Αποτελέσματα αναζήτησης - "СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНЫЙ ПУЧОК"

1

Academic Journal

THE DEVELOPMENT AND FORMATION OF THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE INTERCOSTAL VASCULO-NERVOUS BUNDLE DURING THE PRENATAL PERIOD OF HUMAN ONTOGENESIS

Συγγραφείς: Марчук, O.

Πηγή: Clinical anatomy and operative surgery; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2005); 32-34
Клиническая анатомия и оперативная хирургия; Том 4 № 1 (2005); 32-34
Клінічна анатомія та оперативна хірургія; Том 4 № 1 (2005); 32-34

Θεματικοί όροι: плод, межреберный промежуток, сосудисто-нервный пучок, человек, fetus, intercostal space, vasculo-nervous bundle, human being, плід, міжреберний проміжок, судинно-нервовий пучок, людина

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: http://kaos.bsmu.edu.ua/article/view/260522

View record at OpenAIRE

2

Academic Journal

Anatomy of the neurovascular bundle and methods of its preservation with nerve-sparing prostatectomy

Συγγραφείς: H. S. Gevorgyan, A. A. Kostin, N. V. Vorobyev, K. М. Nyushko, A. G. Muradyan, I. A. Taraki, Y. V. Samsonov

Πηγή: Исследования и практика в медицине, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 53-66 (2018)
Исследования и практика в медицине

Θεματικοί όροι: нервосберегающая радикальная простатэктомия, neurovascular bundle, prostate cancer, рак предстательной железы, 3. Good health, 03 medical and health sciences, сосудисто-нервный пучок, 0302 clinical medicine, Medicine, pC, pc, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, РПЖ

Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/download/293/254
https://doaj.org/article/eac1cc40dc0d42c9bbde40395162ae6f
https://openrepository.ru/article?id=244446
https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/viewFile/293/254
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/anatomiya-sosudisto-nervnogo-puchka-i-metody-ee-sohraneniya-pri-nervosberegayuschey-prostatektomii
https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/293

View record at OpenAIRE Full Text Finder

3

Academic Journal

Topographic and anatomical features of muscular and vascular structures in lateral cervical region during prenatal period of human ontogenesis

Πηγή: Morphologia; Vol. 15 No. 3 (2021); 162-166
Morphologia; Том 15 № 3 (2021); 162-166

Θεματικοί όροι: судинно-нервовий пучок, cervical fascia, foreskin, prenatal development, vascular-nervous bundle, предплод, шийна фасція, 3. Good health, шейная фасция, пренатальное развитие, сосудисто-нервный пучок, пренатальний розвиток, человек, людина, human, передплід

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Σύνδεσμος πρόσβασης: http://morphology.dma.dp.ua/article/view/248962

View record at OpenAIRE Full Text Finder

4

Academic Journal

Anatomy of the neurovascular bundle and methods of its preservation with nerve-sparing prostatectomy ; Анатомия сосудисто-нервного пучка и методы ее сохранения при нервосберегающей простатэктомии

Συγγραφείς: Gevorgyan H.S., Kostin A.A., Vorobyev N.V., Nyushko K.M., Muradyan A.G., Taraki I.A., Samsonov Y.V.

Πηγή: Исследования и практика в медицине

Θεματικοί όροι: pC, prostate cancer, neurovascular bundle, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, рак предстательной железы, РПЖ, сосудисто-нервный пучок, нервосберегающая радикальная простатэктомия

Relation: https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2018-5-3-5; https://openrepository.ru/article?id=244446

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://openrepository.ru/article?id=244446

View record from BASE

5

Academic Journal

Current view on nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy ; Современный взгляд на нервосберегающую технику радикальной простатэктомии

Συγγραφείς: E. A. Sokolov, E. I. Veliev, R. A. Veliev, Е. А. Соколов, Е. И. Велиев, Р. А. Велиев

Πηγή: Cancer Urology; Том 15, № 3 (2019); 17-27 ; Онкоурология; Том 15, № 3 (2019); 17-27 ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776 ; 10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-3

Θεματικοί όροι: radical prostatectomy, neurovascular bundle, nerve-sparing technique, радикальная простатэктомия, сосудисто-нервный пучок, нервосберегающая техника

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/913/865; Салищев Э.Г. Полное иссечение предстательной железы с нижними частями семенных пузырьков и двух нижних третей прямой кишки при раке их. Хирургическая летопись. 1895; 5-6: 885-899.; Young H.H. Conservative perineal prostatectomy: the results of two years experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann. Surg. 1905; 41(4): 549-57. PMID: 17861624.; Memmelaar J. Total prostatovesiculectomy – retropubic approach. J. Urol. 1949; 62(3): 340-8. PMID: 18148289.; Millin T. Retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 1948; 59(3): 267-80. PMID: 18903535.; Kopecky A.A., Laskowski T.Z., Scott R. Jr. Radical retropubic prostatectomy in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. J. Urol. 1970; 103(5): 641-4. PMID: 5443849.; Veenema R.J., Gursel E.O., Lattimer J.K. Radical retropubic prostatectomy for cancer: a 20-year experience. J. Urol. 1977; 117(3): 330-1. PMID: 839596.; Del Regato J.A. Radiotherapy in the conservative treatment of operable and locally inoperable carcinoma of the prostate. Radiology. 1967; 88 (4): 761-66. DOI:10.1148/88.4.761.; Huggins C.B., Scott W.W. Bilateral adrenalectomy in prostatic cancer: clinical features and urinary excretion of 17-ketosteroids and estrogen. Ann. Surg. 1945; 122(6): 1031-41. PMID: 17858696.; Walsh P.C. The discovery of the cavernous nerves and development of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2007: 177(5): 1632-5. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.012.; Mullins J.K., Feng Z., Trock B.J. et al. The impact of anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy on cancer control: the 30-year anniversary. J. Urol. 2012(6); 188: 2219-24. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.028.; Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur. Urol. 2017; 71(4): 618-29. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003.; Раснер П.И., Котенко Д.В., Прилепская Е.А. и соавт. Функциональные результаты радикальной позадилонной и робот-ассистированной простатэктомии у больных локализованным раком предстательной железы. Вестник Национального медико-хирургического центра им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2015; 10(1): 78-83.; Walz J., Burnett A.L., Costello A.J. et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57(2): 179-92. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.009.; Walz J., Epstein J.I., Ganzer R. et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2016; 70(2): 301-11. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026.; Stolzenburg J.U., Schwalenberg T., Horn L.C. et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51(3): 629-39. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.012.; Tewari A., Peabody J.O., Fischer M. et al. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2003; 43(5): 444-54. PMID: 12705985.; Graefen M., Walz J., Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2006; 49(1): 38-48. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.008.; Secin F.P., Serio A., Bianco F.J. Jr. et al. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51(3): 764-71. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.058.; Nielsen M.E., Schaeffer E.M., Marschke P. et al. High anterior release if the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2008; 180(6): 2557-64. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.047.; Muraoka K., Hinata N., Morizane S. et al. Site-dependent and inter-individual variations in Denonvilliers’ fascia: a histological study using donated elderly male cadavers. BMC Urol. 2015; 15: 42. DOI:10.1186/s12894-015-0034-5.; Villers A., Stamey T.A., Yemoto C. et al. Modified extrafascial radical retropubic prostatectomy technique decreases frequency of positive surgical margins in T2 cancer; Lunacek A., Schwentner C., Fritsch H. et al. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy : ‘curtain dissection’ of the neurovascular bundle. BJU Int. 2005; 95(9): 1226-31. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05510.x.; Eichelberg C., Erbersdobler A., Michl U. et al. Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51(1): 105-10. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.038.; Alsaid B., Bessede T., Diallo D. et al. Division of autonomic nerves within the neurovascular bundles distally into corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum components: immunohistochemical confirmation with three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur. Urol. 2011; 59(6): 902-9. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.31.; Ganzer R., Stolzenbrug J.U., Wieland W.F. et al. Anatomic study of periprostatic nerve distribution: immunohistochemical differentiation of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve fibres. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62(6): 1150-6. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.039.; Costello A.J., Dowdle B.W., Namdarian B. et al. Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region. BJU Int. 2011; 107(8): 1210-5. DOI:10.1111/j.1464.-410X.2010.09711.x.; Tewari A., Takenaka A., Mtui E. et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the trizonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006; 98(2): 314-23. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06266.x.; Park B.J., Kim M.J., Whang S.Y. et al. Preoperative detection and localization of accessory pudendal artery with contrast. Radiology. 2012; 262(3): 903-11. DOI:10.1148/radiol.11110934.; Henry B.M., Pekala P.A., Vikse J. et al. Variations in the arterial blood supply to the penis and the accessory pudendal artery: a meta-analysis and review of implications in radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2017; 198(2): 345-53. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.080.; Menon M., Shrivastava A., Bhandari M. et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur. Urol. 2009; 56(1): 89-96. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.032.; Park Y.H., Jeong C.W., Lee S.E. A comprehensive review of neuroanatomy of the prostate. Prostate Int. 2013; 1(4): 139-45. DOI:10.12954/PI.13020.; Lim S.K., Kim K.H., Shin T.Y. et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int. 2014; 114(2): 236-44. DOI:10.1111/bju.12705.; Pisipati S., Ali A., Mandalapu R.S. et al. Newer concepts in neural anatomy and neurovascular preservation in robotic radical prostatectomy. Indian J. Urol. 2014; 30(4): 399-409. DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.142064.; Ganzer R., Stolzenburg J.U., Neuhaus J. et al. Anatomical study of pelvic nerves in relation to seminal vesicles, prostate and urethral sphincter: immunohistochemical staining, computerized planimetry and 3-dimensional reconstruction. J. Urol. 2015; 193(4): 1205-12. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.001.; Gilbert S.M., Dunn R.L., Miller D.C. et al. Functional outcomes following nerve sparing prostatectomy augmented with seminal vesicle sparing compared to standard nerve sparing prostatectomy: results from randomized controlled trial. J. Urol. 2017; 198(3): 600-7. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.133.; Huri E. Novel anatomical identification of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: fascial-sparing radical prostatectomy. Prostate Int. 2014; 2(1): 1-7. DOI:10.12954/PI.13038.; Montorsi F., Wilson T.G., Rosen R.C. et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena consensus panel. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62(3): 368-81. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057.; Tewari A.K., Srivastava A., Huang M.W. et al. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int. 2011; 108(6): 984-92. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10565.x.; Schatloff O., Chauhan S., Silverman A. et al. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 61(4): 796-802. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.048.; Nguyen L.N., Head L., Witiuk K. et al. The risks and benefits of cavernous neurovascular bundle sparing during radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Urol. 2017; 198(4): 760-9. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3344.; Menon M., Dalela D., Jamil M. et al. Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the retzius sparing and standard approaches. J. Urol. 2018; 199(5): 1210-17. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115.; Coughlin G.D., Yaxley J.W., Chambers S.K. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet. 2018; 19(8): 1051-60. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7.; Велиев Е.И., Голубцова Е.Н., Котов С.В. Динамика восстановления удержания мочи у пациентов после радикальной позадилонной нервосберегающей простатэктомии. Онкоурология. 2011; 2: 52-5.; Раснер П.И. Выбор метода оперативного лечения локализованного рака предстательной железы: дис. … д-ра мед. наук, 14.01.23. – М., 2016. – 299 с.; Avulova S., Zhao Z., Lee D. et al. The effect of nerve sparing status on sexual and urinary function: 3-year results from CAESAR study. J. Urol. 2018; 199(5): 1202-09. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.037.; Kumar A., Samavedi S., Bates A.S. et al. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Robotic Surg. 2017; 11(2): 129-38. DOI:10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3.; Martini A., Cumarasamy S., Haines K.G. 3rd et al. An updated approach to incremental nerve sparing for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2018; doi:10.1111/bju.14655.; Mirmilstein G., Rai B.P., Gbolahan O. et al. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting – a prospective observational comparative study. BJU Int. 2018; 121(6): 854-62. DOI:10.1111/bju.14078.; Mangano M.S., De Gobbi A., Beniamin F. et al. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using near-infrared fluorescence technology and indocyanine green: initial experience. Urologiia. 2018; 85(1): 29-31. DOI:10.5301/uj.5000244.; Yoon Y., Jeon S.H., Park Y.H. et al. Visualization of prostatic nerves by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express. 2016; 7(9): 3170-83. DOI:10.1364/BOE.7.003170.; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/913

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/913
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2019-15-3-17-27

View record from BASE

6

Academic Journal

ПОВЫШЕНИЕ КАЧЕСТВА РЕКОНСТРУКТИВНЫХ ОПЕРАЦИЙ НА ВЕРХНИХ КОНЕЧНОСТЯХ ПУТЕМ АНАЛИЗА РЕЗАНЫХ РАН ОБЛАСТИ ПРЕДПЛЕЧЬЯ В ЗАВИСИМОСТИ ОТ ИХ ГЕНЕЗА

Θεματικοί όροι: анализ, analysis, резаная рана, сосудисто-нервный пучок (СНП), предплечье, forearm, neurovascular bundle, cut wound, 3. Good health

7

Academic Journal

HYDRODISSECTION FOR PRESERVATION OF NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE DURING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ; ВОДОСТРУЙНАЯ ДИССЕКЦИЯ В ХИРУРГИИ РАКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ. СОВРЕМЕННОЕ СОСТОЯНИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ

Συγγραφείς: H. S. Gevorgyan, A. A. Kostin, N. V. Vorobyev, P. V. Shegai, Г. С. Геворгян, А. А. Костин, Н. В. Воробьёв, П. В. Шегай

Πηγή: Research and Practical Medicine Journal; Том 3, № 4 (2016); 44-51 ; Research'n Practical Medicine Journal; Том 3, № 4 (2016); 44-51 ; 2410-1893 ; 10.17709/2409-2231-2016-3-4

Θεματικοί όροι: водоструйный диссектор, prostate cancer, neurovascular bundle, radical prostatectomy, water-jet, гидродиссекция, сосудисто-нервный пучок, радикальная простатэктомия

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/162/160; Мазо Е. Б., Гусейнов М. М. Эректильная дисфункция после радикальной простатэктомии у больных раком предстательной железы: возможности лечения. Фарматека. 2006; 15./Mazo E. B., Guseinov M. M. Erektil’naya disfunktsiya posle radikal’noi prostatektomii u bol’nykh rakom predstatel’noi zhelezy: vozmozhnosti lecheniya. Pharmateca. 2006; 15.; Walsh P. C., Donker P. J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982; 128: 492–497.; Reiner W. B. Walsh P. C. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini’s plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J Urol. 1979; 121 (2); 198–200.; Walsh P. C., Donker P. J. Impotence following prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. 1982. J Urol. 2002; 167 (2 Pt 2): 1005–1010.; Walsh P. C. Anatomical radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol. 1998; 162 (6 Pt 2): 2418–2424.; Lepor H., Nieder A. M., Ferrandino M. N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive serie of 1000 cases. J. Urol. 2001; 166 (5): 1729–1733.; Gontero P., Kirby R. S. Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005; 8 (2): 133–139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500781; Sokoloff M. H., Brendler C. B. Indications and contraindications for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2001; 28 (3): 535–543.; Wieder J. A., Soloway M. S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998; 160 (2): 299–315. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022–5347(01)62881–7; Schnall M. D., Imai Y., Tomaszewski J., Pollack H. M., Lenkinski R. E., Kressel H. Y. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 178 (3): 797–802. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.178.3.1994421; Geary E. S., Stamey T. A. Pathological characteristics and prognosis of nonpalpable and palpable prostate cancers with a Hybritech prostate specific antigen of 4 to 10 ng/ml. J Urol. 1996; 156 (3): 1056–1058. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022–5347(01)65701-x; Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K. L., Schlesselman J. J., Soloway M. S. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20 (7): 1853–1858. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.07.069; Walsh P. C. Nerve grafts are rarely necessary and are unlikely to improve sexual function in men undergoing anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2001; 57 (6):1020–1024. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090–4295(01)00987–6; Alsikafi N. F., Brendler C. B. Surgical modifications of radical retropubic prostatectomy to decrease incidence of positive surgical margins. J Urol. 1998; 159 (4):1281–1285. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022–5347(01)63581-x; Graefen M., Haese A., Pichlmeier U., Hammerer P. G., Noldus J., Butz K., et al. A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2001; 165 (3): 857–863. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022–5347(05)66544–5; Scardino P. T., Kim E. D. Rationale for and results of nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2001; 57 (6): 301–307. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090–4295 (01)01008–1; Shah O., Robbins D. A., Melamed J., Lepor H. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003; 169 (6): 2147–2152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000057496.49676.5a; Park E., Dalkin B., Escobar C., Nagle R. B. Site-specific positive margins at radical prostatectomy: assessing cancer-control benefits of wide excision of the neurovascualr bundle on a side with cancer on biopsy. BJU Int. 2003; 91 (3): 219–222. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464–410x.2003.04071.x; Sanwick J. M., Dalkin B. L., Nagle R. B. Accuracy of prostate needle biopsy in predicting extracapsular tumor extension at radical retropubic prostatectomy: application in selecting patients for nerve-sparing surgery. Urology. 1998; 52 (5): 814–818. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090–4295(98)00399–9; Huland H., Hubner D., Henke R. P. Systematic biopsies and digital rectal examination to identify the nerve-sparing side for radical prostatectomy without risk of positive margin in patients with clinical stage T2, N0 prostatic carcinoma. Urology. 1994; 44 (2): 211–214.; Malavaud B., Villers A., Ravery V., Tollon C., Rischmann P., Charlet J. P., et al. Role of preoperative positive apical biopsies in the prediction of specimen-confined prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Eur Urol. 2000; 37 (3): 281–288.; Stamey T. A., Villers A. A., McNeal J. E., Link P. C., Freiha F. S. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection. J Urol. 1990; 143 (6): 1166–1172.; Blute M. L., Bostwick D. G., Berstralh E. J., Slezak J. M., Martin S. K., Amling C. L., et al. Anatomic sitespecific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 1997; 50 (5): 733–739. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090–4295(97)00450–0; Catalona W. J., Smith D. S. Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: intermediate-term results. J Urol. 1998; 160 (6 Pt 2): 2428–3434.; Catalona W. J., Smith D. S. 5-year tumor recurrence rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 1994; 152 (5 Pt 2): 1837–1842.; Gerber G. S., Thisted R. A., Scardino P. T., Frohmuller H. G., Schroeder F. H., Paulson D. F., et al. Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1996; 276 (8): 615–619. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540080037026; Kupelian P., Katcher J., Levin H., Zippe C., Klein E. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostatespecific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology. 1996; 48 (2): 249–260. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090–4295(96)00167–7; Walsh P. C., Partin A. W., Epstein J. I. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results at 10 years. J Urol. 1994; 152 (5 Pt 2):1831–1836.; Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA). Oncology (Williston Park). 2000; 14 (2): 267–72, 277–8. http://www.cancernetwork.com/oncology-journal/prostate-specific-antigen-psa-best-practice-policy; Partin A. W., Yoо J., Carter H. B., Pearson J. D., Chan D. W., Epstein J. I., et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1993; 150 (1): 110–114.; Epstein J. I., Partin A. W., Sauvegout J., Walsh PC. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy: A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996; 20 (3): 286–293.; Partin A. W., Borland R. N., Epstein J. I., Brendler C. B. Influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle (s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer with established capsular penetration. J Urol. 1993; 150 (1): 142–146.; Bastacky S. I., Walsh P. C., Epstein P. C. Relationship between perineural tumor invasion on needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy capsular penetration in clinical stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992; 17 (4): 336–341.; de la Taille A., Katz A., Bagiella E., Olsson C. A., O’Toole K. M., Rubin M. A. Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy: An independent predictor of final pathologic stage. Urology. 1999; 54 (6): 1039–1043. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0090–4295(99)00350–7; Vargas S. O., Jiroutek M., Welch W. R., Nucci M. R., D’Amico A. V., Renshaw A. A. Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy specimens: Correlation with extraprostatic extension at resection. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999; 111 (2): 223–228. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/111.2.223; Bengmark S. Leberchirurgie. Chir Gastroenterol. 1987; 3: 5–11.; Papachristou D. N., Barters R. Resection of the liver with a water jet. Br J Surg. 1982; 69 (2): 93–94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800690212; Сидоров Д. В., Ложкин М. В., Гришин Н. А., Петров Л. О., Майновская О. А., Черниченко М. А., и др. Анатомические резекции печени по поводу метастазов колоректального рака с использованием водоструйной диссекции паренхимы: методологические аспекты и непосредственные результаты. Онкологическая колопроктология. 2013; 1: 35–40./Sidorov D. V., Lozhkin M. V., Grishin N. A., Petrov L. O., Maynovskaya O. A., Chernichenko M. A., et al. Technique and surgical outcomes of anatomical liver resections for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Onkologicheskaya koloproktologiya (Oncological Coloproctology). 2013; 1: 35–40. (In Russian).; Aroussi A. A., Sami I. M., Leguerrier A., Verhoye J. P. The blower: a useful tool to complete thrombectomy of the mechanical prosthetic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81 (5): 1911–1912. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.02.070; Terzis A. J., Nowak G., Rentzsch O., Arnold H., Diebold J., Baretton G. A new system for cutting brain tissue preserving vessels: water jet cutting. Br J Neurosurg. 1989; 3 (3): 361–366.; Izumi R., Yabushita K., Shimizu K., Yagi M., Yamaguchi A., Konishi K., et al. Hepatic resection using a water jet dissector. Surg Today. 1993; 23 (1): 31–35.; Rau H. G., Duessel A. P., Wurzbacher S. The use of water-jet dissection in open and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 2008; 10 (4): 275–280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13651820802167706; Oertel J., Gaab M. R., Knapp A., Essig H., Warzok R., Piek J. Water jet dissection in neurosurgery: experimental results in the porcine cadaveric brain. Neurosurgery. 2003; 52 (1): 153–159.; Nakagawa A., Hirano T., Jokura H., Uenohara H., Ohki T., Hashimoto T., et al. Pulsed holmium: yttrium-aluminumgarnet laser-induced liquid jet as a novel dissection device in neuroendoscopic surgery. J Neurosurg. 2004; 101 (1): 145–150. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0145; Ohki T., Nakagawa A., Hirano T., Hashimoto T., Menezes V., Jokura H., et al. Experimental application of pulsed Ho: YAG laser-induced liquid jet as a novel rigid neuroendoscopic dissection device. Lasers Surg Med. 2004; 34 (3): 227–234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20021; Oertel J., Gaab M. R., Schiller T., Schroeder H. W., Warzok R., Piek J. Towards waterjet dissection in neurosurgery: experimental invivo results with two different nozzle types. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146 (7): 713–720. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701–004–0265–9; Schurr M. O., Wehrmann M., Kunert W., Melzer A., Lirici M. M., Trapp R., et al. Histologic effects of different technologies for dissection in endoscopic surgery: Nd: YAG laser, high frequency and water-jet. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994; 2 (3–4): 195–201.; Sidorov D. V., Frank G. A., Mainovskaya O. A., Lozhkin M. V., Grishin N.A, Petrov L. O. Total mesorectal excision with water-jet dissection in patients with rectal cancer: surgical and morphological aspects. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16 (5): 182–185. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.12514; Сидоров Д. С., Ложкин М. В., Петров Л. О., Гришин Н. А., Троицкий А. А., Исаева А. Г. Хирургические и патоморфологические результаты тотальной мезоректумэктомии с применением методики водоструйной диссекции при раке прямой кишки. Онкологическая колопроктология. 2016; 6 (3): 17–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.17650/2220–3478–2016–6-3–17–22/Sidorov D. V., Lozhkin M. V., Petrov L. O., Grishin N. A., Troitskiy A. A., Isaeva A. G. Surgical and pathomorphological results of total mesorectumectomy by using waterjet dissection technique in patients with rectal cancer. Onkologicheskaya koloproktologiya (Oncological Coloproctology). 2016; 6 (3): 17–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.17650/2220–3478–2016–6-3–17–22 (In Russian).; Köckerling F., Yildirim C., Rose J., Scheidbach H., Geers P. Total mesorectal excision with the water-jet-dissection. Technique and results. Tech Coloproctol. 2004 Nov;8 Suppl 1: s217–25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151–004–0163–4; Touloumtzidis A., Kühn P., Goretzki P. E., Lammers B. J. Water-jet dissection in rectal cancer surgery: surgical and oncological outcomes. Surg Technol Int. 2010; 20: 115–123.; May J., McGovern F. Hemostatic hydrodissection: A new technique to promote nerve-sparing during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep. 2005 Feb; 6 (1): 1.; Fernandez De La Maza S. Early clinical experience with water-jet dissection (helix hydro-jet®) during nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol. 2002; 11 (5/6): 257–264.; Guru K. A., Perlmutter A. E., Butt Z. M., Peabody J. O. Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bandle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2008; 15 (2): 4000–4003. http://www.canjurol.com/abstract.php?ArticleID=&version=1.0&PMID=18405449; Patel I., Spernat D., Lopez-corona E. Hydrodissection of the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy improves post operative erectile function. J Urol. 2011; 186 (1): 233–237. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.022; Rosen R. C., Cappelleri J. C., Smith M. D., Lipsky J., Peña B. M. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999; 11 (6): 319–326.; Clements T., Hershey P., Hakky T., et al. Hydrodissection of the neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol 2012; 187 (4): 1237.; Колонтарев К. Б., Пушкарь Д. Ю., Раснер П. И., Ковылина М.В, Прилепская Е. А., Мальцев Е. Г. Наш опыт применения гидродиссекции при выполнении нервосберегающей робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии. Онкологические и функциональные результаты. Материалы XII съезда Российского общества урологов. Москва, 17–20 сентября, 2012. М., 2012./Kolontarev K. B., Pushkar’ D.Yu., Rasner P. I., Kovylina M.V, Prilepskaya E. A., Mal’tsev E. G. Our experience of applying the hydrodissection during performing of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Oncological and functional results. Proceedings of the XII Congress of the Russian society of urology. Moscow, 17–20 Sep, 2012.; https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/162

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://www.rpmj.ru/rpmj/article/view/162
https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2016-3-4-5

View record from BASE

8

Academic Journal

МОРФОФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКА ПРОВОДНИКОВОГО И СТРОМАЛЬНОГО КОМПОНЕНТОВ СРЕДИННОГО И ЛОКТЕВОГО НЕРВОВ В ОБЛАСТИ СРЕДНЕЙ ТРЕТИ ПЛЕЧА У ПРЕДСТАВИТЕЛЕЙ СЕМЕЙСТВА ПСОВЫХ

Συγγραφείς: ЗАТОЛОКИНА М.А.

Θεματικοί όροι: ПЛЕЧЕВОЕ СПЛЕТЕНИЕ., BRACHIAL PLEXUS., ВНЕСТВОЛЬНОЕ СТРОЕНИЕ ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКОГО НЕРВА, ВНУТРИСТВОЛЬНОЕ СТРОЕНИЕ, СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНЫЙ ПУЧОК, ЭПИНЕВРИЙ, ПЕРИНЕВРИЙ, ЭНДОНЕВРИЙ

Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html

Διαθεσιμότητα: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/morfofunktsionalnaya-harakteristika-provodnikovogo-i-stromalnogo-komponentov-sredinnogo-i-loktevogo-nervov-v-oblasti-sredney-treti
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15948606.png

View record from BASE

9

Academic Journal

РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ СРАВНИТЕЛЬНОГО МОРФОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ИЗУЧЕНИЯ СОЕДИНИТЕЛЬНОТКАННЫХ СТРУКТУР ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКИХ НЕРВОВ ПЛЕЧЕВОГО СПЛЕТЕНИЯ В ЭВОЛЮЦИОННОМ АСПЕКТЕ

Συγγραφείς: ЗАТОЛОКИНА М.А.

Θεματικοί όροι: ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКИЕ НЕРВЫ, ЭНДОНЕВРИЙ, ПЕРИНЕВРИЙ, ЭПИНЕВРИЙ, СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНЫЙ ПУЧОК, "НЕРВ-РАЗГИБАТЕЛЬ", "EXTENSOR NERVE"

Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html

Διαθεσιμότητα: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rezultaty-sravnitelnogo-morfologicheskogo-izucheniya-soedinitelnotkannyh-struktur-perifericheskih-nervov-plechevogo-spleteniya-v
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15946955.png

View record from BASE

10

Academic Journal

СТРОЕНИЕ ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКИХ НЕРВОВ ГРУДНОЙ КОНЕЧНОСТИ В ОБЛАСТИ СРЕДНЕЙ ТРЕТИ ПЛЕЧА У МЛЕКОПИТАЮЩИХ ОТРЯДА ГРЫЗУНЫ

Συγγραφείς: Затолокина, М.

Θεματικοί όροι: ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКИЕ НЕРВЫ, ПЕРИНЕВРИЙ, ЭПИНЕВРИЙ, СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНЫЙ ПУЧОК, МИЕЛИНОВАЯ ОБОЛОЧКА, "НЕРВ-СГИБАТЕЛЬ", "НЕРВ-РАЗГИБАТЕЛЬ", СТЕПНОЙ СУРОК, БОЛОТНЫЙ БОБР, КРЫСА СЕРАЯ, "NERVE – BENDER", "NERVE – EXTENSOR"

Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html

Διαθεσιμότητα: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/stroenie-perifericheskih-nervov-grudnoy-konechnosti-v-oblasti-sredney-treti-plecha-u-mlekopitayuschih-otryada-gryzuny-1
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15728368.png

View record from BASE

11

Academic Journal

ТОПОГРАФО-АНАТОМИЧЕСКИЕ ВЗАИМООТНОШЕНИЯ СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНЫХ ОБРАЗОВАНИЙ СОННОГО ТРЕУГОЛЬНИКА В ХИРУРГИИ БРОНХИАЛЬНОЙ АСТМЫ

Συγγραφείς: МЕЛЬНИКОВ ВАСИЛИЙ МИХАЙЛОВИЧ, КАПУСТИН ДМИТРИЙ ВЯЧЕСЛАВОВИЧ, ВОЛКОВ АРКАДИЙ ВАСИЛЬЕВИЧ

Θεματικοί όροι: СОННЫЙ ТРЕУГОЛЬНИК, СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНЫЙ ПУЧОК, ГЛОМЭКТОМИЯ, БРОНХОСПАЗМ

Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html

Διαθεσιμότητα: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/topografo-anatomicheskie-vzaimootnosheniya-sosudisto-nervnyh-obrazovaniy-sonnogo-treugolnika-v-hirurgii-bronhialnoy-astmy
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15955585.png

View record from BASE

12

Academic Journal

ОСОБЕННОСТИ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКИХ НЕРВОВ ДЛИННЫХ ВЕТВЕЙ ПЛЕЧЕВОГО СПЛЕТЕНИЯ В ОБЛАСТИ СРЕДНЕЙ ТРЕТИ ПЛЕЧА У НАСЕКОМОЯДНЫХ ПЛАЦЕНТАРНЫХ МЛЕКОПИТАЮЩИХ

Συγγραφείς: Затолокина, М.

Θεματικοί όροι: ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКИЕ НЕРВЫ, ПЕРИНЕВРИЙ, ЭПИНЕВРИЙ, СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНЫЙ ПУЧОК, МИЕЛИНОВАЯ ОБОЛОЧКА, "НЕРВ-СГИБАТЕЛЬ", "НЕРВ-РАЗГИБАТЕЛЬ", ЕЖ ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЙ, "NERVE – BENDER", "NERVE – EXTENSOR", ЕUROPEAN HEDGEHOG

Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html

Διαθεσιμότητα: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-organizatsii-perifericheskih-nervov-dlinnyh-vetvey-plechevogo-spleteniya-v-oblasti-sredney-treti-plecha-u-nasekomoyadnyh
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/15721240.png

View record from BASE

13

Academic Journal

Травмы в стоматологии

Συγγραφείς: Г.Б.ИЗТЕЛЕУОВА

Θεματικοί όροι: Вывих, пульпа, периодонт, сосудисто-нервный пучок, периодонтальная связка

Περιγραφή αρχείου: text/html

Διαθεσιμότητα: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/travmy-v-stomatologii
http://cyberleninka.ru/article_covers/16543854.png

View record from BASE

14

Academic Journal

METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE PROSTATE NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE (A REVIEW OF LITERATURE) ; МЕТОДЫ ИДЕНТИФИКАЦИИ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ СОСУДИСТО-НЕРВНОГО ПУЧКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ (ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ)

Συγγραφείς: D. S. Ledyaev, E. V. Zagainova, V. A. Atduyev, Д. С. Ледяев, Е. В. Загайнова, В. А. Атдуев

Πηγή: Cancer Urology; Том 8, № 1 (2012); 109-112 ; Онкоурология; Том 8, № 1 (2012); 109-112 ; 1996-1812 ; 1726-9776 ; 10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-1

Θεματικοί όροι: сосудисто-нервный пучок, erectile dysfunction, neurovascular bundle, эректильная дисфункция

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/191/206; EAU Guides 2011. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer.; Пушкарь Д.Ю., Верткин А.Л., Гамидов С.И. Эректильная дисфункция. М.: Ремедиум, 2010.; EAU Guides 2010. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: Erectile Dysfunction and Premature Ejaculation.; Коган М.И. Эректильная дисфункция. Ростов-на-Дону: Книга, 2005.; Male Sexual Dysfunction. Pathophysiology and treatment. Edited by Fouad R. Kandeel. New York−London: Informa Healthcar, 2007; Walsh P.C., Donker P.J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128(3):492−7.; Klotz L. Intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation during nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: how and when? Curr Opin Urol 2000;10:239−43.; Klotz L., Herschorn S. Early experience with intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy. Urology 1998; 52(4):537–42.; Klotz L., Hearton J., Jewett M. et al. A Randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000;164:1573−8.; Gianduzzo T.R., Colombo J.R., El-Gabry E. et al. Anatomical and electrophysiological assessment of the canine periprostatic neurovascular anatomy: perspectives as a nerve sparing radical prostatectomy model. J Urol 2008; 179(5):2025−9.; Walsh P.C., Marschke P., Catalona W.J. et al. Efficacy of first-generation CaverMap to verify location and function of cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional evaluation by experienced surgeons. Urology 2001; 57:491−4.; Kurokawa K., Suzuki T., Suzuki K. et al. Preliminary results of a monitoring system to confirm the preservation of cavernous nerves. Int J Urol 2003;10:136−40.; Велиев Е.И., Голубцова Е.Н., Котов С.В. Восстановление удержания мочи у пациентов после радикальной позадилонной простатэктомии: роль нервосберегающей техники. Урология 2011;(3):68−71.; Takenaka A., Tewari A., Hara R. et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. J Urol 2007;177(1):225–9.; Fried N.M., Rais-Bahrami S., Lagoda G.A. et al. Identification and imaging of the nerves responsible for erectile function in rat prostate, in vivo, using optical nerve stimulation and optical coherence tomography. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 2007;13:1641–5.; Fried N.M., Lagoda G.A., Scott N.J. et al. Laser stimulation of the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate, in vivo: Optimization of wavelength, pulse energy, and pulse repetition rate. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008. EMBS 2008. 30th Ann IntConference of the IEEE Aug 2008; p. 2777–80.; Nandipati K.C., Raina R., Agarwal A., Zippe C.D. Erectile dysfunction following radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacological management. Drugs & Aging. 2006;23(2):101−17.; Marcelo A.O., Rafael F.C., Sanket C. et al. Erectile dysfunction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010;10(5):747−54.; Leventis A.K., Shariat S.F., Utsunomiya T., Slawin K.M. Characteristics of normal prostate vascular anatomy as displayed by power Doppler. Prostate 2001; 46:281–8.; Ukimura O., Gill I.S., Desai M.M. et al. Real-time transrectal ultrasonograthy during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004;172: 112–8.; Han M. Ultrasound-guided navigation in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Johns Hopkins University. Interventional Study. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00956904 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT00956904; Коган М.И., Белоусов И.И., Болоцков А.С. Артериальный кровоток в простате при синдроме хронической тазовой боли/хроническом простатите. Урология 2011;(3):22−8.; Davila H.H., Mamcarz M., Nadelhaft I. et al. Visualization of the neurovascular bundles and major pelvic ganglion with fluorescent tracers after penile injection in the rat. BJU Int 2007;101:1048−51.; Boyette L.B., Reardon M.A., Mirelman A.J. et al. Fiberoptic imaging of cavernous nerves in vivo. J Urol 2007; 178:2694−700.; Rais-Bahrami S., Levinson A.W., Fried N.M. et al. Optical coherence tomography of cavernous nerves: a step toward real-time intraoperative imaging during nerve-sparing radical prostat ectomy. Urology 2008; 72(1):198–204.; Fried N.M., Rais-Bahrami S., Lagoda G.A. et al. Imaging the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate using optical coherence tomography. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2006;39:36–41.; Aron M., Chung B.E. et al. Preliminary experience with the Niris™ optical coherence tomography system during laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2007;21(8):814−8.; Gelikonov V.M., Gelikonov G.V. New approach to cross-polarized optical coherence tomography based on orthogonal arbitrarily polarized modes. Laser Physics Letters 2006; 3(9):445−51.; Ледяев Д.С., Атдуев В.А., Загайнова Е.В. и др. Интраоперационная визуализация кавернозного нерва с использованием оптической когерентной томографии. Предварительные результаты. Медицинский альманах. Спецвыпуск. II Международная научно-практическая конференция хирургов и урологов. Тезисы. Май 2008; с. 210−2.; Атдуев В.А., Загайнова Е.В., Ледяев Д.С. и др. Интраоперационная визуализация элементов нервно-сосудистого пучка при радикальной цистэктомии и радикальной простатэктомии. Патент РФ № 2375962 Бюллетень: Изобретения. Полезные модели 2009; 35 (II ч.); c. 492.; Masaki F., Isao T., Riko K. et al. Cavernous nerve graft reconstruction using an autologous nerve guide to restore potency. BJU Int%7C2007;100: 1107–9.; Mancuso P., Rashid P. Nerve grafting at the time of radical prostatectomy: Should We Be Doing It? J Surg 2008;78:859–63.; Turkof E., Wulkersdorfer B., Bukaty A. Reconstruction of cavernous nerves by nerve grafts to restore potency: contemporary review of technical principles and basic anatomy. Curr Opin Urol 2006;16:401−6.; Kim E.D., Scardino P.T., Hampel O. et al. Interposition of sural nerve restores function of cavernous nerves resected during radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1999;161:188−92.; Mikio S., Hiroyuki T. Yoshiyuki K. Health-related quality of life evaluation in patients undergoing cavernous nerve reconstruction during radical prostatectomy. Japan J Clin Oncol 2009 39(10):671−6.; https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/191

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/191
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-1-109-112

View record from BASE

15

Academic Journal