New applications of cardiac computed tomography for evaluation of myocardial ischemia ; Новые области применения компьютерной томографии сердца в диагностике ишемии миокарда

Συγγραφείς: M. V. Lisitskaya, E. A. Mershina, O. M. Larina, M. L. Plotnikova, O. S. Shlyapkina, М. В. Лисицкая, Е. А. Мершина, О. М. Ларина, М. Л. Плотникова, О. С. Шляпкина

Συνεισφορές: Работа выполнена в рамках государственного задания МГУ (номер ЦИТИС 121061800148-2)

Πηγή: Medical Visualization; Том 26, № 1 (2022); 70-77 ; Медицинская визуализация; Том 26, № 1 (2022); 70-77 ; 2408-9516 ; 1607-0763

Θεματικοί όροι: атеросклероз коронарных артерий, myocardial ischemia, myocardial perfusion, stress-myocardial perfusion, dual energy computed tomography, fractional flow reserve, atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, КТ-коронарная ангиография, ишемия миокарда, перфузия миокарда, стресс-перфузия миокарда, двухэнергетическая компьютерная томография сердца, фракционный резерв кровотока, коронарокальциноз

Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

Relation: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/983/711; Masuda Y., Naito S., Aoyagi Y. et al. Coronary artery calcification detected by CT: clinical significance and angiographic correlates. Angiology. 1990; 41 (12): 1037– 1047. http://doi.org/10.1177/000331979004101203; Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G. et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008; 52 (21):1724–1732. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031.; Ашихмин Я.И., Синицын В.Е., Плиева Н.В., Щекочихин Д.Ю., Копылов Д.Ю. Возможности компьютерной томографии сердца в стратификации риска и определении оптимальной стратегии первичной профилактики сердечнососудистых осложнений атеросклероза. Кардиология. 2019; 59 (6): 70–80. http://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2019.6.n685. Ashikhmin Ya.I., Sinitsyn V.E., Plieva N.V., Shchekochikhin D.Yu., Kopylov F.Yu. Possibilities of Computed Tomography of the Heart in Risk Stratification and Determination of Optimal Strategy of Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Complications of Atherosclerosis. Kardiologiia. 2019; 59 (6):70–80. (In Russian); Knuuti J., Wijns W., Saraste A. et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2020; 41 (3): 407–477. http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425; Российское кардиологическое общество. Стабильная ишемическая болезнь сердца: Методические рекомендации. 2020, 114 с. https://scardio.ru/content/ Guidelines/2020/Clinic_rekom_IBS.pdf Russian Society of Cardiology. Russian Society of Cardiology. Stable ischemic heart disease. Methodological recommendations. 2020, 114 p. https://scardio.ru/content/Guidelines/2020/Clinic_rekom_IBS.pdf; Knuuti J., Ballo H., Juarez-Orozco L.E. et al. The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability. Eur. Heart J. 2018; 39 (35): 3322–3330. http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy267; Mushtaq S., Conte E., Pontone G. et al. State-of-the-artmyocardial perfusion stress testing: Static CT perfusion. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2020; 14 (4): 294–302. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.09.002; Pelgrim G.J., Dorrius M., Xie X. et al. The dream of a onestop-shop: Meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 2015; 84 (12): 2411–2420. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.032.; Tonino P.A., Fearon W.F., De Bruyne B. et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010; 55 (25): 2816–2821. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096; Hoffmann U., Ferencik M., Udelson J.E. et al.; PROMISE Investigators. Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation. 2017; 135 (24): 2320–2332. http://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024360; Rochitte C.E., George R.T., Chen M.Y. et al. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur. Heart J. 2014; 35 (17): 1120–1130. http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht488; Douglas P.S., Hoffmann U., Patel M.R. et al. Outcomes of Anatomical versus Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015; 372: 1291–1300. http://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1415516; Assen M.V., Vonder M., Pelgrim G.J. et al. Computed tomo graphy for myocardial characterization in ischemic heart disease: a state-of-the-art review. Eur. Radiol. Exp. 2020; 4 (1): 36. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00158-1; Bucher A.M., De Cecco C.N., Schoepf U.J. et al. Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis. Br. J. Radiol. 2014; 87 (1043): 20140159. http://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140159; Sørgaard M.H., Kofoed K.F., Linde J.J. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of static CT perfusion for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A systematic review and metaanalysis. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2016; 10 (6): 450–457. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.09.003; Davies J.E., Cook C.M. Is FFRCT Ready to Assume the Crown Jewels of Invasive FFR? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2017; 10 (4): 434–436. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.06.016; Pontone G., Baggiano A., Andreini D. et al. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2019; 12 (8, Pt 1): 1487–1497. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.023; Kurata A., Mochizuki T., Koyama Y. et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ. J. 2005; 69 (5): 550–557. http://doi.org/10.1253/circj.69.550; Maffei E., Martini C., Rossi A. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of second-generation dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography with iterative reconstructions: a real-world experience. Radiol. Med. 2012; 117 (5): 725–738. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0754-x; Cademartiri F., Seitun S., Clemente A. et al. Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2017; 7 (2): 129–150. http://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.03.22; Lu M., Wang S., Sirajuddin A. et al. Dynamic stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion for detecting myocardial ischemia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018; 258: 325–331. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.095.; Hounsfield G.N. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br. J. Radiol. 1973; 46 (552):1016–1022. http://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1016; Danad I., Fayad Z.A., Willemink M.J., Min J.K. New Applications of Cardiac Computed Tomography: DualEnergy, Spectral, and Molecular CT Imaging. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2015; 8 (6): 710–723. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.03.005; Jin K.N., De Cecco C.N., Caruso D. et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with dual energy CT. Eur. J. Radiol. 2016; 85 (10): 1914–1921. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.023; Wang R., Yu W., Wang Y. et al. Incremental value of dualenergy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2011; 27 (5): 647–656. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9881-7; Ko S.M., Choi J.W., Hwang H.K. et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosineinduced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012; 198 (3): 512–520. http://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7029; Yamada M., Jinzaki M., Kuribayashi S. et al. Beamhardening correction for virtual monochromatic imaging of myocardial perfusion via fast-switching dual-kVp 64-slice computed tomography: a pilot study using a human heart specimen. Circ. J. 2012; 76 (7): 1799– 1801. http://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0463; Bundhun P.K., Yanamala C.M., Huang F. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2016; 16 (1): 249. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0427-8; Ko B.S., Cameron J.D., Munnur R.K. et al. Noninvasive CT-Derived FFR Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comparison With Invasive FFR for Detection of Functionally Significant Stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2017; 10 (6): 663–673. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.07.005; Taylor C.A., Fonte T.A., Min J.K. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013; 61 (22): 2233– 2241. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.083; Tonino P.A., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H. et al.; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009; 360 (3): 213–224. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-4145(09)79763-1; Ko B.S., Linde J.J., Ihdayhid A.R. et al. Non-invasive CTderived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2019; 35 (11): 2103–2112. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01658-x; Zhuang B., Wang S., Zhao S. et al. GW29-e1123 Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) for the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia-with Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve as Reference: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018; 72 (16_Suppl.) C200–C201. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.874; Zhuang B., Wang S., Zhao S., Lu M. Computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for the detection of myocardial ischemia with invasive fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2020; 30 (2): 712–725. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06470-8.; Abbara S., Blanke P., Maroules C.D. et al. SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2016; 10 (6): 435–449. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2009.03.004; Sharma R.K., Arbab-Zadeh A., Kishi S. et al. Incremental diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over coronary angiography stratified by pre-test probability of coronary artery disease and severity of coronary artery calcification: The CORE320 study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015; 201: 570–577. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.110; Koo B.K., Erglis A., Doh J.H. et al. Diagnosis of ischemiacausing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19): 1989–1997. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066.; Синицын В.Е., Глазкова М.А., Мершина Е.А., Архипова И.М. Возможности снижения лучевой нагрузки при проведении мСкТ коронарографии: использование адаптивной статистической итеративной реконструкции. Ангиология и сосудистая хирургия. 2012; 18 (3): 44–49. Sinitsyn V.E., Glazkova M.A., Mershina E.A., Arhipova I.M. Possibilities of decreasing radiation load during MSRT coronarography: using adaptive statistic iterative reconstruction. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2012; 18 (3): 44–49. (In Russian); Маткевич Е.И., Синицын В.Е., Зеликман М.И., Кручинин С.А., Иванов И.В. Основные направления снижения дозы облучения пациентов при компьютерной томографии. REJR. 2018; 8 (3), 60–73. http://doi. org/10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-3-60-73 Matkevich E.I., Sinitsyn V.E., Zelikman M.I., Kruchinin S.A., Ivanov I.V. Main directions of reducing patient irradiation doses in computed tomography. REJR. 2018; 8 (3), 60–73. http://doi.org/10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-3-60-73 (In Russian); Kerl J.M., Bauer R.W., Maurer T.B. et al. Dose levels at coronary CT angiography - a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT. Eur. Radiol. 2011; 21 (3): 530–537. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1954-9; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W., Kolh P., Danchin N. et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. Heart J. 2010; 31 (20): 2501–2555. http://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277; https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/983

Διαθεσιμότητα: https://medvis.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/983
https://doi.org/10.24835/10.24835/1607-0763-983