Showing 1 - 19 results of 19 for search '"ВИРТУАЛЬНАЯ КОЛОНОСКОПИЯ"', query time: 0.71s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
    Academic Journal

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: Возможности виртуальной колоноскопии и ультразвукового исследования в диагностике опухолей толстой кишки / О. В. Коваль, О. В. Щербина, М. Н. Жайворонок, Т. А. Дудник, Л. Н. Васько // Азербайджанский медицинский журнал. – 2023. – № 3. – С. 39–45.; https://repository.pdmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/22127

  3. 3
    Academic Journal

    Source: Medical Visualization; Том 25, № 1 (2021); 54-72 ; Медицинская визуализация; Том 25, № 1 (2021); 54-72 ; 2408-9516 ; 1607-0763

    File Description: application/pdf

    Relation: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/1010/637; Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018; 68 (6): 394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492; Zauber A.G., Winawer S.J., O'Brien M.J., LansdorpVogelaar I., van Ballegooijen M., Hankey B.F., Shi W., Bond J.H., Schapiro M., Panish J.F., Stewart E.T., Waye J.D. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366 (8): 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100370; Spada C., Stoker J., Alarcon O., Barbaro F., Bellini D., Bretthauer M., De Haan M.C., Dumonceau J.M., Ferlitsch M., Halligan S., Helbren E., Hellstrom M., Kuipers E.J., Lefere P., Mang T., Neri E., Petruzziello L., Plumb A., Regge D., Taylor S.A., Hassan C., Laghi A.; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology. Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014; 46 (10): 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1378092; US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo K., Grossman D.C., Curry S.J., Davidson K.W., Epling J.W. Jr., García F.A.R., Gillman M.W., Harper D.M., Kemper A.R., Krist A.H., Kurth A.E., Landefeld C.S., Mangione C.M., Owens D.K., Phillips W.R., Phipps M.G., Pignone M.P., Siu A.L. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2016; 315 (23): 2564–2575. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5989; Von Wagner C., Halligan S., Atkin W.S., Lilford R.J., Morton D., Wardle J. Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences. Health Expect. 2009; 12 (1): 18–26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00520.x; Ghanouni A., Smith S.G., Halligan S., Plumb A., Boone D., Magee M.S., Wardle J., von Wagner C. Public perceptions and preferences for CT colonography or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Patient Educ. Couns. 2012; 89 (1): 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.007; Ghanouni A., Halligan S., Taylor S.A., Boone D., Plumb A., Stoffel S., Morris S., Yao G.L., Zhu S., Lilford R., Wardle J., von Wagner C. Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colono graphy: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2014; 4 (4): e004327. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004327; Harewood G.C., Wiersema M.J., Melton L.J. 3rd. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002; 97 (12): 3186–3194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07129.x; Beebe T.J., Johnson C.D., Stoner S.M., Anderson K.J., Limburg P.J. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2007; 82 (6): 666–671. https://doi.org/10.4065/82.6.666; Neri E., Halligan S., Hellström M., Lefere P., Mang T., Regge D., Stoker J., Taylor S., Laghi A; ESGAR CT Colonography Working Group. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur. Radiol. 2013; 23 (3): 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x; Рогозина Н.Н., Морозов С.П., Башанкаев Б.Н. Виртуальная колоноскопия. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2014; 3 (6): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.17116/oncolog2014677-84.; Wexner S.D., Beck D.E., Baron T.H., Fanelli R.D., Hyman N., Shen B., Wasco K.E.; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006; 63 (7): 894–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.918; Мещеряков А.И., Гурова Н.Ю., Бурков С.Г., Пугачева О.Г., Балашов А.В., Золина А.С. Сравнительная эффективность компьютерной колонографии (виртуальной колоноскопии) в диагностике новообразований толстой кишки при использовании и без использования маркировки остаточного кишечного содержимого. Анналы хирургии. 2018; 23 (1): 33–41. https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9502-2018-23-1-33-41.; Macari M., Lavelle M., Pedrosa I., Milano A., Dicker M., Megibow A.J., Xue X. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology. 2001; 218 (1): 274–277. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja31274; Scalise P., Mantarro A., Pancrazi F., Neri E. Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications. Wld J. Radiol. 2016; 8 (5): 472–483. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.472; Taylor S.A., Slater A., Burling D.N., Tam E., Greenhalgh R., Gartner L., Scarth J., Pearce R., Bassett P., Halligan S. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18 (1): 32– 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0631-0; Campanella D., Morra L., Delsanto S., Tartaglia V., Asnaghi R., Bert A., Neri E., Regge D. Comparison of three different iodine-based bowel regimens for CT colonography. Eur. Radiol. 2010; 20 (2): 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1553-9; Nagata K., Okawa T., Honma A., Endo S., Kudo S.E., Yoshida H. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecaltagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance. Acad. Radiol. 2009; 16 (7): 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.027; Parente F., Vailati C., Bargiggia S., Manes G., Fontana P., Masci E., Arena M., Spinzi G., Baccarin A., Mazzoleni G., Testoni P.A. 2-Litre polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl versus 4-litre polyethylene glycol as preparation for colonoscopy in chronic constipation. Dig. Liver Dis. 2015; 47 (10): 857–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2015.06.008; Téllez-Ávila F.I., Murcio-Pérez E., Saúl A., Herrera-Gómez S., Valdovinos-Andraca F., Acosta-Nava V., Barreto R., Elizondo-Rivera J. Efficacy and tolerability of low-volume (2 L) versus single- (4 L) versus split-dose (2 L + 2 L) polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for colonoscopy: randomized clinical trial. Dig. Endosc. 2014; 26 (6): 731–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12265; Gweon T.G., Kim S.W., Noh Y.S., Hwang S., Kim N.Y., Lee Y., Lee S.W., Lee S.W., Lee J.Y., Lim C.H., Hun Kim H., Kim J.S., Kyung Cho Y., Myung Park J., Seok Lee I., Myung-Gyu Choi. Prospective, randomized comparison of same-day dose of 2 different bowel cleanser for afternoon colonoscopy: picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid versus polyethylene glycol. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94 (13): e628. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000628; Borden Z.S., Pickhardt P.J., Kim D.H., Lubner M.G., Agriantonis D.J., Hinshaw J.L. Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology. 2010; 254 (1): 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090398; Bellini D., De Santis D., Caruso D., Rengo M., Ferrari R., Biondi T., Laghi A. Bowel preparation in CT colonography: Is diet restriction necessary? A randomised trial (DIETSAN). Eur. Radiol. 2018; 28 (1): 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4997-3.; Lawrance I.C., Willert R.P., Murray K. A validated bowelpreparation tolerability questionnaire and assessment of three commonly used bowel-cleansing agents. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013; 58 (4): 926–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2449-0.; Rex D.K., Katz P.O., Bertiger G., Vanner S., Hookey L.C., Alderfer V., Joseph R.E. Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013; 78 (1): 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.024; Katz P.O., Rex D.K., Epstein M., Grandhi N.K., Vanner S., Hookey L.C., Alderfer V., Joseph R.E. A dual-action, lowvolume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 108 (3): 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.441.; https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/1010

  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19