Showing 1 - 20 results of 45 for search '"НАБЛЮДАТЕЛЬНОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ"', query time: 0.72s Refine Results
  1. 1
    Academic Journal

    Contributors: The investigation has not been sponsored, Исследование не имело спонсорской поддержки

    Source: Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics; Vol 16 (2024): (Suppl. 2); 44-50 ; Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика; Vol 16 (2024): (Suppl. 2); 44-50 ; 2310-1342 ; 2074-2711 ; 10.14412/2074-2711-2024-0

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://nnp.ima-press.net/nnp/article/view/2315/1689; Ward M, Goldman MD. Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2022 Aug 1;28(4):988-1005. doi:10.1212/CON.0000000000001136; Hedegaard CJ, Krakauer M, Bendtzen K, et al. T helper cell type 1 (Th1), Th2 and Th17 responses to myelin basic protein and disease activity in multiple sclerosis. Immunology. 2008 Oct;125(2):161-9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02837.x. Epub 2008 Apr 4. Erratum in: Immunology. 2008 Nov;125(3):438.; Denic A, Wootla B, Rodriguez M. CD8(+) T cells in multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013 Sep;17(9):1053-66. Jul 6.; Kumar G, Axtell RC. Dual Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 25;24(3):2336. doi:10.3390/ijms24032336; Kappos L, Hartung HP, Freedman MS, et al; ATAMS Study Group. Atacicept in multiple sclerosis (ATAMS): a randomised, placebocontrolled, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):353-63. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70028-6. Epub 2014 Mar 6.; Yang L, Zhou R, Tong Y, et al. Neuroprotection by dihydrotestosterone in LPS-induced neuroinflammation. Neurobiol Dis. 2020 Jul;140:104814. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104814. Epub 2020 Feb 19.; Costa-Frossard L. Real-life clinical practice studies in multiple sclerosis. Farm Hosp. 2021 Mar 8;45(2):51-2. doi:10.7399/fh.11663; Fox RJ, Mehta R, Pham T, et al. Real-world disease-modifying therapy pathways from administrative claims data in patients with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):211. doi:10.1186/s12883-022-02738-7; Kraus SH, Luessi F, Trinschek B, et al. Cladribine exerts an immunomodulatory effect on human and murine dendritic cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2014 Feb;18(2):347-57. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2013.11.027. Epub 2013 Dec 5.; Kopadze T, Döbert M, Leussink VI, et al. Cladribine impedes in vitro migration for treating multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2009 Mar;16(3):409-12. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02433.x; Sipe JC. Cladribine for multiple sclerosis: review and current status. Expert Rev Neurother. 2005 Nov;5(6):721-7. doi:10.1586/14737175.5.6.721; Kopadze T, Döbert M, Leussink VI, et al. Cladribine impedes in vitro migration of mononuclear cells: a possible implication Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Nov;46:102572. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2020.102572. Epub 2020 Oct 8.19. Freedman MS, Leist TP, Comi G, et al. The efficacy of cladribine tablets in CIS patients retrospectively assigned the diagnosis of MS using modern criteria: Results from the; Jorgensen LO, Hyrlov KH, Elkjaer ML, et al. Cladribine modifies functional properties of microglia. Clin Exp Immunol. 2020 Sep;201(3):328-40. doi:10.1111/cei.13473. Epub 2020 Jul 6.; Giovannoni G. Cladribine to Treat Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Oct;14(4):874-87.; Giovannoni G, Comi G, Cook S, et al; CLARITY Study Group. A placebo-controlled trial of oral cladribine for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):416-26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0902533. Epub 2010 Jan 20.; Leist TP, Comi G, Cree BA, et al; Oral Cladribine for Early MS (ORACLE MS) Study Group. Effect of oral cladribine on time to conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with a first demyelinating event (ORACLE MS): a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Mar;13(3):257-67. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70005-5. Epub 2014 Feb 4.; Giovannoni G, Soelberg Sorensen P, Cook S, et al. Safety and efficacy of cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Results from the randomized extension trial of the CLARITY study. Mult Scler. 2018 Oct;24(12):1594-604. doi:10.1177/1352458517727603. Epub 2017 Sep 5.; Giovannoni G, Soelberg Sorensen P, Cook S, et al. Efficacy of Cladribine Tablets in high disease activity subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A post hoc analysis of the CLARITY study. Mult Scler. 2019 May;25(6):819-27. doi:10.1177/1352458518771875. Epub 2018 May 2.; Leist T, Cook S, Comi G, et al. Long-term safety data from the cladribine tablets clinical development program in multiple sclerosis. Mult ORACLE-MS study. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Oct 9;3(4):2055217317732802. doi:10.1177/2055217317732802; Boyko AN, Boyko OV. Cladribine tablets' potential role as a key example of selective immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2018 May 3;8:35-44. doi:10.2147/DNND.S161450; Giovannoni G, Boyko A, Correale J, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis from the CLARITY / CLARITY Extension cohort of CLASSIC-MS: An ambispective study. Mult Scler. 2023 May;29(6):719-30. doi:10.1177/13524585231161494. Epub 2023 Apr 3.; Giovannoni G, Boyko A, Correale J, et al. A plain language summary on assessing the long-term effectiveness of cladribine tablets in people living with relapsing multiple sclerosis: The CLASSIC-MS study. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2023 Oct;13(5):261-68. doi:10.2217/nmt-2023-0018. Epub 2023 Aug 3.; Rammohan K, Coyle PK, Sylvester E, et al. The Development of Cladribine Tablets for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Review. Drugs. 2020 Dec;80(18):1901-28. doi:10.1007/s40265-020-01422-9; Nabizadeh F, Mohamadi M, Rahmani S, et al. Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2023 Sep;44(9):3045-57. doi:10.1007/s10072-023-06794-w. Epub 2023 Apr 17.; Clavelou P, Castelnovo G, Pourcher V, et al. Expert Narrative Review of the Safety of Cladribine Tablets for the Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1457-76. doi:10.1007/s40120-023-00496-3. Epub 2023 Jun 29. Erratum in: Neurol Ther. 2024 Feb;13(1):255-6. doi:10.1007/s40120-023-00564-8; Pfeuffer S, Rolfes L, Hackert J, et al. Effectiveness and safety of cladribine in MS: Real-world experience from two tertiary centres. Mult Scler. 2022 Feb;28(2):257-68. doi:10.1177/13524585211012227. Epub 2021 May 12.; Zhong M, van der Walt A, Monif M, et al. Prediction of relapse activity when switching to cladribine for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2023 Jan;29(1):119-29. doi:10.1177/13524585221111677. Epub 2022 Jul 27.; Spelman T, Ozakbas S, Alroughani R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus other oral disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: Results from MSBase registry. Mult Scler. 2023 Feb;29(2):221-35. doi:10.1177/13524585221137502. Epub 2022 Nov 26.; Sorensen PS, Pontieri L, Joensen H, et al. Real-world experience of cladribine treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A Danish nationwide study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Feb;70:104491. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.104491. Epub 2022 Dec 28.; Stepien A, Pogoda-Wesolowska A, Tokarz-Kupczyk E, et al. Cladribine tablets for highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Poland: a real-world, multi-centre, retrospective, cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2023;57(4):371-8. doi:10.5603/PJNNS.a2023.0050. Epub 2023 Jul 25.; Rauma I, Viitala M, Kuusisto H, et al. Finnish multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine tablets: a nationwide registry study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 May;61:103755. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.103755. Epub 2022 Mar 19.; Magalashvili D, Mandel M, Dreyer-Alster S, et al. Cladribine treatment for highly active multiple sclerosis: Real-world clinical outcomes for years 3 and 4. J Neuroimmunol. 2022 Nov 15;372:577966. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2022.577966. Epub 2022 Sep 6.; Brownlee W, Amin A, Ashton L, Herbert A. Real-world use of cladribine tablets (completion rates and treatment persistence) in patients with multiple sclerosis in England: The CLARENCE study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Nov;79:104951. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2023.104951. Epub 2023 Aug 21.; Aerts S, Khan H, Severijns D, et al. Safety and effectiveness of cladribine tablets for multiple sclerosis: Results from a single-center realworld cohort. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Jul;75:104735. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2023.104735. Epub 2023 Apr 25.; Santos M, Sequeira J, Abreu P, et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Cladribine in Multiple Sclerosis: Real-World Clinical Experience From 5 Tertiary Hospitals in Portugal. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2023 May-Jun 01;46(3):105-11. doi:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000552. Epub 2023 Apr 11.; Zhu C, Kalincik T, Horakova D, et al; MSBase Study Group. Comparison Between Dimethyl Fumarate, Fingolimod, and Ocrelizumab After Natalizumab Cessation. JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):739-48. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1542; Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G, et al; OPERA I and OPERA II Clinical Investigators. Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-34. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1601277. Epub 2016 Dec 21.; Oreja-Guevara C, Brownlee W, Celius EG, et al. Expert opinion on the long-term use of cladribine tablets for multiple sclerosis: Systematic literature review of real-world evidence. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Jan;69:104459. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.104459. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

  2. 2
    Academic Journal

    Source: Modern Rheumatology Journal; Том 17, № 4 (2023); 57-63 ; Современная ревматология; Том 17, № 4 (2023); 57-63 ; 2310-158X ; 1996-7012

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/1460/1385; Goh NS, Desai SR, Veeraraghavan S, et al. Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: a simple staging system. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun 1;177(11):1248-54. doi:10.1164/rccm.200706-877OC. Epub 2008 Mar 27.; Bergamasco A, Hartmann N, Wallace L, Verpillat P. Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 18; 11:257-273. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S191418. eCollection 2019.; Steele R, Hudson M, Lo E, Baron M; Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. Clinical decision rule to predict the presence of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr; 64(4):519-24. doi:10.1002/acr.21583.; Lumetti F, Barone L, Alfieri C, et al. Quality of life and functional disability in patients with interstitial lung disease related to Systemic Sclerosis. Acta Biomed. 2015 Sep 14; 86(2):142-8.; Zhou Z, Fan Y, Thomason D, et al. Eco-nomic Burden of Illness Among Commercially Insured Patients with Systemic Sclerosis with Interstitial Lung Disease in the USA: A Claims Data Analysis. Adv Ther. 2019 May; 36(5):1100-1113. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-00929-2. Epub 2019 Mar 30.; Tyndall AJ, Bannert B, Vonk M, et al. Causes and risk factors for death in systemic sclerosis: a study from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Oct;69(10):1809-15. doi:10.1136/ard.2009.114264. Epub 2010 Jun 15.; Aragona CO, Versace AG, Ioppolo C, et al. Emerging Evidence and Treatment Perspectives from Randomized Clinical Trials in Systemic Sclerosis: Focus on Interstitial Lung Disease. Biomedicines. 2022 Feb 21;10(2):504. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10020504.; Van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Nov;65(11):2737-47. doi:10.1002/art.38098. Epub 2013 Oct 3.; Wittram C, Mark EJ, McLoud TC. CT-histologic correlation of the ATS/ERS 2002 classification of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Radiographics. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5): 1057-71. doi:10.1148/rg.235035702.; Suliman YA, Dobrota R, Huscher D, et al. Brief Report: Pulmonary Function Tests: High Rate of False-Negative Results in the Early Detection and Screening of Scleroderma-Related Interstitial Lung Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;67(12):3256-61. doi:10.1002/art.39405.; Rutka K, Garkowski A, Karaszewska K, tebkowska U. Imaging in Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 12;10(2):248. doi:10.3390/jcm10020248.; Ананьева ЛП, Александрова ЕН. Аутоантитела при системной склеродермии: спектр, клинические ассоциации и прогностическое значение. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2016;54(1):86-99.; Yang C, Tang S, Zhu D, et al. Classical Disease-Specific Autoantibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: Clinical Features, Gene Susceptibility, and Disease Stratification. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 19;7:587773. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.587773. eCollection 2020.; Stochmal A, Czuwara J, Trojanowska M, Rudnicka L. Antinuclear Antibodies in Systemic Sclerosis: an Update. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2020 Feb;58(1):40-51. doi:10.1007/s12016-018-8718-8.

  3. 3
    Academic Journal

    Source: Modern Rheumatology Journal; Том 17, № 2 (2023); 57-64 ; Современная ревматология; Том 17, № 2 (2023); 57-64 ; 2310-158X ; 1996-7012

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://mrj.ima-press.net/mrj/article/view/1410/1341; Hunter DJ, March L, Chew M. Osteoarthritis in 2020 and beyond: a Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020 Nov 28;396(10264): 1711-2. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32230-3. Epub 2020 Nov 4.; Ackerman IN, Kemp JL, Crossley KM, et al. Hip and knee osteoarthritis affects younger people, too. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Feb;47(2):67-79. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7286.; GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.; https://ourworldindata.org/burdenof-disease; Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Smith E, et al. Global, regional and national burden of osteoarthritis 1990-2017: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):819-28. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216515. Epub 2020 May 12.; Cleveland RJ, Alvarez C, Schwartz TA, et al. The impact of painful knee osteoarthritis on mortality: a community-based cohort study with over 24 years of follow-up. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Apr 1;27(4):593e602. doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.12.008.; Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, et al. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum.2012 Jun;64(6):1697e707. doi:10.1002/art.34453.; BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326791.; https://www.medtran.ru/rus/trials/clinicaltrials.htm; Wang D, Bakhai A. Clinical trials. A practical guide to design, analysis and reporting. London; 2006. 480 p.; Bruyere O, Honvo G, Veronese N, et al. An updated algorithm recommendation for the management of knee osteoarthritis from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Apr 30. pii: S0049-0172(19)30043-5. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.04.008.; Yang W, Sun C, He SQ, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Disease-Modifying Osteoarthritis Drugs for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis — a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7): 2085-93. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06755-z. Epub 2021 Apr 12.; Chen C, Guo-Feng B, Guanhua X , et al. Altered Wnt and NF-κB Signaling in Facet Joint Osteoarthritis: Insights from RNA Deep Sequencing. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2018 May; 245(1):69-77. doi:10.1620/tjem.245.69.; Loeser RF, Collins JA, Diekman BO. Ageing and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;12(7):412-20. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.65. Epub 2016 May 19.; Олариу Л, Димитриу Б, Мануэла Эне Д и др. In vitro влияние препарата Алфлутоп на механизмы развития остеоартрита. Вестник Академии румынских ученых. 2017;(6)1:82-99.; Каратеев АЕ. Биоактивный концентрат мелкой морской рыбы: оценка эффективности и безопасности препарата на основании анализа 37 клинических исследований. Современная ревматология. 2020; 14(4);111-24. doi:10.14412/1996-7012-2020-4-111-124.; Алексеева ЛИ, Шарапова ЕП, Таскина ЕА и др. Многоцентровое слепое рандомизированное плацебо-контролируемое исследование симптоми структурно-модифицирующего действия препарата Алфлутоп у больных остеоартрозом коленных суставов. Сообщение 1 – оценка симптоммодифицирующего действия препарата. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2013; 51(5);532-8.; Алексеева ЛИ, Шарапова ЕП, Таскина ЕА и др. Многоцентровое слепое рандомизированное плацебоконтролируемое исследование симптоми структурно-модифицирующего действия препарата Алфлутоп у больных остеоартрозом коленных суставов. Сообщение 2 – оценка структурно-модифицирующего действия препарата. Научно-практическая ревматология. 2014;52(2);174-7.

  4. 4
    Academic Journal

    Contributors: Разработка дизайна исследования, сопровождение и финансовая поддержка исследования осуществлялись компанией AbbVie. Компания AbbVie принимала участие в интерпретации данных, обзоре и утверждении публикации.

    Source: Journal Infectology; Том 15, № 2 (2023); 47-59 ; Журнал инфектологии; Том 15, № 2 (2023); 47-59 ; 2072-6732 ; 10.22625/2072-6732-2023-15-2

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://journal.niidi.ru/jofin/article/view/1503/1058; Blach S. Global status update on the HCV prevalence and cascade of care entering 2020. AASLD meeting; 2021 Nov 12-15: abstract 100.; Hoofnagle JH. Course and outcome of hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2002; 36 (1): 21-9.; Di Bisceglie AM. Natural history of hepatitis C: its impact on clinical management. Hepatology. 2000; 31: 1014-8.; Keikha M, Eslami M, Yousefi B, Ali-Hassanzadeh M, Kamali A, Yousefi M, et al. HCV genotypes and their determinative role in hepatitis C treatment. VirusDisease. 2020; 31(3): 235-240.; Smith DB, Bukh J, Kuiken C, Muerhoff AS, Rice CM, Stapleton JT, et al. Expanded classification of hepatitis C virus into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes: updated criteria and genotype assignment web resource. Hepatology. 2014; 59 (1): 318-27.; Чуланов, В.П. Промежуточные результаты международного многоцентрового проспективного наблюдательного исследования «MOSAIC» по оценке эпидемиологии, субъективных и экономических исходов лечения хронического вирусного гепатита С / В.П. Чуланов [и др.] // Инфекционные болезни. – 2018. – № 16(1). – С. 5–14.; Dhiman RK, Grover GS, Premkumar M, Taneja S, Duseja A, Rathi S, et al. Direct-acting antiviral therapy is safe and effective in pediatric chronic hepatitis C: the public health perspective. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2019; 68(1): 74-80.; AASLD-IDSA HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C guidance 2018 update: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C virus infection. Clinical infectious diseases. 2018; 67(10): 1477-92.; Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380: 2095-128.; Chen SL, Morgan TR. The natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) Infection. Int J Med Sci. 2006; 3 (2): 47-52.; Fried MW, Shiffman M, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Gonçales Jr FL, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347 (13): 975-82.; Manns M, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, et al. PegInterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2001; 358: 958-65.; Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H Jr, Morgan TR, Balan V, Diago M, Marcellin P, et al. Peginterferon-alpha 2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140 (5): 346-55.; Mubashir S, Gul I, Rashool A, Gul S, Gulzar GM, Wani MA. Side effect profile of hepatitis C treatment with peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavarin. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 2017; 6(7): 1-8.; Kowdley KV, Gordon SC, Reddy KR, Rossaro L, Bernstein DE, Lawitz E, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(20):1879-88.; Bourlière M, Bronowicki JP, de Ledinghen V, Hézode C, Zoulim F, Mathurin P, et al. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin to treat patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis non-responsive to previous protease-inhibitor therapy: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial (SIRIUS). The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2015;15(4):397-404.; Ioannou GN, Beste LA, Chang MF, Green PK, Lowy E, Tsui JI, et al. Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir, or Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Ombitasvir and Dasabuvir Regimens for Treatment of Patients With Hepatitis C in the Veterans Affairs National Health Care System. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(3):457-471.; Liu X, Hu P. Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with chronic HCV infection. Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology. 2021; 9(1): 125-132.; Berg T, Naumann U, Stoehr A, Sick C, John C, Teuber G, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/ pibrentasvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection: data from the German Hepatitis C Registry. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2019; 49(8): 1052-1059.; Liu CH, Liu CJ, Hung CC, Hsieh SM, Su TH, Sun H, et al. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: Real-world effectiveness and safety in Taiwan. Liver International. 2020; 40(4): 758-768.; Sugiura A, Joshita S, Yamashita Y, Yamazaki T, Fujimori N, Kimura T, et al. Effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for hepatitis C: real-world experience and clinical features of retreatment cases. Biomedicines. 2020; 8(74): 1-11.; D’Ambrosio R, Pasulo L, Puoti M, Vinci M, Schiavini M, Lazzaroni S, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in 723 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Journal of hepatology. 2019; 70(3): 379-387.; Wyles DL, Poordad F, Wang S, Alric L, Felizarta F, Kwo P, et al. SURVEYOR-II, Part 3: Efficacy and Safety of ABT-493/ABT-530 in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 3 Infection with Prior Treatment Experience and/or Cirrhosis. Independent reporting on 67 th AASLD. 2016 Nov 11-15: abstract 113.; Forns X, Lee S, Valdes J, Lens S, Ghalib R, Aguilar H, et al. Glecaprevir plus pibrentasvir for chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6 infection in adults with compensated cirrhosis (EXPEDITION-1): a single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2017; 17(10): 1062-1068.; Zeuzem S, Feld JJ, Wang S, Bourliere M, Wedemeyer H, Gane EJ, et al. ENDURANCE-1: Efficacy and Safety of 8-versus12-week Treatment with ABT-493/ABT-530 in patients with Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Infection. Independent reporting on 67 th AASLD. 2016 Nov 11-15: abstract 253.; Asselah T, Kowdley KV, Zadeikis N, Wang S, Hassanein T, Horsmans Y, et al. Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 Infection Without Cirrhosis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2018; 16(3): 417–426.; Foster GR, Gane E, Asatryan A, Asselah T, Ruane PJ, Pol S, et al. ENDURANCE-3: safety and efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir compared to sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir in treatmentnaïve HCV genotype 3-infected patients without cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2017; 66 (suppl 1): abstract GS-007.; Rockstroh JK, Lacombe K, Viani RM, Orkin C, Wyles D, Luetkemeyer AF et al. Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus type 1: the EXPEDITION-2 study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018; 67(7): 1010-1017.; Persico M, Aglitti A, Milella M, Coppola C, Messina V, Claar E, et al. Real-life glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in a large cohort of patients with hepatitis C virus infection: The MISTRAL study. Liver International. 2019; 39(10): 1852-1859.; Dufour JF, Zuckerman E, Zadeikis N, Hezode C, Paik SW, Andreone P, et al. Safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in adults with chronic genotype 1–6 hepatitis C virus infection: an integrated analysis. 52 nd Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver. 2017 Apr 19-23: abstract FRI-238.; https://journal.niidi.ru/jofin/article/view/1503

  5. 5
    Academic Journal

    Source: Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention; Том 21, № 5 (2022); 29-37 ; Эпидемиология и Вакцинопрофилактика; Том 21, № 5 (2022); 29-37 ; 2619-0494 ; 2073-3046

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.epidemvac.ru/jour/article/view/1672/873; Logunov D.Y., Dolzhikova I.V., Shcheblyakov D.V., et al. Gam-COVID-Vac Vaccine Trial Group. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia // Lancet. 2021. Vol. 397, № 10275. P. 671–681. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00234-8; González S., Olszevicki S., Salazar M., et al. Effectiveness of the first component of Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) on reduction of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infections, hospitalisations and mortality in patients aged 60-79: a retrospective cohort study in Argentina. EClinicalMedicine. 2021. Vol. 40. P. 101126. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101126; Rearte A., Castelli J.M., Rearte R., et al. Effectiveness of rAd26-rAd5, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and BBIBP-CorV vaccines for risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and death due to COVID-19 in people older than 60 years in Argentina: a test-negative, case-control, and retrospective longitudinal study. Lancet. 2022. Vol. 399, № 10331. P. 1254–1264. doi:0.1016/S0140-6736(22)00011-3; Vokó Z., Kiss Z., Surján G., et al. Nationwide effectiveness of five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Hungary-the HUN-VE study // Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 398–404. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.011; Petrović V., Vuković V., Patić A., et al. Immunogenicity of BNT162b2, BBIBP-CorV and Gam-COVID-Vac vaccines and immunity after natural SARS-CoV-2 infection-A comparative study from Novi Sad, Serbia // PLoS One. 2022. Vol. 17, № 2. P. e0263468. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263468; Matveeva O., Ershov A. Retrospective Cohort Study of the Effectiveness of the Sputnik V and EpiVacCorona Vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant in Moscow (June–July 2021). Vaccines. 2022. Vol. 10, № 7. P. 984. doi:10.3390/vaccines10070984; Рыжиков А. Б., Рыжиков Е. А., Богрянцева М. П. и др. Простое слепое плацебо-контролируемое рандомизированное исследование безопасности, реактогенности и иммуногенности вакцины «ЭпиВакКорона» для профилактики COVID-19 на добровольцах в возрасте 18–60 лет (фаза I–II). Инфекция и иммунитет. 2021. Т. 11. №. 2. С. 283–296. doi:10.15789/2220-7619ASB-1699; Kozlovskaya L.I., Piniaeva A.N., Ignatyev G.M., et al. Long-term humoral immunogenicity, safety and protective efficacy of inactivated vaccine against COVID-19 (CoviVac) in preclinical studies // Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 1790–1806. doi:10.1080/22221751.2021.1971569; Bagrov D.V., Glukhov G.S., Moiseenko A.V., et al. Structural characterization of β-propiolactone inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) particles. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022. Vol. 85, № 2. P. 562–569. doi:10.1002/jemt.23931; Ishmukhametov A.A., Siniugina A.A., Yagovkina N.V., et al. Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated whole virion vaccine CoviVac against COVID-19: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled phase I/II clinical trial. Medrxiv. 2022. doi:10.1101/2022.02.08.22270658; Korang S.K., von Rohden E., Veroniki A.A., et al. Vaccines to prevent COVID-19: A living systematic review with Trial Sequential Analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials // PLoS One. 2022. Vol. 17, № 1. P. e0260733. doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01516-1; Shah S., Gui H., Chua P.E.Y., et al. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intent in Singapore, Australia and Hong Kong // Vaccine. 2022. Vol. 40, № 21. P. 2949–2959. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.062; Falahi S., Kenarkoohi A. Host factors and vaccine efficacy: Implications for COVID-19 vaccines. J. Med. Virol. 2022. Vol. 94, № 4. P. 1330–1335. doi:10.1002/jmv.27485; Su Z., Cheshmehzangi A., McDonnell D., et al. Gender inequality and health disparity amid COVID-19 // Nurs. Outlook. 2022. Vol. 70, № 1. P. 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2021.08.004; Жидкова Е. А., Гутор Э. М., Вильк М. Ф. и др. Изучение позиции к здоровью и здоровому образу жизни у работников железнодорожной отрасли. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины. 2021. Т. 29, № S2. С. 1350–1357. doi:10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-s2-1350-1357; Xiao J., Cheung J.K., Wu P., et al. Temporal changes in factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among adults in Hong Kong: Serial cross-sectional surveys. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022. Vol. 23. P. 100441. doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100441; Жидкова Е. А., Костенко Н. А., Горяев А. А., Гуревич К. Г. Особенности заболеваемости и течения COVID-19 у сотрудников ЧУЗ ОАО «РЖД». Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2021. Т. 61, № 8. С. 534–539. doi:10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-8-534-539; https://www.epidemvac.ru/jour/article/view/1672

  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
    Academic Journal

    File Description: application/pdf

  12. 12
    Academic Journal

    Source: Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology; Vol 15, No 5 (2019); 641-648 ; Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии; Vol 15, No 5 (2019); 641-648 ; 2225-3653 ; 1819-6446

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.rpcardio.com/jour/article/view/2033/1863; Kim S.Y. Efficacy versus effectiveness. Korean J Fam Med. 2013;34(4):227. DOI:10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.4.227.; IONA Study Group. Trial to show the impact of nicorandil in angina (IONA): design, methodology, and management. Heart. 2001;85(6):E9. DOI:10.1136/heart.85.6.e9.; The IONA Study Group. Effect of nicorandil on coronary events in patients with stable angina: the Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina (IONA): randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9314):1269-75. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08265-X.; Japanese Coronary Artery Disease (JCAD) Study Investigators. Current status of the background of patients with coronary artery disease in Japan. Circ J. 2006;70(10):1256-62. DOI:10.1253/circj.70.1256.; Sakata Y., Nakatani D., Shimizu M., et al. Oral treatment with nicorandil at discharge is associated with reduced mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Cardiology. 2012;59(1):14-21. DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2011.08.001.; Марцевич С.Ю., Лукина Ю.В., Кутишенко Н.П., и др. Наблюдательное многоцентровое исследование применения никорандила у больных стабильной ишемической болезнью сердца с высоким сердечно-сосудистым риском (НИКЕЯ): дизайн, первые результаты. Российский Кардиологический Журнал. 2017;(9):75-82. DOI:10.15829/1560-4071-2017-9-75-82.; Марцевич С.Ю., Лукина Ю.В., Кутишенко Н.П., и др. Первые результаты оценки влияния длительного применения никорандила на вероятность возникновения сердечно-сосудистых осложнений у больных стабильной ишемической болезнью сердца (данные наблюдательного исследования НИКЕЯ). Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии. 2019;15(3):335-42. DOI:10.20996/1819-6446-2019-15-3-335-342.; Марцевич С.Ю., Кутишенко Н.П., Толпыгина С.Н., и др. Эффективность и безопасность лекарственной терапии при первичной и вторичной профилактике сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. Рекомендации ВНОК. Рациональная Фармакотерапия в Кардиологии. 2011;7(5):6-14. DOI:10.20996/1819-6446-2011-7-5.; Sherman R.E., Anderson S.A., Dal Pan G.J., et al. Real-World-Evidence - what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2293-7. DOI:10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.; Trentino K., Farmer S., Gross I., et al. Observational studies - should we simply ignore them in assessing transfusion outcomes? BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):96. DOI:10.1186/s12871-016-0264-4.; Faraoni D., Schaefer S.T. Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together? BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):102. DOI:10.1186/s12871-016-0265-3.; Kim H.S., Lee S., Kim J.H. Real-world Evidence versus Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical Research Based on Electronic Medical Records. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(34):e213. DOI:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e213.; Stuart B.L., Grebel L.E., Butler C.C., et al. Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(662):e643-e649. DOI:10.3399/bjgp17X692153.; Bolland M.J., Grey A., Gamble G.D., Reid I.R. Concordance of Results from Randomized and Observational Analyses within the Same Study: A Re-Analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Limited-Access Dataset. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139975. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139975.; Trotta F. Discrepancies between observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Focus Farmacovigilanza. 2012;73(11):1 [cited by Oct 01, 2019]. Available from: https://www.pharmaco-vigilance.eu/content/discrepancies-between-observational-studies-and-randomized-controlled-trials.; Singh S., Loke Y.K. Drug safety assessment in clinical trials: methodological challenges and opportunities. Trials. 2012;13:138. DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-138.; Naci H., Ioannidis J.P. How good is “evidence” from clinical studies of drug effects and why might such evidence fail in the prediction of the clinical utility of drugs? Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:169-89. DOI:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124614.; Лепахин В.К., Стуров Н.В., Астахова А.В. Методы выявления и регистрации неблагоприятных побочных реакций на лекарственные средства в период их широкого применения. Трудный Пациент. 2008;9:42-6.; Hammad T.A., Pinheiro S.P., Neyarapally G.A. Secondary use of randomized controlled trials to evaluate drug safety: a review of methodological considerations. Clin Trials. 2011;8(5):559-70. DOI:10.1177/1740774511419165.; https://www.rpcardio.com/jour/article/view/2033

  13. 13
  14. 14
    Academic Journal

    Source: Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice; № 2 (2012); 13-21 ; Качественная клиническая практика; № 2 (2012); 13-21 ; 2618-8473 ; 2588-0519

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/159/161; UKPDS Group . Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) // Lancet 1998; 352: 837–853.; American Diabetes Association. Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. // Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (Suppl. 1): S28–S32.; Clar C., Barnard K., Cummins E. et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: systematic review // Health Technol Assess. 2010;14(12):1-140 .; Fernandez A., Seligman H., Quan J. et al. Associations between aspects of culturally competent care and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes // Med Care. 2012; 50(Suppl. 2):S74-79.; Tricco A.C., Ivers N.M., Grimshaw J.M. et al. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Lancet. 2012; 379(9833):2252-2261.; Ягудина Р.И., Куликов А.Ю., Аринина Е.Е. Фармакоэкономика сахарного диабета . — М .: МИА . — 2011 . — 352с .; McIntosh B., Cameron C., Singh S.R. et al. Second-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis // Open Med. 2011;5(1):35-48.; Inzucchi S.E. et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach . Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) . Diabetologia (2012) 55:1577–1596 .; Guisasola A.F., Mavros P., Nocea G. et al. Glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in seven European countries: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) study // Diabetes Obes Metab. — 2008;10 (Suppl. 1):8-15.; Qiu Y., Fu A.Z., Radican L. Time to add-on medication use for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who failed metformin monotherapy // Value in Health. 2010; 13(7):A299.; Frenzel A., Reuter A. Learning from disease management programs: how medical treatments and quality of diabetic care (type II) in Germany are directly and indirectly improved by DMPS // Value in Health. 2010; 13(7):A300.; Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Аметов А.С. и др. Консенсус совета экспертов Российской Ассоциации эндокринологов (РАЭ) по инициации и интенсификации сахароснижающей терапии СД 2 типа // Сахарный диабет. 2011;4:6-17.; Шестакова М.В., Балан А. Терапия двухфазным инсулином аспарт 30/70 (НовоМикс® 30) улучшает гликемический контроль у пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2 типа: данные российской когорты пациентов наблюдательной программы IMPROVE™ — программы по изучению безопасности и эффективности двухфазного инсулина аспарт 30 в рутинной клинической практике // Сахарный диабет. 2010; 1: 92-100.; Аметов А.С. Сахарный диабет 2 типа . Проблемы и решения . — М .:ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2011 . — 704с .; Qayyum R., Bolen S., Maruthur N. et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes // Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(8):549-559.; Freeman J.S. Insulin analog therapy: improving the match with physiologic insulin secretion // J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009;109(1):26-36.; Strojek K., Bebakar W.M.W. Once-daily initiation with biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral drugs: an open-label, multinational RCT // Cur. Med. Research & Opinion. 2009;25(12):2887–2894.; Fernández Landó L., Massari F., Oviedo A., Jiang H. Starting an insulin regimen with insulin lispro mix 25 versus glargine insulin for type 2 diabetes // Medicina (B Aires). 2012;72(3):235-242.; Pollock R.F., Curtis B.H., Valentine W.J. A long-term analysis evaluating the cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin lispro mix 75/25 and mix 50/50 versus long-acting basal insulin analogs in the United States // J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):766-775.; Bell D.S. Insulin therapy in diabetes mellitus: how can the currently available injectable insulins be most prudently and efficaciously utilised? // Drugs. 2007;67(13):1813-1827.; Колбин А.С. Клинико-экономическое сравнение инсулина гларгин и инсулина премикс аспарт при сахарном диабете типа 2 // Качественная клиническая практика. 2009; (2):82-86.; Tibaldi J.M. Evolution of insulin development: focus on key parameters // Adv Ther. 2012;29(7):590-619.; Luzio S.D., Beck P., Owens D.R. Comparison of the subcutaneous absorption of insulin glargine (Lantus) and NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes // Horm Metab Res. 2003; 35:434–438.; Lepore M., Pampanelli S., Fanelli C. et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro // Diabetes. 2000; 49: 2142-2148.; Rosenstock J., Davies M., Home P.D. et al. A randomised, 52-week, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine when administered as add-on to glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes // Diabetologia. 2008;51(3):408-416.; Фармакоэкономика и фармакоэпидемиология — практика приемлемых решений . Ред . В .Б .Герасимов, А .Л .Хохлов, О .И .Карпов . — М .:Медицина, 2005 . — 352 с .; http://grls .rosminzdrav .ru по состоянию на 1 сентября 2012 г .; http://www .pharmvestnik .ru/calcs/drugs/ по состоянию на 1 сентября 2012 г .; Ягудина Р.И., Куликов А.Ю., Нгуен Т. Определение «порога готовности платить» в России, в Европейских странах и в странах СНГ // Современная фармакоэкономика и фармакоэпидемиология — 2011; 4(1):7-13.; Флетчер Р., Флетчер С., Вагнер Э. Клиническая эпидемиология . Основы доказательной медицины . — М .: Медицина . 1998 . — 352 с .; Liebl A., Prusty V., Valensi P. et al. Ten years of experience with biphasic insulin aspart 30: from drug development to the latest clinical findings // Drugs. 2012;72(11):1495-1520.; Nobels F., D’Hooge D., Crenier L. Switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30/50/70 from biphasic human insulin 30/50 in patients with type 2 diabetes in normal clinical practice: observational study results // Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(6):1017-1026.; Goodall G., Jendle J.H., Valentine W.J., et al. Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 vs . insulin glargine in insulin naı¨ve type 2 diabetes patients: modelling the long-term health economic implications in a Swedish setting // Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 869-876.; Palmer J.L., Beaudet A., White J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes in China // Adv Ther 2010; 27: 814-827.; https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/159

  15. 15
    Academic Journal

    Contributors: Работа выполняется в рамках государственного контракта. Номер государственного контракта/Номер соглашения о предоставлении субсидии: 14.607.21.0066.

    Source: Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice; № 1 (2015); 78-86 ; Качественная клиническая практика; № 1 (2015); 78-86 ; 2618-8473 ; 2588-0519

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/10/10; The CURRENT-OASIS 7 Investigators. Dose Comparisons of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Acute Coronary Syndromes. // N Engl J Med 2010, 363 (10): 930-42.; Matthew J., Price M.J., Berger P.B., Teirstein P.S., Tanguay J.-F., Angiolillo D.J. et al. for the GRAVITAS Investigator. Standard- vs High-Dose Clopidogrel Based on Platelet Function Testing After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The GRAVITAS Randomized Trial. // JAMA 2011, 305(11): 1097-104.; Dewilde W.J.M., Oirbans T., Verheugt F.W.A., Kelder J.C., De Smet B.J.G.L., Herrman J-P. et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. // Lancet 2013, 381(9872): 1107-15.; Aradi D., Storey R.F., Komocsi A., Trenk D., Gulba D., Kiss R.G. et al. on behalf of the Working Group on Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology Expert position paper on the role of platelet function testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. // Eur Heart J 2014, 35(4): 209-15.; Mega J.L., Simon T., Collet J.P., Anderson J.L., Antman E.M., Bliden K. et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. // JAMA 2010, 304(16): 1821-30.; Harmsze A.M., van Werkum J. W., ten Berg J.M., Zwart B., Bouman H.J., Breet N.J. et al. CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C9*3 alleles are associated with stent thrombosis: a case-control study. // Eur Heart J 2010, 31(24): 3046.; Sibbing D., Stegherr J., Latz W., Koch W., Mehilli J., D?rrler K. et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism and stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. // Eur Heart J 2009, 30(8): 916-22.; Robertson D., Williams G.H. Clinical and translational Science: Principles of Human Research. 1st ed. Academic Press: Elsevier; 2009.; Лифшиц Г.И., Данилкина С.Т., Гуськова Е.В., Воронина Е.Н., Филипенко М.Л. Ассоциация генов, кодирующих белки гемостаза, с параметрами периферического гемостаза и предрасположенностью к атеротромбозам у пациентов с сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями. // Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2011, 4: 90-6.; Price M.P., Murray S.S., Angiolillo D.J., Lillie E., Smith E.N., Tisch R.L. et al. Influence of Genetic Polymorphisms on the Effect of High- and Standard-Dose Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. // J Am Col Cardiol 2012, 59 (22): 1928-37.; Aradi D., Sibbing D., Bonello L. Current evidence for monitoring platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndrome: A plea for individualized antiplatelet treatment. // Int J Cardiol 2013, 167 (5): 1794-97.; Orban M., Sibbing D. Platelet Function Testing in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome // J Cardiovascular Translational Research 2013, 6 (3): 371-7.; Грацианский Н.А. Некоторые методы оценки функции тромбоцитов при лечении клопилогрелем и связь их результатов с ишемическими событиями и кровотечениями - [Электронный ресурс]. - Режим доступа http://athero.ru/Genes.pdf. - 23 ноября 2013 г.; Gremmel T., Steiner S., Seidinger D., Koppensteiner R., Panzer S., Kopp C.W. Comparison of methods to evaluate clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition after percutaneous intervention with stent implantation. // Thromb Haemost 2009, 101 (2): 333-9.; Клиническая лабораторная диагностика: Национальное руководство: в 2 т. - Т. 1. / под ред. В.В. Долгова, В.В. Меньшикова. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2012: 761-4.; Айнетдинова Д.Х., Удовиченко А.Е., Сулимов В.А. Резистентность к антитромбоцитарным препаратам у больных острым коронарным синдромом с подьёмом сегмента ST. // Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии 2008, 2: 23-9.; Кнауэр Н.Ю., Лифшиц Г.И., Воронина Е.Н., Коледа И.В., Гуськова Е.В. Информативность генетических маркеров для оптимизации персонализированной терапии клопидогрелем. // Кардиология 2013, 8: 72-5.; Joshi R., Hossain R., Morton A.C., Ecob R., Judge H.M., Wales C. et al. Evolving pattern of platelet P2Y12 inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes // Platelets 2014, 25 (6): 416- 22.; Lua D., Owens J., Kreutz R.P. Plasma and whole blood clot strength measured by thrombelastography in patients treated with clopidogrel during acute coronary syndromes. // Thromb Res 2013, 132 (2): 94-8.; Tsantes A.E., Ikonomidis I., Papadakis I., Bonovas S., Gialeraki A., Kottaridi C. et al. Impact of the proton pump inhibitors and CYP2C19*2 polymorphism on platelet response to clopidogrel as assessed by four platelet function assays. // Thromb Res 2013, 132 (2): 105-11.; Angiolio D.J., Saucedo J.F., DeRaad R., Frelinger A.L., Gurbel P.A., Costigan T.M. et al. Increased platelet inhibition after switching from maintenance clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Results of the SWAP (Switching Anti Platelet) study. // J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 56 (13): 1017-23.; Rideg O., Komocsi A., Magyarlaki T., Tokés-Füzesi M., Miseta A., Kovács G.L. et al. Impact of genetic variants on post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. // Pharmacogenomics 2011, 12 (9): 1269-80.; Buonamici P., Marcucci R., Migliorini A., Gensini G.F., Santini A., Paniccia R. et al. Impact of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration on drug-eluting stent thrombosis. // J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49 (24): 2312-17.; Mejin M., Tiong W.N., Hui Lai L.Y., Tiong L.L., Bujang A.M., Hwang S.S. et al. CYP2C19 genotypes and their impact on clopidogrel responsiveness in percutaneous coronary intervention. // Int J Clin Pharm 2013, 35 (4): 621-8.; Belozertseva L.A., Voronina E.N., Kokh N.V., Tsvetovskaya G.A., Momot A.P., Lifshits G.I. et al. Personalized approach of medication by indirect anticoagulants tailored to the patient-Russian context: what are the prospects? // EPMA J 2012, 3 (1): 10.; Лифшиц Г.И., Отева Э.А., Николаев К.Ю., Куроедов А.Ю., Николаева А.А., Масленников А.Б. Особенности формирования факторов риска ишеми ческой болезни сердца у детей с отягощённым семейным анамнезом и подходы к профилактике. // Консилиум 1999,6:60-63; Samama C.M., Lecoules N., Kierzek G., Claessens Y.E., Riou B., Rosencher N. et al. FONDACAST Study Group. Comparison of fondaparinux with low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prevention in patients requiring rigid or semi-rigid immobilization for isolated non-surgical below-knee injury. // J Thromb Haemost 2013, 11 (10): 1833-43.; Breet N.J., van Werkum J.W., Bouman H.J., Ten Berg J.M., Hackeng C.M. et al. Platelet function tests for the monitoring of P2Y12 inhibitors. // Expert Opin Med Diagn 2010, 4(3):251-65.; Маниатис Т., Фрич Э. и Сэмбрук Дж. 1984. Молекулярное клонирование. М.: Мир.; http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4253b1_01.pdf; Bovill E.G., Terrin M.L., Stump D.C., Berke A.D., Frederick M., Collen D., et al. Hemorrhagic events during therapy with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, heparin, and aspirin for acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Phase II Trial. // Ann Intern Med 1991, 115 (4): 256-65.; Mega J.L., Close S.L., Wiviott S.D., Shen L., Hockett R.D., Brandt J. T. et al. Cytochrome P-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. // Engl J Med. 2009; 360(4): 354-62.; CC/AHA/SCAI 2005 GUIDELINE UPDATE FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). // J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47: 1-121.; Вольская Е., Александрова О. Новый статус для наблюдательных исследований // Ремедиум 2009, 3: 6-10.; Вольская Е.А. Основы надлежащей практики неинтервенционных исследований лекарственных препаратов. // Качественная клиническая практика 2011, 1: 19-24.; von Elm E., Altmanc D.G., Egger M., Pocock S.J., Gotzschee P.C., Vandenbrouckef J.P. for the STROBE The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008, 61: 344-9.; https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/10

  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
    Academic Journal

    Source: Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice; № 1 (2015); 92-98 ; Качественная клиническая практика; № 1 (2015); 92-98 ; 2618-8473 ; 2588-0519

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/12/12; Inzucchi S.E., Bergenstal R.M., Buse J.B. et al. Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Approach. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(6): 1364-1379.; Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В. Оптимизация и интенсификация инсулинотерапии при сахарном диабете 2 типа (клинические рекомендации). Сахарный диабет. 2010; 5: 9-16.; Колбин А.С. Фармакоэкономика базально-болюсной инсулинотерапии сахарного диабета 2 типа. Практическая фармакоэкономика. Эндокринология (научный сборник) Под ред. Р.У Хабриева. 2011, ООО Издательство «Р-Врач»: 67-75.; Майоров А.Ю., Мельникова О.Г. Клинические и психологические аспекты гипогликемии при сахарном диабете. Сахарный диабет. 2010;(3):46-50.; Davis R.E., Morrissey M., Peters J.R. et al. Impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life and productivity in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005; 21(9):1477-1483.; Henderson J.N., Allen K.V., Deary I.J. et al. Hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: frequency, symptoms and impaired awareness. Diabet Med.2003;20(12):1016-1021.; Новик А.А., Ионова Т.И. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине (3-еизд., перераб. идополненное), под ред. академика РАМНЮ.Л. Шевченко. М.: РАЕН, 2012.; Ягудина Р.И., Куликов А.Ю., Литвиненко М.М. QALY: история, методология и будущее метода. Фармакоэкономика. 2010; 3 (1): 7-11.; Methods for the Analysis of Costs and Cost-Effectiveness in Randomized Studies [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.ispor.org/OpenSourceIndex/ cached/www.uphs.upenn.edu/dgimhsr/costgrnt.PDF (дата обращения: 01.06.2012).; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Available from: www.nice.org.uk. [Accessed March 7, 2010]; Dawson D., Gravelle H., O’Mahony M., et al. Developing new approaches to measuring NHS outputs and productivity. Summary report// CHE Research Paper 6. York, UK: Center for Health Economics, The University of York.; Weinstein M.C., Torrance G., McGuire A., et al. QALY: Thebasics.ValueinHealth. 2009;12: 5-9.; Mehrez A., Gafni A. Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory, and healthy-years equivalents. Med Decis Making. 1989;9: 142-149.; American College of Physicians. Information on cost-effectiveness: an essential product of a national comparative effectiveness program. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 956-961.; Erik Nord. The Person Trade-Off Approach to Valuing Health Care Programs, 1994.; Kaplan, Robert M. Utility assessment for estimating quality-adjusted life years. Valuing health care: Costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies. 1995; 31-60. Retrieved 2014-05-06.; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada. 3rd. ed. Ottawa: The Agency; 2006.Available:>http://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/186_EconomicGuidelines_e.pdf<< (accessed 2007 Feb 9).; Sullivan P. W., Ghushchyan V. Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(4): 410-420.; Fanshel S., Bush J.W. A health status index and its application to health service outcomes. Oper Res. 1970;18;1021-1066.; Brazier J., Usherwood T., Harper R., Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J ClinEpidemiol. 1998, 58: 1115-28.; Новик А.А., Ионова Т.И., Гандек Б. и др. Показатели качества жизни населения Санкт-Петербурга. Пробл. стандартизации в здравоохр. 2001. № 4: 22-31.; Clarke P., Gray A., Holman R. Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using theEQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Med Decis Making. 2002; 22(4): 340-349.; Colquitt J.L., Green C., Sidhu M.K. et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes. London (UK): National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2002. Available: >>http://www.nice.org.uk/download.aspx?o=38421<< (accessed 2006 Sep 19).; Colquitt J.L., Green C., Sidhu M.K. et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes. Health Technol Assess (Winch Eng) 2004; 8(43).; Sullivan P.W., Lawrence W.F., Ghushchyan V. A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care.2005; 43(7): 736-749.; Brazier J., Roberts J., Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.J Health Econ. 2002, 21: 271-292.; Brazier J.E., Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12.Med Care2004, 42: 851-859.; Ferreira L.N., Ferreira P.L., Pereira L.N., Brazier J. An application of the SF-6D to create health values in Portuguese working age adults. J of Med Economics 2008, 11: 215-233.; Cruz L.N., Camey S.A., Hoffman J.F., Rowen D. Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians. Value in Health. 2011, 14: 108-114.; https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/12