Εμφανίζονται 1 - 20 Αποτελέσματα από 367 για την αναζήτηση '"АКАДЕМИЧЕСКОЕ ПИСЬМО"', χρόνος αναζήτησης: 0,91δλ Περιορισμός αποτελεσμάτων
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
    Academic Journal

    Συγγραφείς: Абдуллаева, Симела

    Πηγή: Eurasian Journal of Medical and Natural Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): Eurasian Journal of Medical and Natural Sciences; 9-12 ; Евразийский журнал медицинских и естественных наук; Том 5 № 11 (2025): Евразийский журнал медицинских и естественных наук; 9-12 ; Yevrosiyo tibbiyot va tabiiy fanlar jurnali; Jild 5 Nomeri 11 (2025): Евразийский журнал медицинских и естественных наук; 9-12 ; 2181-287X

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

  8. 8
    Academic Journal

    Συγγραφείς: Доспанова , Дилара

    Πηγή: Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture ; Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture ; 41-44 ; Евразийский журнал социальных наук, философии и культуры; Том 5 № 11 (2025): Евразийский журнал социальных наук, философии и культуры; 41-44 ; Yevrosiyo ijtimoiy fanlar, falsafa va san'at jurnali; Jild 5 Nomeri 11 (2025): Евразийский журнал социальных наук, философии и культуры; 41-44 ; 2181-2888

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

  9. 9
    Academic Journal

    Πηγή: Science Editor and Publisher; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 6-31 ; Научный редактор и издатель; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 6-31 ; 2541-8122 ; 2542-0267

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/459/310; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/459/311; Munn Z., Peters M. D. J., Stern C., Tufanaru C., McArthur A., Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x; Peters M. D. J., Marnie C., Tricco A. C., Pollock D., Munn Z., Lyndsay A. et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020;18(10):2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167; Mak S., Thomas A. An introduction to scoping reviews. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2022;14(5):561–564. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00620.1; Arksey H., O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616; Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., O’Brien K. K., Colquhoun H., Levac D. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018;169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850; Levac D., Colquhoun H., O’Brien K. K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010;5:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69; Maggio L. A., Larsen K., Thomas A., Costello J. A., Artino A. R., Jr. Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review. Medical Education. 2021;55(6):689–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14431; Hart C. Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2018. 352 p.; Ridley D. The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012. 232 p.; Thomas A., Lubarsky S., Varpio L., Durning S. J., Young M. E. Scoping reviews in health professions education: Challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology. Advances in Health Science Education. 2020;25(4):989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09932-2; Munn Z., Pollock D., Khalil H., Lyndsay A., Mclnerney P., Godfrey C. M. et al. What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2022;20(4):950–952. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00483; McElravy L. J. Form follows function: Research and assessment design for leadership learning. New Directions for Student Leadership. 2022;(175):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20517; Swales J. M. Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2004. 328 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524827; Booth A. Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A structured methodological review. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x; Grant M. J., Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x; Tikhonova E. V., Kosycheva M. A., Golechkova T. Yu. Scoping review rhetorical structure of discussion section: Genre specifics and principles of modeling. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. 2025;11(2):80–118. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2025-11-2-0-4; Swales J. M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 280 p.; Moreno A. I., Swales J. M. Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes. 2018;50:40–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006; Sun H., Mei X., Zhang H. Understanding news & views articles: Rhetorical structures across different disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 2024;73:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.10.001; Cotos E., Huffman S., Link S. A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes. 2017;46:90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001; Tikhonova E. V., Kosycheva M. A., Golechkova T. Yu. Research article discussion moves and steps in papers on medicine: Academic literacy and respect for readers. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. 2023;9(2):97–128. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-2-0-6; Farhang-Ju M., Jalilifar A., Keshavarz M. H. Specificity and generality of lexical bundles in the rhetorical moves of applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2024;69:101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101387; Gao S., Pramoolsook I. A cross-cultural move analysis of electronic engineering research article introductions: The case of Chinese, Thai, and native English scholarly writers. Ampersand. 2023;10:100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100106; Lin L., Evans S. Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes. 2012;31(3):150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002; Косычева М. А., Тихонова Е. В. Введение к эмпирической статье: от структуры к функциональному содержанию. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2022;4(2);6–16. https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2022.i2.s155; Mak S., Thomas A. Steps for conducting a scoping review. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2022;14(5):565–567. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1; Тихонова Е. В., Шленская Н. М. Обзор предметного поля как метод синтеза научных данных. Хранение и переработка сельхозсырья. 2021;(3):11–25. https://doi.org/10.36107/spfp.2021.257; Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310; Hyland K., Zou H. Titles in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2022;56:101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101094; Hyland, K. Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press; 2004. 256 p. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23927; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/459

  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Academic Journal

    Πηγή: Science Editor and Publisher; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 104-113 ; Научный редактор и издатель; Vol 10, No 1 (2025); 104-113 ; 2541-8122 ; 2542-0267

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/445/305; Hyland K. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge; 2006. 356 p.; Ammon U. Linguistic inequality and its effects on participation in scientific discourse and on global knowledge accumulation– with a closer look at the problems of the secondrank language communities. Applied Linguistics Review. 2012;3(2):333–355. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0016; Montgomery S. L. The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2017. 312 p.; Кириллова О. В., Парфенова С. Л., Гришакина Е. Г., Кочетков Д. М., Кулешова А. В., Базанова Е. М. и др. Методические рекомендации по подготовке и оформлению научных статей в журналах, в международных наукометрических базах данных. М.: Наука; 2017. 159 с.; Flowerdew J. Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly. 2000;34(1):127–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588099; Lillis T. M., Curry M. J. Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London: Routledge; 2010. 224 p.; Flowerdew J. Some thoughts on English for research publication purposes (ERPP) and related issues. Language Teaching. 2015;48(2):250–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000523; Curry M. J., Lillis T. Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards. TESOL Quarterly. 2004;38(4):663–688. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588284; Salager-Meyer F. Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2008;7(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009; Bowker L., Buitrago Ciro J. Machine Translation and Global Research: Towards Improved Machine Translation Literacy in the Scholarly Community. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd; 2019. 128 p. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787567214; Olohan M. Scientific and Technical Translation. London: Routledge; 2016. 262 p.; Hynninen N., Kuteeva M. “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2017;30:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.009; Medvedeva N. Applying translation mistakes classifications to work out the translation quality assessment criteria. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2021;118:116–122. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.12.16; Lacruz I. Cognitive effort in translation, editing, and post-editing. In: Schwieter J.W., Ferreira A., editors. The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017, pp. 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch21; Bangalore S., Bangalore S., Behrens B., Carl M., Ghankot M., Heilmann A., Nitzke J. et al. Syntactic variance and priming effects in translation. In: Carl M., Bangalore S., Schaeffer M., editors. New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB. Cham: Springer; 2016, pp. 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20358-4_10; Schaeffer M., Carl M. Measuring the cognitive effort of literal translation processes. In: Germann U., Carl M., Koehn Ph., Sanchis-Trilles G., Casacuberta F., Hill R., O’Brien S., editors. Proceedings EACL 2014 Workshop on Humans and Computer-Assisted Translation (Gothenburg, April 2014). Kerrville, TX: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2014, pp. 29–37. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-0306; Sager J. C., Dungworth D., McDonald P. F. English Special Languages: Principles and Practice in Science and Technology. Wiesbaden: Brandstetter; 1980. 400 p.; Byrne J. Technical Translation: Usability Strategies for Translating Technical Documentation. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. 295 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4653-7; Schäffner C. Metaphor and translation: Some implications of a cognitive approach. Journal of Pragmatics. 2004;36(7):1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.012; Montalt V., González-Davies M. Medical Translation Step by Step: Learning by Drafting. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing; 2007. 308 p.; Gile D. Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing; 2009. 283 p.; Chesterman A. Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing; 2000. 219 p.; Salager-Meyer F. A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes. 1992;11(2):93–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80002-X; Montgomery S. Of towers, walls, and fields: Perspectives on language in science. Science. 2004;303(5662):1333–1335. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095204; Jamali H. R., Nikzad M. Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics. 2011;88(2):653–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0412-z; Paiva C. E., Lima J. P., Paiva B. S. Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. Clinics. 2012;67(5):509–513. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(05)17; Majhi S., Sahu L., Behera K. Practices for enhancing research visibility, citations and impact: Review of literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management. 2023,75(6):1280–1305. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2023-532; Hartley J., Sydes M., Blurton A. Obtaining information accurately and quickly: Are structured abstracts more efficient? Journal of Information Science. 1996;22(5):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551596022005; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/445

  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
    Academic Journal

    Συγγραφείς: J. Iwaz, Ж. Иваз

    Πηγή: Science Editor and Publisher; Vol 8, No 2 (2023); 142-147 ; Научный редактор и издатель; Vol 8, No 2 (2023); 142-147 ; 2541-8122 ; 2542-0267

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/382/245; Ware M. Peer review: benefits, perceptions and alternatives. Publishing Research Consortium; 2008. Available at: https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2015_fall/inls700_001/Readings/Ware2008-PRCPeerReview.pdf (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Provenzale J. M. Revising a manuscript: ten principles to guide success for publication. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010;195(6):W382–W387. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5553; Morriswood B. The devil in the details (a short guide to writing figure legends). Total Internal Reflection; 2021. Available at: https://totalinternalreflectionblog.com/2021/08/11/the-devil-in-the-details-ashort-guide-to-writing-figure-legends (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Neagu R. C. How to respond to reviewers’ comments: a practical guide for authors. Language Editing; 2022. Available at: https://www.languageediting.com/respond-to-reviewers-comments (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Parletta N. How to respond to difficult or negative peer-reviewer feedback. Nature Index; 2021. Available at: https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/how-to-respond-difficult-negative-peer-reviewerfeedback (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Cummings P., Rivara F. P. Responding to reviewers’ comments on submitted articles. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2002;156(2):105–107. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.156.2.105; Williams H. C. How to reply to referees’ comments when submitting manuscripts for publication. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2004;51(1):79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.049; Tetzner R. Responding to peer reviewer comments: a free example letter. Proof-Reading-Service.com; 2021. Available at: https://www.proof-reading-service.com/en/blog/responding-peer-reviewer-commentsfree-example-letter (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Noble W. S. Ten simple rules for writing a response to reviewers. PLoS Computational Biology. 2017;13(10):e1005730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005730; Wiley Author Services. Step by step guide to reviewing a manuscript. John Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/how-to-perform-a-peer-review/stepby-step-guide-to-reviewing-a-manuscript.html (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Bik E. Peer review essentials for the beginning peer reviewer. Clarivate; 2015. Available at: https://clarivate.com/blog/peer-review-essentials-for-the-beginning-peer-reviewer (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Rojon C., Saunders M. N. Dealing with reviewers’ comments in the publication process. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. 2015;8(2):169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2015.1047463; Cochran A. Should you “revise and resubmit”? The Scholarly Kitchen; 2016. Available at: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/10/20/should-you-revise-and-resubmit (accessed: 16.11.2022).; Carnovale C. How to respond to reviewer comments: the CALM way. Elsevier; 2019. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/authors-update/how-to-respond-to-reviewer-comments-the-calm-way (accessed: 16.11.2022).; https://www.scieditor.ru/jour/article/view/382

  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
    Conference

    Περιγραφή αρχείου: application/pdf

    Relation: Язык. Общество. Образование : сборник научных трудов IV Международной научно-практической конференции «Лингвистические и культурологические аспекты современного инженерного образования» памяти кандидата педагогических наук, доцента Н.А. Качалова, Томск, 15-17 ноября 2023 г.; http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/77927

    Διαθεσιμότητα: http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/77927