. :600-606

Θεματικοί όροι: «сервисное государство», классификатор государственных услуг для предпринимателей, mechanism of public administration, процесс предоставления услуг предпринимателям, guide-book on public services for business, public service for the businessman, «путеводитель по государственным услугам для бизнеса», the process of services provision for businessmen, classifier of public services for the businessmen, specific principles of cooperation, механизм государственного управления, 'service state', state digital platform, государственная услуга предпринимателю, государственная цифровая платформа

The Model of the State Digital Platform on Labor Contracts in China ; Модель государственной цифровой платформы трудовых договоров в Китае

Συγγραφείς: L. Dun, G. Yuan, Л. Дунь, Г. Юань

Συνεισφορές: The study is sponsored by the National Social Science Foundation of China (grant number: 16CJL036), Исследование спонсируется Национальным фондом социальных наук Китая (номер гранта: 16CJL036)

Πηγή: Digital Law Journal; Vol 3, No 1 (2022); 20-31 ; Цифровое право; Vol 3, No 1 (2022); 20-31 ; 2686-9136

Θεματικοί όροι: цифровизация рынка труда, Internet platforms, the state digital platform on labor contracts, labor relations in the Internet platforms, social security system in the Internet platforms, macroeconomic equilibrium, digitalization on labor market, интернет-платформы, государственная цифровая платформа по трудовым договорам, трудовые отношения на интернет-платформах, система социального обеспечения на интернет-платформах, макроэкономическое равновесие

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/91/63; Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press.; Aloisi, A. (2016). Commoditized workers. Case study research on labour Law issues arising from a set of ‘on-demand/gig economy’ platforms. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 653–687.; Chen, B., Liu, T., Guo, L., & Xie, Z. (2020). The disembedded digital economy: Social protection for new economy employment in China. Social Policy and Administration, 54(7), 1246–1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12603; Cherry, M. A. (2016). Beyond misclassification: The digital transformation of work. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 544–577. https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=faculty; Dieuaide, P., & Azaïs, C. (2020). Platforms of work, labour, and employment relationship: The grey zones of a digital governance. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00002; Fabo, B., Karanovic, J., & Dukova, K. (2017). In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 163–175. http://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916688861; Furubotn, E. G., & Richter R. (2000). Institutions and economic theory. The contribution of the new institutional economics. The University of Michigan Press. http://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6715; Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135–162. http://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250; Gutbrod, M. (2020). Digital transformation in economy and law. Digital Law Journal, 1(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.38044/DLJ-2020-1-1-12-23; Inozemtsev, M. I. (2020). Digital law journal: Introduction. Digital Law Journal, 1(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.38044/DLJ-2020-1-1-8-11; Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056; Li, B., Fisher, K.R., Farrant, F.Q., & Cheng, Z. (2021). Digital policy to disability employment? An ecosystem perspective on China and Australia. Social Policy and Administration, 55(5), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12666; Liu, D., Geng, Y., & Yuan, L.-Q. (2020). The age of digitalization: Tendencies of the labor market. Digital Law Journal, 1(3), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2020-1-3-14-20; Lucas, R. E. Jr. (2002). Lectures on economic growth. Harvard University Press.; Menegatti, E. (2018). A fair wage for workers on-demand via app. In E. Ales, Y. Curzi, T. Fabbri, O. Rymkevich, I. Senatori, & G. Solinas (Eds.), Working in Digital and Smart Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.; Muntaner, C. (2018). Digital platforms, gig economy, precarious employment, and the invisible hand of social class. International Journal of Health Services, 48(4), 597–600.; Osipov, V., Yuan, L., Liu, D., & Geng, Y. (2021). Digitalization as objective factor of the substitution of the labor by the capital. In I. Stepnov (Ed.), Technology and business strategy: Digital uncertainty and digital solutions (pp.165–176). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63974-7_12; Osipov, V. S. (2019). The rise of unemployment in the cyber economy. In V. Filippov, A. Chursin, J. Ragulina, & E. Popkova The Cyber Economy. Contributions to Economics (pp. 105–116). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31566-5_11; Pissarides, Ch. A. (2000). Equilibrium unemployment theory. MIT Press.; Pulkka, V.-V. (2017). A free lunch with robots — Can a basic income stabilise the digital economy? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917708704; Schmidt, F. A. (2017). Crowd design: From tools for empowerment to platform capitalism. Birkhäuser.; Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Polity Press.; Sidorenko E. L., & von Arx P. (2020). Transformation of law in the context of digitalization: Defining the correct priorities. Digital Law Journal, 1(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.38044/DLJ-2020-1-1-24-38; Sundararajan, A. (2016). The Sharing economy. The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. MIT Press.; Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘gig economy’: Employee, self-employed or the need for a special employment regulation? Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701381; Webster, E., Budlender, D., & Orkin, M. (2015). Developing a diagnostic tool and policy instrument for the realization of decent work. International Labour Review, 154(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2015.00017.x; Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: A study in the economics of internal organization. The Free Press.; Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. The Free Press.; Xu, Y., & Liu, D. (2021). Decent work for the digital platform workers. A preliminary survey in Beijing. Digital Law Journal, 2(1), 48–63.; Yankovskaya, V. V., Osipov, V. S., Zeldner, A. G., Panova, T. V., & Mishchenko, V. V. (2021). Institutional matrix of social management in region’s economy: stability and sustainability vs innovations and digitalization. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(1-2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2020-0088; Zysman, J., & Kenney, M. (2017). Intelligent tools and digital platforms: Implications for work and employment. Intereconomics, 52(6), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0699-y; https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/91

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/91
https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-1-20-31