-
1Academic Journal
Συγγραφείς: Amelya Gustina, Prakoso Bhairawa Putera, Elena V. Tikhonova, Амелия Густина, Пракасo Бхаирава Путера, Елена Викторовна Тихонова
Πηγή: Science Editor and Publisher; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 114-136 ; Научный редактор и издатель; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 114-136 ; 2541-8122 ; 2542-0267
Θεματικοί όροι: Лейденский манифест, research quality, science policy, responsible metrics, altmetrics, research evaluation, DORA, Leiden Manifesto, качество исследований, научная политика, ответственное отношение к метрикам, альтметрики, оценка исследований
Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/438/306; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/438/307; Archambault É., Larivière V. The limits of bibliometrics for the analysis of the social sciences and humanities literature. In: World Social Science Report, 2010: Knowledge Divides. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2010, pp. 251–254.; Glänzel W., Thijs B., Debackere K. The application of citation-based performance classes to the disciplinary and multidisciplinary assessment in national comparison and institutional research assessment. Scientometrics. 2014;101:939–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1247-1; El-Ouahi J. Scientometric rules as a guide to transform science systems in the Middle East and North Africa. Scientometrics. 2024;129:869–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04916-x; Cobo M. J., López-Herrera A. G., Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011;62(7):1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525; Thelwall M. The pros and cons of the use of altmetrics in research assessment. Scholarly Assessment Reports. 2020;2(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.10; Putera P. B., Iriany I. S., Gustina A., Pasciana R., Wismayanti Y. F., Qatrunnada N. Weather, climate, and society: A retrospective between 2009 and 2022 using bibliometric and content analysis. Weather, Climate, and Society. 2024;16(4):651–672. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-23-0047.1; Bornmann L. Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics. 2015;103(3):1123–1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1565-y; Lendvai G. F. Valuing diversity, from afar: A scientometric analysis of the Global North countries’ overrepresentation in top communication journals. Communication Studies Review. 2025;4(1):82–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2024-0056; Albanna B., Handl J., Heeks R. Publication outperformance among Global South researchers: An analysis of individual-level and publication-level predictors of positive deviance. Scientometrics. 2021;126(10):8375–8431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04128-1; Turki H., Fraumann G., Hadj Taieb M. A., Ben Aouicha M. Global visibility of publications through digital object identifiers. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2023;8:1207980. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1207980; Кириллова О. В., Тихонова Е. В. Критерии качества научного журнала: измерение и значимость. Научный редактор и издатель. 2022;7(1):12-27. https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-22-39; Ismail S., Nason E., Marjanovic S., Grant J. Bibliometrics as a tool for supporting prospective R&D decision-making in the health sciences: Strengths, weaknesses and options for future development. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2009. Available from: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR685.html (accessed: 20.05.2025).; Bornmann L. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics. 2014;8(4):895–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005; Senthil R., Anand T., Somala C. S., Saravanan, K. M. Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence in healthcare research: Trends and future directions. Future Healthcare Journal. 2024;11(3):100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100182; Sahar R., Munawaroh M. Artificial intelligence in higher education with bibliometric and content analysis for future research agenda. Discover Sustainability. 2025;6:401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01086-z; Ellegaard O. The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics. 2018;116(1):181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z; Mallapaty S. China bans cash rewards for publishing papers. Nature. 2020;579(7797):18. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00574-8; Zhu H., Shuhuai L. Instant prediction of scientific paper cited potential based on semantic and metadata features: Taking artificial intelligence field as an example. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(12):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312945; Hicks D., Wouters P., Waltman L., de Rijcke S., Rafols I. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature. 2015;520:429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a; Wilsdon J. The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. 2015. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473978782; Blockmans W., Engwall L., Weaire D. Bibliometrics: Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance. London: Portland Press; 2015.; Asubiaro T., Onaolapo S., Mills D. Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage. Scientometrics. 2024;129(3):1469–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x; Sugimoto C. R., Robinson-Garcia N., Murray D. S., Yegros-Yegros A., Costas R., Larivière V. Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move. Nature. 2017;550:29–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/550029a; Põder E. What is wrong with the current evaluative bibliometrics? Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2022;6:824518. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.824518; Ioannidis J. P. A., Maniadis Z. Quantitative research assessment: Using metrics against gamed metrics. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2024;19(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03447-w; Falagas M. E., Alexiou V. G. Editors may inappropriately influence authors’ decisions regarding selection of references in scientific articles. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2007;19(5):443–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901583; Ioannidis J. P. A., Thombs B. D. A user’s guide to inflated and manipulated impact factors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2019;49(9):e13151. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13151; Norris S. Bibliometrics and research evaluation: uses and abuses (Book review). Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2019;7(1):eP2286. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2286; Ioannidis J. P. A., Maniadis Z. In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments. PLoS Biology. 2023;21(12):e3002408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002408; Tahamtan I., Bornmann L. Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A literature review. Profesional de la Información. 2020;29(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.02; Szomszor M., Adie E. Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations. Quantitative Science Studies. 2022;3(3):624–650. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00204; Morgan-Thomas A., Tsoukas S., Dudau A., Gąska P. Beyond declarations: Metrics, rankings and responsible assessment. Research Policy. 2024;53(10):105093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105093; Donthu N., Kumar S., Mukherjee D., Pandey N., Lim W. M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070; Ma L. Metrics and epistemic injustice. Journal of Documentation. 2022;78(7):392–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0240; Mondal H., Deepak K. K., Gupta M., Kumar R. The h-index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2023;12(11):2531–2537. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1613_23; Vivek N., Clark E., Gao L., Xu S., Baskauf S., Nguyen K., Goldin M., Prasad K., Miller A., Zhang P., Yang S., Rohde S., Topf M., Gelbard A. Social network analysis as a new tool to measure academic impact of physicians. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2025;10(1):e70060. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70060; O’Connor S. The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) in nursing science. Nursing Science Quarterly. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10147/634330 (accessed: 20.05.2025).; Montazerian M., Shaghaei N., Drachen T. M., Dorch B. F. Editorial: Quality and quantity in research assessment: examining the merits of metrics. volume II. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2024;9:1400009. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1400009; Saroyan A. Fostering creativity and critical thinking in university teaching and learning: Considerations for academics and their professional learning. OECD Education Working Papers. 2022;(280). https://doi.org/10.1787/09b1cb3b-en; Genderjahn S., Bertelmann R., Ferguson L.M., zu Castell W., Dransch D., Juckeland G. et al. Helmholtz Open Science Briefing: Helmholtz Open Science Forum “Research Evaluation, Reputation Systems, and Openness”. Potsdam: Helmholtz Open Science Office; 2023. https://doi.org/10.48440/os.helmholtz.065; Irawan D. E., Abraham J., Tennant J. P., Pourret O. The need for a new set of measures to assess the impact of research in earth sciences in Indonesia. European Science Editing. 2021;47:e59032. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2021.e59032; Bornmann L., Leydesdorff L. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape. EMBO Reports. 2014;15(12):1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439608; Ioannidis J. P. A., Pezzullo A. M., Cristiano A., Boccia S., Baas J. Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors. PLoS Biology. 2025;23(1):e3002999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002999; Safder I., Hassan S. U. Bibliometric-enhanced information retrieval: A novel deep feature engineering approach for algorithm searching from full-text publications. Scientometrics. 2019;119(1):257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03025-y; Kirchik O., Gingras Y., Larivière V. Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993–2010). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012;63(7):1411–1419. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22642; Pislyakov V., Shukshina E. Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014;65(11):2321–2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23093; Raitskaya L., Tikhonova E. Pressure to publish internationally: Scholarly writing coming to the fore. Journal of Language and Education. 2020;6(1):4–7. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10631; van Eck N. J., Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/438