-
1Academic Journal
Authors: Elena V. Tikhonova, Marina A. Kosycheva, Елена Викторовна Тихонова, Марина Александровна Косычева
Source: Science Editor and Publisher; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 6-31 ; Научный редактор и издатель; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 6-31 ; 2541-8122 ; 2542-0267
Subject Terms: редакторские практики, scoping review introduction, academic discourse structure, academic writing, introduction rhetorical organization, scholarly communication, editorial practices, структура академического дискурса, академическое письмо, риторическая организация введения, научная коммуникация
File Description: application/pdf
Relation: https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/459/310; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/459/311; Munn Z., Peters M. D. J., Stern C., Tufanaru C., McArthur A., Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x; Peters M. D. J., Marnie C., Tricco A. C., Pollock D., Munn Z., Lyndsay A. et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020;18(10):2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167; Mak S., Thomas A. An introduction to scoping reviews. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2022;14(5):561–564. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00620.1; Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616; Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., O’Brien K. K., Colquhoun H., Levac D. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018;169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850; Levac D., Colquhoun H., O’Brien K. K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010;5:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69; Maggio L. A., Larsen K., Thomas A., Costello J. A., Artino A. R., Jr. Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review. Medical Education. 2021;55(6):689–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14431; Hart C. Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. 352 p.; Ridley D. The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012. 232 p.; Thomas A., Lubarsky S., Varpio L., Durning S. J., Young M. E. Scoping reviews in health professions education: Challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology. Advances in Health Science Education. 2020;25(4):989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09932-2; Munn Z., Pollock D., Khalil H., Lyndsay A., Mclnerney P., Godfrey C. M. et al. What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2022;20(4):950–952. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00483; McElravy L. J. Form follows function: Research and assessment design for leadership learning. New Directions for Student Leadership. 2022;(175):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20517; Swales J. M. Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2004. 328 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524827; Booth A. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A structured methodological review. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x; Grant M. J., Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x; Tikhonova E. V., Kosycheva M. A., Golechkova T. Yu. Scoping review rhetorical structure of discussion section: Genre specifics and principles of modeling. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. 2025;11(2):80–118. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2025-11-2-0-4; Swales J. M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 280 p.; Moreno A. I., Swales J. M. Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes. 2018;50:40–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006; Sun H., Mei X., Zhang H. Understanding news & views articles: Rhetorical structures across different disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 2024;73:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.10.001; Cotos E., Huffman S., Link S. A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes. 2017;46:90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001; Tikhonova E. V., Kosycheva M. A., Golechkova T. Yu. Research article discussion moves and steps in papers on medicine: Academic literacy and respect for readers. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. 2023;9(2):97–128. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-2-0-6; Farhang-Ju M., Jalilifar A., Keshavarz M. H. Specificity and generality of lexical bundles in the rhetorical moves of applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2024;69:101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101387; Gao S., Pramoolsook I. A cross-cultural move analysis of electronic engineering research article introductions: The case of Chinese, Thai, and native English scholarly writers. Ampersand. 2023;10:100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100106; Lin L., Evans S. Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes. 2012;31(3):150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002; Косычева М. А., Тихонова Е. В. Введение к эмпирической статье: от структуры к функциональному содержанию. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2022;4(2);6–16. https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2022.i2.s155; Mak S., Thomas A. Steps for conducting a scoping review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2022;14(5):565–567. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1; Тихонова Е. В., Шленская Н. М. Обзор предметного поля как метод синтеза научных данных. Хранение и переработка сельхозсырья. 2021;(3):11–25. https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.257; Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310; Hyland K., Zou H. Titles in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2022;56:101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101094; Hyland, K. Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press; 2004. 256 p. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/459