Showing 1 - 20 results of 145 for search '"ДЕЛИКТНАЯ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬ"', query time: 0.86s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    Academic Journal

    Source: Digital Law Journal; Vol 4, No 4 (2023); 8-35 ; Цифровое право; Vol 4, No 4 (2023); 8-35 ; 2686-9136

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/189/117; https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/189/110; Ahrens, H., & Spickhoff, A. (2022). Deliktsrecht [Tort Law]. Beck.; Aristotel. (2020). Etika. Kniga V [Ethics. Book V]. Izdatel’stvo AST [Publishing house AST].; Bogdanov, D. (2013). Spravedlivost’ kak osnovnoe nachalo grazhdansko-pravovoj otvetstvennosti v rossijskom i zarubezhnom prave [Justice as the main principle of civil liability in Russian and foreign law]. Prospekt.; Borges, G. (2016). Haftung für selbstfahrende Autos. Computer und Recht, 32(4), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.9785/cr-2016-0412; Calabresi, G. (1965). The decision for accidents: An approach to non-fault allocation of costs. Harvard Law Review, 78(4), 713–745. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1268; Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (2010). Sravnitel’noe chastnoe parvo (T.2) [Comparative private law (Vol. 2)]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [International relationships].; Fairgrieve, D. (2005). L’Exception française? The French law of product liability. In D. Fairgrieve (Ed.), Product liability in comparative perspective (pp. 84–99). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493850.007; Faure, M., & Li, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and (compulsory) insurance. Journal of European Tort Law, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2022-0001; Kötz, H. (1991). Ist die Produkthaftung eine vom Verschulden unabhängige Haftung [Is product liability a liability independent of fault]? In B. Pfister & M. Will. (Eds.), Festschrift für Werner Lorenz (pp.109–121). Tübingen: mohr.; Koziol, H. (2016). Gibkaya sistema — zolotaya seredina v zakonodatel’stve i doktrine [The flexible system — the happy medium in legislation and theory]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil law review], 16(6), 246–267.; Koziol, H. (2021). Obezlichivaetsya li otzenka neostorozhnosti v institute vozmeshcheniya vreda [Is the necessity assessment at the institute of harmful recovery]? Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil law review], 21(2), 217–244. https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-2-217-244; Kramer, E. (2020). Nachalo obshchego vsem vmeneniya v deliktnom i dogovornom prave [The principle of objective imputation in tort and contract law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil law review], 20(1), 236– 262. https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2020-20-1-236-262; Kratenko, M. (2022). Institut otvetstvennosti za vred, prichinennyj defektnoj produkciej, v zakonodatel’stve Rossii: bol’shoj potencial ili klubok protivorechij [Product liability rules in Russian legislation: Great potential or mass of contradictions]? Zakon [Statute], 11, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2022-19-11-176-187; Lenze, S. (2005). German product liability law: between European Directives, American Restatements and common sense. In Product liability in comparative perspective (pp. 100–125). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493850.008; Markelova, A. (2021). Civil liability of taxi-aggregation companies: Between contract and tort law. Digital Law Journal, 2(4), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-4-8-19; Markesinis, B.S., & Unberath, H. (2002). The German law of torts: A comparative treatise (4th ed.). Hart Publishing.; Nasibullina, I. (2020). Prichinno-sledstvennaya svyaz’: kamen’ pretknoveniya v sporah s proizvoditelem i prodavcom defektnyh tovarov [Causation: A deal breaker in disputes over defective products]. Zakon [Statute], 3. 57–68.; Nikitenko, S. (2023). Koncepcii deliktnoj otvetstvennosti za vred, prichinennyj sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta [Concepts of tort liability for damage caused by artificial intelligence systems]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossijskoj Federacii [The Herald of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation], 1, 156–174. https://doi.org/10.37239/2500-2643-2022-18-1-156-174; Ripstein, A. (2004). The division of responsibility and the Law of Tort. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1811–1844. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol72/iss5/21; Rolz, Dzh. (1995). Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of justice]. Izdatel’stvo Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta [Novosibirsk State University Publishing House].; Selbst, A. (2020). Negligence and AI’s human users. Boston University Law Review, 100(4), 1315–1376.; Sharkley, C. (2022). Products liability in the digital age: Online platforms as “cheapest cost avoiders”. Hastings Law Journal, 73(5), 1327–1352.; Shavell, S. (1980). Strict liability versus negligence. Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1),1–25.; Shavell, S. (2003). Economic analysis of accident law. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.367800; Stapleton, J. (1996). Product liability. Butterworths.; Stepanov, S. (2021a). Deconstruction of the legal personhood of artificial intelligence. Digital Law Journal, 2(2), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-2-14-30; Stepanov, S. (2021b). Sovremennye teorii protivopravnosti: shvejtsarskij podkhod [Modern theories of wrongfulness: The Swiss approach]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Сivil law review], 21(1), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-1-219-253; Stepanov, S. (2023). Balans interesov storon v deliktnom prave [Balance of parties’ interests in tort law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava [Civil law review], 23(4), 90–126. https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2023-23-4-90-126; Suvorov, E. (2019). Nekotorye problemy elektronnoj torgovli: k voprosu ob otvetstvennosti vladel’cev agregatorov pered potrebitelyami [Some problems of e-commerce: On the question of aggregator owners’ liability to customers]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossijskoj Federacii [The Herald of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation], 9, 57–67.; Tololaeva, N. (2020). Passivnye solidarnye obyazatel’stva: rossijskij podhod i kontinental’no-evropejskaya tradiciya [Passive solidary obligations: Russian approach and continental European tradition]. Statut [Statute].; Wagner, G. (2017). Produkthaftung für autonome Systeme. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 217(6), 708–765. https://doi.org/10.1628/000389917X15126388934364; Wagner, G. (2022). Liability rules for the digital age: Aiming for the Brussels effect. Journal of European Tort Law, 13(3), 191–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2022-0012; Wagner, G. (2024). Digitale Ordnungspolitik — Haftung und Verantwortung. List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik, 50, 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41025-022-00237-8; Whittaker, S. (1985). The EEC Directive on Product Liability. Yearbook of European Law, 5(1), 233–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/5.1.233; https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/189

  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20