Showing 1 - 20 results of 189 for search '"НАЛОГОВАЯ ОПТИМИЗАЦИЯ"', query time: 0.90s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    Source: Vestnik of Brest State Technical University; No. 2(137) (2025): Vestnik of Brest State Technical University; 188-194
    Вестник Брестского государственного технического университета; № 2(137) (2025): Вестник Брестского государственного технического университета; 188-194

    File Description: application/pdf

  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
    Academic Journal

    Contributors: The article was prepared at the expense of the grant from the Russian Scientific Foundation № 23-28-01690, https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-01690/., Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 23-28-01690, https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-01690/.

    Source: MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research); Том 15, № 4 (2024); 607-624 ; МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие); Том 15, № 4 (2024); 607-624 ; 2411-796X ; 2079-4665 ; 10.18184//2079-4665.2024.15.4

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/1779/1051; Laffer A. Government exactions and revenue deficiencies // Cato Journal. 1981. Vol. 1. Р. 1–21. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Government-Exactions-and-Revenue-Deficiencies-Laffer/fbc6de4968de3836d9a71f83ba844feb4e8e7605#related-papers (дата обращения: 24.03.2024); Povarova A.I. The issues of tax burden distribution in Russia’s economy // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2013. Vol. 6. Iss. 30. Р. 153–168. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tvmdyz; Shnaider E., Kandel A. A system for forecasting corporate-tax revenue based on fuzzy logic and fuzzy set theory // Information Sciences. 1992. Vol. 63. Iss. 1-2. Р. 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(92)90060-L; Kuo Y.-Y., Liang K.-Y. Human judgments in New York state sales and use tax forecasting // Journal of Forecasting. 2004. Vol. 23. Iss. 4. Р. 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.914; Rich R., Bram J., Haughwout A., Orr J., Rosen R., Sela R. Using regional economic indexes to forecast tax bases: evidence from New York // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2005. Vol. 87. Iss. 4. Р. 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465305775098215; Горский И.В. К проблеме налоговой нагрузки в России // Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2015. № 1. С. 127–133. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/rnzhjm; Лыкова Л.Н. Налоговое бремя в Российской экономике: избыточное или недостаточное // Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2014. № 3. С. 4–11. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/sfukfv; Барашева Т.И. Налоговое регулирование субъектов малого и среднего предпринимательства // Север и рынок: формирование экономического порядка. 2011. № 1(27). С. 146–150. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/nrbkip; Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Evaluation of Russian economic sectors’ sensitivity to tax burden // Journal of Tax Reform. 2020. Vol. 6. Iss. 2. Р. 157–179. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/glrhsv. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.2.080; Okafor L.E., Bhattacharya M., Apergis N. Bank credit, public financial incentives, tax financial incentives and export performance during the global financial crisis // The World Economy. 2019. Vol. 43. Iss. 1. Р. 114–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12848; Christensen R.C., Hearson M. The new politics of global tax governance: taking stock a decade after the financial crisis // Review of International Political Economy. 2019. Vol. 26. Iss. 5. Р. 1068–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625802; Ju J., Li L., Nie G., Shi K., Wei S.-J. Nonlinear capital flow tax: capital flow management and financial crisis prevention in China // China & World Economy. 2019. Vol. 27. Iss. 4. Р. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12284; Чернова Е.Г., Разманова С.В. Структурные сдвиги в нефтегазовой отрасли: ключевые факторы, индикаторы, последствия // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика. 2017. Т. 33. № 4. С. 622–640. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/lhpbvp. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu05.2017.406; Zhang F., Huang Y., Nan X. The price volatility of natural resource commodity and global economic policy uncertainty: Evidence from US economy // Resources Policy. 2022. Vol. 77. Р. 102724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102724; Hajiyev N., Abdullayeva S., Abdullayeva E. Financial stability strategies for oil companies amidst high volatility in the global oil products market // Energy Strategy Reviews. 2024. Vol. 53. Р. 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101377; Зайцев Ю.К., Лощенкова А.Н. Влияние санкций на выручку российских компаний // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2024. № 2(63). Р. 57–74. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tujrzc. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_2_57-74; Minabe N. The possible shapes of the production possibility curve under Cobb-Douglas production function: a comment // European Economic Review. 1982. Vol. 19. Iss. 2. Р. 395–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(82)80062-7; Biddle J. Retrospectives: the introduction of the Cobb-Douglas regression // Journal of economic perspectives. 2012. Vol. 26. Iss. 2. Р. 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.2.223; Muro K. A note on the three-sector Cobb-Douglas GDP function // Economic Modelling. 2013. Vol. 31. Р. 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.11.008; Cheng M.L., Han Y. A modified Cobb-Douglas production function model and its application // IMA Journal of Management Mathematics. 2014. Vol. 25. Iss. 3. Р. 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpt012; Shen Z., Hassani A., Shi Q. Multi-objective time-cost optimization using Cobb-Douglas production function and hybrid genetic algorithm // Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2016. Vol. 22. Iss. 2. Р. 187– 198. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.897966; Kaplanoglou G., Rapanos V., Daskalakis N. Tax compliance behaviour during the crisis: the case of Greek SMEs // European Journal of Law and Economics. 2016. Vol. 42. Р. 405–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-016-9547-y; Buettner T., Kauder B. Political biases despite external expert participation? An empirical analysis of tax revenue forecasts in Germany // Public Choice. 2015. Vol. 164. Р. 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0279-2; Jochimsen B., Lehmann R. On the political economy of national tax revenue forecasts: evidence from OECD countries // Public Choice. 2017. Vol. 170. Р. 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0391-y; Fisher L.A., Kingston N. Improved forecasts of tax revenue via the permanent income hypothesis // Australian Economic Review. 2017. Vol. 50. Iss. 1. Р. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12198; Tanzer E.P. The effect on housing quality of reducing the structure tax rate // Journal of Urban Economics. 1985. Vol. 17. Iss. 3. Р. 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(85)90053-1; Zellner A., Ngoie J.K. Evaluation of the effects of reduced personal and corporate tax rates on the growth rates of the U.S. economy // Econometric Reviews. 2012. Vol. 34. Iss. 1-2. Р. 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.944468; Malliaris A.G., Malliaris M. What microeconomic fundamentals drove global oil prices during 1986–2020? // Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2021. Vol. 14. Iss. 8. Р. 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080391; Алехин Б.И. Нефть и рубль: коллапс коинтеграции // Финансовый журнал. 2021. Т. 13. № 1. С. 58–74. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/kmvvzp. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2021-1-58-74; Zhou S., Zhou P., Ji H. Can digital transformation alleviate corporate tax stickiness: The mediation effect of tax avoidance // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022. Vol. 184. Р. 122028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122028

  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20