-
1Academic Journal
Authors: I. S. Fishman, И. С. Фишман
Source: Economics of Science; Том 6, № 3 (2020); 159-168 ; Экономика науки; Том 6, № 3 (2020); 159-168 ; 2949-4680 ; 2410-132X
Subject Terms: внутренний фонд посевного финансирования, technology/innovation transfer, commercialization of innovation by universities, Technology Transfer Office, University Incubators, Сollective Research Centers, Inner Seed Funds, трансфер технологий/инноваций, коммерциализация инноваций университетами, центры по передаче технологий, университетские инкубаторы, совместные исследовательские центры
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/280/176; Mathisen M., Rasmussen T. E. (2019) The development, growth, and performance of university spinoffs: a critical review // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 1–48.; Villani E., Einar Rasmussen E., Grimaldi R. (2017) How intermediary organizations facilitate universityindustry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological forecasting and social change // An international journal. 86–102.; Rasmussen E., Moen O., Gulbrandsen M. (2006) Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge // Technovation. 26:518–533.; Munari F., Pasquini M., Toschi L. (2015) From the lab to the stock market? The characteristics and impact of university-oriented seed funds in Europe // Journal of Technology Transfer. 40:948–975.; Shane S. (2004) Academic entrepreneurship university spinoffs and wealth creation / Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.; Mathisen M. T. (2017) The growth of research-based spin-offs: Unleashing the value of academic entrepreneurship / Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 224 p.; Wright M., Lockett A., Clarysse B., Binks M. (2006) University spin-out companies and venture capital // Munari Research Policy. 35:481–501.; Munari F., Toschi L. (2011) Do venture capitalists have a bias against investment in academic spinoffs? Evidence from the micro- and nanotechnology sector in the UK // Industrial and Corporate Change. 20:397–432.; Toole A. A., Czarnitzki D. (2007) Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 63:716–738.; Yague-Perales R.M., March-Chorda I. (2012) Performance analysis of research spin-offs in the Spanish biotechnology industry // Journal of Business Research. 65:1782–1789.; Zhang J. F. (2009) The performance of university spin-offs: An exploratory analysis using venture capital data // Journal of Technology Transfer. 34:255–285.; Meoli M., Paleari S., Vismara S. (2013) Completing the technology transfer process: M&As of science-based IPOs // Small Business Economics. 40:227–248.; Stephan A. (2014) Are public research spin-offs more innovative? // Small Business Economics. 43:353–368.; Lowe R. A., Ziedonis A. A. (2006) Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms // Management Science. 52:173–186.; Wennberg K., Wiklund J., Hellerstedt K., Nordqvist M. (2011) Implications of intra-family and external ownership transfer of family firms: short-term and long-termperformance differences // Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 5:352–372.; Ensley M. D., Hmieleski, K.A. (2005) A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups // Research Policy. 34:1091–1105.; Salvador E. (2011) Are science parks and incubators good «brand names» for spin-offs? The case study of Turin // Journal of Technology Transfer. 36:203–232.; Ortin-Angel P., Vendrell-Herrero F. (2014) University spin-offs vs. other NTBFs: Total factor productivity differences at outset and evolution // Technovation. 34:101–112.; Colombo M. G., D’Adda D., Piva E. (2010) The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: An empirical analysis // Journal of Technology Transfer. 35:113–140.; Bonardo D., Paleari S., Vismara S. (2011) Valuing university-based firms: The effects of academic affiliation on IPO performance // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 35:755–776.; Bonardo D., Paleari S., Vismara S. (2010) The M&A dynamics of European science-based entrepreneurial firms // Journal of Technology Transfer. 35:141–180.; Miozzo M., DiVito L. (2016) Growing fast or slow?: Understanding the variety of paths and the speed of early growth of entrepreneurial science-based firms // Research Policy. 45:964–986.; Mueller C., Westhead P., Wright M. (2012) Formal venture capital acquisition: can entrepreneurs compensate for the spatial proximity benefits of South East England and ‘star’ golden-triangle universities? // Environment and Planning. 44:281–296.; Lubik S., Garnsey E. (2016) Early business model evolution in science-based ventures: The case of advanced materials // Long Range Planning. 49:393–408.; Gans J. S., Stern S. (2003) The product market and the market for «ideas»: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs // Research Policy. 32:333–350.; Vincett P. S. (2010) The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy // Research Policy. 39:736–747.; https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/280
-
2Report
Subject Terms: Silk Road, 4. Education, научно-техническое сотрудничество, один путь», Шелковый путь, One Road initiative, joint research centers, scientific diplomacy, научная дипломатия, совместные исследовательские центры, 11. Sustainability, scientific and technical cooperation, One Belt, инициатива «Один пояс