Showing 1 - 20 results of 288 for search '"ЮЖНАЯ ОСЕТИЯ"', query time: 0.84s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Academic Journal

    Subject Geographic: USPU

    Relation: Политическая лингвистика. 2019. № 6 (78)

  4. 4
    Academic Journal

    Subject Geographic: USPU

    Relation: Политическая лингвистика. 2021. № 3 (87)

  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
    Academic Journal

    Subject Geographic: USPU

    Relation: Политическая лингвистика. 2018. № 4 (70)

  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Academic Journal

    Source: Современная наука и инновации, Vol 0, Iss 4, Pp 272-276 (2022)

    File Description: electronic resource

  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
    Academic Journal

    Source: History and Culture; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023); 113-134 ; Պատմություն և մշակույթ ; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023); 113-134 ; Պատմություն և մշակույթ հայագիտական հանդես; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023); 113-134 ; История и культура; Том 19 № 1 (2023); 113-134 ; 1829-2771

    File Description: application/pdf

  19. 19
    Academic Journal

    Contributors: The study was supported by the RFBR and MES RSO, project no. 20-514- 07001., Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке гранта РФФИ и МОН РЮО, проект № 20-514-07001.

    Source: Vestnik NSUEM; № 2 (2023); 53-71 ; Вестник НГУЭУ; № 2 (2023); 53-71 ; 2073-6495

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://nsuem.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2325/1111; Дорошенко С.В., Джабиев В.В. Современные торговые отношения между Республикой Южная Осетия и российскими регионами: особенности, тенденции, барьеры, риски // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Экономика. 2022. Т. 30, № 4. С. 530–547. URL: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2022-30-4-530-547; Маркедонов С.М. Де-факто государства: политический феномен постсоветского пространства // Вестник РГГУ. Серия «Политология. История. Международные отношения. Зарубежное регионоведение. Востоковедение». 2018. № 1 (11). C. 24– 40. DOI:10.28995/2073-6339-2018-1-24-40; Савин К.Н., Шеломенцев А.Г., Джабиев В.В. Финансовая основа экономической состоятельности Республики Южная Осетия // Вопросы современной науки и практики. Университет им. В.И. Вернадского. 2021. № 1 (79). С. 98–110.; Сёмин А.Н., Мазлоев В.З., Кибиров А.Я. Агротуризм как фактор социально-экономического развития сельских территорий Республики Южная Осетия // Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий. 2021. № 11. С. 66–72.; Шеломенцев А.Г., Гончарова К.С. Факторы социально-экономического развития частично признанных и непризнанных республик Кавказа // Вестник МГИМО Университета. 2021. Т. 14, № 5. С. 203–223. URL: https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2021-5-80-203-223; Abushov K. Explaining Foreign Policy Deviations: The Strategic Rationale of Russia’s Recognition of Abkhazia’s and South Ossetia’s Independence // Ethnopolitics. 2022. Vol. 21, no. 4. P. 401–422. DOI:10.1080/17449057.2021.1882117; Ahluwalia P., Miller T. Why did the World not learn lessons from South Ossetia and Abkhazia: Russia’s push into Ukraine? // Social Identities. 2022. Vol. 28, no. 2. P. 147– 149. DOI:10.1080/13504630.2022.2057018; Ambrosio T., Lange W. The architecture of annexation? Russia’s bilateral agreements with South Ossetia and Abkhazia // Nationalities Papers. 2016. No. 44 (5). P. 673–693. doi:10.1080/00905992.2016.1203300; Bakke K.M., Linke A.M., O’Loughlin J., Toa G. Dynamics of state-building after war: External-internal relations in Eurasian de facto states // Political Geography. 2018. No. 63. P. 159–173. DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.011; Beacháin D. Abkhazia and South Ossetia / Visoka G., Doyle J., Newman E. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of State Recognition. 2019. P. 430–445. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351131759; Besolova E., Bekoeva I., Balikoeva M. General and specific traits in the folklore and ritual life of the peoples of the Caucasus (ethnolinguistic aspect) // ECORFAN Journal Mexico. 2022. P. 24.; Blakkisrud H., Kolstø P. From Secessionist Conflict Toward a Functioning State: Processes of State- and Nation-Building in Transnistria, Post-Soviet Affairs. 2011. Vol. 27, no. 2. P. 178–210. DOI:10.2747/1060-586X.27.2.178; Buzard K., Graham B.A.T., Horne B. Unrecognized states: a theory of self-determination and foreign influence // Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 2017. Vol. 33, no. 3. P. 578–611.; Galkina T.A., Popov F.A. Russia’s borders with Abkhazia and South Ossetia on four scales: Analysis of the political discourse // Reg. Res. Russ. 2016. No. 6. P. 258–266. URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970516030023; German T. Russia and South Ossetia: conferring statehood or creeping annexation? // Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea. 2016. No. 16 (1). P. 155–167. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1148411; Gerrits A., Bader M. Russian patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: implications for conflict resolution // East European Politics. 2016. Vol. 32, no. 3. P. 297–313. DOI:10.1080/21599165.2016.1166104; Golunov S. Pandemic Borders of Post-Soviet De Facto States // Journal of Borderlands Studies. 2022. No. 37 (4). P. 741–760. DOI:10.1080/08865655.2021.1943495; Hoch T. Independence or unification with a patron state? not such’ dichotomous ideas as one would think: Evidence from South Ossetia // Studies of Transition States and Societies. 2020. No. 12 (1). P. 68–89. URL: http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/859/697; Hoch T., Kopeček V. (Eds.). De Facto States in Eurasia (1st ed.). Routledge. 2019. 324 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244049; Hoch T., Souleimanov E., Baranec T. Russia’s role in the official peace process in South Ossetia // Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series. 2014. No. 23. P. 53–71. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bog-2014-0004; Kolsto P. The sustainability and future of unrecognized quasi-states // Journal of Peace Research. 2006. No. 43 (6). P. 723-740. doi:10.1177/0022343306068102; Kolsto P. Biting the hand that feeds them? Abkhazia–Russia client–patron relations // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2020. No. 36 (2). P. 140–158. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2020.1712987; Kolsto P., Blakkisrud H. Russia’s neighborhood policy and its eurasian client states: no autocracy export // Russia in Global Affairs. 2021. No. 2. P. 38–62. DOI:10.31278/1810-6374-2021-19-2-38-62; Krasniqi G. Contested territories, liminal polities, performative citizenship: a comparative analysis // EUI Working Paper RSCAS. 2018. No. 13. P. 60.; Lynch D. Separatist states and post-Soviet conflicts // International Affairs. 2002. No. 78 (4). P. 831–848. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00282; Matsuzato K. Transnational minorities challenging the interstate system: Mingrelians, armenians, and muslims in and around Abkhazia // Nationalities Papers. 2011. No. 39 (5). P. 811–831. doi:10.1080/00905992.2011.599376; Miarka A. Para-states as an instrument for strengthening Russia’s position – the case of Transnistria // Journal of Strategic Security. 2020. Vol. 13, no. 2. Р. 1–18. URL: https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.13.2.1750; Minakov M. On the extreme periphery. The status of post-soviet non-recognised states in the world-system // Ideology and Politics Journal. 2019. No. 1 (12). P. 39–72.; Nishikawa-Pacher A. The diplomacy of post-Soviet de facto states: ontological security under stigma // International Relations. 2019. No. 33. P. 563–585.; O’Loughlin J., Toalb G., Kolosovc V. Who identifies with the “Russian World”? Geopolitical attitudes in southeastern Ukraine, Crimea, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2016. Vol. 57, no. 6. P. 745–778. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1295275; O’Loughlin J., Kolosov V. A. Building identities in post-Soviet “de facto states”: cultural and political icons in Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia, Transdniestria, and Abkhazia // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2020. No. 58. P. 691–715.; Sebentsov A.B., Karpenko M.S., Gritsenko A.A. et al. Economic Development as a Challenge for “De Facto States”: Post-Conflict Dynamics and Perspectives in South Ossetia. Reg. Res. Russ. 2022. No. 12. P. 414–427. URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/ S2079970522700277; Souleimanov E.A., Abrahamyan E., Aliyev H. Unrecognized states as a means of coercive diplomacy? Assessing the role of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Russia’s foreign policy in the South Caucasus // Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2018. No. 18 (1). Р. 73–86. doi:10.1080/14683857.2017.1390830; Ulas H. The Dynamics of Social Movements in Unrecognized States – A Comparative Study // Front. Polit. Sci. 2021. No. 3. P. 724125. doi:10.3389/fpos.2021.724125; https://nsuem.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/2325

  20. 20